Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Hukdonfonix

(56 posts)
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 05:13 PM Oct 2012

Can we agree now that Rubio is "it" for 2016?

Rubio avoided the VP pick like the plague.

Rubio will have 8 years of experience in the Senate by 2016.

When Romney loses... it will be the "fault" of the mainstream Repubs who nominated him. I guaran-damn-tee you that the next Repub candidate will be a Tea Bagger and NOT Jebbie.

It's Rubio... Rubio/Haley 2016

59 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Can we agree now that Rubio is "it" for 2016? (Original Post) Hukdonfonix Oct 2012 OP
No. Jeb Bush is the republican candidate in 2016 as a sane republican(his words not mine) graham4anything Oct 2012 #1
Sorry I don't buy it. Hukdonfonix Oct 2012 #10
Hillary will be there, if she is called. Her past four years have matured her in the eyes cr8tvlde Oct 2012 #15
the repudiation of Mitt AND MORE IMPORTANT- Ryan(who looks like an idiot this year) graham4anything Oct 2012 #22
McCain was a moderate to them too Ter Oct 2012 #25
You do realize that "they"(the tea party) are not the real power graham4anything Oct 2012 #45
I concur - the Bushes DID expect Hillary to be in from 2009-2016, and always intended for 2016 blm Oct 2012 #51
I agree with everything you say and all Ter Oct 2012 #52
I think the same thing powergirl Oct 2012 #17
Not ¡Jeb! ? tanyev Oct 2012 #2
I disagree, wholeheartedly. longship Oct 2012 #3
Disagree away...but this is just harmless speculation from political junkies on the internet. cr8tvlde Oct 2012 #18
Not if President Romney is running for re-election... regnaD kciN Oct 2012 #4
I actually just outsideworld Oct 2012 #50
Oh, that would be precious . . . fleur-de-lisa Oct 2012 #5
Rubio is about to be notched down along with his buddy Rep. David Rivera flamingdem Oct 2012 #6
I was just going to type that. Rubio, for all purposes, is pretty much over in FL politics..n/t monmouth Oct 2012 #21
Doesn't Rubio have some skeletal remains in his closet? nm nc4bo Oct 2012 #7
Watch out for his right jeb left on green only Oct 2012 #8
Bet its Jeb for the Repubs and Warner for the Dems Thrill Oct 2012 #9
If Bachmann or Newt had won the nomination... Hukdonfonix Oct 2012 #11
A lot can happen in four years. I'm not assuming anything The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2012 #12
vs. Clinton/Castro ? cr8tvlde Oct 2012 #13
Lets get this straight... Hukdonfonix Oct 2012 #14
And if any of them, plus Texas, just squeak by Red, the forces will rev up cr8tvlde Oct 2012 #19
I prefer: Rubio is the future loser of the 2016 election Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2012 #16
We're not winning three in a row Ter Oct 2012 #24
yes we are Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2012 #30
Wanna bet? Ter Oct 2012 #53
Yes.. One million dollars. In my view, Obama will turn things around and there will be zero Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2012 #57
Because the last time Democrats won three or more presidential elections in a row was 1948 Ter Oct 2012 #58
Rubio is only a consideration if you think he is 'Hispanic' and 'Hispanics vote in blocs' grantcart Oct 2012 #20
My son works in Miami Sekhmets Daughter Oct 2012 #27
Exactly! He's Cubano, not Mexicano! sammytko Oct 2012 #39
No shot Ter Oct 2012 #23
Good...Dems will take the WH for the third straight election Sekhmets Daughter Oct 2012 #26
empty suit! hrmjustin Oct 2012 #28
It could be Bush- Rubio KaryninMiami Oct 2012 #29
Well, the GOP believes minorities vote out of race loyalty Scootaloo Oct 2012 #32
The tea party would puke at that ticket Ter Oct 2012 #54
No, we were certain Palin was "it" for 2012. Scootaloo Oct 2012 #31
Let's not forget another Florida pol DonCoquixote Oct 2012 #33
Historically, in the primary era, the GOP Proud Public Servant Oct 2012 #34
Don't forget. The Supreme Court appointed Bush. He didn't actually win. doccraig67 Oct 2012 #49
Rubio/Haley 2016--I get sick at even the thoughts of it! Auntie Bush Oct 2012 #35
No, its Jeb. HooptieWagon Oct 2012 #36
Rubio is an overrated lightweight. BlueStater Oct 2012 #37
Jeb/Rubio... too obvious. n/m Rosco T. Oct 2012 #38
Republicans will not put a minority at the head of the ticket. tjdee Oct 2012 #40
Rubio has birther issues. And remember Mel Martinez? They said same shit about him. smorkingapple Oct 2012 #41
No offense to you, but who cares? We've got two big elections before then to deal with. n/t gkhouston Oct 2012 #42
yes, it could be someone firmly controlled through their alec created state government politicans Sunlei Oct 2012 #43
I'm hoping its Romney again. fun n serious Oct 2012 #44
+1! Cha Oct 2012 #47
You greatly overestimate the ability of the GOP to overlook race. MjolnirTime Oct 2012 #46
Rubio's race is white Ter Oct 2012 #55
not till this race is over Danmel Oct 2012 #48
Jeb will kill or destroy Rubio first. sofa king Oct 2012 #56
I tend to agree with this assessment - TBF Oct 2012 #59
 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
1. No. Jeb Bush is the republican candidate in 2016 as a sane republican(his words not mine)
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 05:17 PM
Oct 2012

