HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Retired » Retired Forums » 2016 Postmortem (Forum) » Secretary Clinton, It IS ...

Fri Feb 5, 2016, 07:11 AM

Secretary Clinton, It IS Really Easy.. RELEASE THE DAMN TRANSCRIPTS!

Who is in charge Madam Secretary? You or the Wall Street cronies, Moguls and Hedge Fund Managers to whom you were speaking?

We, The American People... have been patient....

Bernie Sanders has been exceedingly ... patient...

You are determined to be President... (Bucket List?)

RELEASE THE DAMN TRANSCRIPTS!!!!

15 replies, 1178 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 15 replies Author Time Post
Reply Secretary Clinton, It IS Really Easy.. RELEASE THE DAMN TRANSCRIPTS! (Original post)
CorporatistNation Feb 2016 OP
CorporatistNation Feb 2016 #1
PonyUp Feb 2016 #2
CorporatistNation Feb 2016 #4
bigwillq Feb 2016 #3
CorporatistNation Feb 2016 #5
Fuddnik Feb 2016 #6
polly7 Feb 2016 #8
Nonhlanhla Feb 2016 #7
Empowerer Feb 2016 #10
TheSarcastinator Feb 2016 #11
Empowerer Feb 2016 #12
Empowerer Feb 2016 #9
ViseGrip Feb 2016 #13
Empowerer Feb 2016 #14
CorporatistNation Feb 2016 #15

Response to CorporatistNation (Original post)

Fri Feb 5, 2016, 07:14 AM

1. If You Don't Know The Status of The Transcripts,Then WHO Does?

So get to it forthwith and ... RELEASE THE DAMN TRANSCRIPTS!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CorporatistNation (Original post)

Fri Feb 5, 2016, 07:16 AM

2. Who's in charge of Madam Secretary? I saw one of her charges from Goldman Sachs in audience. n/t

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PonyUp (Reply #2)

Fri Feb 5, 2016, 07:18 AM

4. There Ya Go...

The ESTABLISHMENT IS FIRMLY IN CHARGE OF... MADAM SECRETARY...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CorporatistNation (Original post)

Fri Feb 5, 2016, 07:18 AM

3. Cut it out

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to CorporatistNation (Original post)

Fri Feb 5, 2016, 08:59 AM

6. Just saw Lee Fang (Intercept) on Democracy Now.

He said one speech was specifically tailored to a Goldman Sachs audience, where she stated she was against all this populist "reign in the banks and Wall Street stuff".

Release the transcripts Hillary. Just what do you tell banksters behind closed doors?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Fuddnik (Reply #6)

Fri Feb 5, 2016, 09:06 AM

8. This.

She was up here being paid by two Big Banks who were major pushers of the Keystone XL just before announcing her running for president. Did she talk about our banking system? ... that's doubtful. She gave other speeches paid by Chambers of Commerce as well, all across the country where she was reported to have stressed Canada's need to be vigilant against terra. I guess she forgot Canadians died in the worst areas of Afghanistan from the beginning of it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CorporatistNation (Original post)

Fri Feb 5, 2016, 09:02 AM

7. You all sound like rightwingers

demanding Obama's college transcripts.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to Empowerer (Reply #10)

Fri Feb 5, 2016, 09:18 AM

11. why do you have such a problem with honesty and transparency

and smear those who simply want the truth available.

Your scam is showing.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TheSarcastinator (Reply #11)

Fri Feb 5, 2016, 09:22 AM

12. You're not interested in honesty and transparency

You're interested in a political club to use against Clinton.

As I noted, no matter what she does won't satisfy you people. First of all, the transcripts probably aren't hers to release because she probably never created any and if her hosts did - and that's a big IF - the release would have to be done by them. It's been 12 hours since she was asked about them. Why do you think they should have been released by now?

Second, you know good and well that if transcripts are released and no one finds a smoking gun in them, that won't be seen as any exoneration. It will just be further "proof" of her supposed "corruption" - the absence of any incriminating information will be assumed by y'all to be the result of a coverup.

You know that. I know that. And I'm sure that she knows that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CorporatistNation (Original post)

Fri Feb 5, 2016, 09:16 AM

9. How do YOU know it's that easy?

You are assuming that she has the transcripts. But I don't know of any speaker who keeps transcripts of their speeches (prepared texts, yes, but not transcripts). Transcripts, if they are done, are done by the hosts. She probably had no idea last night if there are transcripts or who has them, so she would have been insane to say, "Sure, I'll release them," since they probably aren't in her possession and aren't hers to release.

But, of course, none of that will matter since the very fact that someone said, "release the transcripts" will now lead to months of "WHY HASN'T SHE RELEASED THE TRANSCRIPTS?! IT'S BEEN 24 WHOLE HOURS SINCE IT FIRST CAME UP. WHAT'S SHE HIDING!"

"SHE RELEASED THE TRANSCRIPTS BUT THEY DON'T INCLUDE ANYTHING WE CAN USE AGAINST HER SO SHE MUST HAVE ALTERED THEM!"

"SHE RELEASED THE TRANSCRIPTS BUT THEY DON'T INCLUDE ANYTHING WE CAN USE AGAINST HER SO SHE DIDN'T RELEASE ALL OF THE TRANSCRIPTS!!"

Followed by years of:

'WHERE ARE THE REST OF THE TRANSCRIPTS?!?!?!"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Empowerer (Reply #9)

Fri Feb 5, 2016, 06:08 PM

13. In her contracts she controls them, she keeps them, no videotaping or recording. No copies.

 

It's all up to her! She'll look into it......

I want the Monsanto speech....she has their big lobbyist now running her campaign and THIS is never discussed here.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ViseGrip (Reply #13)

Fri Feb 5, 2016, 06:43 PM

14. You have access to her contracts?

If there are no recordings or videotaping, then there's no transcript ...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CorporatistNation (Original post)

Fri Feb 5, 2016, 07:26 PM

15. Ever Hear of A "Court Reporter?" That Is Where The Transcripts Come from...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread