What Sectors of the Private Economy Does Sanders Approve of?
He rails against the oil and gas industry, wants to eliminate the entire private insurance industry, break up the big banks, raise taxes on wall street speculation, and more generally speaks of corporate America with a derisive sneer. Not to defend corporate America at all, but while Sander's interest in economic justice and his hatred of the "billionaire class" is very clear, his views about how wealth is actually generated and how economic growth happens are very, very unclear. In an interview back when he first announced h said the following:
In interview with CNBC way back in May, Sanders said the following:
HARWOOD: If the changes that you envision in tax policy, in finance, breaking up the banks, were to result in a more equitable distribution of income, but less economic growth, is that trade-off worth making?
SANDERS: Yes. If 99 percent of all the new income goes to the top 1 percent, you could triple it, it wouldn't matter much to the average middle class person. The whole size of the economy and the GDP doesn't matter if people continue to work longer hours for low wages and you have 45 million people living in poverty. You can't just continue growth for the sake of growth in a world in which we are struggling with climate change and all kinds of environmental problems. All right? You don't necessarily need a choice of 23 underarm spray deodorants or of 18 different pairs of sneakers when children are hungry in this country. I don't think the media appreciates the kind of stress that ordinary Americans are working on. People scared to death about what happens tomorrow. Half the people in America have less than $10,000 in savings. How do you like that? That means you have an automobile accident, you have an illness, you're broke. How do you retire if you have less than $10,000, and you don't have much in the way of Social Security?
The guy really does seem like he wants to convert the US Economy into a European economy. Many European economies have very large safety-nets, far less economic inequality, and higher marginal tax rates, and a broader range of taxes -- think things like VAT gasoline taxes, etc. But European economies are, for the most part, far less dynamic than the US economy, with much lower growth.
It's not an unreasonable thing to want to trade economic growth for economic justice. But personally, I want an economy that is both just and dynamic. A just economy without growth would not be a pretty sight. You think unemployment is bad at times in America, compare historical rates of American unemployment with historical rates of unemployment in much of Europe. Not a pretty picture. On the other hand, a growing economy without justice is not a pretty sight either. It concentrates more and more in the hands of fewer and fewer.
But call me naive, I want a political economic vision that promises to reconciles economic dynamism and social justice. That's what democrats should be standing for. We shouldn't be poo-pooing growth in the way that Sanders does. In America, which has been long distinguished by its economic dynamism, that's a losing proposition. It's no basis for a revolution. It's a basis for defeat.
Growth matters. Justice matters. We democrats can deliver both. To say that we can't have both and that we have to chose between them is a false dichotomy.
= new reply since forum marked as read
'nuf said..... 
and sneakers. Is that wrong? 
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.