It will be Jeb vs. Hillary.

forget anyone else.

Rubio won't even be in any office by then, neither will most of the 2010 winners who only won because the democrats didn't contest it properly

Jeb has cleared the deck.
(and republicans will never nominate a minority.)

 

Hukdonfonix

(56 posts)
10. Sorry I don't buy it.
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 05:28 PM
Oct 2012

Let me start by saying I believe Hillary (and I was a Hillary supporter in 2007-2008) when she says she's done with Politics when she retires next year.

Number two, I'm not sure if you realize it or not... Rubio was elected in 2010. And a Senate term is 6 years. Rubio WILL be in office until then.

Number three, Romney is seen as a squishy middle of the road moderate. Why would the Pubs nominate another one in 2012? The failure of Romney is a failure of a Jebbie too.
The Repiglican will stand up in righteous indignation Wednesday Morning in November and say "See!! We told you!! A genuine Conservative will win given the opportunity".

cr8tvlde

(1,185 posts)
15. Hillary will be there, if she is called. Her past four years have matured her in the eyes
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 05:50 PM
Oct 2012

of the Democrats and muted her enemies. Bill Clinton did not just give the best speech of his life just for Obama...make no mistake, he was reminding everyone of the Clinton name and power. And Bill has redeemed himself with his non-partisan non-profit.

Jeb, I think, like Hillary, will step forward if "asked". They both have skeletons...heck, they might even agree to keep it out of the gutter for once. Now that would be a quid pro quo I could cheer for.

The two American political families...it would be a real race.

 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
22. the repudiation of Mitt AND MORE IMPORTANT- Ryan(who looks like an idiot this year)
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 08:14 PM
Oct 2012

means the tea party will be totally repudiated so someone not associated with either Mitt or the tea party.

Jeb comes off as a sane person to the republicans(and more important-he can go in there saying he knows how to win, and his family knows how to win. And Florida and Texas are two states the repubs need to keep(and Texas will be turning blue soon enough, and Florida will be blue this year.)

Jeb for some reason has very high ratings, is seen as someone who does want to do something about immigration(because heknows the repubs need to enlarge their base) and Rubio is not known.
And with Mitt so repudiated, the Bush's bad news will be old news to the republicans who vote in the primaries(we already know Jeb is bad, but that doesn't matter to republicans.)

The whole primary changes made a few weeks back at their convention were all helpful to Jeb(a known entity, and horrible to any upstart).

And Jeb has a book coming out in the next six months(on education I believe, his subject)

so beware and re-read Paul Waldman's Fraud to remind oneselves about how the Bush's do things over and over and over again

As to Hillary, read past posts of mine, no politician in their right mind says they are going to run until they do. And Hillary don't need to enter at the earliest late 2013, and really she don't need to enter officially til Dec. 2014 or mid-winter 2015.
(all she needs to do is make sure all the other democrats don't run and then run unchallenged ).

And it will be a woman President in 2016. Time is due. And Hillary by far is the single most qualified candidate of either sex, and no woman (except maybe Michelle, but if she ever runs herself, it won't be in 2016. (I would prefer they put both Obama's on the Supreme Court, wouldn't that be something.)

 

Ter

(4,281 posts)
25. McCain was a moderate to them too
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 08:50 PM
Oct 2012

They complained. What did they do in 2012? Nominated another one.

 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
45. You do realize that "they"(the tea party) are not the real power
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 01:51 AM
Oct 2012

and the tea party is as welcome to "real" republicans as much as they are to us.

The rightwing extremists like Rand and Ron and all the other nut jobs are not part of the republican power.

