2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumI'm in a bit of a somber mood today. The reason I support
Bernie Sanders for president is that people in America struggling in their everyday lives shouldn't have to fight so hard just to be heard. Really, that's all I have to say. I hope you all have a great day.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)The primary can get a little vitriolic, but we really are on the same side. Hope you have a good day too.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)it's really hard to believe we're "on the same side".
Hell, one time I counted 5 OP's by you on the first page of GD Primaries that were all smears or bullshit complaints about Bernie.
Bernie represents the average American. Hillary doesn't.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Roland99
(53,342 posts)Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)It's just Clinton and her DINO pals (like Debbie) who may be on the other side.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)Arkansas in all likelihood will vote for the Republican. The state has NEVER voted for a Democratic ticket that didn't include at least one Southerner since the 1940s. My vote has never, ever come close to mattering in presidential elections. Even in 1968, the closest Arkansas presidential vote in my lifetime, but when I was too young to vote, the state went for George Freakin' Wallace by a wide margin, with Nixon coming in second.
I lived in Arkansas when Hillary was First Lady. My Democratic mentor when I was a teenager, my history teacher, was supremely pissed that Hillary started to meddle in the state's educational system. Between that time and now, the state has gone from true blue to deep red.
While a corporate lawyer at the Rose Law Firm, Hillary helped to overturn a ballot initiative by Little Rock voters that would have given them a break on their utility rates at a time when inflation was eating away the wages of working people.
If the ballot initiative had succeeded, my family would have likely been able to eventually benefit from it, since it likely would have spread statewide.
As a University of Arkansas student, I also worked on a temporary basis at a Walmart warehouse in its home office town when Hillary sat on the board. I commuted the 40-mile round trip from Fayetteville to Bentonville for a measly $18 gross a night, on an on-call basis. It was obvious by reading the notices in the break room that labor was having a lot of difficulties with management. That situation did not change during the time I was there.
Meanwhile, a lot of my liberal professors at the University of Arkansas were remarking that Hillary serving on the board of Wal-Mart was "the best of both worlds"--that is, "Hillary gets to rub shoulders with America's Richest Man, while Sam Walton has a nearly direct connection to the Governor". And although it has been said that Hillary worked to raise the salaries of women at Wal-Mart, a woman I knew who was working full-time in an intellectual capacity at corporate shortly after Hillary left was only puling in a lousy $15,000 a year.
Hillary also got donations from Arkansas' richest Republicans (Sam Walton, Jackson Stephens, Don Tyson, et al) to help finance her husband's 1992 presidential campaign, and has been cozy with Alice Walton ever since.
When she and Bill came back to Arkansas for a visit in August 1993, and I and about 75 other locals went to the Springdale airport to greet them, Bill dived into the crowd and started shaking everybody's hand, while Hillary was aloof.
And things that Hillary has done after leaving Arkansas, including plugging NAFTA and TPP as SoS and the President's wife, shilling for Bush's war against a defenseless Iraq asSenator from New York, and laughing about the death of a nation's leader as SoS, have really rubbed me the wrong way. And another straw on the proverbial camel's back was when Bill Clinton came back to Arkansas in 2010 to campaign for Blanche Lincoln versus a more liberal candidate in the Democratic Senate primary. Lincoln won the primary in a dubious run-off election, then went on to get her ass handed to her in the general election-- the first time an incumbent Democratic Senator from Arkansas had lost an election since Reconstruction.
So please, tell me why Hillary is such a great candidate.
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)unfortunately, a lot of that experience is doing crappy things.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)proceed to write a multi-paragraph Hillary-bash?
And this is after not even answering my very simple question: will you vote for the Dem nominee?
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)DanTex
(20,709 posts)I said I'm voting for the Dem nominee, because we all have the same goals.
How did this become controversial?
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)DanTex
(20,709 posts)a discussion about how we're all on the same side.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)A Hillary supporter finds a Bernie supporter and then demands to know if they will vote for Hillary in the general and if they say no than they get reported for a violation of the Terms Of Service of the website and are expelled.
There are several long time and very popular members who were ejected.
Some Hillary supporters are still grave dancing in their sig lines over one of them as if it was a major victory that they're proud of.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)Anyway, no, I'm not baiting, I just figured that, since my post was about how we're all ultimately on the same side, voting for the eventual nominee even if it isn't my or anyone else's first choice was a relevant question.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Besides, it really isn't anyone's business who they actually vote for.
