HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Retired » Retired Forums » 2016 Postmortem (Forum) » I think Bernie's proposed...

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 07:48 PM

 

I think Bernie's proposed system would, indeed, make us pay less, not more, .....

Last edited Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:12 PM - Edit history (3)

It's very likely that what we save with Bernie's Universal Health insurance system will more
than compensate for the rise in taxes for the Middle Classes. The average family is
paying $6,000+ for health care today. Under Bernie's system, the average Middle Class
family will be paying $600+. This means a savings of $5,000+ per year. The rise
in income tax for the average family certainly will be a lot less than $5,000.

Bernie is correct. There is nothing to fear. Under his plan Americans will be paying less.

19 replies, 1567 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 19 replies Author Time Post
Reply I think Bernie's proposed system would, indeed, make us pay less, not more, ..... (Original post)
Cal33 Jan 2016 OP
Auggie Jan 2016 #1
Cal33 Jan 2016 #5
Auggie Jan 2016 #8
Cal33 Jan 2016 #13
FreakinDJ Jan 2016 #2
Sheepshank Jan 2016 #3
Cal33 Jan 2016 #6
Odin2005 Jan 2016 #15
Metric System Jan 2016 #4
Cal33 Jan 2016 #11
reformist2 Jan 2016 #7
Cal33 Jan 2016 #14
kelly1mm Jan 2016 #9
Cal33 Jan 2016 #12
Gothmog Jan 2016 #10
Cal33 Jan 2016 #16
mythology Jan 2016 #17
Cal33 Jan 2016 #18
ViseGrip Jan 2016 #19

Response to Cal33 (Original post)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 07:55 PM

1. $6,000? Try $14,400, plus the $3,000 yearly deductable.

Blue Shield PPO (Covered California) for two adults.

It's highway robbery.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Auggie (Reply #1)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 08:03 PM

5. Yes, it is highway robbery. Some places are worse than others. Well, the vast majority

 

of people will be paying far less than they are paying now.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cal33 (Reply #5)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 08:14 PM

8. By the way, let's be sure to call this health insurance, not health care

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Auggie (Reply #8)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:17 PM

13. You're right. I have made the correction in the OP.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cal33 (Original post)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 07:55 PM

2. Bernie is right

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cal33 (Original post)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 07:56 PM

3. it's unfortunate that Bernie actually said he would need to raise taxes

 

certain buzz words seem to stick.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Sheepshank (Reply #3)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 08:05 PM

6. Yup, the same idea occurred to me. Or he could have added the explanation that the

 

Last edited Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:06 PM - Edit history (1)

savings on health insurance would more than make up for the income tax increase on the middle-classes.
On the whole, the savings for the average person would be quite substantial.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Sheepshank (Reply #3)

Fri Jan 29, 2016, 09:23 AM

15. Cuomo basically forced him into saying it.

Which is what I think was the whole point of that BS "town hall".

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cal33 (Original post)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 07:57 PM

4. How will he implement this system given the difficulty Pres. Obama faced in passing the ACA, not

just in Congress but also selling it to the American people?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Metric System (Reply #4)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 10:45 PM

11. In order to get any biggie through, Bernie and Liz Warren would have to motivate

 

the American people to vote in more Progressive Democratic candidates into the
House and Senate, and have fewer Third-Way Establishment Democrats as candidates.
I'm sure Liz and Bernie are willing to work very hard at this, because no bill will get
through without adequate votes.

Democrats do not have the reputation of complaining very hard when
Republicans make things rough for them with their well-known shenanigans.
For example: During Pres. Obama's first term alone, the Republican Senate
filibustered 400+ times. They knocked down every bill proposed by the Democrats
-- bills that would have benefitted the American people, if they had been allowed to
pass. With few exceptions, most of the Dem. congressmen and women said little or
nothing, This is a golden opportunity to let both Dems. and Republicans know what
the Republican congressmen are really doing to them. The proof (filibuster of a
bill useful to the American people) is right there.

Why the Dems. kept on saying nothing afterwards, did get me angry many times.
Dems. do not have the luxury of a slough of Democratic news media to broadcast
to the people afterwards. This is a kind of self-destructing death-wish.


