2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumNoam Chomsky just came out in support of Bernie!!!! Update: Corrected information, see post
Last edited Wed Jan 27, 2016, 12:11 PM - Edit history (1)
Saz facebook feed.
UPDATE:
The site saw had a misleading headline:
Bernie Sanders Just Picked Up Support from the Worlds Most Renowned Intellectual
body down in the body it says
http://usuncut.com/politics/noam-chomsky-says-bernie-sanders-has-best-policies/
I plead midnight posting madness........
So, yeah, Chomsky's remarks could be construed as support, even tho he says he will vote for Hillary to ensure Republicans do not win.
Which I think is the wrong reason for voting......ever notice how we alway seem to be forced to vote AGAINST something rather than FOR something?
I want a ballot that gives the option to vote for "None of the Above"
hollysmom
(5,946 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,225 posts)dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)admirer of Chomsky. I thought the feeling might be mutual.
TheBlackAdder
(28,225 posts)draa
(975 posts)bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)But I'll still take it.
senz
(11,945 posts)two or three months ago? Maybe he had just mentioned Bernie?
TIME TO PANIC
(1,894 posts)Peace Patriot
(24,010 posts)...you don't provide a link.
Please clear up the confusion, and provide a link to back up your OP title. It's too important a matter to let it remain muddled. I just visited Chomsky's Facebook page and I don't see anything there. What do you mean by "Saz facebook feed"?
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)and it had a misleading headline:
Bernie Sanders Just Picked Up Support from the Worlds Most Renowned Intellectual
body down in the body it says
http://usuncut.com/politics/noam-chomsky-says-bernie-sanders-has-best-policies/
I plead midnight posting madness........
Peace Patriot
(24,010 posts)Very interesting statement by Chomsky, and yes, it is an endorsement of Sanders (see below) with some qualification, and he certainly does not endorse Clinton (but would vote for her against any Republican). Chomsky is worried about our rigged system, as I am, and as we all should be. It's not just rigged by Big$ and the BigLies media, it's actually quite directly riggable by the privately owned 'TRADE SECRET' code in all our vote-counting systems, put in place during the 2002-2004 period. He doesn't mention the latter, though he really should. He says that a New Dealer candidate, like Bernie Sanders, "doesn't have much of a chance" in "our system of mainly bought elections."
It should also be clarified who he was talking about ("the competition" in the following: "Chomsky stated that he would ultimately back Clinton in the general election, though he did not endorse her so much as malign the competition." He was talking about the Republican creep show, not Sanders. He does NOT malign sanders but says that he mostly agrees with him.
"Chomsky said that 'If he (Sanders) were elected, I think he would of the current candidates I think hed be the one who would have, from my point of view, the best policies.'
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)does not make sense.
studyshare
(49 posts)SecularMotion
(7,981 posts)http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/01/noam-chomsky-bernie-sanders-policies-election-160125180058899.html