2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumprocon
(15,805 posts)What sort of dastardly plans do think Kissinger and Albright are currently connected with what would be likely to attract women?
jeff47
(26,549 posts)You should be familiar with what makes Kissinger deplorable already.
Albright just made a comment about women going to extra-special-torture Hell if they don't vote for Clinton.
procon
(15,805 posts)dating from January 2015 when they gave testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee on the topic of global challenges and U.S. national security strategy and were interrupted by protesters. What does this have to do your title asserting that "Women Are Lining Up Behind Kissinger and Albright"?
It sounds more like sour grapes in trying to imply there's some secret, nefarious connection between an old, unrelated photo, Kissinger, and Albright's remark in support of Clinton.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)cascadiance
(19,537 posts)... for Bush! It's all interconnected!
Wilms
(26,795 posts)Small world, that new world order.
kath
(10,565 posts)Them" in the sense of giving HK and MA their support.
it was a good play on words!
Wilms
(26,795 posts)I think I struck a nerve.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)PonyUp
(1,680 posts)BuelahWitch
(9,083 posts)chervilant
(8,267 posts)is pretty raw after the debacle in Iowa.
Also, did you see Chelsea's "lapsu linguae"? President Sanders, indeed!
Wilms
(26,795 posts)They're done.
chervilant
(8,267 posts)deja vu...
#NotMeUs
dixiegrrrrl
(60,161 posts)the one about money?
chervilant
(8,267 posts)where Chelsea called Bernie "President Sanders."
dixiegrrrrl
(60,161 posts)where?
when?
and is it on tape for posterity?
dixiegrrrrl
(60,161 posts)Watching her as she speaks and was wondering what she was looking up at, so often.
chervilant
(8,267 posts)Eric J in MN
(35,639 posts)...for how well she ran the State Dept.
Clinton was introduced at a NH event today by Albright, who said that women who don't help each other (vote for Clinton) will burn in Hell.
The OP is making a joke about women lining up behind Kissinger and Albright with a photo of women lining up to protest against Kissinger and Albright.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)a known and wanted war criminal who has the blood of millions on his hands.
That tells me all I need to know about her and then some.
aquart
(69,014 posts)You'd find a criminal conspiracy in Hillary brushing her teeth.
Where she gets the strength and courage to get up every morning and deal with this endless bullshit, I will never know. My admiration grows daily.
Wilms
(26,795 posts)Where did hifi allege a conspiracy?
aquart
(69,014 posts)The talking points have all been geared to guilt by association. It's ugly. Endless and ugly. But it's all you got so you gotta run with it.
After all, your man thinks our biggest threat comes from NK.
Wilms
(26,795 posts)So do sane scientists, plus the Pentagon and CIA. Go figure.
JoeyT
(6,785 posts)I mean, it isn't hard. I can't remember the last time I hung out with or praised a war criminal or had a war criminal praise me. I bet lots of people can't. You don't exactly run into war criminals while you're out buying bread. None of my friends have carpet bombed Cambodia for no good reason.
It isn't all Sanders supporters have got, but when it's a strong enough talking point that alleged liberals are trying to reform the image of Henry Fucking Kissinger because they're so desperate to keep anything from tainting Hillary, it's a pretty goddamn strong one.
You're judged by the company you keep, but apparently Hillary is too good for that. That kind of thing is for the peasantry.
greiner3
(5,214 posts)43's, Jeb!'s grandfather and 41's father Preston Bush was a convicted war criminal. Just sayin
JoeyT
(6,785 posts)A convicted one, I mean.
chervilant
(8,267 posts)OR, you may not have seen Albright's incredibly condescending comment that Theres a special place in hell for women who dont help each other!
Feel the BERN!!!
#NotMeUs
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)Or this little comment from her.
"What's the point of you saving this superb military for, Colin, if we can't use it?"
tazkcmo
(7,419 posts)In a very personal way. These war hawks don't give a crap about the people that die in these wars, ours or the "enemies". It's boots, assets, hardware or any other euphemism that they can use besides People. War is fun and profitable.
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)The women are lined up behind them...holding protest signs.
tecelote
(5,156 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)They have remained vigilant and unyielding in their resistance.
I'm a big fan.
avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)They are amazing.
kas125
(2,483 posts)I've done with them are some of the proudest moments of my life. But I wouldn't say we're courageous, just driven by our consciences to speak the truth when it seems as if most people would rather not even know what's really happening. I think most of them are like me - I can't let horrible things be done in our names without making sure that history records that I was opposed to them.
avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)It not easy and you place yourselves at risk. You and the rest of Code Pink awaken many people's consciences as well.
kas125
(2,483 posts)makes it a lot easier and we always have fun, no matter what we're doing. I've gotten to meet a lot of amazing people that I would have never had the chance to meet without CodePink and done things that if someone had told me 15 years ago I'd do I would have thought they were crazy. It is nice to hear from people who support us; as I'm sure you know, not everyone does - even at DU.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)Well Done.
For those who don't remember, Albright was SoS under Bill Clinton while the Clinton extreme sanctions were imposed on Iraq. Those sanction have been credited with the unnecessary deaths of over 1/2 MILLION innocent Iraqi children.
Albright was asked about the 500,000 dead children on 60 minutes:
"It was worth it."
That statement curdled my blood...1/2 MILLION DEAD innocent Brown children.
I'm not surprised in the least that this woman with the blood of 1/2 MILLION children on HER hands
supports Hillary.
Birds of a feather.... and that includes Kissinger too.
That much blood NEVER washes off.
forest444
(5,902 posts)And to Clinton's credit, he enacted the Oil for Food and Medicine program - which substantially alleviated conditions after taking effect in 1995 (Dubya rescinded Oil-for-Food in 2002).
He could have done more, yes. But it's amazing how many of Poppy Bush's rotten policies the Rethugs have been able to transfer blame for in the public discourse onto Bill Clinton. Clinton was no saint; but the media really did a number on him - usually to the benefit of his predecessor.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)...to recognize bad policy?
He was still president while the Iraqi Children were dying, no matter how you try to rationalize it.
My post was not about Bill Clinton, but Maddy Albright and US Policy.
Do you have anything that will ameliorate Albright's statement on deaths 1/2 MILLION innocent Brown Children?
forest444
(5,902 posts)But Clinton does deserve some credit for Oil for Food & Medicine - which he helped enact over the opposition of much of the media and of course the hysterical fits of the neocons and the entire GOP caucus (especially Jesse Helms). The fact that he helped enact it so close to the next election cycle ('96) was also to his credit, I think.
We may never know how many Iraqi lives Oil for Food saved; but it was no doubt in the hundreds of thousands.
burrowowl
(18,494 posts)instead of continuing this policy.
forest444
(5,902 posts)The Oil for Food & Medicine program is proof of that - and keep in mind that it was enacted over the vitriolic objections of Poppy's criminal neocons and the GOP caucus alike.
Though far from perfect, Iraqi observers were unanimous in their observation that Oil for Food substantially improved living standards in Iraq - which is why Dubya rescinded the program in 2002.
Wilms
(26,795 posts)Hell of a way for a kid yo die. But ya know, "it was worth it".
"Not as bad as..." That's how we wind up with such shitty leaders.
Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)and Albright agreed the sanctions were worth the deaths of half a million Iraqi children.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)and it was a massive failure, enriching Saddam and his henchmen. Very little of the food and medicine made it down to the children and Iraqi People who needed it.
Council on Foreign Relations
IRAQ: Oil for Food Scandal
<snip>
Saddam Hussein exploited the program, earning some $1.7 billion through kickbacks and surcharges, and $10.9 billion through illegal oil smuggling, according to a 2004 Central Intelligence Agency investigation. Wide-scale mismanagement and unethical conduct on the part of some UN employees also plagued the program, according to the UN Independent Inquiry
<more>
http://www.cfr.org/iraq/iraq-oil-food-scandal/p7631
Oil for Food did NOT stop the Iraqi Children from dying, but enriched the profiteers.
It was a massive failure.
The children and vulnerable (everyone not living in a palace) kept dying.
It blows my mind that anyone can rationalize away the miserable deaths of 1/2 MILLION innocent children. That is more children than were killed in Hiroshima, Nagasaki, and the firebombing of Tokyo COMBINED.
forest444
(5,902 posts)Which of course would have been the politically expedient thing to do. Nothing of that scale gets done at the UN without U.S. approval, as you know.
Albright was an unbelievable bitch for rationalizing the deaths of 500,000 Iraqi - or any - children. But do you know when she said that? In early 1996 - just as Oil for Food was being implemented. There's no question it was riddled with corruption; but a "2004 CIA investigation" by its very date and nature almost certainly contains gross exaggerations (the "getting rid of Saddam was the right thing no matter what else happens" narrative).
