Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

WillyT

(72,631 posts)
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 12:59 PM Feb 2016

Let THIS Headline Sink In... 'Poll: Hillary Clinton And Bernie Sanders Are Tied Nationally - CBSNews

Poll: Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders are tied nationally
Rebecca Shabad - CBS News
February 5, 2016, 10:40 AM

Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders are now virtually tied nationally, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released Friday.

The poll, which was conducted in the two days after Monday's Iowa caucuses, found that 44 percent of Democratic voters support Clinton and 42 percent said they back Vermont's independent senator. Eleven percent said they are undecided.

In the last poll conducted in late December, Clinton was leading against Sanders 61 percent to 30 percent.


Link: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/poll-hillary-clinton-and-bernie-sanders-are-tied-nationally/







173 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Let THIS Headline Sink In... 'Poll: Hillary Clinton And Bernie Sanders Are Tied Nationally - CBSNews (Original Post) WillyT Feb 2016 OP
While still in bed this morning, turned on the tv and was greeted by this headline. jillan Feb 2016 #1
Clinton still ahead by 2 points HassleCat Feb 2016 #2
Do you not grasp the concepts of margin-of-error and "statistical tie"? kath Feb 2016 #7
Yes, I do HassleCat Feb 2016 #34
This message was self-deleted by its author bvf Feb 2016 #123
Friends don't let friends use the phrase "statistical tie"... PoliticAverse Feb 2016 #52
By the same token, Bernie outperforms Hillary against Trump, Rubio & Cruz by 5 points. reformist2 Feb 2016 #11
Withn the margin of error. CentralMass Feb 2016 #17
Clinton down by double digiits since Bernie was seen on the NATIONAL STAGE. Wait 'till after sabrina 1 Feb 2016 #33
^ This. AzDar Feb 2016 #39
Indeed!!! And they're responding Plucketeer Feb 2016 #62
I wondered about that also. but yes, OWS was the first sign that the citizenry were aware sabrina 1 Feb 2016 #63
100% agree Plucketeer Feb 2016 #71
You always seem to nail it. I don't even have to write anything, I just need to follow you rhett o rick Feb 2016 #109
I couldn't agree more with you and Sabrina more… tex-wyo-dem Feb 2016 #121
+1000! Nt tex-wyo-dem Feb 2016 #120
You are right about Bernie's motivation and impact, Sabrina senz Feb 2016 #128
"The difference between a politician and a public servant." HUGE difference. senz Feb 2016 #125
That has always been the way I have seen Bernie. pangaia Feb 2016 #126
Yes, he chose public service as the best available means to live out his ideals. senz Feb 2016 #130
Kenny G is a schlock soprano sax player. pangaia Feb 2016 #131
lol, great Bernista minds think alike. senz Feb 2016 #133
Man, your story is almost a dupe of Dorkzilla, :>)) pangaia Feb 2016 #150
Well that's an honor. :) senz Feb 2016 #165
I found it.. shots of the percussionists... pangaia Feb 2016 #170
Thank you so much for the video. I was referring to live performances senz Feb 2016 #171
GREAT questions.. pangaia Feb 2016 #172
A couple of our classical musicians senz Feb 2016 #173
I am also an admirer of jazz-especially smooth jazz Duckfan Feb 2016 #137
I heard all thjose guys in the city when I was "coming of age." pangaia Feb 2016 #149
lol, he had his back turned the time I saw him, too, and I felt hurt by it senz Feb 2016 #166
That's why they ignored him. in_cog_ni_to Feb 2016 #75
The more who know him, the more support him. Duval Feb 2016 #94
Reducing a 30 point gap to 2, in 6 weeks. HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #40
Bernie has obviously plateaued Mnpaul Feb 2016 #122
You can tell there's an earthquake happening. HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #127
Read about margin of error! Nt Logical Feb 2016 #155
See my response above HassleCat Feb 2016 #163
Mm. I predict that Larry Wilmore will be doing another "interview with Clinton staffer" winter is coming Feb 2016 #3
Those skits are priceless! beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #10
That was one of the funniest skits I've ever seen! n/t JimDandy Feb 2016 #91
It was! Here's the video in case some haven't seen it yet: beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #92
Good idea. More people need to see this. It is so spot on! JimDandy Feb 2016 #98
"if that's your position then I will talk only to white people..." cui bono Feb 2016 #100
I don't buy it. cali Feb 2016 #4
I can't wait for Super Tuesday to be over hack89 Feb 2016 #5
You can start getting concerned. Le Taz Hot Feb 2016 #16
So Bernie has pulled even in every Super Tuesday state? hack89 Feb 2016 #18
Said no one but you . . . Le Taz Hot Feb 2016 #22
But you implied the state polls are changing. hack89 Feb 2016 #26
Not all polls are external polls. Le Taz Hot Feb 2016 #29
Did you see the latest Boston Globe poll on New Hampshire? hack89 Feb 2016 #30
Link please nt dorkzilla Feb 2016 #49
Sure hack89 Feb 2016 #55
Yeah I got it off the website dorkzilla Feb 2016 #58
You didn't read the entire thread did you? A Simple Game Feb 2016 #117
A link for a STRAWMAN? That's a new one. rhett o rick Feb 2016 #110
How can the race be even nationally hack89 Feb 2016 #111
STRAWMAN argument means that you put forth a defence for an argument that rhett o rick Feb 2016 #112
So you agree he is still behind in the Super Tuesday states? hack89 Feb 2016 #113
Those 2 things will likely happen at different times. n/t PoliticAverse Feb 2016 #53
I am sure it will be ugly all the way to the convention hack89 Feb 2016 #57
To be tied nationally Bernie has to be leading in some states. totodeinhere Feb 2016 #134
I am with Nate Silver on this hack89 Feb 2016 #145
I respect Nate but I disagree to a point. National polls if nothing else have a psychological effect totodeinhere Feb 2016 #159
But we do not hold a national primary hack89 Feb 2016 #161
National polls do not reflect a general election demographic. totodeinhere Feb 2016 #162
We will see hack89 Feb 2016 #164
Primaries are all about expectations. If Bernie loses South Carolina but comes closer than totodeinhere Feb 2016 #168
"Rationality" meaning we all love hillary? Nt Logical Feb 2016 #156
No. The end of this Lord of the Flies phase we are going through hack89 Feb 2016 #160
The unstoppable train is having trouble with it's overloaded baggage car. K&R Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2016 #6