SunSeeker
(51,508 posts)If you aren't voting Dem, you shouldn't be on this site.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)It's as traditional as the VW Microbus with flowers on the side and the bong that hasn't had the water changed for so long it has polliwogs swimming in it.
SunSeeker
(51,508 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)I believed it was one of those primordial building blocks of protein experiments.
A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)I have to assume you aren't paying attention to the primary race.
Bernie wants to expand my Social Security, Hillary wants to "enhance" my Social Security. I don't like it when the Republicans want to "enhance" my Social Security, don't ask me to like it when Hillary wants to do it.
I want my wife, children, and grandchildren to have affordable health care, so does Bernie. Hillary wants to "work on" the ACA.
Hillary wanted to and still wants to kill people that don't look like us and alienate the survivors while wasting taxpayer money to do so. Bernie thought in the past and still thinks that is a bad idea. I agree with Bernie.
I could go on but you should get the idea from these examples. We are talking day and night on so many issues.
As for my vote? I will support the most liberal candidate in the general election.
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)"Hillary wanted to and still wants to kill people that don't look like us and alienate the survivors while wasting taxpayer money to do so." What tha?
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)DanTex
(20,709 posts)Hillary, for example, wants universal healthcare by expanding ACA. Bernie wants to get there with single payer. Same goal, different road.
The main reason I support Hillary is because I think she is more electable, and the most important thing is to defeat the GOP to protect and expand on the progress we've made with Obama.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Branding people's sincerely held liberal/progressive goals as unicorns and socialist bullshit is not likely to make people feel warm and fuzzy about claims of unity.
(I know glass houses, but you asked a question.)
litlbilly
(2,227 posts)they are not on our side, period. Anyone who posts things like that are not progressive's, liberals, democrats, they are conservatives.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)raise taxes. Does that mean he's not on your side either?
litlbilly
(2,227 posts)litlbilly
(2,227 posts)Bubzer
(4,211 posts)Health Wagon
(99 posts)You call it "bash" I see facts.
Truth apparently hurts, doesn't it? You might want to seriously rethink your candidate.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)Health Wagon
(99 posts)DanTex
(20,709 posts)who looked at his health plan in detail find it unworkable to the point of dishonesty.
Health Wagon
(99 posts)because under federal law, the manufacturers are only to sell to FFL dealers. There is the exemption that if the gun is defective and they knew about it, the immunity goes away.
http://www.lanierlawfirm.com/law_firm_news/remington-rifle-lawsuit.htm
http://www.al.com/news/birmingham/index.ssf/2015/07/taurus_agrees_to_voluntary_rec.html
Two examples of gunmakers getting sued because of defects.
The parents of Jessica Ghawi got it wrong, they should be suing the people that sold James Holmes the arsenal. Wish they didn't get hit with a fine (which is the unfair part, in my opinion).
druidity33
(6,444 posts)when people use that criticism of Bernie and you point out how that law could have been implemented and what it meant... well, you get crickets. I mean, i can see the argument of putting gun manufacturers out of business through lawsuits, but at least be honest about it. And that would bring up cars... couldn't we just sue car companies out of business too?
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)Not innuendo, not bullshit from someone's blog, actual EXPERIENCES. As someone who was a very liberal resident of Arkansas during the Bill and Hillary years. And actual things that Hillary and her husband have done since then that have made me go from a Clinton supporter to someone who has become disgusted with that family.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)I look at the big picture.
Again, it's ironic that you attack me for posting "crap" about Bernie, and then go on a long anti-Hillary tirade about why you are "disgusted" with her.
The whole point of my post is that we're all ultimately on the same side.
mdbl
(4,973 posts)when she proves she's still on the same side. If she wins the primary, I guess we'll find out. Until then, i am going with Bernie because I trust he will prove truer to his words.
mountain grammy
(26,598 posts)this is a telling of truth, not to bash Hillary, but to try to convince you that, maybe, just possibly, she is not the candidate our party needs. This is the kind of history that's convinced me to support Bernie Sanders. I supported Obama in 2008 because of Clinton's history, even knowing he was far less liberal than me, I trusted him to be one of us. Simple, I know, maybe delusional, but I've got to have a candidate who hasn't sold out to the 1%.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)You can't really have it both ways.
PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)No. other than that take away what you will
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)classykaren
(769 posts)Jarqui
(10,122 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)Most of us don't know anything about the Clintons from that time, so your first-hand experience is interesting and valuable. I've long suspected she lacks empathy for others, even though she tries to fake it, and that could explain some of the behaviors you observed.
