Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Thenewire

(130 posts)
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 10:11 PM Jan 2016

Among Sanders supporters are right wing operatives

Whose mission is not only to elect a republican president but completely overrun the senate and house of representatives with republicans. Sanders is a candidate whose ideas throughout US history has proven to be disastrous for the Democratic party. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1972

Clinton is not directly attacking Sanders for saying he is a socialists or wants to legalize drugs, things that were fair game back then even during the Democratic primary. If anything, the Democratic party is being very accepting of Sanders and his rhetoric considering the devastating implications they can have if he is nominated. A democratic party candidate cannot win without the support of the establishment, without the support of those who currently have the power of wealth. I understand that legitimate Sanders supporters are trying to achieve good things and I respect those ideas but please keep in mind what happened during that presidential election and the parallels, hopefully we don't end up repeating history.

79 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Among Sanders supporters are right wing operatives (Original Post) Thenewire Jan 2016 OP
Is fear and paranoia Kelvin Mace Jan 2016 #1
You know, I really wouldn't care of O'Malley got the nomination instead Thenewire Jan 2016 #7
Congress is in the hands of the GOP Kelvin Mace Jan 2016 #18
That may not be the case around the country. blue neen Jan 2016 #24
HRC damaged herself Kelvin Mace Jan 2016 #26
Um, that clearly is not what the article is saying. blue neen Jan 2016 #32
We know those right wingers believe that, but they're living in the old world. Fawke Em Jan 2016 #50
This is Pennsylvania. It is the old world! blue neen Jan 2016 #64
And an even redder congress.... daleanime Jan 2016 #27
Yep, Kelvin Mace Jan 2016 #61
Definitely...... daleanime Jan 2016 #62
They want to broaden the definition of VRW conspiracy. Skwmom Jan 2016 #21
Not Necessarily, But Look Around Vogon_Glory Jan 2016 #29
Off topic I know ms liberty Jan 2016 #35
Yup, off-topic but Vogon_Glory Jan 2016 #39
You must have been on a different DU Kelvin Mace Jan 2016 #59
You got that right madokie Jan 2016 #76
Got any names? The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2016 #2
Joe McCarthy did it better neverforget Jan 2016 #10
"They're playing my song!" Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #33
talking mirror?... islandmkl Jan 2016 #3
Spreading Ever More FUD cantbeserious Jan 2016 #4
And yet we're the cranks. eom VulgarPoet Jan 2016 #5
Clinton's donor list looks like a guest list for a Republican fundraiser Doctor_J Jan 2016 #6
Just the other day Mnpaul Jan 2016 #12
I wouldn't mind the Democratic party becoming completely Socialist Thenewire Jan 2016 #16
WOW RobertEarl Jan 2016 #23
I have zero faith in them Fumesucker Jan 2016 #79
Yours is an extremely odd post. Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #40
They sure like to dredge up the Ghost of 1972, don't they? Art_from_Ark Jan 2016 #67
Kind of explains why they're reliably unaware of the existence of the Millennials, too. Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #69
Exactly. And I read O'Malley's big backer also supported McCain and palled around with Palin. Skwmom Jan 2016 #22
Debbie Wasserman Schultz teamed up w/Sheldon Adelson to put sick people in prison for med. marijuana Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #78
Among H supporters are right wing operatives RobertEarl Jan 2016 #8
Among Clinton supporters are right wing operatives Cheese Sandwich Jan 2016 #9
Isn't that page a hoot? Huckabee, Kissinger, Condi, Jeb! Ridge and more! merrily Jan 2016 #48
Really? 99Forever Jan 2016 #11
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Jan 2016 #13
Maybe I'm reading too much into your reply . . , R. P. McMurphy Jan 2016 #28
I believe it is a reference to boxing. n/t JonLeibowitz Jan 2016 #30
Sock it to me was a tag line on Laugh In. merrily Jan 2016 #53
Thanks for the info. R. P. McMurphy Jan 2016 #55
You're welcome. I knew you'd appreciate info about Laugh in. merrily Jan 2016 #60
Vote for Hillary or we're all doomed. JeffHead Jan 2016 #14
LMAO! beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #15
And I thought it was Pretend Sanders Hates Women's Rights Day. merrily Jan 2016 #38
It's always BOOGIE MAN day! beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #44
I keep forgetting how to celebrate that. merrily Jan 2016 #45
I usually light a few candles, put on some good music and open a bottle of wine. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #46
Every day? Cool, but I think I'll just keep laughing. Works for me. merrily Jan 2016 #51
HRC isn't a RW operative - she's the leading Neocon Rightist in the D Party. leveymg Jan 2016 #17
I said it before, I'll say it again VulgarPoet Jan 2016 #57
What an idiotic statement. n/t JTFrog Jan 2016 #66
I think there is one behind you.. LOOK OUT!!! Motown_Johnny Jan 2016 #19
If I was a Republican, I would BEG you to run Clinton. It would be the gift that kept on giving. Skwmom Jan 2016 #20
LOL! nt m-lekktor Jan 2016 #25
"or wants to legalize drugs"... did you just come through a time warp? FOUR STATES and counting Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #31
Oh yeah, that's how FDR got elected to four terms ... senz Jan 2016 #34
The Great Depression and then WWII got FDR elected.... FrenchieCat Jan 2016 #54
That's what Republicans always say! senz Jan 2016 #58
. farleftlib Jan 2016 #36
Among Hillary's supporters are right wingers. The New Deal was such a "disaster" for the Dem merrily Jan 2016 #37
Bernie doesn't have a SuperPAC run by a right-winger, David Brock jfern Jan 2016 #41
I'm sorry that your party puts the people who hold power and wealth over you. Autumn Jan 2016 #42
You're going straight to ignore. Bye. liberal_at_heart Jan 2016 #43
Not come back RobertEarl Jan 2016 #49
Then why are all the right-wing attacks on single payer coming from the Hillary campaign? Fawke Em Jan 2016 #47
ouch! restorefreedom Jan 2016 #68
Cute conspiracy theory! AgingAmerican Jan 2016 #52
Yes, reject the scary radicalism HassleCat Jan 2016 #56
We must protect our precious bodily fluids. dinkytron Jan 2016 #63
FUD ain't workin'. Keep tryin'. cherokeeprogressive Jan 2016 #65
Not if they keep forgetting to cook it first. Kalidurga Jan 2016 #70
They're throwing SOMETHING at the wall Art_from_Ark Jan 2016 #75
Sanders is doing a great job. McCamy Taylor Jan 2016 #71
Bull shit. Fearless Jan 2016 #72
Among Clinton supporters are right wing corporatists. Betty Karlson Jan 2016 #73
12 people recommended this slop sammythecat Jan 2016 #74
Yeah Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #77

Thenewire

(130 posts)
7. You know, I really wouldn't care of O'Malley got the nomination instead
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 10:19 PM
Jan 2016

This isn't about fear or paranoia, this is about reality but you make of it what you will. It isn't just a presidential election, congress is also on the line. I'm also doing this for my own conscious if these terrible events were to repeat themselves I would at least have something to look back on.

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
18. Congress is in the hands of the GOP
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 10:28 PM
Jan 2016

and unlikely to change hands unless we get a candidate with coat tails, and HRC does not have them. So, if HRC is that nominee and wins, she faces a GOP congress for four years.

blue neen

(12,465 posts)
24. That may not be the case around the country.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 10:41 PM
Jan 2016

This is from an article in the Philadelphia Inquirer about Pat Toomey's re-election bid:

"For all the fretting about Cruz and Trump, local Republicans took heart from a primary season that they argue has shown the party's energy and diversity and damaged Clinton."

"Some even dream of seeing Sanders, an avowed socialist, atop the Democratic ticket, which might cancel out any challenge posed by Cruz or Trump."

"I'd much rather run against Bernie Sanders than Hillary Clinton, absolutely," Gleason said."

http://www.philly.com/philly/news/politics/20160126_Will_Trump_or_Cruz_sink_Toomey_re-election_bid_.html

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
26. HRC damaged herself
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 10:47 PM
Jan 2016

with her own party. With HRC as the nominee, she will energize the loons on the right to turn out, while alienating a portion of her base, possibly enough to cost her the election. But even if she wins, she will galvanize the down-ballot races against her, thus control of Congress will remain in GOP hands. She also sets us up for a massive loss in 2020, just in time for the census.

blue neen

(12,465 posts)
32. Um, that clearly is not what the article is saying.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 10:55 PM
Jan 2016

It's really a pretty interesting article. It's worth taking the time to read the whole thing.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
50. We know those right wingers believe that, but they're living in the old world.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 11:32 PM
Jan 2016

People want a populist.

Bernie is one.

Hillary is not.

Bernie will be more challenging for them. They just don't know it, yet.

daleanime

(17,796 posts)
27. And an even redder congress....
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 10:49 PM
Jan 2016

after 2 years when republicans get to run against her again, that is of course assuming that she manages to win the general election. Which is not a given.

