"They"??

[SusanCalvin]

Uh, Andrea (note, no "Mrs. Greenspan&quot - who is this "they" of which you speak? It took me four or five sentences to figure it out.

Oho - so the Clinton campaign (not Hillary herself) did kinda, sorta declare victory, and we go from that to "sigh of relief"?

I'd find it amusing, if the fate of the world didn't hang in the balance.

Yeah, I didn't provide a link, but I hope I've provided a coherent description. Network, MSNBC. Time, 11:10 or so Central.

[Empowerer]

1. Methinks that whichever Clinton staffer declared victory to Andrea Mitchell has already gotten a

pretty good talking to.

That was a stupid thing to do. And Hillary did not repeat the mistake in her remarks, which were clearly not a victory speech.

I still think it likely that she'll end up ahead. But the campaign rep should never have said that.

[SusanCalvin]

2. Yep. Super-dumb move. nt

[Babel_17]

3. I noticed she was pretty incoherent

She had a lot to say, much of it nuanced, and very little time to prepare. Context can help only so much, I couldn't discern her specific points.

[Empowerer]

5. I thought she was quite eloquent.

Ear of the beholder . . .

[SusanCalvin]

8. Well, as I said,

It took me 4-5 sentences to figure out who the heck "they" was. (If you're talking about Andrea Mitchell.)

[Babel_17]

9. She was on more than once

She even looked self conscious about being flustered the time I'm thinking of.

[Iggy Knorr]

7. Her 2am booty call is Alan Greenspan

maybe cut her some slack near the end of the evening....

[ornotna]

4. She seemed a bit flustered

and confused.

[SusanCalvin]

6. OMG, it was nuts.

You call this journalism, even on the fly???