Love this! kath Feb 2016 #9
The wheels are starting to come off the train. PonyUp Feb 2016 #15
Looks to me like the train has left the station (sort of). n/t dgibby Feb 2016 #103
while the bridge is being washed out because ChairmanAgnostic Feb 2016 #20
lulz corkhead Feb 2016 #38
Buster Keaton: "The Secretary" Mike__M Feb 2016 #61
Good analogy. I see what you did there... eom Betty Karlson Feb 2016 #90
hehe... cui bono Feb 2016 #102
A little late but neverforget Feb 2016 #115
They lost Hillary's crown on the way to the coronation! Odin2005 Feb 2016 #138
Camp Weathervane will claim it's an outlier. HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #8
Or we can point to the latest NH polls that show Hillary surging hack89 Feb 2016 #31
Yes, she's closing the gap. HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #35
The primaries start and end on Super Tuesday hack89 Feb 2016 #44
Hillary will do well in the Southeast primaries... HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #47
So will Bernie's hack89 Feb 2016 #54
Bernie raised $3m in 24 hrs following Iowa caucus. HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #59
He has no organization hack89 Feb 2016 #60
No organization? HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #64
How many days did he spend in Iowa? hack89 Feb 2016 #65
No more than Clinton. HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #67
Rallies =/= organizing hack89 Feb 2016 #70
Had enough to tie Hillary in Iowa. HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #78
You need to start linking to some state polls hack89 Feb 2016 #80
You have in your last two posts pangaia Feb 2016 #83
That's nice. nt hack89 Feb 2016 #84
Hold On there toothless dragon Feb 2016 #68
Only in the sense that she is not going to run out of money hack89 Feb 2016 #72
They're already running low on money. HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #76
She has more money on hand then Bernie does. nt hack89 Feb 2016 #79
And she's burning through it much quicker. HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #81
She will have all that she needs hack89 Feb 2016 #82
Wall St already cut off Jeb's funding. HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #85
Not in the New Hampshire poll hack89 Feb 2016 #87
Worked really well in 2008. Helen Borg Feb 2016 #143
Obama had a large and effective organization in place early hack89 Feb 2016 #146
Bernie has been setting up a large and effective organization in place as well. Helen Borg Feb 2016 #147
There is no evidence of it hack89 Feb 2016 #148
Bullshit. NH doesn't have to be a tie with Bernie having been SO far ahead, and he lives next door. RBInMaine Feb 2016 #118
where? Rosa Luxemburg Feb 2016 #157
Kicking and bouncing for Bernie!!! PonyUp Feb 2016 #12
So, since I have all the Hillary cheerleaders on Ignore, Le Taz Hot Feb 2016 #13
Nah, they're busy trumpeting the one where Clinton is only down by 15 in NH. jeff47 Feb 2016 #21
"Only down by 15 in NH." Le Taz Hot Feb 2016 #23
'Tis just a scratch" n/t PonyUp Feb 2016 #41
OvertimePolitics Robbins Feb 2016 #46
As in Iowa, Le Taz Hot Feb 2016 #48
Don't for get Poland! catnhatnh Feb 2016 #97
k&r krawhitham Feb 2016 #14
It's a brand new day. dreamnightwind Feb 2016 #19
This is why you never let anyone else tell you what "reality" is AZ Progressive Feb 2016 #24
What worries me... Helen Borg Feb 2016 #25
Looks fine and dandy SheenaR Feb 2016 #27
Let this sink in - Boston Globe-Suffolk University New Hampshire Poll-Sanders 50% Clinton 41% hack89 Feb 2016 #28
OMG did anyone predict this would happen? FlatBaroque Feb 2016 #32
That's amazing ... Considering ... Trajan Feb 2016 #36
omg. Holy wtf I didn't see that coming. Cheese Sandwich Feb 2016 #37
We'll see more donations and more big endorsements Rosa Luxemburg Feb 2016 #158
If you listened to Hillary supporters... jham123 Feb 2016 #42
K&R the electorate can see through HRC's lies and ties to interests that harm the 99% amborin Feb 2016 #43
Of course now polls are meaningless Lordquinton Feb 2016 #45
Can you imagine the Shitstorm that's raging right now at Weathervain Central.....? Indepatriot Feb 2016 #50
As people hear his message they usually turn into a supporter! Dustlawyer Feb 2016 #51
K & R! TIME TO PANIC Feb 2016 #56
Is this Sanders' real honest-to-goodness ceiling? shawn703 Feb 2016 #66
I hear they're 'reality-based'.... HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #73
Wait... have we plateaued yet? kenfrequed Feb 2016 #69
Like sinking into UglyGreed Feb 2016 #74
Can you say outlier poll FloridaBlues Feb 2016 #77
Kicked and recommended! Enthusiast Feb 2016 #86
Those polls never matched what was on the ground in my city. JimDandy Feb 2016 #88
K&R. No wonder Clinton was so angry last night. JDPriestly Feb 2016 #89
Obama lacked the passion to fight them. Utopian Leftist Feb 2016 #107
Nailed It billhicks76 Feb 2016 #116
It is said that after the 2008 election, strategery blunder Feb 2016 #140
And he will continue to pull ahead of her... SoapBox Feb 2016 #93
K&R! Brings a smile! nt Duval Feb 2016 #95
K&R n/t warrprayer Feb 2016 #96
That makes sense katmondoo Feb 2016 #99
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #101
What I love in that poll is that it also shows Sanders does better against the GOP. basselope Feb 2016 #104
Our day will come . . . Utopian Leftist Feb 2016 #105
I love it. nt Live and Learn Feb 2016 #106
Oh, The Misogyny! Warren DeMontague Feb 2016 #108
Wow That Was Fast billhicks76 Feb 2016 #114
They do. hifiguy Feb 2016 #119
Remember when "certain individuals" were shoving polls down our throats daily? senz Feb 2016 #124
Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! avaistheone1 Feb 2016 #129
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2016 #132
Here is the thing that the Clinton camp does not want to hear. Bernie's recent surge has much to do totodeinhere Feb 2016 #135
CBS reporting on the Quinnipiac poll. Beacool Feb 2016 #136
Reuters/Ipsos also reporting similar numbers. HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #139
Chelsea got it right a couple days ago madokie Feb 2016 #141
That is how Chelsea lost Helen Borg Feb 2016 #142
Probably worse madokie Feb 2016 #144
Kicketty Kickin' Faux pas Feb 2016 #151
Yep she's peaked Rosa Luxemburg Feb 2016 #152
She is losing PATRICK Feb 2016 #153
Yes!!! Nt Logical Feb 2016 #154
This is such a happy thread I could hug it. senz Feb 2016 #167
Good to know. nt LWolf Feb 2016 #169

