2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumGloria Steinem apologizes.
https://www.facebook.com/GloriaSteinem/posts/10153237059092854
Good for her. No doubling-down or doublespeak: "I mispoke. I apologize."
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)I guess she did not like the blowback she was getting. Notice Hillary did not call out any of her campaigns people like Bernie called out those Bernie bro supporters.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)She took a beating on social media and walked it back.
artislife
(9,497 posts)Her glory days were during the ages she short shifted.
They were fighting for civil rights and against the war.
We are fighting for civil rights(with people getting killed while black and being sent back to certain death) rights and against the wars!
We also have a planet that is in stage 4.
NWProf
(51 posts)The nice thing with being an older person is that you have seen a lot of stuff go under the bridge of life. When Nixon misspoke, Gloria would have been all over him. Nixon would have returned fire and neither would have walked back anything.
The not so nice thing about getting older is that more and more of your friends die and unless you have many activities that introduce you to new ideas, you tend to calcify in your thoughts. Another term for this is the "get off my lawn" syndrome.
The 80 year old Gloria Steinem that I watched on Bill Maher was not the G.S. I idolized in the 1960s. Her reasoning seems to be that because younger women do not follow blindly the Feminist Thought of the 60s and 70s there is something wrong with them. It must be the "follow the boys" to get the boys. The fact that it might be that young women have not been co-opted by the system and are responding to the facts as they see them with no "life experiences" coloring their thoughts, simply never occurs to her.
But I suspect that the real reason Gloria had a change of thought and is attempting to calm things down is that she has a book she is plugging. It is not going to boost sales to have half the target group mad at you.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Instead most Hillary supporters not only didn't object, they agreed with Steinem.
Implying that intelligent young women are hormone crazed idiots just because they support another candidate was beyond the pale.
The apology might soothe most but it won't be forgotten.
Good luck getting those women to support you in the ge, Hillary.
bvf
(6,604 posts)Blowback's a bitch, especially when it comes on the heels of a comment that flies in the face of one's lifelong philosophy.
Madeleine Albright should follow suit, if only for repurposing an otherwise laudable sentiment in order to condemn those who don't support her chosen candidate.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)fbc
(1,668 posts)imo
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)I have a real aversion to the term "mispoke". Additionally "I apologize for what has been misinterpreted"
is sort of a non-apology apology.
JudyM
(29,785 posts)uses the terms "sorry" or "apologize."
Response to fbc (Original post)
m-lekktor This message was self-deleted by its author.
cali
(114,904 posts)She says her comments were misinterpreted.
She didn't say misinterpreted. She said misspoke. Those things are pretty much opposites.
TTUBatfan2008
(3,623 posts)She didn't need to say that part. Just say I apologize. I'm glad she admitted it was a mistake.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)elias49
(4,259 posts)People misinterpret things all the time. We're human. It's the fault of the interpreter.
"Misspoke" is the fault of the speaker.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)first time. This is a bow to public censure. She meant what she said the first time and what about her transgender comments about Caitlyn Jenner?
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)"Sorry you misinterpreted me"
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Good catch on the non-apology
I also hold Ms Steinem to blame for the song "Where the Boys Are" that keeps running through my head.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)cyberswede
(26,117 posts)farleftlib
(2,125 posts)How about "I said something insulting and incorrect and I take it back. I'm truly sorry." That would be an apology.
Farleftlib, your statement would have been a far better statement for her.
Her's is too wishy-washy for me.
I thought it was a contradiction of who she is
onehandle
(51,122 posts)daleanime
(17,796 posts)That it's not possible to disagree with someone you respect. Thanks for letting us know how you feel.
senz
(11,945 posts)Glamrock
(12,003 posts)I love Gloria! I watched her say it and had the same reaction as Bill. Glad she acknowledged she was wrong. It's primary season and people get a little overzealous (I know, not here at DU
). So I'll cut her some slack. I love an idealist who stands by their ideals. Apology works for me.
Empowerer
(3,900 posts)before many DUers parents were even born. She's earned our respect, gratitude, and, yes, some slack. She screwed up and she apologized. Unless anyone here can claim they've never made a mistake or misspoken, they should simply accept her apology graciously and move on. This loop has closed.
Eric J in MN
(35,639 posts)...can understandably cause someone to misspeak, because of the competing needs to be political and to be entertaining.
senz
(11,945 posts)kath
(10,565 posts)statement that could be interpreted in multiple ways. To say it was misinterpreted is utter bullshit.
demmiblue
(39,720 posts)What a shame.
farleftlib
(2,125 posts)I couldn't quite get to the apology part through all the caveats and excuses. She's too smart not to know this.
jillan
(39,451 posts)Gloria Steinem is a true hero. A true fighter.
asjr
(10,479 posts)saltpoint
(50,986 posts)She has shown the Republican candidates what it means to be an adult. It may be setting way too high a standard for most Republicans, but that's no fault of Ms. Steinem's.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)She blames others for "misinterpreting" what she clearly said. The she claims to have "misspoke", a politicians excuse for when they accidentally say exactly what they mean.
72DejaVu
(1,545 posts)Now, how about Susan Sarandon?
farleftlib
(2,125 posts)Why should she apologize?
72DejaVu
(1,545 posts)that women who support Hillary are "voting with their vagina".
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)They admit that Bernie's policies are better but they want a woman in the white house. That's what Susan was referring to.
She never implied that women were hormone crazed idiots like Gloria.
72DejaVu
(1,545 posts)Does it have to be the same to warrant an apology?
Sanders supporters were owed the apology from Steinem. Clinton supporters are owed an apology from Sarandon.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Susan never implied that all women vote with their vaginas.
72DejaVu
(1,545 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)She didn't use a broad brush to tar all supporters like Gloria.
72DejaVu
(1,545 posts)"Vote with your vagina" would be considered an insult by anyone other than Sanders supporters and Gamergaters.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)It's only offensive if you're uptight about the word vagina.
72DejaVu
(1,545 posts)So, I'm a male. If I call Bernie a dick, you won't alert on me, right?
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)In your fictional scenario your calling Bernie a "dick" is like someone else calling Hillary the c-word.
If that's the kind of person you are, go for it.
72DejaVu
(1,545 posts)I'm just trying to find out what the new rules and standards are since the revolutionaries took over.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)But like I said, if that's how you roll please proceed.
I might not alert but someone else probably will.
senz
(11,945 posts)The male corollary to "vagina" is "penis."
Most (but not all) of the alternative terms are used as slurs. "Dick" is most certainly a slur.
Know the difference.
chervilant
(8,267 posts)this quarter, either, but I am adding you to my IL. Buh-bye.
72DejaVu
(1,545 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)And it is entirely truthful
senz
(11,945 posts)Ms. Steinem made the mistake of belittling young women -- something that would have horrified her younger self. She went against her own beliefs, but it was nothing more than a clumsy mistake.
emulatorloo
(46,155 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)Gloria Steinem has a huge backlog of well-earned good will, and she is now over 80, which makes nearly everyone more fallible.
I still love her.
But I do wish she could appreciate the good will that Bernie equally deserves and could fully understand why he deserves it. I would like her to comprehend the beauty of this man. I would like good to know good.
Blue_Adept
(6,499 posts)it's hard to understand how you can get caught up in a moment and say something that just makes sense in your head but comes out completely wrong.
I've run and been involved in a number of panels at conventions for years and you see it regularly and have done it myself.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)On shows where you have folks vigorously trying to oppose you or attack you and see how they would fare.
I'd pay money to see it.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)For those that missed the interview:
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)that interview.
Blue_Adept
(6,499 posts)That's all.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)adversarial interview conditions, contentious and aggressive interviewers who were out to make her look bad were regularly demolished by Gloria when she was the age of the women she now denigrates. She was astonishingly skillful back then under very aggressive inquiry.
She's also a very transphobic person who uses what I think of as hate speech against transgender people. Because of that I do not care for her at all.
She's a fitting endorsement for Hillary really.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Anything to say about what I said about Gloria, in spite of it not being about you? She's got a hideous history of very hateful speech about transgender people. Does that make her a great endorsement to have? I think maybe if you are Ted Cruz, yes.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)imagine what nutty comment most of us might make in that situation.
Empowerer
(3,900 posts)But I also cringed and thought, "Ooh - that's gonna leave a mark ..."
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)However, I am not now, nor have I ever been, a young woman.
sarge43
(29,173 posts)Really? So, it's our fault for not catching the nuance? Sounded to this old bat like the classic sexist cliche of "They only do this to get a husband".
Unfortunately, screws up are remembered long after an attempt at redemption.
"One aw shit wipes out a hundred attaboys."
A Little Weird
(1,754 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)what's been misinterpreted as implying young women aren't serious in their politics
She's still trying to say it was "misinterpreted". It wasn't. It was just a stupid thing to say.
in_cog_ni_to
(41,600 posts)Pissed off a LOT of young (and older) female voters. She said...they're following boys to Bernie.
Here's what she said..
There's no "mismisinterpreted" there. Sorry. She said what she said.
PEACE
LOVE
BERNIE
no_hypocrisy
(54,908 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)I thought it was a terribly funny thing to say. It was so over the top ridiculous and stupid that I couldn't find it in my heart to be offended. I just wanted to say there there Gloria it will be all right, young ladies do have minds of their own and it's okay if many of them don't agree with you these days, you still broke some ground and your legacy will be intact I am sure.
Matariki
(18,775 posts)it was sad to see someone I respect go where she went with that statement. Her apology doesn't really explain her statement, but at least she apologized.
jalan48
(14,914 posts)Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)She always does, and she's said far worse than that. Look it up people
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)think and say in private. She HAD to make an official apology because it was arrogant! and Fuck this "icon" bullshit, nobody is above criticism.
When is DWS going to apologize ? for calling young women complacent ?
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)Albright's analysis of eternal damnation has certainly been interpreted as meaning that women should vote with their vaginas. If that was a misinterpretation, Albright should speak up and explain what she meant, or better yet just retract it.