2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumIt's Simple, Actually...
Nominate HRC, and watch the Repukes come out in droves...
And if it looks like the Establishment put its finger on the scale...
Watch all the energy, passion, and youthful exuberance of the Democrats drain away.
Nominate Bernie... and watch the Nation and the Establishment change...
Watch young, old, Democrats, Independents, and yes... many sane Republicans...
Change the world.
Metric System
(6,048 posts)PyaarRevolution
(814 posts)Many will feel disenfranchised, especially the young people.
John Poet
(2,510 posts)she'll drive Republican turnout UP,
and Democratic/Liberal turnout DOWN.
Hell, some rank-and-file union members might even vote TRUMP against Hillary,
since he's been against all the trade deals, and she's supported them.
PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)that ah Single payer is a joke ah being liberal is a joke ah well I guess thats that then. Democratic party is officially dead. Defeated by the CLinton party
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)That LOL is nervous laughter in the face of what is perceived as a dreaded outcome. There's really NOTHING to dread about real and substantive change - change for the good. Not the rhetorical change we got short-changed with in '08 - not the "change" of dynasties again - not a change of gender or race or ANY of those superficial changes like a coat of new paint , which while nice, would likely justgive us more of the same, old ONE PERCENT, piderdle down dumb-onomics.
No, for this LOL-er, the unknown on the other side of the threshold where the hopeful populace dare to tread is terrifying! After all - the royalistic governance of the past four decades is all they've ever known. Geez - how COULD we stand and do for ourselves?
Yeah - it's not really funny for any LOL-ers with "H" avatars. They're simply scared to death of a realm where WE (the people) call the shots.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Dark n Stormy Knight
(10,484 posts)Behavior which typifies the level of intelligence which explains Trumps popularity.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)be above this petty crap.
Dark n Stormy Knight
(10,484 posts)Maybe it's just nostalgia, but I could swear that when I first began reading DU, back in 2008, the the general demonstrated IQ level was higher.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)The Group "Populist Reform of the Democratic Party" still has some great discussions.
Dark n Stormy Knight
(10,484 posts)Thanks.
Old Codger
(4,205 posts)Really, that is so 2008
Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)SammyWinstonJack
(44,316 posts)Agony
(2,605 posts)Hillary supporters are why I won't ever vote for her
LOL!
Gene Debs
(582 posts)Stryder
(450 posts)She will de energize the Dems, turn off the Indies and bring
Repubs off their death beds to vote against her.
So we get the added bonus of a down ticket disaster.
Got it
(59 posts)ErikJ
(6,335 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)It's very simple, you either support the American Aristocracy or the People. Hint: H. Clinton is part of the American Aristocracy.
I can only conclude that you are happy with the state of America because voting for the status quo will guarantee a continuation.
Metric System
(6,048 posts)"I was blown away by the complete inability for Sanders supporters to respect that people may actually support Hillary Clinton for valid reasons. No, instead the comments run from this author must be ignorant of the truth (i.e., not intelligent enough to figure it out) to this author must be part of an organized smear campaign."
http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/1/22/1473797/-I-will-not-condone-the-conspiracy-theories-and-the-ugliness-I-am-supporting-Clinton
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)"valid reasons" they support her. Some say she is tough and think that alone is enough. But being tough on Iraqi's, or on college students in debt, or tough on drug crime, may not meet the standard for a Democrat. Margaret Thatcher was tough, but I wouldn't vote for her either.
Some say she has "experience". Again, that alone isn't enough, esp if that "experience" has huge mistakes.
There are two sides to the class war and simply saying that one supports the Wealthy 1% over the People 99%, because they have valid reasons, isn't enough. What valid reasons override the 50 million living in poverty?
thereismore
(13,326 posts)Gore1FL
(22,965 posts)You are going to havea difficult time trying to take high moral ground on a flat plain.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Gore1FL
(22,965 posts)but very little substance.
Rather than a thread drive-by, why don't you try to argue the OP?
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)not one who has more baggage than an Amtrak train, and is more hated than just
about anyone by Republicans (who Hillary said were her 'number one enemy')
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)stillwaiting
(3,795 posts)It's why Hillary must lose if the Democrats are to win the White House.
Hillary can not win.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)But remember that it took 400 years of slavery and Jim Crow, and redlining, and murder by police, and blacks are still not treated as equal.
So maybe the Third Way will bring single payer, and a living wage, and more income equality.....
in 400 years.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)just point and look at Donald... no contest. Bernie wins. But up against Donalds twin. 50/50
TCJ70
(4,387 posts)...my own, lifelong republican mother said the other day that if Trump or Cruz are nominated she'd gladly vote Bernie...but followed it up with there being absolutely no way she'd vote for Hillary.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)I have had exactly the same experience. Older members of my family who are republicans hate trump an cruz but hate Hillary more. They think Sanders is a little crazy and way too liberal, but would rather have him than another Clinton.