The Bush's control the party, have for 40 years, and just because WE the democrats don't like their politics doesn't mean they still don't control it within the power (people be damned.)

Look at the royal treatment Bush41 gets, (just this weekend, he was all over tv on the Ryder Cup sidelines, all the players bowing down to him and his son W who was there (and pearl based Barbara.)

If you think the Bush name is really tarnished, you are beliving the hype.

And remember another thing- Rush Limbaugh himself has not won on any issue of his in what? 25 years? Ever? They are just big mouth pieces.

Meanwhile Karl Rove kept getting what he wanted by winning the lower offices for future use
and systematically attempting to repudiate the extreme right, same as the right was repudiated when Goldwater/Miller set them back a few years.

It is a inner-party struggle, and if you think George W. Bush did anything wrong to what his own plan was, you are mistaken. Everything that happened from 2000-2008 was on his plan and what he wanted.

Then he left the next president 8 years of cleaning up, so that they can do more and more the following 8 years.

It's a chessmatch, games are long (in years) and not everything today is apparent til tomorrow comes.

Trouble is, Obama plays chess better than 41 or 43, and our key is to prevent 45 from being Bush,Jeb, because the repubicans would vote for him, running as a "winner" with the family background to prove it.
And the Bush family (around for decades, profiteers for who knows how long(WW2 at least),
will continue to make billions.

Ask yourself another question-as bad as the times are supposedly to the republicans, how many dollars did the Bush family as a whole lose from 2008-2012. How many dollars did Mitt Romney lose in those years, while he yaps about how bad it has been, has he or anyone he knows had it bad? And ask Mitt(with a lie detector going), would he vote for Jeb Bush if Jeb were running, or would he vote for Rand Paul?

And ask a regular republican blue collar worker, how much worse Rand would be over Jeb.
At the end of the day, Jeb will get half the repubs while Rand would get at most 10%, maybe a little more than his father did because he is better looking and younger and has a voice that doesn't sound like he inhales helium, but not winning numbers. And ask yourself why a blue collar worker that is racist and would never vote for a black president or a woman, why would they vote for a darker skinned Cuban named Rubio (who quite possibly would have his own birther problem to them?)

No way a republican would actually vote for Rubio(or Jindal or the others.)
(If they would, McCain would have won with Sarah, however even most republicans felt Sarah was not qualified, and all her polling showed and told her not to run in 2012, but to keep going for the commercial success she discovered.

So remember- "they" that complains the loudest is the Bush's, who want the deck cleared for Jeb. (that is the reason Ryan was picked and looks so incompetent that he cannot give any one any real facts about his ideas- so that he is repudiated, as are all other tea party people so that one of the teaparty folk don't get anywhere near the nomination four years from now.

May the democratic party and Hillary be strong enough to stop Jeb.
Because the republicans won't stop him, being that they actually like him, and the nomination is his for the asking.
(I am convinced he also could have been nominated this year, but I am also convinced going in Jeb planned it just as I said here, and that to the Bush family, 8 years is not too long to sit back and count the money then re-start it again to make it even more in 2016, should the democrats fracture and not come together with the strongest candidate and not some way to the left person who might have great ideas conceptually and be a great person, but is marked as a flake by the right and like McGovern gets whipped in the general.)
(look how easy Tim Russert finished any hope of say Dennis Kucinich back in 2008.)

blm

(114,658 posts)
51. I concur - the Bushes DID expect Hillary to be in from 2009-2016, and always intended for 2016
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 09:56 AM
Oct 2012

to be Jeb's ascension.

That is why I know BushInc won't rig the voting machines en masse for Romney - they probably will for some senate and congressional seats, though.

Too many people still don't 'get' the Bush family and the fascist cronies who surround them. It all goes so much deeper than most realize. BCCI report is a great place to start that info-load.

 

Ter

(4,281 posts)
52. I agree with everything you say and all
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 12:16 PM
Oct 2012

But I also see it slowly changing. In 2008 there just weren't enough anti-police state tea baggers in the House, Senate, and Governors. 2012 there are many more. Look at the NDAA vote in the Senate. It passed what, 87-13? Many of those 13 "No's" were newly elected Republicans. Same think with the Patriot Act. It renewed, but last year in the House 30+ Republicans voted to strike it down. Many were freshmen. 2016 may swing even more to weed out the establishment. Rand Paul may take this one all the way to the White House.

powergirl

(2,393 posts)
17. I think the same thing
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 05:54 PM
Oct 2012

Jeb vs. Hillary

And can't use Rubio as VP because they are both from Florida

longship

(40,416 posts)
3. I disagree, wholeheartedly.
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 05:25 PM
Oct 2012

Why is anybody worrying about 2016? We have a minor detail of the 2012 presidential election. And a Senate to hold and a House of Representatives to regain. And that all happens in about four weeks, not four years.