The deaths referred to in the estimate took place between the imposition of sanctions by Poppy Bush (1991) and, presumably, the end of 1995. Iraq never collected comprehensive statistics the way developed countries do; but the consensus in the late '90s among UN officials and others was that living conditions improved and mortality rates declined substantially. It was far from ideal, of course, but it was a real improvement over prior conditions.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)...that the death rate declined substantially? I have read nothing that supports that.
I already posted a link from Council on Foreign Relations that disagrees,
and my memory of that time was that the so called "Oil for Food" was an unmitigated disaster with very, very little of the medicine and food delivered to its intended recipients,
and, of course, there was the water treatment issue mentioned above.
artislife
(9,497 posts)And we are all getting shat on. I think a lot of politicians only see Black and White and forget about the colors of the rainbow.
I think I have a lot in common with Libyan and Honduran children.
Blood on their hands that will never wash off.
shadowmayor
(1,325 posts)We've been bombing, shooting, burning, starving and hurting the Iraqi people for 25 years now. We destroyed an Arab country that was secular and used to have a brewery. Why are we so inured to this massacre?
Spent OIF3 (2005) or two Thomas Friedman (tell the Iraqi people to suck on this!) units worth of time in Abu Ghraib prison - a festering shit hole if ever there was one. We destroyed their country, devastated the population, and unleashed a civil war from hell.
Half a million little brown-skinned Muslim kids - fuck 'em, they're just Iraqis as they said while I was in Iraq.
Albright and Kissinger should be horsewhipped, forced to walk naked through the town to the gallows. Fuck em' I say, they're just evil government officials!!!
polly7
(20,582 posts)DrBulldog
(841 posts)... when tens of thousands of young American men died because of Kissinger's lies - and incredibly years later he admitted it! But he never had to worry. In the United States we only prosecute OTHER countries' war criminals.
avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)My my! Don't Albright and Kissinger look uncomfortable at that table being confronted for their wrong doing?
Scruffy1
(3,533 posts)leveymg
(36,418 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)hopemountain
(3,919 posts)Last edited Sat Feb 6, 2016, 10:45 PM - Edit history (1)
sacrifice other women's children to the ravages of war? how is that?
this is not the type of woman i consider fit to lead our country. and, no, i do not see the difference in electing a woman who thinks the same as investors in the war machine and maintaining the status quo vs a corporate male puppet who will do the same.
these are the ways hillary votes against the best interests of women & their families:
she supports monsanto gmo foods and poisons & toxins in the food supply for the masses;
she supports wars that offer up the children of the masses for the greed of the corporate war machine;
she is not interested in a living wage for single parents - the majority of whom are women;
she supports the corporate interests to privatize our natural resources which export our resources to china - while fracking, injecting and polluting our earth and the water table - water our children drink with poisons and heavy metals. yes, she is helping the people of flint. that's nice - but, we will see exactly just how much of a force she can be to make a difference there and how she follows up with other environmental crisis regardless of the election outcome;
how is she willing to revamp the costs and financing of education so that when a young person graduates they are not saddled with life crushing debt? her plan offers a pittance of relief and still puts ridiculous amounts of money in the pockets of the banksters and the corporate run education machine;
how much is she willing to do to lower medical costs? is she willing to work to get insurance companies, pharmaceutical companies, and medical providers to negotiate low cost medical care? is she willing to work to overturn legislation which allows these "medical providers" protection from negotiation?
just because she is a woman does not mean she is the woman for the job. i do not see her with the sincere will to right the social, economic and environmental injustices that affect women and families.
it is alarming to see her pandering to women of color and that women are following her solely for the reason that she is a woman. what exactly is she promising them? why are they not seeing what i see?
Uncle Joe
(65,136 posts)Thanks for the thread, Wilms.
snowy owl
(2,145 posts)To tell women that they should vote for a woman just because we are women makes us look like sheep to the slaughter. If there is even one woman out there falling for that, she should be ashamed. That's about as sexist as it gets.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts).
silenttigersong
(957 posts)Recommended.
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)I'll take Code Pink ANYTIME over that Table of Trash.
6chars
(3,967 posts)
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)matter who she admires, her fans adore her regardless of who she admires, who she associates with or what her positions are on issues.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)Fucking criminal. Why is this monster still alive?
bvar22
(39,909 posts)The thought of even being in the same room with that soulless mass murderer creeps me out.
I don't believe in Hell, but thinking of him makes me hope I'm wrong and Dante is right.
I want him to burn in the deepest ring of hell, and take his war mongering pals with him.
