Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Irony doesn't get much better than this - the Libertarian candidate for President (Original Post) hedgehog Sep 2012 OP
Don't they do this every election cycle? Wounded Bear Sep 2012 #1
What is the irony, exactly? tama Sep 2012 #2
Maybe something like SoapBox Sep 2012 #3
I have debated RW libertarians many times. tama Sep 2012 #4
Actually SoapBox Sep 2012 #5
It is also possible tama Sep 2012 #6
fine, but they oppose all regulation of commerce including anti-trust regulation. Warren Stupidity Sep 2012 #7
Not all regulation tama Sep 2012 #8

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
3. Maybe something like
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 12:25 PM
Sep 2012

Ron Paul, railing against government all the time but...

he's been SUCKING a living off of it since the early 70's!

 

tama

(9,137 posts)
4. I have debated RW libertarians many times.
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 12:36 PM
Sep 2012

Their argue that monopolies and trusts of crony capitalism are created by government regulations and restrictions in the first place. I have many disagreements with them, but that is a point I concede.

 

tama

(9,137 posts)
6. It is also possible
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 01:38 PM
Sep 2012

to agree to disagree and still be friends. I very much disagree with us-against-them mentality...

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
7. fine, but they oppose all regulation of commerce including anti-trust regulation.
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 01:42 PM
Sep 2012

The fact that monopolistic practices occurred in this country the last time we had a gilded age and required a reform era that introduced for the first time federal laws to prevent and dismantle these monopolies, monopolies that developed in exactly the sort of minimal government system they advocate, is entirely lost on them.

 

tama

(9,137 posts)
8. Not all regulation
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 02:01 PM
Sep 2012

they are very much in favor of regulation that protects the notion private capitalistic property. Which of course is regulation of commerce. But they are generally very confused on that matter, and very quickly degrade to blather about "god-given" or "natural" rights in defense of capitalistic private property, together with fantasies of violence.

IMO the problem of regulation to protect capitalistic property cannot be solved with additional regulations, which creates new and more complex problems without solving the initial problem. Which is why I'm libertarian communist, not libertarian capitalist.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Irony doesn't get much be...