The Republican Main Stream Media certainly said nothing. The news media are 90%
Republican-owned anyway. Democrats have nothing to fight back with in this area.

I think, with Bernie and Liz working as a team, they would not hesitate to let the
world know -- loud, clear and long -- each time that the Republicans vote out a bill
that the Democrats want to pass that would benefit the American people, as a whole.
They can describe in detail what the American people had just lost in benefits, that the
Republicans were the ones who do not want the American people to have a better
life, And those bills made by the Republicans for the benefit of their super-rich
masters would be blocked by the Dem. Congressmen and Senators, so that the rich
would not get richer at the expense of the middle-class and the poor.

All this will be pointed out loud and clear and often. In time, even the none-too-
bright citizens will begin to catch on who means them well, and who is stealing from
them - the Democrats or the Republicans?

This simple plan must be repeated over and over again, and each and every time
an unfair blockage has taken place. Naming the names of the perpetrators, what
type of harm it would have on the American people. And if you are sick and tired of this
Republican nonsense, vote for (name the Progressive candidates) who will be running
at the next election.

I hope it will be quicker, but Democrats could quite possibly have both Houses of
Congress within 4 years (perhaps within 2 years).

For Bernie to get his agenda through, he and Liz will first have to concentrate on the
work of getting sufficient numbers of Representatives and Senators, where they cannot
be blocked or filibustered by the Republicans.

With Bernie in the WH and Liz in the Senate, they will be a tremendous team. Both
of them have bulldog tenacity, They will inspire others to work with them. They are
both winners.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cal33 (Original post)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 08:07 PM

7. I am still amazed that Hillary has decided to make taxes an issue.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to reformist2 (Reply #7)

Fri Jan 29, 2016, 08:32 AM

14. She's trying to hit him with everything she can rustle up. She's panicky. It's hard

 

to think well under these circumstances.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cal33 (Original post)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 08:17 PM

9. Technically you are wrong. Taxes paid (to government) would go up. Medical Insurance payments

to insurance providers and medical expenses would go down. The NET would likely be lower overall expenses for the middle class family, but TAXES themselves would go up.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kelly1mm (Reply #9)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:01 PM

12. You're right, Kelly. I've made the changes. And thanks.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cal33 (Original post)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 09:53 PM

10. Krugman-Sanders health plan looks a little bit like a standard Republican tax-cut plan

I trust Prof. Krugman on this http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2016/01/19/weakened-at-bernies/?_r=0

On health care: leave on one side the virtual impossibility of achieving single-payer. Beyond the politics, the Sanders “plan” isn’t just lacking in detail; as Ezra Klein notes, it both promises more comprehensive coverage than Medicare or for that matter single-payer systems in other countries, and assumes huge cost savings that are at best unlikely given that kind of generosity. This lets Sanders claim that he could make it work with much lower middle-class taxes than would probably be needed in practice.

To be harsh but accurate: the Sanders health plan looks a little bit like a standard Republican tax-cut plan, which relies on fantasies about huge supply-side effects to make the numbers supposedly add up. Only a little bit: after all, this is a plan seeking to provide health care, not lavish windfalls on the rich — and single-payer really does save money, whereas there’s no evidence that tax cuts deliver growth. Still, it’s not the kind of brave truth-telling the Sanders campaign pitch might have led you to expect.

Again, as noted by Prof. Krugman this plan does not add up. Sanders proposed savings are hypothetical and unrealistic

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gothmog (Reply #10)

Fri Jan 29, 2016, 11:29 AM

16. Let's see your hypothetical figures which will show the savings of Bernie's plan to be unrealistic.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cal33 (Reply #16)

Fri Jan 29, 2016, 11:42 AM

17. As opposed to the grounded in reality claim that

 

The Sanders plan will save more on prescription drugs than is spent yearly?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mythology (Reply #17)

Fri Jan 29, 2016, 01:54 PM

18. "The Sanders plan will save more" is also based on hypothesis, but I gave my figures

 

supporting that hypothesis. Would you also come out with your figures?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cal33 (Original post)

Fri Jan 29, 2016, 02:10 PM

19. Economists think so too! And the Physicians for a National Health Plan!

 

www.PNHP.org

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread