2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHere's 13 minutes of Hillary Clinton contradicting herself and lying.
It is beyond me how her supporters can engage in such active denial.
This is not made-up propaganda, it's Hillary vs Hillary proving she'll say anything - true or not - to get elected.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)Arazi
(8,781 posts)Very damning
6chars
(3,967 posts)polly7
(20,582 posts)Questioning someone on their record isn't being 'attacked' any more than an employer going through history and references on an applicant's resume. Don't the people whose futures and lives are so affected by those they vote to put in office have the right to know where someone actually stands???
So strange.
MauriceLawrence96
(48 posts)it is footage of her caught lying.
Time and time again.
You can choose to ignore it if it makes you feel better.
6chars
(3,967 posts)Karmadillo
(9,253 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)TCJ70
(4,387 posts)...attacks don't usually have video to back them up. This is video evidence of wishy-washiness that will come back to bite her in the GE. It's also the reason she won't win unless Trump is the Republican nominee.
frylock
(34,825 posts)ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...but the rest of us are bending under the burdens placed upon us.
dsc
(53,341 posts)One you get Bosnia, so that is one for you. Two, on marriage equality, Sanders did the same, exact precise thing as did O'Malley so they are all even. Sanders is on tape opposing it in 2006 for Vermont and didn't favor it until his state enacted it with no help from him. O'Malley also initially opposed it. The emails I see no lie there. Even if you believe all of the lying GOPers I still see no lie. The issue seemed to me to be if the state department actually kept the emails she sent to other state department employees which they apparently didn't. But emails she sent to them and those they sent to her would have been on department servers which is what she said. She didn't say that they kept them or didn't keep them. BTW doesn't that mean we wouldn't have these emails at all but for her decision to use her server instead of theirs assuming Gowdy isn't a big fat liar. The NAFTA thing also seems a stretch. Publicly she had to support Admin policy and that was pro NAFTA she is saying she fought against it within the Admin.
thesquanderer
(12,921 posts)Not that I've seen. He talks about how he supported civil unions (Vermont passed that in 2000), but I"ve never heard him oppose same sex marriage. (Many SSM supporters also supported civil unions... supporting the latter doesn't mean you're against the former.)
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)Would have loved her to be on some truth serum drug when he asked that.
"Why yes, Anderson, I would in fact say anything to get elected. This is what makes me a great candidate! Some even say I'm a genius!"
