2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumAmong Sanders supporters are right wing operatives
Whose mission is not only to elect a republican president but completely overrun the senate and house of representatives with republicans. Sanders is a candidate whose ideas throughout US history has proven to be disastrous for the Democratic party. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1972
Clinton is not directly attacking Sanders for saying he is a socialists or wants to legalize drugs, things that were fair game back then even during the Democratic primary. If anything, the Democratic party is being very accepting of Sanders and his rhetoric considering the devastating implications they can have if he is nominated. A democratic party candidate cannot win without the support of the establishment, without the support of those who currently have the power of wealth. I understand that legitimate Sanders supporters are trying to achieve good things and I respect those ideas but please keep in mind what happened during that presidential election and the parallels, hopefully we don't end up repeating history.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)all that HRC supporters have to offer?
Thenewire
(130 posts)This isn't about fear or paranoia, this is about reality but you make of it what you will. It isn't just a presidential election, congress is also on the line. I'm also doing this for my own conscious if these terrible events were to repeat themselves I would at least have something to look back on.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)and unlikely to change hands unless we get a candidate with coat tails, and HRC does not have them. So, if HRC is that nominee and wins, she faces a GOP congress for four years.
blue neen
(12,465 posts)This is from an article in the Philadelphia Inquirer about Pat Toomey's re-election bid:
"For all the fretting about Cruz and Trump, local Republicans took heart from a primary season that they argue has shown the party's energy and diversity and damaged Clinton."
"Some even dream of seeing Sanders, an avowed socialist, atop the Democratic ticket, which might cancel out any challenge posed by Cruz or Trump."
"I'd much rather run against Bernie Sanders than Hillary Clinton, absolutely," Gleason said."
http://www.philly.com/philly/news/politics/20160126_Will_Trump_or_Cruz_sink_Toomey_re-election_bid_.html
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)with her own party. With HRC as the nominee, she will energize the loons on the right to turn out, while alienating a portion of her base, possibly enough to cost her the election. But even if she wins, she will galvanize the down-ballot races against her, thus control of Congress will remain in GOP hands. She also sets us up for a massive loss in 2020, just in time for the census.
blue neen
(12,465 posts)It's really a pretty interesting article. It's worth taking the time to read the whole thing.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)People want a populist.
Bernie is one.
Hillary is not.
Bernie will be more challenging for them. They just don't know it, yet.
blue neen
(12,465 posts)daleanime
(17,796 posts)after 2 years when republicans get to run against her again, that is of course assuming that she manages to win the general election. Which is not a given.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)and going in with an economy teetering on the brink of another meltdown, she will get all the blame when it blows up. At least Bernie can say, "This is what I came to Washington to fix." HRC has cashed too many checks to make that claim. But she will tell them to "cut it out".
daleanime
(17,796 posts)same problem for Hillary if the economy tanks before the election.
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)Now that I think of it, they always use conspiracy as if it is a bad word EXCEPT when it comes to the VRWC.
But what the heck, special rules apply to them.
Vogon_Glory
(10,352 posts)Not necessarily, but look around. I don't remember nearly this much intra-party vitriol and hatred during the 2008 primary season.
I don't doubt one minute that there are GOP-Tea Party activists, Koch-roaches and other right-wing low-lives trying to knee-cap Democratic efforts to choose a winning candidate and halt GOP efforts to drag us back to 1893 and the worst of the Gilded Age.
ms liberty
(11,364 posts)but you're not going to offer to entertain us with your poetry, are you?
Vogon_Glory
(10,352 posts)When asked by whackos
To produce free verse
To conform to their "librul" trope
I choose to refuse and say
"nope, no way, you dope."
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)I remember things got real nasty with the PUMA crowd.
Seems about the same to me, though most juries I serve on involve fighting among the partisans.
madokie
(51,076 posts)how do these people get through the gate anyway
The Velveteen Ocelot
(131,217 posts)I didn't think so.
neverforget
(9,516 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)again.
islandmkl
(5,275 posts)like the one in Cinderella?