Chef Eric
(1,024 posts)Read and learn.
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/11/the-lifelong-conservatives-who-love-bernie-sanders/417441/
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/6/22/1395700/-Republicans-for-Bernie-Sanders
http://www.salon.com/2015/08/21/republicans_for_bernie_sanders_why_the_democratic_socialist_is_sweeping_his_home_state_partner/
https://www.reddit.com/r/RepublicansForSanders
pangaia
(24,324 posts)You just made that up so you could feel good.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)Republicans despise her. They think she's untrustworthy.
sammythecat
(3,597 posts)will actually embrace Sanders over whichever Republican nutbag he'd be running against. Hillary, however, is an entirely different situation because Republicans have had an absolutely visceral hatred of Hillary Clinton for over 25 years. They will fall all over themselves voting against her and a small, but significant, number of Democrats won't bother voting if Hillary is the nominee.
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)green917
(442 posts)Who are life-long republicans taking a serious look at senator sanders and really liking what they see and hear. These aren't fence-sitting independents or moderates either but staunch republicans. They (as i think many republicans do) realize that his plans offer the best future for our democracy and our society in general.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)and racism trump Sanders when they enter the voting booth.
green917
(442 posts)Others, well, they will follow your template here exactly.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)pointed out is that if H. Clinton wins the nomination, it will certainly galvanize the Republicons to vote against her. On the other hand, many moderate Republicans will vote for Sanders in lieu of the Clown that the R's run.
It's simple math that Sanders will get more Democrats to vote and some Republicans while Clinton will get less Democrats to vote and galvanize opposition to herself.
If you truly want to win in Nov, best support Sanders.
fbc
(1,668 posts)A Hillary Clinton presidency would be nothing but four years of impeachment hearings.
Divernan
(15,480 posts)with prompt payoffs of govt. contracts, and poor ole Bill being shuttled by Air Force Two (equipped with Navy Doctor and oxygen tanks) around the country, and propped up to fund-raise for her second term.
thereismore
(13,326 posts)retrowire
(10,345 posts)as the majority of passion that annoys you Hillary supporters so much turns it's back on you.
Hillary is not favored. She is highly disliked on all sides... Why can't Hillary supporters see that?
It's an uphill battle with Bernie AND Hillary.
But Bernie's got the support that's willing to fight that battle. Hillary's got a message that says, "we can't get up that hill, let's go this way."
Fuck that, we want to climb the damn hill! So if Bernie loses, this energized base of Bernie's is NOT going to carry over to her. It just won't happen guys. And Hillary will lose the WH for the Democratic party. I'm sorry but it's just not meant to be.
Marty McGraw
(1,024 posts)but Washington all together.
freebrew
(1,917 posts)blaming Bernie supporters for staying home.
A LOT will stay home rather than decide: Tweedle-Dum/Tweedle-Dee...
(Nader didn't cost the election, BFEE did)
sammythecat
(3,597 posts)I try to understand why there is even a question among Democrats which candidate to support. To me, Bernie is everything real Democrats have longed to see for decades. Finally, we have a genuine, true-blue Democrat who is pissed off and willing to fight and keep on fighting. The way I see it Hillary has one, and only one, thing going for her and it's that she's a woman. But the wrong woman. If there was a male Democrat with her record, her history, and all her negatives, he would have been dismissed out of the race a long time ago. He wouldn't stand a chance. At all.
Punkingal
(9,522 posts)Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)
?cb=1408962241asuhornets
(2,427 posts)delusional. Just saying.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)They will not only not show, you will never hear from them again.
They're already used to being accused of not getting up off their asses.
Usually by older, pissed of, Establishment types.
asuhornets
(2,427 posts)the case then I guess we all will have to suffer under a Republican President. I'm for Hillary but if Sanders win, I'll vote for him. And that is the difference between me and them(you).
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Last time it mattered here, was 1968... and they shot our guy in the head.
well I'm in Georgia so I guess we are in the same boat
If every one in California took your approach the GOP will win. That is not a valid answer.
BTW I hope Bernie wins and you don't have too vote for Mickey Mouse, but your attitude discuss me.
Divernan
(15,480 posts)In your 4+ years of membership on DU, you have cared so very little about the direction and status of the Democratic party and politics that you have posted all of 60 posts. Now you post a brief insult, calling Willy T delusional, with not a jot of substance to back up your insult or debate the OP.
You're deep in the negative cred zone, you know.