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
61. Yep,
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 12:01 AM
Jan 2016

and going in with an economy teetering on the brink of another meltdown, she will get all the blame when it blows up. At least Bernie can say, "This is what I came to Washington to fix." HRC has cashed too many checks to make that claim. But she will tell them to "cut it out".

Skwmom

(12,685 posts)
21. They want to broaden the definition of VRW conspiracy.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 10:33 PM
Jan 2016

Now that I think of it, they always use conspiracy as if it is a bad word EXCEPT when it comes to the VRWC.

But what the heck, special rules apply to them.

Vogon_Glory

(10,352 posts)
29. Not Necessarily, But Look Around
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 10:50 PM
Jan 2016

Not necessarily, but look around. I don't remember nearly this much intra-party vitriol and hatred during the 2008 primary season.

I don't doubt one minute that there are GOP-Tea Party activists, Koch-roaches and other right-wing low-lives trying to knee-cap Democratic efforts to choose a winning candidate and halt GOP efforts to drag us back to 1893 and the worst of the Gilded Age.

ms liberty

(11,364 posts)
35. Off topic I know
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 11:01 PM
Jan 2016

but you're not going to offer to entertain us with your poetry, are you?

Vogon_Glory

(10,352 posts)
39. Yup, off-topic but
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 11:10 PM
Jan 2016

When asked by whackos
To produce free verse
To conform to their "librul" trope
I choose to refuse and say
"nope, no way, you dope."

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
59. You must have been on a different DU
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 11:59 PM
Jan 2016


I remember things got real nasty with the PUMA crowd.

Seems about the same to me, though most juries I serve on involve fighting among the partisans.

neverforget

(9,516 posts)
10. Joe McCarthy did it better
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 10:23 PM
Jan 2016
http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/mccarthy-says-communists-are-in-state-department

Speaking before the Ohio County Women’s Republican Club in Wheeling, West Virginia, Senator McCarthy waved before his audience a piece of paper. According to the only published newspaper account of the speech, McCarthy said that, “I have here in my hand a list of 205 [State Department employees] that were known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party and who nevertheless are still working and shaping the policy of the State Department.” In the next few weeks, the number fluctuated wildly, with McCarthy stating at various times that there were 57, or 81, or 10 communists in the Department of State. In fact, McCarthy never produced any solid evidence that there was even one communist in the State Department.
 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
6. Clinton's donor list looks like a guest list for a Republican fundraiser
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 10:19 PM
Jan 2016

But thanks for sharing. and I love what's happened to the party since your beloved DLC took over.

Mnpaul

(3,655 posts)
12. Just the other day
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 10:23 PM
Jan 2016

they were touting the support of Bush's former National Security Director.

Thenewire

(130 posts)
16. I wouldn't mind the Democratic party becoming completely Socialist
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 10:25 PM
Jan 2016

But the election is this year. You cannot destroy and rebuild the supposed establishment in less than a year. The people with all the power, with the influence and money who support the democratic party right now will leave before they would support a candidate like Sanders. You should have started this 3 years ago after Obama got elected. This sudden interest to go against the establishment isn't grassroots, it is something that was sponsored by right wing extremists starting with the tea party and it has finally reached our side.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
23. WOW
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 10:40 PM
Jan 2016

So you think the heads of our party will desert the people if the people decide to want Bernie?

You claim: "The people with all the power, with the influence and money who support the democratic party right now will leave before they would support a candidate like Sanders."

You have such little faith in them, do you? Doesn't bode well for the leaders, does it? Who they gonna support? A republican?

I dunno, man, if you feel that way, what's the use?

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
79. I have zero faith in them
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 05:46 AM
Jan 2016

I rather suspect the Democratic establishment will be running against Bernie if he wins the nomination, they'll try to be inconspicuous about it but hippos practicing parkour would be less obvious.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
40. Yours is an extremely odd post.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 11:12 PM
Jan 2016

It's like you don't actually understand the parameters of the political debate in this country, or that it's 2016 instead of 1972.