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)But thanks for sharing. and I love what's happened to the party since your beloved DLC took over.
Mnpaul
(3,655 posts)they were touting the support of Bush's former National Security Director.
Thenewire
(130 posts)But the election is this year. You cannot destroy and rebuild the supposed establishment in less than a year. The people with all the power, with the influence and money who support the democratic party right now will leave before they would support a candidate like Sanders. You should have started this 3 years ago after Obama got elected. This sudden interest to go against the establishment isn't grassroots, it is something that was sponsored by right wing extremists starting with the tea party and it has finally reached our side.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)So you think the heads of our party will desert the people if the people decide to want Bernie?
You claim: "The people with all the power, with the influence and money who support the democratic party right now will leave before they would support a candidate like Sanders."
You have such little faith in them, do you? Doesn't bode well for the leaders, does it? Who they gonna support? A republican?
I dunno, man, if you feel that way, what's the use?
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)I rather suspect the Democratic establishment will be running against Bernie if he wins the nomination, they'll try to be inconspicuous about it but hippos practicing parkour would be less obvious.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)It's like you don't actually understand the parameters of the political debate in this country, or that it's 2016 instead of 1972.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)As if Nixon's in the White House, Kissinger is Secretary of State, the Vietnam War is still going but Nixon and Kissinger will announce the end of American involvement just before the election, the White House Plumbers have burgled Democratic Headquarters, and the Democratic nominee has bungled his choice for a running mate
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Skwmom
(12,685 posts)Last edited Tue Jan 26, 2016, 11:14 PM - Edit history (1)
Coale likes to help his friends. He has an eclectic set of them, both inside politics and out, some of whom he met through his wife, Fox News host Greta Van Susteren.
Since the mid-1990s, according to campaign finance records, Coale has donated more than $750,000 to political candidates and committees, most of them Democratic. But he has also palled around with Republican Sarah Palin. He attended Kim Kardashians wedding and represented Lisa Marie Presley in her divorce from Michael Jackson, back when Presley was affiliated with the Church of Scientology, where Coale and Van Susteren have been prominent members for years.
Coale supported his friend John McCain, a Republican, in the 2008 presidential election. But during the primaries, he was a major booster of Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton, whom he also considers a friend.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/hes-along-for-the-ride-with-martin-omalley/2015/04/12/fc70b548-d3ad-11e4-ab77-9646eea6a4c7_story.html
Think about it.....
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)So if we're looking into who in our party has noxious fucking right-wing asshats on the speed dial, maybe we can start there.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Whose mission is not only to elect a republican president but completely overrun the senate and house of representatives with republicans, (Like DWS has done). Sanders is a candidate whose ideas throughout US history have proven to be good for the Democratic party.
He says pretty much the same as Obama but Sanders is the real deal.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)
Sec. Kissinger: Shed (Sec. Clinton would) put me under a great conflict of interest if she were a candidate, because I tend to support the Republicans Yes, Id be comfortable with her as the president. According to Sec. Kissingers interview with NPRs Scott Simon, regarding whether Sec. Kissinger thought Sec. Clinton would be a good president, I know Hillary as a person. And as a personal friend, I would say yes, shed be a good president. But shed put me under a great conflict of interest if she were a candidate, because I tend to support the Republicans Yes, Id be comfortable with her as the president. (NPR, 9/8/14)
Republicans praised the prospect of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton Sunday. Former Nixon and Ford Secretary of State Henry Kissinger said Sunday that Clinton would be an outstanding selection. She is a lady of great intelligence, demonstrated enormous determination and would be an outstanding appointment, Kissinger told the World Economic Forums India Economic Summit in New Delhi, according to Bloomberg News. (CNN.com, 11/16/08)
I think of Hillary with admiration and affection. . . When I call Mrs. Clinton Hillary, I do that not so much to indicate familiarity but to use a name that the whole world uses. It shows to what extent she has succeeded in her people-to-people work. Henry Kissinger, Former National Security Adviser and Secretary of State for President Nixon and President Ford (Washington Post, 5/3/13)
merrily
(45,251 posts)I rest my case.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)Got any ACTUAL proof of your insulting accusation? If not, I highly recommend self deleting it immediately.
Response to Thenewire (Original post)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
R. P. McMurphy
(866 posts)but is there an emphasis on "sock" as in puppet? The four-year hibernation seems odd to me.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)But, draw your own conclusions.
FYI. Calling someone a sock, mole, etc. in a post will probably get you an alert and maybe a hide.
R. P. McMurphy
(866 posts)I wasn't aware and will be careful.
merrily
(45,251 posts)If you haven't read the Terms of Service, you may want to do that. However, once a post is alerted on, 7 people jury or judge the post and a lot of subjectivity and interpretation occurs.
Until you feel acclimated, be mindful of personal insults. There is also a distinction sometimes made between saying "your post is rude" and saying "you're rude" or you're being rude. One is about the post, the others are about the poster.
JeffHead
(1,186 posts)Really inspiring message you have there.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Oh man it's getting deep in here.
OOGA BOOGA!!! A VOTE FOR BERNIE WILL DOOM US ALL!!!
merrily
(45,251 posts)Turns out, it's Opposite Day, which explains a lot here. Then again, DU seems to celebrate Opposite Day much more often than only 1 day out of 365 or 366.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Bernie is the ultimate evil villain, he's one thing one day, another the next.
He's too far to the left! He's too far to the right! He's a right wing conspiracy, a left wing conspiracy, a Republican, a commie, a dangerous radical who's really just the establishment...he's every kind of boogie man you could ever want!
merrily
(45,251 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)leveymg
(36,418 posts)The real operators are on Wall Street and rolling around in Bentleys in Saudi Arabia. She's their operative.
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)Between her voting record and her donors, she does a better job at being a neocon than most card carrying NRA members.
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)Skwmom
(12,685 posts)m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)have legalized marijuana for adult recreational use. California- perhaps you've heard of it- with 34 Million voters, is likely to do so as well this November.
A majority of Americans support marijuana legalization, and something like half the states have legalized medical marijuana; all those state laws are in conflict with Federal law, which is why Sanders supports removing Marijuana from the Controlled Substances Act, a perfectly reasonable and well-supported policy position.

So seriously, what the everloving fuck?
senz
(11,945 posts)You wrote,
FrenchieCat
(68,868 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)farleftlib
(2,125 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Party that Democrats controlled the Oval Office for 20 consecutive years were seen to have controlled Congress for the better part of 40 or more consecutive years, ending in 1994, during the administration of one William Jefferson Clinton, a center right Democrat.
You need to give the McGovern meme a rest. It's exhausted.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12778825 (This ain't 1972.) (Please read both the OP and the replies.)
jfern
(5,204 posts)Autumn
(49,019 posts)A party should look out for the people.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)I think the OP will think twice before posting such a preposterous OP again.
ETA: I went ahead and recc'd it so others can see this.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Fail.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)sometimes, the truth hurts
i hope they have a lot of advil over at camp clinton....
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Meanwhile Hillary is pushing GOP policies.
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)"A democratic party candidate cannot win without the support of the establishment, without the support of those who currently have the power of wealth." Sounds like a Democratic Party candidate cannot win without abandoning Democratic ideals in favor of the interests of those who have the power of wealth. Speaking of disastrous for the Democratic Party, let's look at our 35 year descent into oblivion. We are now the minority party at all levels of government.
dinkytron
(568 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Sooner or later one of those pieces of pasta is going to stick to the wall... I promise.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)but I don't think it's pasta
McCamy Taylor
(19,240 posts)Fearless
(18,458 posts)Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)And those are on the record. The Sanders operatives are just a rumour, produced by fear bordering on McCarthy-esque paranoia. But then: that is what right wing corporatism begets.
sammythecat
(3,602 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)that's pretty fucked up.
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.