We will have four years to argue over the Democratic and Republican 2016 nominees, neither of which we will know for another three years or more.

So, forgive me for disagreeing.

cr8tvlde

(1,185 posts)
18. Disagree away...but this is just harmless speculation from political junkies on the internet.
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 05:55 PM
Oct 2012

Frankly, this one is becoming pretty much a shoe-in. What we need to do now is shout out the the registration/election/etc. fraud up front and center so the MSM have something to fill in their 24 hour time with. Massachusetts and Wisconsin, the home states of the Rs are going Democratic...some over 50%.

regnaD kciN

(27,643 posts)
4. Not if President Romney is running for re-election...
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 05:25 PM
Oct 2012

In other words, GOTV!

We can wait to speculate about 2016 until November 7th.

outsideworld

(601 posts)
50. I actually just
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 09:38 AM
Oct 2012

Lol'd not because its not possible but because speculation of all this is going to be useless if we dont win the election within 35 days

fleur-de-lisa

(14,704 posts)
5. Oh, that would be precious . . .
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 05:26 PM
Oct 2012

his 2010 fund-raising irregularities should knock him out of the race pretty quickly!

I really think the TP is on its way out, although it may take a few years for them to become totally irrelevant. When the repukes lose the presidential campaign, the Senate majority and some key congressional seats in November, they will be forced to take a hard look at the nutjobs who have taken over the party. Perhaps the TP assholes, the religious zealots, and the racists should split off and form their own nutcase party?

flamingdem

(40,899 posts)
6. Rubio is about to be notched down along with his buddy Rep. David Rivera
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 05:26 PM
Oct 2012

He owns a house with Rivera and both enjoy using their party credit cards for personal purchases among other things. Of course Rivera is involved with something far worse which will require a certain quantity of singing to the Feds to save his own hide, we can always hope he implicated Rubio.

monmouth

(21,078 posts)
21. I was just going to type that. Rubio, for all purposes, is pretty much over in FL politics..n/t
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 06:15 PM
Oct 2012

left on green only

(1,484 posts)
8. Watch out for his right jeb
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 05:28 PM
Oct 2012

By 2016, the rube will be back in Cuber charmin the women folk with his forked tongue.

cr8tvlde

(1,185 posts)
13. vs. Clinton/Castro ?
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 05:38 PM
Oct 2012

I agree he wants the pick. But the Rs two candidates from the South? and a Cuban Hispanic? I wonder if the Tea Party can carry them, especially with Florida likely going Blue in 2012.

For the Ds, Hillary plus Bill Clinton's magic...and Julian Castro plus his twin and big credentials in Texas/Southwestern Hispanics... going to be interesting, to say the least, especially if Colorado, Arizona and Nevada turn Blue this year. More of a Southwestern/West Coast bloc than the actual number of electoral votes. And Texas with favorite son(s), and Ohio filling in a northern/northeastern bloc...

The House 2014 will surely be a clue.

 

Hukdonfonix

(56 posts)
14. Lets get this straight...
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 05:50 PM
Oct 2012

If Florida, Colorado, Arizona and Nevada all go DEM this year there IS NO Repiglican party in 2016.

cr8tvlde

(1,185 posts)
19. And if any of them, plus Texas, just squeak by Red, the forces will rev up
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 06:03 PM
Oct 2012

to take over in 2014. My sense is that the Democrats ...and the electorate ... will be ready for 2010 payback/reboot.

The Southwestern Hispanics are on "native ground" and are a force just learning political effectiveness.

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
57. Yes.. One million dollars. In my view, Obama will turn things around and there will be zero
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 02:14 PM
Oct 2012

reason to switch parties

Why are you so negative about it?

 

Ter

(4,281 posts)
58. Because the last time Democrats won three or more presidential elections in a row was 1948
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 06:02 PM
Oct 2012

Plus presidents aren't usually as popular in their second terms because they move from the middle and alienate them. We'll see though. It almost happened in 2000. Hell, there's a good chance it did happen in 2000, with the Florida fiasco.

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
20. Rubio is only a consideration if you think he is 'Hispanic' and 'Hispanics vote in blocs'
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 06:13 PM
Oct 2012

The fact is that there is real animus between Cuban-Americans and Hispanic-Americans because CA, like Rubio, have never given a damn about undocumented workers, if they are here they automatically get visas. Hispanic Americans resent the special treatment Cubans get and resent even more the fact that CA never express solidarity.