I appreciate your sharing.
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)DanTex
(20,709 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)that have come out to participate because of the chance for an honest politician and if Clinton should win the nomination, they will be very disappointed. And if you really want to ensure a Democrat in the WH, you should heed the warning. Otherwise, you will have no Ralph Nader to blame for your failure.
PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)2 % of that is Hillary and 98 % is Bernie so.... if Bernie has to be written in thats how it's gotta be.
ecstatic
(32,648 posts)Anyone who doesn't care about up to 4 Supreme Court nominations is not on the same side as I am.
Many Bernie supporters openly admit that they will assist the GOP in the Fall by not voting or doing a write in vote. They say their vote won't matter either way because their state is too red or very blue. Imagine if everyone took the same approach?
Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)There's certainly no shortage of nasty crap posted about the candidate I support (hell I could probably just post a photo of the home page and find an updated list right there). I've also been wrong and over the top a few times and admitted it right in thread, deleting the post('s) after taking a breath and realizing i wasn't helping anyone.
Do you not see the irony how your first paragraph complains about Ark's posts, then you jump right onto the last sentence and take a snipe as Hillary?
Look, I get why there's such a great love, and passion around Senator Sanders campaign. He's an incredible orator. He's definitely a master at connecting with those who support him. His message is strong and powerful. Hell, I'd be lying through my teeth if I said i wasn't jealous of that. I support Hillary, but I do admit, I'm not passionate about it. My heart doesn't light up with hope at the prospect of her being president. I would not stand out in the cold for an hour among thousands of other supporters to hear her speak.
But, just like you, I do believe that my candidate IS the one that will be the one to get us the most progress, and on a site dedicated to Democrats, I SHOULD be able to at least make that statement without my character being assassinated for doing so.. Hell, that's what Republicans or for.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)I respect that you've taken ownership when you realized you were wrong. Big kudos for that... that's not easy...not at all. Particularly when there are many who'll pounce on you for it.
I definitely agree that character assassination is the go-to for many who disagree and, rather than have a substantive debate, choose scorched earth tactics.
One minor thing... and I kinda hate bringing it up in light of all the agreement I share with you on this post... but I feel the need to point out that your willingness to take the high road and claim whatever failings you may have, your level of maturity doesn't transfer to Ark through mentioning your actions and then mentioning Ark.
Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)approach.
Thank you for your kind words.
Come this summer there's going to be enough character assassination coming at whomever our candidate is. The garbage we dig up on our candidates and attacks we use against our candidates in this primary could come back to bite us in the arse. I'm very thankful our 3 candidates are more respectful to each other than we are
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)Not something I'm exactly proud of. Some of it, I can rightly say I was baited into... or perhaps allowed myself to get baited into... some of it was just borne of my frustration. Either way, there's definitely been some pretty bad posts... and bad posts always feed more bad posts. In short: downward spirals suck (unless we're talking about the album, which I rather enjoyed).
Anyway, I think we very likely agree that the nomination can't come soon enough. With luck, DU will settle quickly after that.
Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)I know exactly what you mean about not feeling proud about some of the things I've posted.
I've been downright rude and obnoxious to people that, at the end of the day I probably agree with on 95% or more on ideological/political issues.
I hope so too!
humbled_opinion
(4,423 posts)indictment on why Hillary can't win a GE.... " I support Hillary, but I do admit, I'm not passionate about it." If you, a loyal supporter that is overlooking her multitude of flaws and baggage aren't passionate about supporting her, how in the world will she ever get enough support to win a GE? Haven't you paid attention to how hugely important this election is turning out to be? More to the point can you even for one minute imagine Trump in the White House, I was struck with fear one day at work when a die hard Teapublican said to me I don't care what Trump says or does he has my unconditional support, I asked why and his response is that I and all like minded Democrats never once stood up to stop Obama from usurping the Constitution with his lawless attacks on our Freedom, I couldn't eve respond to that because it sounded so insane to me, but that is their mainstream now. I feel bad that Hillary brings so much baggage and that she is not inspiring like Bernie is, see:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017324155
for context.
So then I ask Hillary supporters why are you all so hard and fast against Bernie, his campaign is reaching critical mass, he is leading in all the early state polls, so to me it looks like there is only side in this debate that is being stubborn....
Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)Regardless if a candidate drums up passion or not is not an indicator (it certainly doesn't hurt, but it's not an actual indicator). The one that can drum up the most votes does. Either Hillary or Bernie has that capability in the GE.
I don't have passion for Hillary. I have admiration of her and everything she's gone through and done. I have a belief in her capability to govern well. I have faith that as president she will strive to give us continued progress that President Obama started. What's more, I am sure the methodology she'll use.
Because she's been through the ringer and back. Every aspect of her life since she started being first lady has undergone extreme scrutiny, and she's still standing. Bernie is polling very well for the GE right now, but the GE has not started yet. Bernie has not been in the direct target of the Republicans yet. This month is the first time I've even see their side take a shot at him (worse they went after his wife). It was an awful hit piece, but really, that's JUST the beginning. In the primary both Hillary and Bernie have been very cordial with each other (other than a few very mild back door attacks). The Republicans will not Treat him with the same consideration.
Agreed. Trump leading the whacko right is very concerning. Despite what the polls say, I think Hillary will do better against trump than Bernie will. Why?
Trump is drumming up the same kind of passion that Bernie is, just a very different platform.
Consider that, at the end of the day, Trump is only pulling ~33% of his party. The reason he's so far ahead is because the rest of the whacko's are competing for their same base.. Much of that base will not vote for trump in a General. Much of the Republican establishment is VERY anti-Trump. I'm not naive enough to believe they will support Hillary, but i can see a lot of them not coming out on election day to support Trump.
As to your last statement, I am not anti-Bernie. I am pro-Hillary, and come the General I will be Pro Democrat regardless of who that person is, and it would be a fair statement to say that I'll also be anti-Republican.
humbled_opinion
(4,423 posts)I am applying a risk management strategy in the primaries, I can fully support Bernie Sanders he speaks to my heart, I agree with him 100 percent and I have passion as well as admiration for his campaign. However, you cannot deny that she does terrible when it comes to the question of honesty.... I truly hoped that this email issue was behind her but it is very concerning and very risky to waste a vote on her and she winds up getting indicted. Better to galvanize all of our support behind Bernie Sanders now and not have to worry about the baggage.... The worst possible scenario in my mind is Hillary beating Bernie becoming the nominee and then getting indicted.... people that voted for her will have the results of that fiasco on their heads...
SammyWinstonJack
(44,129 posts)Cary
(11,746 posts)And when I get trash talked I get this same low level I know you are but what am I crap.
I have no problem with Bernie Sanders but I am embarrassed to be associated with Bernie Sanders supporters. Own your own behavior. Look in the mirror instead of blaming others.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)It never fails that about halfway through the thread when no one has a reasonable rebuttal to DanTex the responses devolve into personal attacks on Dan's character. Just in: Bernie is not perfect-He has vulnerabilities. If he makes it to the GE, it will make what has been said in the primary seem like slow pitch softball.
humbled_opinion
(4,423 posts)the real question is for those whom we support, whose side are they on? So I submit some factual proof of why I support the candidate that I support.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017324155
Now I showed you mine, show me yours...
daybranch
(1,309 posts)the side of the oligarchy and we are fighting that oligarchy you support. We both have a common foe , republicans but they too are representing the same oligarchy to which Hillary's donors belong. Simple enough for you. I hope you do not find this vitriolic, but I am not on the side of Hillary and if I have to vote for her, I will be holding my nose.
Cary
(11,746 posts)The attacks on me are not about "sides." The attacks on me are people acting out their own insecurities and malice.
There is no good reason for the "sides" schtick. You always "hold your nose" when you vote. It isn't really about personalities, it's about policies. If you want more war and less taxes for billionaires, go with the Republicans. Perpetuate their smears and their disinformation. Insist on some mythological ideological purity, just like the radical right is doing. Scuttle our collective efforts against "conservatives."
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Definitely the "more war" part and who the hell knows what Hillary is going to do to the people who made sure she didn't stay "dead broke" for more than a moment or two after leaving the White House.
Cary
(11,746 posts)There is a huge difference, and no power in your defeatism.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)At this point it's getting late to change any perceptions, it is what it is and unfortunately in politics perception is reality.
Cary
(11,746 posts)It takes all kinds.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Cary
(11,746 posts)Without you.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)Cary
(11,746 posts)It's utterly ridiculous and profoundly stupid to accuse fellow Democrats of this nonsense, which is why those pushing this garbage against Democrats are marginal and will always be marginal.
retrowire
(10,345 posts)have more say in Washington than we the people?
Phlem
(6,323 posts)Lookee how Bill's NAFTA turned out. A fucking huge pile if stinking crap but the TPP will be better?
I post only a few times a week anymore because of the obvious "Blinders" of the Hillary supporters. It's just not worth it anymore.
retrowire
(10,345 posts)Phlem
(6,323 posts)in_cog_ni_to
(41,600 posts)That's just a ludicrous thing to say.
PEACE
LOVE
BERNIE
Cary
(11,746 posts)And you deserve to lose.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)begun and we intend to throw out those that are corrupted by the wealthy 1%. The growing wealth gap is literally killing Americans.
Cary
(11,746 posts)Over the top.
Phlem
(6,323 posts)Did you see post #64 ?
You better tune down your hypocrisy, your right wing is showing.
William769
(55,142 posts)On Wed Jan 27, 2016, 12:43 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
Then you will lose, period.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1069948
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Really?
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Jan 27, 2016, 12:50 AM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Person alerting is way too sensitive??
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Yes, really.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Really? Give me a break.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Grow up.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
Amazing.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Sachs. You can't deny that. She is in tight with the banksters and Wall Street. And none are on our side. They want our resources to make themselves richer.
Now she may honestly feel for us and maybe try to help us but not at the expense of the Wealthy 1%. If the poor get help it will come from the middle class and the working class. In fact, I bet the wealth gap will continue to grow if she gets the presidency.
Some of those that are comfortable with the way things are, with 16 million children living in poverty, with the US having the highest infant mortality rate of all modern nations, don't understand why we are so enthused by Sen Sanders. We see this as a life or death struggle for many Americans. H. Clinton and her personal $50,000,000 is on the wrong side of the class war.
Phlem
(6,323 posts)So obvious it's like the sun colliding with earth but, Huh? I support Oligarchs? Says the guy with "thirdway, fresh thinking" logo on his sig line.
It's just fucking stupid and not funny, tolerable, and just plain old ludacris anymore.
My step father never finished middle school, went straight into the military, retired Republican.
Told me he he could tell when a car's oil needs to be changed by tasting it, and still makes more sense than the Hillary supporters in DU.
Holy Fuck.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)They don't care one iota what she stands for. She is on the side of the American Aristocracy in this class war and her supporters don't care.
Lorien
(31,935 posts)They have money stashed away, they wave the flag for Team Blue, the official choice of the DLC. Never mind that their kids won't have a planet that can support the lives of 90% of extant species within 40 years; it's all about that TEAM WIN!
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Lorien
(31,935 posts)Phlem
(6,323 posts)Called out the third way bigtime after the midterms and haven't looked back ever since and her supporters are fake or are clinically ignorant.
I've actually lived with relatives that exhibit it (Stepfather) for years. What can say, didn't make through middle school and retired tech sergeant and fully Republican.
It does teach you how to reach deeper and maintain.
We have less than a year. We can do this!
Solidarity!
Lorien
(31,935 posts)and so much more!
whereisjustice
(2,941 posts)Lorien
(31,935 posts)all of our fresh water is toxic, to allow Monsanto to fill our shelves with toxic unlabeled GMO products, to allow Wall Street to cause another recession, to ruin student's lives with impossible debt burdens, to screw workers with a non-living wage, to allow big Pharma insiders to regulate our medications, to keep affordable healthcare out of the reach of millions of Americans, to start a war with Iran. We are NOT on the same side, we never were.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)Tanuki
(14,914 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)As the Princeton study showed, we have almost no say in what happens in the US. This campaign has made that quite clear. Keep your head up, soldier on.
raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)There are those who add their wealth to the choir of consumption without conscience and thereby diminish whatever voice they may have had and there are those who take the idea of democracy, for all, seriously.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I would argue those voices are being heard by all three of out candidates. One of the best primaries on the issues I have seen. O'Malley has really nailed it with his platform, as has Clinton, and to a lesser extent, Sanders. All three are addressing the issues with respect to those hurting most from our system. It's a great time in history to be a Democrat.
asjr
(10,479 posts)candidates running for office. The Republican candidates are all ready for the trash heap.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)although i disagree about bernie
merrily
(45,251 posts)Duval
(4,280 posts)CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)or does...or does not say or do.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)That's Hillary's position.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)...to shut up and vote for OUR candidate, or else???!