jillan

(39,451 posts)
1. While still in bed this morning, turned on the tv and was greeted by this headline.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 01:03 PM
Feb 2016

What a way to start my day!!

 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
2. Clinton still ahead by 2 points
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 01:03 PM
Feb 2016

So they're not tied. Sanders is still making progress, though. Iowa definitely helped him, and his debate performance gave him a little boost. Things are definitely looking better every day.

 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
34. Yes, I do
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 01:35 PM
Feb 2016

There is really no such thing as a statistical tie. A poll is an estimate, and a 52-48 result could be 57-43 or 47-53. Either way, the same candidate is ahead, because you have to look at the range of possibilities, and how those possibilities are distributed within that range. That means Clinton is ahead in this particular poll because it indicates she is more likely to win. Of course, all the polls showed Clinton with a comfortable lead in Iowa, so there is a definite possibility the polls are not accurate, in spite of being able to cite a specific margin of error. That's what I think, and I believe Sanders will defeat Clinton.

Response to HassleCat (Reply #34)

reformist2

(9,841 posts)
11. By the same token, Bernie outperforms Hillary against Trump, Rubio & Cruz by 5 points.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 01:06 PM
Feb 2016

Except those numbers are outside the margin of error!

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
33. Clinton down by double digiits since Bernie was seen on the NATIONAL STAGE. Wait 'till after
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 01:34 PM
Feb 2016

NH. All he ever needed was for the people to get to know him.

 

Plucketeer

(12,882 posts)
62. Indeed!!! And they're responding
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 02:34 PM
Feb 2016

I had worried for years that the citizenry at large couldn't tell the difference between a politician and a public servant. Looks like I need not worry any more. They CAN differentiate between the two.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
63. I wondered about that also. but yes, OWS was the first sign that the citizenry were aware
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 02:37 PM
Feb 2016

of the difference which is why they so brutally tried to crush it. But the citizzenry had no National Voice to get behind, until now. THAT is why, imo, Bernie ran for the WH. In fact he said so. All his work in the Senate could not overcome the Corporate controlled Congress so he decided to get on the National stage himself and give the people a voice.

I will be forever grateful to him for making that sacrifice for US. Because I really do not think he wanted to do this.

 

Plucketeer

(12,882 posts)
71. 100% agree
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 02:56 PM
Feb 2016

And also your view of OWS and it's failing. I've wondered more than once, what MIGHT HAVE developed if that event had nominated some one soul to speak their collective minds. Would it have incited our own "Wall Street Spring"? We'll never know. I only hope that WHEN president Sanders takes office, the snowball just keeps rolling and rolling and.....

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
109. You always seem to nail it. I don't even have to write anything, I just need to follow you
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 08:59 PM
Feb 2016

around (not in a creepy way) and say "I agree with sabrina".

Esp this: "I will be forever grateful to him for making that sacrifice for US. Because I really do not think he wanted to do this." I wish I still had his speech he gave when he was making up his mind. He acknowledged that it would be a great risk to him personally and his family to run for president. That hit me hard. We were asking him to put himself and his family at risk for us. I feel we owe him huge for that.

tex-wyo-dem

(3,190 posts)
121. I couldn't agree more with you and Sabrina more…
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 11:11 PM
Feb 2016

We owe Bernie a huge amount of gratitude! I don't think that he wanted to run at first, but when Warren did not run I think he felt he had to.

He said his greatest fear was running for president and that no one would respond to his ideas and message. Well that's been disproven in a most dramatic way

On a less positive note, I do fear her his and his family's safety. He is taking on some seriously powerful figures in this world, and they are not going to give up power quietly.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
128. You are right about Bernie's motivation and impact, Sabrina
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 12:51 AM
Feb 2016

one could hear his reluctance/ambivalence as he approached the idea on the TH show. I think the massiveness of the public response surprised even him. At some point, he must have realized his time had truly come.

I do worry that people are not ready to carry on if, for whatever reason, he can't/doesn't continue. Certainly awareness is up but we don't quite have a movement yet. But it's closer than it's been since the 60s/70s.

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
126. That has always been the way I have seen Bernie.
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 12:41 AM
Feb 2016

He is a public servant whose trade, or means to serve, is through politics.

And he is very, very good at his craft. He is like the difference between Miles and Kenny G.


 

senz

(11,945 posts)
130. Yes, he chose public service as the best available means to live out his ideals.
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 01:14 AM
Feb 2016

His dogged persistence despite years being ignored, dismissed, and belittled by many in the Congress and Senate speaks to his complete loyalty and faith in basic principles.

Bernie is very good at what he does, knowledgeable and professional without being the least bit full of himself.

I've heard of Kenny G but can't quite recall any of his music at present, however my first jazz album was Kind of Blue, and although I've acquired several more Miles' albums, riffs from pieces in KoB still go through my mind at odd moments. It was a classic.

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
131. Kenny G is a schlock soprano sax player.
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 01:32 AM
Feb 2016

My reference came from this post I made a few days ago in reply to Dorkzilla about jazz. etc.. The actual quote is from a FB friend of mine..


I stole that Kenny G idea from a FB friend. I don't want to link to his wall but Under photos of Bernie and Hillary there were 2 quotes..

"Jazz is an underappreciated art form. Now you can quote me on this, and I hope I'm wrong, but there will never be another era like there was with Miles Davis, John Coltrane, Charles Mingus, and the great Duke Ellington."


"I love it. I really do. It's not Christmas until I put on Kenny G's Christmas album."

I grew up the '50s and '60s in North Jersey listening to Miles, Coltrane, Monk, Dizzy, Basie, Getz, and on and on. I was never a great jazz musician, more classical, but good enough to have played with Gary Burton, Lew Soloff, Dick Halligan, Dick Lowenthal and a few others...


And you know what is funny,.. DORKZILLA was talking about Miles and her boyfriend the jazzer AND Kinda Blue!!
Am I freaking out here??

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
133. lol, great Bernista minds think alike.
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 02:02 AM
Feb 2016

Glad to know I haven't missed anything w/Kenny G.

My jazz-loving friend introduced me to Miles, Mingus, Monk, Coltrane, Sonny Rollins, Dizzy, and others, a wonderful education punctuated with performances by Miles, Mingus, Coltrane, Sonny (all in SF), Monk (at UCLA) and Dizzy (at a venue on the beach called The Lighthouse.) I had no idea how much this guy was giving me at the time. That entire era, including the writers and poets, was amazingly intense and intelligent, high artistic integrity.

You're fortunate to be a musician, pangaia; I don't have any ability but have always admired it in others. It's one that has always seemed "a gift of the gods." What instrument(s) do you play?

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
150. Man, your story is almost a dupe of Dorkzilla, :>))
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 12:41 PM
Feb 2016

I feel I was so lucky to be born when I was, 1943.. and growing up in the '50s '60s. Only looking back do I realize what a special time it was. the good, the beautiful, the difficult and the sad...

Vietnam, '68 Demo convention
I went to JFK's funeral. I was in Memphis when MLK was assassinated...

I worked a bit at STAX. Played for Issac Stern, Pablo Casals... etc etc,,
I heard/saw the originals when they came out of-- Sgt Pepper, Surrealistic Pillow, Easy Rider, etc etc... After seeing Easy Rider I went to a "DRIVE IN." YUP ! A triple feature. Three biker flicks.. ready for this? One with Peter Fonda, one with Jack Nicholson and one with Dennis Hopper !!!
I still have my 'stereo system' from the '70s... Thorens, Marantz, McIntosh and Klipschorns.. and my first tape recorder...an old Wollensack. :&gt ))

I am a percussionist/timpanist. or was-- "retired."

A third of the kids in my HS Band studied with players in the NY Phil. A couple violinist in the orchestra even studied with Ruggerio Ricci. His ex-, Ruth Ricci, was the string teacher! Little did I know.

jeeze, that was long.


 

senz

(11,945 posts)
165. Well that's an honor. :)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 04:09 PM
Feb 2016

Pretty sure she's quite a bit younger than me, but we have a few things in common, and she's a fave.

I'm in your generation, pangaia, also retired, but my career wasn't nearly as exciting as yours. You've had the honor of working with some very big names in what were undoubtedly exciting performances. It must have been a wonderful experience. Speaking as a non-musician, percussion has always looked like the most fun because who, as a kid, didn't love to bang on things, lol. It's so natural. When watching classical performances that give only a few scattered minutes to the percussionist, I always wonder what the percussionist is thinking during all the non-percussive parts of the performance. The percussive sound always grabs everyone's attention, probably wakes up those who were snoozing. The best, most extended percussive performances I've heard have been in contemporary classical music - a huge pleasure. Your NY HS band sounds truly exceptional.

I heard the originals when they came out, too, and used to adore Drive Ins. Saw Easy Rider with the man whom I eventually married and what impressed me most was the performance of the actor who played the southern lawyer. Kept saying, that guy has a great future in acting!

The record player part of my old stereo system has long been, along with some very worthy vinyl, in non-air conditioned storage, so the vinyl is probably ruined.

Thanks for sharing some of your interesting experiences, pangaia!

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
170. I found it.. shots of the percussionists...
Sun Feb 7, 2016, 07:30 PM
Feb 2016

You are right TV directors have zero clue about camera shots. The percussionists might be the only people moving and they show, for the 49th time, a shot of the trumpets. Of course I am partisan.

Same thing happens in baseball.. all those super-duper close ups of the pitcher's nose hair, the batter blinking,. on line drives they follow the ball instead of the players... blechk

Well, here is one performance where the camera work is a little better than usual.. especially toward the end. Mahler 1st Sym., last Mvt,.. Dudamel and the L.A. Phil in Walt Disney Hall..



What do we do when not playing? Well depends... on the percussionist, the circumstances, rehearsal or performance. etc... in rehearsal it could be anything from going out for a beer, hanging backstage, sitting there preparing, or, me- sitting there and studying the score. ( Almost nobody does that.)

In concerts, one has to stay 'in the music.' or SHOULD..


In the better orchestras, the timpanist is often the 2nd, 3rd or 4th highest paid player, after the concert master and principal horn, sometimes the principal trumpet.The job is a lot harder and more important than it might look. :&gt )



 

senz

(11,945 posts)
171. Thank you so much for the video. I was referring to live performances
Sun Feb 7, 2016, 08:20 PM
Feb 2016

but the video you found shows everything close up, a real treat. Exciting performance; my ex father-in-law was a huge Mahler fan. I'm not very knowledgeable but was naturally attracted to Baroque and New Music and also enjoy early music, mainly Renaissance. Have never been a big fan of the romantics except, of course, Beethoven.

Watching the video raises all kinds of curiosity questions, like, what happens if an excited violinist elbows (or worse, bows) the person next to them? What if you need to scratch your nose? Do musicians feel competitive with one another or is it mainly a joy to be working in concert? Do musicians react to how well or badly the other musicians are playing? Do musicians ever dislike the conductor? Do they have to watch the conductor even after many rehearsals? And something else I've long wondered: does the concert master act superior to other musicians?

Just wondering what it's like. You certainly don't have to answer if you don't feel like it.

Your approach of staying put and staying with the music probably made your performances better. It must have been really nice playing with an orchestra.

Did you know that there are at least a couple of other classical musicians among DU Bernie supporters?

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
172. GREAT questions..
Sun Feb 7, 2016, 08:32 PM
Feb 2016

I think I will PM you, as I will have to create a word doc so I can edit little by little to answer it all. :&gt ))))

Glad to..

I assume there might be other classical musicians but don't know who they are.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
173. A couple of our classical musicians
Sun Feb 7, 2016, 08:42 PM
Feb 2016

are commenting toward the bottom of this ridiculous thread:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511129430

I'd known about one, a clarinetist, as shown in her sig. It's kind of cool to have y'all around.

Duckfan

(1,268 posts)
137. I am also an admirer of jazz-especially smooth jazz
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 02:37 AM
Feb 2016

But you must be fond of that dude in the movie Jerry McGuire who plays the brother of the girl he starts dating. If you remember he gave Cruise that cassette tape of an only recording of Miles and Coltrane together. I think back on that scene and the dude was so serious about the session being pure gold in the studio.

But I lost interest in MD after I found out what kind of musician he really was i.e. playing to an audience with his back turned to them.

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
149. I heard all thjose guys in the city when I was "coming of age."
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 12:20 PM
Feb 2016

Then I moved away, slid away from playing jazz.. Then I went to visit my sister in La in... whenever it was. We went to a Miles gig. I hadn't seen him in forever. And he was playing with his back to the audience. It was kind odd putting, Kinda blue, actually. :&gt But....
It was hi bebop day and just after that I knew and kept with me...
 

senz

(11,945 posts)
166. lol, he had his back turned the time I saw him, too, and I felt hurt by it
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 04:27 PM
Feb 2016

because we were physically near him. It seemed extremely unfriendly and rejecting. I later heard that he had an intense dislike of white people and assumed that was why he did it. Well, I can understand why PoC dislike whites; they have every right to. But it could also be that Miles found it difficult to concentrate when facing an audience. Van Morrison, a deeply musical person, also turned his back to the audience at times, but it always looked like he was so completely enthralled that he forgot everything else. There's something beautiful about losing yourself in what you're doing. It's one of nature's free highs. Seems a distinctly genius thing to do.

in_cog_ni_to

(41,600 posts)
75. That's why they ignored him.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 03:02 PM
Feb 2016

They knew people would love him and they do!

PEACE
LOVE
BERNIE

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
40. Reducing a 30 point gap to 2, in 6 weeks.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 01:46 PM
Feb 2016

I'll take it. Sanders can keep getting millions of $30 donations to continue to fight. Clinton can't go back to her $2700 donors and ask for more.

winter is coming

(11,785 posts)
3. Mm. I predict that Larry Wilmore will be doing another "interview with Clinton staffer"
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 01:03 PM
Feb 2016

segment on Monday night's The Nightly Show.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
10. Those skits are priceless!
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 01:06 PM
Feb 2016

I love the one where he chugs a bottle of Pepto:

?width=0&height=0&crop=true

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
100. "if that's your position then I will talk only to white people..."
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 05:01 PM
Feb 2016

Can you imagine the Hillarage if Bernie had said that?

When that video came out it became crystal clear that almost all the Bernie/BLM DUraout was not really about race, it was about THE race to the White House. It was mostly just Hillarage.

It's a shame because it's an issue that deserves proper discussion and shouldn't be used as a political football.

.

hack89

(39,181 posts)
5. I can't wait for Super Tuesday to be over
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 01:04 PM
Feb 2016

and rationality is restored to DU.

When the state polls start changing is when I will get concerned.

hack89

(39,181 posts)
26. But you implied the state polls are changing.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 01:23 PM
Feb 2016

certainly you can at least show me those links. Thanks in advance.

Le Taz Hot

(22,271 posts)
29. Not all polls are external polls.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 01:28 PM
Feb 2016

He is coming up in ALL state polls. But it doesn't matter and I'm not going to bother with very searchable links because you are a blind Hillary supporter which means suspension of all reason. I'm not even sure why the hell you're on my screen.

<flush>

Problem solved.

hack89

(39,181 posts)
30. Did you see the latest Boston Globe poll on New Hampshire?
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 01:30 PM
Feb 2016

how does that fit into you meme?

hack89

(39,181 posts)
111. How can the race be even nationally
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 09:17 PM
Feb 2016

if Bernie is behind in all the primary states? If he is still behind in all the Super Tuesday states then the national poll is irrelevant.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
112. STRAWMAN argument means that you put forth a defence for an argument that
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 09:21 PM
Feb 2016

no one presented. No one claimed he "has pulled even in every Super Tuesday state?" So you were asking for a link to show something no one claimed.

hack89

(39,181 posts)
113. So you agree he is still behind in the Super Tuesday states?
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 09:26 PM
Feb 2016

and that the national poll is not reflective of the state of the elections.

totodeinhere

(13,688 posts)
134. To be tied nationally Bernie has to be leading in some states.
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 02:20 AM
Feb 2016

Yes state by state polls are important but nationwide trends are also important. And state polls tend to lag. We don't have recent results in many states that may reflect Bernie's recent surge.

hack89

(39,181 posts)
145. I am with Nate Silver on this
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 10:02 AM
Feb 2016

national polls mean nothing at this stage of the election. State polls are all I look at. It will become clearer over the upcoming days.

totodeinhere

(13,688 posts)
159. I respect Nate but I disagree to a point. National polls if nothing else have a psychological effect
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 01:44 PM
Feb 2016

and can affect the attitude of campaign donors and affect the enthusiasm and commitment of supporters. So yes national polls are important even though the nomination will be decided on a state by state basis.

hack89

(39,181 posts)
161. But we do not hold a national primary
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 01:57 PM
Feb 2016

So national polls reflect a general election demographic that does not accurately reflects who votes in primaries.

totodeinhere

(13,688 posts)
162. National polls do not reflect a general election demographic.
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 02:03 PM
Feb 2016

A general election demographic would include all voters, not just Democrats. But the poll we are discussing here was conducted among only self-described Democrats. I wish I could somehow get it through your head that it's the psychological effect of national polls that is important, not the ability of a national poll to reflect actual results.

The news that Bernie has come from 30 points down to tie Hillary in this national poll is big news. It is being discussed everywhere including here at DU and on the cable news networks. We can be sure that the Clinton campaign is not happy about this although like you they will try to spin it.

hack89

(39,181 posts)
164. We will see
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 02:50 PM
Feb 2016

South Carolina will be the real test for Bernie. A state where POC are key. I doubt that that particular voting bloc is swayed by national polls. If Bernie loses SC then the national polls become irrelevant.

totodeinhere

(13,688 posts)
168. Primaries are all about expectations. If Bernie loses South Carolina but comes closer than
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 05:20 PM
Feb 2016

expected then his campaign can spin it as a moral victory and the result may not hurt his campaign going forward. Where I think the race could be turned upside down is in Nevada. A Sanders victory there would be significant. For Sanders to win the Nevada caucuses he has got to run up a big margin in the north of the state to offset Hillary's popularity in Clark County.

hack89

(39,181 posts)
160. No. The end of this Lord of the Flies phase we are going through
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 01:54 PM
Feb 2016

I would be happy to vote for either candidate in the general election.

ChairmanAgnostic

(28,017 posts)
20. while the bridge is being washed out because
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 01:12 PM
Feb 2016

Wall street refused to pay its fair share in taxes that would fix our nation's infrastructure. They'd rather pay her unbelievably high sums
for a three hour tour. A three hour tour.
The weather started getting rough
the ship began to list
if not for the funding of her wall street pals
the mill would be short of grist.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
102. hehe...
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 05:03 PM
Feb 2016


We need less weight! Oh nm, a bunch of supporters left to get on the Bernie Express. We're good. Um... sort of...

.
 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
8. Camp Weathervane will claim it's an outlier.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 01:05 PM
Feb 2016

However, when it's the same polling outfit that's showing that big a swing, then indeed the tide is turning. Time to send the DLClinton packing.

hack89

(39,181 posts)
31. Or we can point to the latest NH polls that show Hillary surging
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 01:31 PM
Feb 2016

and cutting Bernie's lead to single digits.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
35. Yes, she's closing the gap.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 01:42 PM
Feb 2016

Anything worse than a tie is going to be a huge setback for her. The national polls have tightened up considerably. It's going to be a prolonged primary battle, and Hillary is going to run out of money...her $2700 donors can't donate again. Sanders donors can keep sending in their $30 donations till the cows come home. So Hillary desparately needs a tie in NH.

hack89

(39,181 posts)
44. The primaries start and end on Super Tuesday
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 01:50 PM
Feb 2016

That is when a more realistic Democratic primary voting demographic has their say. That is where Hillary's organization will dominate.

Bernie might hang around to the convention but he will never significantly challenge Hillary when it comes to delegate counts.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
47. Hillary will do well in the Southeast primaries...
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 01:55 PM
Feb 2016

...but the battle will be far from over. Bernie is going to do well in the northeast, rustbelt, and west coast. Hillarys campaign is going to be deeply in debt if she lasts that long.

hack89

(39,181 posts)
54. So will Bernie's
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 02:04 PM
Feb 2016

he has to spend a shit ton of money real fast. That is the problem for him going forward - a lot of primaries in a short time. It takes a large experienced organization to win in such a situation. Bernie does not have that.

The issue is pretty straight forward. Bernie and Hillary will split the white vote while Hillary will dominate the non-white vote. That is what we saw in Iowa. That is a clear path to a Hillary victory.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
59. Bernie raised $3m in 24 hrs following Iowa caucus.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 02:13 PM
Feb 2016

Almost all his donors are under $200. They can keep giving and giving. Plus his campaign is thriftier. Clinton spends a lot on her focus groups, pollsters, hair and clothing, and first class travel for her 100 person entourage. She's going to run out of money in an extended primary battle.

hack89

(39,181 posts)
60. He has no organization
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 02:24 PM
Feb 2016

he may have the money but no time to use it effectively. You cannot create an effective political organization overnight - Hillary has spent years building hers.

The money issue is overblown. She will spend what it takes. She still has more money on hand plus there is the Super Pac money that will easily mean another 60 million dollars of ads and support for her.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
64. No organization?
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 02:38 PM
Feb 2016

He started less than a year ago with no name recognition and no money, polling in single digits 80 points behind Clinton. Now he nearly beat Clinton in Iowa, nearly ties her in latest national poll. He's doing quite well for "no organization". And he has out fundraiser her in January.
Clinton's super PAC money can't be used for her campaign, only ads. At some point, ads become so saturated they actually turn off voters. Media is dying anyway. But in any case, all the ads in the world won't help her if her campaign funds run out.

hack89

(39,181 posts)
65. How many days did he spend in Iowa?
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 02:49 PM
Feb 2016

how many rallies and town halls did he hold?

There was no competition for his time - everything he did was focused on Iowa. Can't do that for the Super Tuesday states. Now you have to have an organization in multiple states and campaign in multiple states. States that are much bigger than Iowa. That is where Hillary's years of planning will win for her. That is where all those endorsements from Democratic office holders will pay off as they campaign for her. Bernie can't do that.

The national poll is not as important as the state polls. For one thing, we do not hold a national primary and that poll reflects a GE demographic. The demographics for Democratic primaries is much different - for one thing the role of POC is much larger in the primaries. That is why you need to look at the state polls. And right now Bernie is not doing well in any of them other than New Hampshire (and even then Hillary has sliced his lead to single digits since Iowa).

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
67. No more than Clinton.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 02:54 PM
Feb 2016

Until January he was holding big rallies all over the country, even since then he hasn't been exclusively campaigning in Iowa. Plus he's still performing his Senate duties...he's only missed like 5% of votes.

hack89

(39,181 posts)
70. Rallies =/= organizing
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 02:56 PM
Feb 2016

the nuts and bolts of getting out the vote is time consuming and requires an experienced organization. Bernie does not have that.

hack89

(39,181 posts)
80. You need to start linking to some state polls
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 03:17 PM
Feb 2016

right now he is in a massive hole. He has yet to show he can win in a state with a significant non-white electorate. Hillary won the non-white vote in Iowa by a large margin. Splitting the white vote with Hillary means she wins.

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
83. You have in your last two posts
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 03:27 PM
Feb 2016

admitted that Hillary has been planning this for years. Since, oh, maybe about 1992..
That is one of the things that sickens me about her.

And then there is all that PAC money you say she can get.. That's another thing that sickens me.



 

toothless dragon

(51 posts)
68. Hold On there
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 02:54 PM
Feb 2016

Money issue over blown?... no its not... if it wasn't for Millionaires for Hillary and Corporate Money Hillary wouldn't be a candidate....

hack89

(39,181 posts)
72. Only in the sense that she is not going to run out of money
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 02:57 PM
Feb 2016

and be unable to compete like the poster I was replying to seems to think.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
76. They're already running low on money.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 03:03 PM
Feb 2016

Bill was wanting to reallocate resources to NH a few weeks ago when Iowa looked doubtfull. Their cash on hand is low, and her donors can't exceed the $2700 they've already given. Sanders has 3 million donors, very few have given the max.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
85. Wall St already cut off Jeb's funding.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 03:32 PM
Feb 2016

Hillary is still losing ground in polls, the 1% expect a better result on their purchase, not losing to a 74 year old Jewish socialist who's capturing voters imagination by storm. Voters are looking for fundamental change, not status quo from an establishment candidate. Both party's elites badly misread the tea leaves of public opinion...or they knew, and figured voters too stupid to figure out the scam.

hack89

(39,181 posts)
87. Not in the New Hampshire poll
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 03:35 PM
Feb 2016

she cut Bernie's lead to single digits in just four days. Besides, once Super Tuesday comes around, Wall Street will feel much better. No way Bernie is going to come out of that the winner. I doubt he will win a single state.

hack89

(39,181 posts)
146. Obama had a large and effective organization in place early
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 10:06 AM
Feb 2016

just another way Bernie is not Obama.

hack89

(39,181 posts)
148. There is no evidence of it
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 10:29 AM
Feb 2016

that's why he went the "hold large rallies every where" route - cheaper and quicker while compensating for a lack of organization.

 

RBInMaine

(13,570 posts)
118. Bullshit. NH doesn't have to be a tie with Bernie having been SO far ahead, and he lives next door.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 10:20 PM
Feb 2016

Last edited Fri Feb 5, 2016, 11:57 PM - Edit history (1)

Le Taz Hot

(22,271 posts)
13. So, since I have all the Hillary cheerleaders on Ignore,
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 01:07 PM
Feb 2016

are they posting this one in all-caps headlines in 2 different forums and a couple of groups? Hmmmm?

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
21. Nah, they're busy trumpeting the one where Clinton is only down by 15 in NH.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 01:12 PM
Feb 2016

From a pollster that completely blew it in IA

Le Taz Hot

(22,271 posts)
23. "Only down by 15 in NH."
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 01:17 PM
Feb 2016

That cracked me up. Rumor hath it that Nevada is starting to look pretty good for Sanders (maybe VERY good but I don't want to jinx it) and he's coming up in Arkansas -- one of her 3 "home" states. He's coming up in South Carolina but I think SC is solidly hers. Super Tuesday will not be a sweep for her and I think there's going to be some surprises.

Robbins

(5,066 posts)
46. OvertimePolitics
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 01:52 PM
Feb 2016

which was one of best on Iowa with bernie having on point lead had a poll of nevada In january with Clinton ahead 45 to 42.That was kind of ignored since they are new but they did very good In iowa on Dem side.they also have her up by 3 In Minnesotta and up by only 5 In Arkansas and here In Missouri.since MSM tends to ignore nevada is after NH first I think nevada could be a real race.
I feel Clinton will probally win SC but if we can make it close that is real victory.

Le Taz Hot

(22,271 posts)
48. As in Iowa,
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 01:55 PM
Feb 2016

there are Californians (and I'm sure other staters as well) swarming to Nevada for the next two weeks. After that, we're planning on ascending to Colorado. Super Tuesday is not a done deal for her. Yes, she will win multiple states and will probably win the majority but she doesn't have all of them and, as I said earlier, I think there will be some surprises. By the way, there's movement in the Nevada polls.

catnhatnh

(8,976 posts)
97. Don't for get Poland!
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 04:34 PM
Feb 2016

Er, Connecticut....4 years at Yale! And Illinois, and Arkansas, and New York, And Washington DC, and Pennsylvania....Hey-since Bernie is "supposed" to win NH because it's "Next to" Vermont, how many adjacent states are supposed to be cakewalks for Hillary???

AZ Progressive

(3,411 posts)
24. This is why you never let anyone else tell you what "reality" is
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 01:17 PM
Feb 2016

Even if they are so called experts. Anything can happen, don't close yourself from all possibilities.

Helen Borg

(3,963 posts)
25. What worries me...
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 01:22 PM
Feb 2016

Is that the status quo candidate has in place a distributed network of loyal people. Even assuming that nobody is intentionally cheating, we all know about unconscious biases. And if you accumulate many of such biases, it can have an effect on the process. It can account for a few percentage points or so.

SheenaR

(2,052 posts)
27. Looks fine and dandy
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 01:25 PM
Feb 2016

But I still think Bernie trails by more nationwide.


In two weeks I would believe this more, as the campaign has begun to do some very smart things volunteer-wise for Super Tuesday and beyond (per a conference call I was on).

Soon the entire country will know both candidates and the nation will decide.

hack89

(39,181 posts)
28. Let this sink in - Boston Globe-Suffolk University New Hampshire Poll-Sanders 50% Clinton 41%
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 01:27 PM
Feb 2016

how big was Sanders' lead four days ago?

 

Trajan

(19,089 posts)
36. That's amazing ... Considering ...
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 01:43 PM
Feb 2016

EVERY deadly pen from every media empire have been hitting the polemical sauce this week, sharpening their quills and penning a wide array of fearful diatribes and cynical declamations ...

Wow, are THEY ever scared ... It's a full bore hatefest in the nation's newsrooms this morning ...

Somebody's got a bone to pick with Mr. Sanders ideas of fairness and regard for his fellow human beings ... They don't like his ideas, apparently ...

The ink is bloody red this morning ...

Time to donate again ...

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
37. omg. Holy wtf I didn't see that coming.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 01:43 PM
Feb 2016

This will energize the Bernie support a lot because that headline is awesome.

Rosa Luxemburg

(28,627 posts)
158. We'll see more donations and more big endorsements
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 01:41 PM
Feb 2016

watch people switch camps from Hillary to Bernie!

jham123

(278 posts)
42. If you listened to Hillary supporters...
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 01:47 PM
Feb 2016

you'd believe that this 50/50 split is actually UNITY within the party

 

Indepatriot

(1,253 posts)
50. Can you imagine the Shitstorm that's raging right now at Weathervain Central.....?
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 01:57 PM
Feb 2016

Oh, to be a fly on the wall....

Dustlawyer

(10,539 posts)
51. As people hear his message they usually turn into a supporter!
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 01:58 PM
Feb 2016

Bernie doesn't have to convince anyone the game is rigged, they already knew that. What they are learning is there is someone that is not bought off, that has a really long history of fighting for equality and against corruption, who is willing to take on TPTB!

Many will be people who stopped voting, got tired of the "lesser of two evils", or just feel that the Democratic Establishment has screwed them over. Bernie gives them hope that they can help to rid our government of the wealthy leaches that have been pulling the strings of our corrupt politicians.

I hope that all of the corrupt politicians, Wall Street power brokers/king makers, the MIC, Big Pharma, oil companies, insurance companies... all shit themselves! They will fight like he'll to retain control over our once Democratic government. It won't be easy, but if we can get Bernie in the White House and stand with him in the inevitable battle to enact Publicly Funded Elections, we can create huge positive changes for our country. Bernie was right last night when he said that nothing in his agenda will get done until we can get the $$$$ out of politics!!!

shawn703

(2,712 posts)
66. Is this Sanders' real honest-to-goodness ceiling?
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 02:51 PM
Feb 2016

Poor Camp Weathervane, never right on anything.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
73. I hear they're 'reality-based'....
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 02:58 PM
Feb 2016

...though I have no idea what planet their base is on.

kenfrequed

(7,865 posts)
69. Wait... have we plateaued yet?
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 02:55 PM
Feb 2016

I definitely recall that we were suppose to plateau last August, or October, or November.

JimDandy

(7,318 posts)
88. Those polls never matched what was on the ground in my city.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 03:50 PM
Feb 2016

Almost everyone I've talked to has been for Bernie for months, so where the heck were they polling before?

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
89. K&R. No wonder Clinton was so angry last night.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 03:51 PM
Feb 2016

Wow! Bernie will be the next president.

My theory of the day: Obama is very loved by all of us. But the Republicans were extremely nasty to him for no reason.

And now, we want a fighter. Someone who will put those Republicans in their places. The idiots. They were so nasty to Obama. Just let them try with Bernie. He will have the internet and the telephone wires into their offices so jammed that they won't know what hit them.

They should never have treated Obama who is a wonderful person so badly. What goes around comes around.

Utopian Leftist

(534 posts)
107. Obama lacked the passion to fight them.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 05:48 PM
Feb 2016

It's true that he handled himself with grace and dignity, at all times, even though the Cons did not.

But had he stood up for single payer or closing Guantanamo or putting Main Street over Wall Street, or any of the other liberal ideas that we hoped he would stand for, they could never have knocked him over.

They succeeded because of two things: 1) Obama didn't fight back and 2) The American Public has the attention span of a gnat (and if one doesn't "fight back," immediately, they assume tacit agreement).

Hopefully you are right and Bernie will be better able to stand up to them. After all, Bernie doesn't represent himself, he represents a grass-roots movement. And behind him stands towering the best ideas of Progressives, many as yet untried....

strategery blunder

(4,225 posts)
140. It is said that after the 2008 election,
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 05:20 AM
Feb 2016

when Obama, having inherited the Wall Street Bailouts, held a meeting with the banksters and told them (and I'm paraphrasing), "You fcked up the economy and now you're demanding that the people you robbed blind hand over more taxpayer money to make good your gambling losses. I'm the only thing standing between you and the torches and pitchforks" when the banksters demanded more, more, more.

Of course, the banksters took their ball, went home, and engineered the 2010 teahadist propaganda. They managed to kick the can down the road for a few years, they thought they had OWS beaten into a pulp, but the anger that Obama tried to warn the banksters about cannot be suppressed forever.

The thing I love about Bernie is I can trust him to follow up on that message that Obama tried to give to the oligarchs years ago.

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
93. And he will continue to pull ahead of her...
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 03:58 PM
Feb 2016

and all of the batshit insane PukeBaggers.

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
119. They do.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 10:22 PM
Feb 2016

They are sick to the teeth of the status quo of plutocracy and War Forever Everywhere. And no one represents that more vividly than HRH, at least among non-Republicans. Well, maybe the gormless and useless DWS. That I will grant.

Response to WillyT (Original post)

totodeinhere

(13,688 posts)
135. Here is the thing that the Clinton camp does not want to hear. Bernie's recent surge has much to do
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 02:23 AM
Feb 2016

with growing support in minority communities. The more they get to know Bernie the more they like him. Much of Hillary's previous minority support was about name recognition.

madokie

(51,076 posts)
141. Chelsea got it right a couple days ago
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 05:23 AM
Feb 2016

when she slipped and said President Sanders

I'm sure mother has taken her to the wood shed on that one too

Rosa Luxemburg

(28,627 posts)
152. Yep she's peaked
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 12:48 PM
Feb 2016

I had to pinch myself this morning. What wonderful news! This is the most exciting campaign!

PATRICK

(12,396 posts)
153. She is losing
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 12:52 PM
Feb 2016

people who would have jumped ship to other centrist/known stars demonstrating a lack of ability to build voting numbers. Somewhat, but she could still power through a win. That of course is a guess based on whatever signs you also get from how insiders behave because they have better info than the rest of us, public opinion polls up the wazoo notwithstanding.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Let THIS Headline Sink In...