That is why he wasn't picked for VP, he only appears strong among those that aren't more familiar with the under currents of the Hispanic community.

Sekhmets Daughter

(7,515 posts)
27. My son works in Miami
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 08:52 PM
Oct 2012

Cuban Americans do NOT believe they are Hispanic! When he first told me that I couldn't stop laughing....

 

Ter

(4,281 posts)
23. No shot
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 08:45 PM
Oct 2012

Rand Paul takes this all the way to the White House. No way an NDAA supporter can win anything by 2016. Republicans are turning against it. He's a fake tea bagger and FR knows it.

KaryninMiami

(3,073 posts)
29. It could be Bush- Rubio
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 08:56 PM
Oct 2012

With Jeb's Hispanic wife and Rubio being Rubio- the GOP could see this as the way to win the Latino vote and serve the tea party.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
32. Well, the GOP believes minorities vote out of race loyalty
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 09:19 PM
Oct 2012

The GOP are racists, and racists always assume everyone else is, too.

They should look at the sort of black support their black candidates get; very little. it's not the race, it's the ideas the candidate has, and no matter the color, all of the GOP ideas are bad.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
31. No, we were certain Palin was "it" for 2012.
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 09:17 PM
Oct 2012

Four years is like two decades, politically. We'll have to wait until 2015 to get a glimmer of the field ahead.

DonCoquixote

(13,961 posts)
33. Let's not forget another Florida pol
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 09:20 PM
Oct 2012

As much as Joe Scab gives me Hives, he is someone that can distance himself from the Tea Party and Mitt Romney. He also has a built in podium, which I think he is already using.

Proud Public Servant

(2,097 posts)
34. Historically, in the primary era, the GOP
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 09:35 PM
Oct 2012

likes to test-drive its candidates and so nominates previous losers. Romney, McCain, Dole, Daddy Bush, Reagan -- all took a run at the nomination and lost before getting it on the second go-'round. W is the only exception. They might break tradition again, but that's the pattern -- and if they stick with it, my money's on Huckabee.

Auntie Bush

(17,528 posts)
35. Rubio/Haley 2016--I get sick at even the thoughts of it!
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 09:37 PM
Oct 2012

I couldn't stand it...hate then both...but especially Haley. I couldn't stand to listen to him so I'd only hear half the election. But that's OK...I don't need or want to.

tjdee

(18,048 posts)
40. Republicans will not put a minority at the head of the ticket.
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 11:34 PM
Oct 2012

Never gonna happen.

They might do a VP thing, to like, appeal to Hispanics, but I find it EXTREMELY hard to believe that large chunks of the Republican faithful will want another "other" as President.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
43. yes, it could be someone firmly controlled through their alec created state government politicans
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 12:22 AM
Oct 2012

The Governess and state politicans wouldn't be in their offices without that corporation doing the work for them.

People may notice by then they will need a Federal Gov to save them from their State and local Gov.

 

Ter

(4,281 posts)
55. Rubio's race is white
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 12:22 PM
Oct 2012

He's a Caucasian of Cuban descent, and even the most filthy white nationalist would not have a problem with that. It's his positions on immigration that would bother the far-right.

Danmel

(5,778 posts)
48. not till this race is over
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 03:19 AM
Oct 2012

Dont want to jinx anything by the sin of presumption.

(or as we say in Yiddish- kenahora)

sofa king

(10,857 posts)
56. Jeb will kill or destroy Rubio first.
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 12:33 PM
Oct 2012

Just think for one moment about the fact that the Shrub Administration had to lie and cover up every single day of their reign in order to keep themselves from prison.

Law and precedent prevents President Obama from throwing open the books on the Bush Administration, but the next President can do it. If half of what I think is in there hasn't been perfectly wiped, then dozens of Republicans will have their careers and their lives utterly destroyed. Fraud, financial crimes, document destruction, election theft, murder, mass murder, they are potentially open to all of those charges if those records ever see the light of day.

Jeb Bush is going to kill or destroy anyone who gets in his way in 2016. His party, his life, and his family depends on it, and he doesn't give a fuck if some Cuban is more popular.

TBF

(36,678 posts)
59. I tend to agree with this assessment -
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 06:09 PM
Oct 2012

I used to think they'd run Rubio this time but then the skeletons came falling out of his closet (and who better to rattle that closet than the Bush/Rove machine)? I think it'll be Jeb.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Can we agree now that Rub...