Why is Andrea Mitchell predicting an Iowa Democratic legal challenge?

[Skwmom]

http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/01/msnbcs-mitchell-predicts-democratic-legal-challenge-over-iowa-results-video/

[NowSam]

1. She believes it will be too close to call.

[Schema Thing]

3. I thought Iowa had proportional allotment?

[brooklynite]

2. Because it's an exciting "hook" for future newscasts.

[wyldwolf]

7. drama = ratings

[Contrary1]

16. Yep. Seems to be the way things are done now...even at the local level. n/t

[riversedge]

4. Because she is silly and makes stuff up

[kristopher]

5. No, she's been nervously saying that all day.

Hillary is up to no good.

[Skwmom]

9. I just saw her mention it this morning. n/t

[valerief]

6. Because Mrs. Greenspan wants to ensure her candidate wins the caucus. nt

[riversedge]

8. Why do you post OP's from vile RW sites?? Shameful.

[Skwmom]

10. I saw her say it this morning. That was the link I found.

[riversedge]

14. Then post what was said --not a RW site.

[demwing]

11. Because she thinks Bernie might win

And wants to cast "pre-doubt"...

[fleur-de-lisa]

12. Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT

On Mon Feb 1, 2016, 09:04 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

Why is Andrea Mitchell predicting an Iowa Democratic legal challenge?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511111069

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Right wing rag trash website.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Mon Feb 1, 2016, 09:14 PM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Yes, it's a right wind website. But let the readers decide its merit.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: So sick of this
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I think the question is whether the article is referring to a fact or not. Not what the publication the article is in. If the alerter had given evidence that the info was purely made up I'd vote for a hide. Otherwise this just seems like alert stalking.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: This is a rightwing mag.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Hey alerter, I really don't care where the poster got the link. This post is a legitimate question. Leave it alone.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: This is abuse of the alert system, and a waste of members time.

[left-of-center2012]

13. Some people alert over any little thing

[SidDithers]

15. Why are you posting a link to Tucker Carlson's website?...nt

Sid

[oasis]

17. Oh what a tangled web we WEAVER.

[kristopher]

18. Did she know about the staffing problem?

Sounds like a reasonable question to ask.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511117888