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
67. They sure like to dredge up the Ghost of 1972, don't they?
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 01:25 AM
Jan 2016

As if Nixon's in the White House, Kissinger is Secretary of State, the Vietnam War is still going but Nixon and Kissinger will announce the end of American involvement just before the election, the White House Plumbers have burgled Democratic Headquarters, and the Democratic nominee has bungled his choice for a running mate

Skwmom

(12,685 posts)
22. Exactly. And I read O'Malley's big backer also supported McCain and palled around with Palin.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 10:36 PM
Jan 2016

Last edited Tue Jan 26, 2016, 11:14 PM - Edit history (1)

Coale likes to help his friends. He has an eclectic set of them, both inside politics and out, some of whom he met through his wife, Fox News host Greta Van Susteren.

Since the mid-1990s, according to campaign finance records, Coale has donated more than $750,000 to political candidates and committees, most of them Democratic. But he has also palled around with Republican Sarah Palin. He attended Kim Kardashian’s wedding and represented Lisa Marie Presley in her divorce from Michael Jackson, back when Presley was affiliated with the Church of Scientology, where Coale and Van Susteren have been prominent members for years.

Coale supported his friend John McCain, a Republican, in the 2008 presidential election. But during the primaries, he was a major booster of Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton, whom he also considers a friend.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/hes-along-for-the-ride-with-martin-omalley/2015/04/12/fc70b548-d3ad-11e4-ab77-9646eea6a4c7_story.html

Think about it.....

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
78. Debbie Wasserman Schultz teamed up w/Sheldon Adelson to put sick people in prison for med. marijuana
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 05:34 AM
Jan 2016

So if we're looking into who in our party has noxious fucking right-wing asshats on the speed dial, maybe we can start there.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
8. Among H supporters are right wing operatives
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 10:21 PM
Jan 2016

Whose mission is not only to elect a republican president but completely overrun the senate and house of representatives with republicans, (Like DWS has done). Sanders is a candidate whose ideas throughout US history have proven to be good for the Democratic party.

He says pretty much the same as Obama but Sanders is the real deal.

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
9. Among Clinton supporters are right wing operatives
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 10:23 PM
Jan 2016


Sec. Kissinger: “I know Hillary as a person. And as a personal friend, I would say yes, she’d be a good president.” According to Sec. Kissinger’s interview with NPR’s Scott Simon, regarding whether Sec. Kissinger thought Sec. Clinton would be a good president, “I know Hillary as a person. And as a personal friend, I would say yes, she’d be a good president. But she’d put me under a great conflict of interest if she were a candidate, because I tend to support the Republicans… Yes, I’d be comfortable with her as the president.” (NPR, 9/8/14)

Sec. Kissinger: “She’d (Sec. Clinton would) put me under a great conflict of interest if she were a candidate, because I tend to support the Republicans… Yes, I’d be comfortable with her as the president.” According to Sec. Kissinger’s interview with NPR’s Scott Simon, regarding whether Sec. Kissinger thought Sec. Clinton would be a good president, “I know Hillary as a person. And as a personal friend, I would say yes, she’d be a good president. But she’d put me under a great conflict of interest if she were a candidate, because I tend to support the Republicans… Yes, I’d be comfortable with her as the president.” (NPR, 9/8/14)

“Republicans praised the prospect of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton Sunday. Former Nixon and Ford Secretary of State Henry Kissinger said Sunday that Clinton would be an ‘outstanding’ selection. ‘She is a lady of great intelligence, demonstrated enormous determination and would be an outstanding appointment,’ Kissinger told the World Economic Forum’s India Economic Summit in New Delhi, according to Bloomberg News.” (CNN.com, 11/16/08)

“I think of Hillary with admiration and affection. . . When I call Mrs. Clinton ‘Hillary,’ I do that not so much to indicate familiarity but to use a name that the whole world uses. It shows to what extent she has succeeded in her people-to-people work.” – Henry Kissinger, Former National Security Adviser and Secretary of State for President Nixon and President Ford (Washington Post, 5/3/13)
http://correctrecord.org/praise-for-hillary-clinton/

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
11. Really?
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 10:23 PM
Jan 2016

Got any ACTUAL proof of your insulting accusation? If not, I highly recommend self deleting it immediately.

Response to Thenewire (Original post)

R. P. McMurphy

(866 posts)
28. Maybe I'm reading too much into your reply . . ,
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 10:50 PM
Jan 2016

but is there an emphasis on "sock" as in puppet? The four-year hibernation seems odd to me.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
53. Sock it to me was a tag line on Laugh In.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 11:39 PM
Jan 2016

But, draw your own conclusions.

FYI. Calling someone a sock, mole, etc. in a post will probably get you an alert and maybe a hide.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
60. You're welcome. I knew you'd appreciate info about Laugh in.
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 12:01 AM
Jan 2016


If you haven't read the Terms of Service, you may want to do that. However, once a post is alerted on, 7 people jury or judge the post and a lot of subjectivity and interpretation occurs.