But I know. To you this primary is simply an occasion for LOL, LMFAO and 1 line insults. We see you for what you are. Not a pretty sight.
asuhornets
(2,427 posts)It doesn't matter if I post infrequently. Bernie supporters on DU are very insulting at times. When they start vetting Bernie, you guys are going to go crazy.
olddots
(10,237 posts)NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)eom
Empowerer
(3,900 posts)Wow.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)SmittynMo
(3,544 posts)I agree,approve, and support this post 100%. I could not have said it any better. It's 100% to the point and exactly what I see in the future.
Mr.Bill
(24,906 posts)as soon as he wins a few primaries, every Republican candidate will start calling him a communist.
Republican turnout will go through the roof, regardless of their nominee.
zeemike
(18,998 posts)You can count on that.
Because that will turn off independents and some moderate Republicans.
And while the commie label works for Trump and Cruz supporters it don't work as well as it used to.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)sibelian
(7,804 posts)They will say whatever they need to say in order to oppose the candidate. The significant factor is the extent to which they are credible to the voting populace in making their accusations.
mikehiggins
(5,614 posts)The choice will be between
Sanders is a Communist/Socialist/Old Jew From NYC
Hillary is... well, Hillary
Which one do you think the GOPukes will find more offensive? Which will get their voters to the poll?
I swear, the Clinton faction reminds me of nothing more than schoolkids who'll give the bully their lunch money before the bully even asks for it.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)Everything I've seen from conservatives echoes the wariness around her apparent Machiavellian tendencies.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)keep those idiots that they've always had, but some of the moderates are getting sick of the diatribe. In any event, Sanders has a better chance in the general than Clinton.
lastone
(588 posts)Thank you, this is the truth. There was a drudge poll today showing Bernie as second to trump by 6-8 points, amazing how even on a right wing news site Bernie has yuuuge support! The Sanders Tsunami will change the world!
MeNMyVolt
(1,095 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)Change has come
(2,372 posts)MeNMyVolt
(1,095 posts)Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)SammyWinstonJack
(44,316 posts)Good at it too.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)...thank you so much. That was lovely.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)And words that need to be taken seriously...our country and 99% of our citizens depend on a win by Bernie.
Duval
(4,280 posts)I believe we can make it happen. And change is exactly what we need. So many are hurting now and if Bernie's Democrats get out and get involved, we can make a very good beginning.
WillyT, you've been a "path finder"!!
pnwmom
(110,301 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Sad that Democrats will use the rationalization that it's too hard to fix, to justify accepting the status quo.
Also, using that emoticon is sad also. Really?
pnwmom
(110,301 posts)achievable progress is the best path, or some fantasy idea of a bloodless "revolution."
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)"bloodless revolution" happens in this Century. Heard of quantum energy? From what you say, I doubt it.
Here's one definition ... en′ergy lev`el
n.
one of a quantized series of states in which matter may exist, each having constant energy and separated from others in the series by finite quantities of energy.
Also called en′ergy state`.
It was one of the greatest discoveries of our generation...the "aha factor". Bernie has much of that essence in his message.
When the People are ready, the Leader will appear. Presidential politics came to Bernie Sanders. He has not coveted it for decades.
pnwmom
(110,301 posts)You should acquaint yourself with them. They're the bodies that write laws. And Bernie would be constrained by the same Congress that would constrain Hillary or Martin.
He won't be able to wave his magic wand and get them unelected. Senators are elected, by the way, every years. So he's stuck with 2/3 of the 2016 Senators till at least 2020 no matter what. And a 60 vote majority is required to get anything past the filibuster.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)the R and D aisle and believe you me, when his "revolutionaries" start showing up, it won't take long. Already new candidates are declaring based on his principles. DWS, perhaps being the most notable.
This isn't just some little whim. I remember Ronald Reagan ... much to my chagrin ... and what he did. Also Arnold S., perhaps to a lesser degree. Well, Bernie is the other half of that. And setting Hillary back on her heels...perhaps into retirement... is no small accomplishment, either.
It's our turn to school the establishment. I believe he is the only one who it is well known does not have an enemy in Washington. He's come from nothing to at par or ahead. He works with people...he brings people together. That's the best we can ask. Not many of those you mentioned above have these character or political traits.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)LWolf
(46,179 posts)Be that change.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Kum ba ya together.
Sorry but this is more fantasy.
sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)TIME TO PANIC
(1,894 posts)Keep the insults coming, it seems to be helping her in the polls.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)Gene Debs
(582 posts)Spot on!
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)thereismore
(13,326 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Fighting for honesty and a fair shake for the 99% may be a big goal but it's worth fighting for. Clinton supporters are fighting to keep the status quo. Keep 16 million children living in poverty, keep the continuing growth in corporate profits.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)If it's so simple why are there Democrats that want to continue the domination of our government by the American Aristocracy?
I guess they either benefit directly from the corruption, are in denial of the troubles the People are facing, or trust that the Aristocracy will make things better.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)Feel the Bern and give the World a chance at healing.