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)Serious question. I don't get it. It seems to me like the stances that Sanders takes are much more in line with supporting the black community than Clinton's. I'd love to know why the black community is overwhelmingly supporting Clinton when the stances I see Sanders take on economics, health care, marijuana, Wall Street, and other things seem much more solid than Clinton.
I'm not trying to be the "shut up and vote for the white guy." Really. I'm trying to understand.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)central and that's why he'll lose. And NO! I do not support Hillary Clinton, either.
I don't support either of them. They both turn me off.
Qutzupalotl
(14,286 posts)Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)...on the RACE issue, I do not trust him. I do not trust Bernie Sanders. And I definitely do not trust Hillary Clinton.
I live in Maryland and I may end up skipping the presidential category altogether and just supporting the down ticket candidates, which among them, will be Donna Edwards.
islandmkl
(5,275 posts)and determine which aspect of the very real 'inequality' hinders racial justice...if it was only about race there would be a lot fewer poor people of all colors....
Martin Luther King, Jr. knew it was/is about more than race...and it was when he started addressing national issues BEYOND race that he became a threat to the power structure:
Now our struggle is for genuine equality, which means economic equality, he told a rally of AFSCME sanitation workers in Memphis on March 18, 1968, barely two weeks before his death. For we know now that it isnt enough to integrate lunch counters. What does it profit a man to be able to eat at an integrated lunch counter if he doesnt have enough money to buy a hamburger?
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)And I do not trust Bernie Sanders or Hillary Clinton on the race issue.
Deal with it.
I am not voting for Bernie Sanders.
Some of you white Sanders supporters have really turned off black voters, and you're turning more of us off each and every day you continue to lecture us on RACE.
YOU ARE NOT BLACK! You don't get to tell us what to do!
Slavery is OVER!!!
Lorien
(31,935 posts)Hillary fights to put more people into the for-profit prison industry that she takes huge donations from. Her "three strikes" rule has made quite the tidy profit for them!
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)I do not trust him when it comes to race.
And I certainly do not trust Hillary Clinton. I loathe the Clintons. Their policies have all but destroyed the black community.
I won't be voting for a presidential candidate. That is becoming clearer to me as time passes.
I will be skipping that voting category and voting only for down ticket candidates.
Uncle Joe
(58,282 posts)Peace to you, mmonk.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)as bernie would say, we all need to stand together
he started something. and no matter who wins the nom(i still think it will be bernie), the fuse he lit is NOT going out.
things are gonna change
https://m.
NRaleighLiberal
(60,006 posts)Probably goes back further than that...as in Reagan. Oh, I forgot Nixon.
Cary
(11,746 posts)The Kochs are making a power play. It's a pure power grab. Why people tolerate it is beyond me.
farleftlib
(2,125 posts)and after last night I think we are being heard - finally. Bernie is a great man and his candidacy has energized so many people and has already surpassed everyone's expectations. I truly think we're going to win. It won't be easy but nothing good ever is.
I hope you start feeling better very soon.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Zorra
(27,670 posts)Great sig line, mmonk, very appropriate for this thread.
lovemydog
(11,833 posts)I too want people in America struggling in their everyday lives to be heard. Haven't yet decided who I'm voting for (my state's primary is very late). I keep that in mind in all my voting. Hope you enjoy a good evening.
Lorien
(31,935 posts)The working people can't survive it, students can't survive it, and the planet certainly cannot survive it. This is a fight for our lives!
Bad Dog
(2,025 posts)Anything is better than that. Vote for the Democratic candidate whoever that is.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)you recognize how we are being manipulated by the Oligarchy. We must vote against Citizens United and HRC.
Bad Dog
(2,025 posts)Last Republican president gave us Iraq and the birth of IS along with a lot of other nasty things. Bill Clinton helped bring about peace in Northern Ireland, unlike any of his Republican or Democrat predecessors.
I don't have a vote, I'm not American, I'm British, but whenever you people elect a Republican it always bites us on the arse.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)to the worst president in history when the chips were down. The Oligarchy is selling their candidate by showing us how much worse it'd be if we elect a Republicon. The greed of the Oligarchy is literally killing Americans and others in the world.
We must fight to end the corruption in DC that includes many Democrats.
Bad Dog
(2,025 posts)By throwing your bottle out of the pram and either not voting or voting for the enemy if your candidate does not get in.
America was the only country in the World whose population actually supported the illegal war in Iraq, and your Media colluded with the deception. Despite an overwhelming majority of our population being against it we were still railroaded into it.
I don't want that to happen again.