Until you feel acclimated, be mindful of personal insults. There is also a distinction sometimes made between saying "your post is rude" and saying "you're rude" or you're being rude. One is about the post, the others are about the poster.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
38. And I thought it was Pretend Sanders Hates Women's Rights Day.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 11:10 PM
Jan 2016

Turns out, it's Opposite Day, which explains a lot here. Then again, DU seems to celebrate Opposite Day much more often than only 1 day out of 365 or 366.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
44. It's always BOOGIE MAN day!
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 11:24 PM
Jan 2016

Bernie is the ultimate evil villain, he's one thing one day, another the next.

He's too far to the left! He's too far to the right! He's a right wing conspiracy, a left wing conspiracy, a Republican, a commie, a dangerous radical who's really just the establishment...he's every kind of boogie man you could ever want!


leveymg

(36,418 posts)
17. HRC isn't a RW operative - she's the leading Neocon Rightist in the D Party.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 10:26 PM
Jan 2016

The real operators are on Wall Street and rolling around in Bentleys in Saudi Arabia. She's their operative.

VulgarPoet

(2,872 posts)
57. I said it before, I'll say it again
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 11:44 PM
Jan 2016

Between her voting record and her donors, she does a better job at being a neocon than most card carrying NRA members.

Skwmom

(12,685 posts)
20. If I was a Republican, I would BEG you to run Clinton. It would be the gift that kept on giving.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 10:31 PM
Jan 2016




Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
31. "or wants to legalize drugs"... did you just come through a time warp? FOUR STATES and counting
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 10:54 PM
Jan 2016

have legalized marijuana for adult recreational use. California- perhaps you've heard of it- with 34 Million voters, is likely to do so as well this November.



A majority of Americans support marijuana legalization, and something like half the states have legalized medical marijuana; all those state laws are in conflict with Federal law, which is why Sanders supports removing Marijuana from the Controlled Substances Act, a perfectly reasonable and well-supported policy position.



So seriously, what the everloving fuck?

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
34. Oh yeah, that's how FDR got elected to four terms ...
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 10:59 PM
Jan 2016

You wrote,

Sanders is a candidate whose ideas throughout US history has proven to be disastrous for the Democratic party.






merrily

(45,251 posts)
37. Among Hillary's supporters are right wingers. The New Deal was such a "disaster" for the Dem
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 11:07 PM
Jan 2016

Party that Democrats controlled the Oval Office for 20 consecutive years were seen to have controlled Congress for the better part of 40 or more consecutive years, ending in 1994, during the administration of one William Jefferson Clinton, a center right Democrat.

You need to give the McGovern meme a rest. It's exhausted.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12778825 (This ain't 1972.) (Please read both the OP and the replies.)

Autumn

(49,019 posts)
42. I'm sorry that your party puts the people who hold power and wealth over you.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 11:15 PM
Jan 2016

A party should look out for the people.

A democratic party candidate cannot win without the support of the establishment, without the support of those who currently have the power of wealth.
 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
49. Not come back
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 11:30 PM
Jan 2016

I think the OP will think twice before posting such a preposterous OP again.

ETA: I went ahead and recc'd it so others can see this.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
47. Then why are all the right-wing attacks on single payer coming from the Hillary campaign?
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 11:29 PM
Jan 2016


Fail.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
68. ouch!
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 01:31 AM
Jan 2016

sometimes, the truth hurts

i hope they have a lot of advil over at camp clinton....

 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
56. Yes, reject the scary radicalism
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 11:44 PM
Jan 2016

"A democratic party candidate cannot win without the support of the establishment, without the support of those who currently have the power of wealth." Sounds like a Democratic Party candidate cannot win without abandoning Democratic ideals in favor of the interests of those who have the power of wealth. Speaking of disastrous for the Democratic Party, let's look at our 35 year descent into oblivion. We are now the minority party at all levels of government.

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
65. FUD ain't workin'. Keep tryin'.
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 12:29 AM
Jan 2016

Sooner or later one of those pieces of pasta is going to stick to the wall... I promise.

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
73. Among Clinton supporters are right wing corporatists.
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 03:54 AM
Jan 2016

And those are on the record. The Sanders operatives are just a rumour, produced by fear bordering on McCarthy-esque paranoia. But then: that is what right wing corporatism begets.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Among Sanders supporters ...