Mon Feb 8, 2016, 08:21 PM
RobertEarl (13,685 posts)
Yes, Bernie is taking over the Party
And, Yes, it will become a much more leftist party which improves upon and strengthens the socialism on which this country thrives.
The party's powers that be, are quite disturbed, and are becoming increasingly upset with the Bernie supporters who have little regard for them and the elites' corrupt ways. It is a new day for the Democratic Party, and soon to be seen in the results from the New Hampshire break out. The Iowa results, where Bernie came from 50 points down, was quite alarming to the elites and they see what's coming. They are truly Feeling the Bern!
|
89 replies, 10280 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
RobertEarl | Feb 2016 | OP |
ladjf | Feb 2016 | #1 | |
ananda | Feb 2016 | #21 | |
jwirr | Feb 2016 | #67 | |
bjobotts | Feb 2016 | #74 | |
Kip Humphrey | Feb 2016 | #87 | |
Plucketeer | Feb 2016 | #85 | |
Trajan | Feb 2016 | #2 | |
Fawke Em | Feb 2016 | #3 | |
arcane1 | Feb 2016 | #30 | |
rhett o rick | Feb 2016 | #4 | |
Ferd Berfel | Feb 2016 | #6 | |
Fuddnik | Feb 2016 | #27 | |
rhett o rick | Feb 2016 | #38 | |
LondonReign2 | Feb 2016 | #65 | |
1000words | Feb 2016 | #5 | |
rhett o rick | Feb 2016 | #7 | |
cui bono | Feb 2016 | #8 | |
1000words | Feb 2016 | #9 | |
RobertEarl | Feb 2016 | #11 | |
1000words | Feb 2016 | #12 | |
padfun | Feb 2016 | #10 | |
RobertEarl | Feb 2016 | #16 | |
Matariki | Feb 2016 | #13 | |
RobertEarl | Feb 2016 | #42 | |
Beacool | Feb 2016 | #14 | |
zentrum | Feb 2016 | #18 | |
bvar22 | Feb 2016 | #73 | |
DaveT | Feb 2016 | #24 | |
RobertEarl | Feb 2016 | #40 | |
bravenak | Feb 2016 | #32 | |
elmac | Feb 2016 | #15 | |
zentrum | Feb 2016 | #17 | |
Cary | Feb 2016 | #19 | |
Lazy Daisy | Feb 2016 | #20 | |
RobertEarl | Feb 2016 | #44 | |
jwirr | Feb 2016 | #68 | |
Rebkeh | Feb 2016 | #22 | |
RobertEarl | Feb 2016 | #45 | |
Rebkeh | Feb 2016 | #54 | |
RoccoR5955 | Feb 2016 | #23 | |
SmittynMo | Feb 2016 | #25 | |
RKP5637 | Feb 2016 | #26 | |
guillaumeb | Feb 2016 | #28 | |
WillyT | Feb 2016 | #29 | |
bravenak | Feb 2016 | #31 | |
Quayblue | Feb 2016 | #64 | |
bravenak | Feb 2016 | #78 | |
Quayblue | Feb 2016 | #88 | |
bravenak | Feb 2016 | #89 | |
Lucinda | Feb 2016 | #76 | |
bravenak | Feb 2016 | #77 | |
Lucinda | Feb 2016 | #80 | |
bravenak | Feb 2016 | #81 | |
Lucinda | Feb 2016 | #82 | |
bravenak | Feb 2016 | #83 | |
Uncle Joe | Feb 2016 | #33 | |
humbled_opinion | Feb 2016 | #34 | |
H2O Man | Feb 2016 | #35 | |
kerry-is-my-prez | Feb 2016 | #36 | |
johnlucas | Feb 2016 | #37 | |
cantbeserious | Feb 2016 | #39 | |
RobertEarl | Feb 2016 | #46 | |
Trajan | Feb 2016 | #52 | |
Todays_Illusion | Feb 2016 | #41 | |
Iggy Knorr | Feb 2016 | #43 | |
Spitfire of ATJ | Feb 2016 | #47 | |
RobertEarl | Feb 2016 | #48 | |
Spitfire of ATJ | Feb 2016 | #49 | |
RobertEarl | Feb 2016 | #50 | |
AgingAmerican | Feb 2016 | #51 | |
Lorien | Feb 2016 | #53 | |
Helen Borg | Feb 2016 | #55 | |
Myrina | Feb 2016 | #56 | |
Impedimentus | Feb 2016 | #57 | |
ChiciB1 | Feb 2016 | #58 | |
NurseJackie | Feb 2016 | #59 | |
secondwind | Feb 2016 | #60 | |
RobertEarl | Feb 2016 | #61 | |
randr | Feb 2016 | #62 | |
Pharaoh | Feb 2016 | #63 | |
hueymahl | Feb 2016 | #66 | |
TryLogic | Feb 2016 | #69 | |
Ivan Kaputski | Feb 2016 | #70 | |
DownriverDem | Feb 2016 | #71 | |
DFW | Feb 2016 | #72 | |
gordyfl | Feb 2016 | #75 | |
PatrynXX | Feb 2016 | #79 | |
dpatbrown | Feb 2016 | #84 | |
RobertEarl | Feb 2016 | #86 |
Response to RobertEarl (Original post)
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 08:25 PM
ladjf (17,320 posts)
1. As a person who has voted only Democrat , I say
we would be MOST fortunate if Bernie were to become the philosophical leader of the Democratic Party.
|
Response to ladjf (Reply #1)
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 09:47 PM
ananda (23,237 posts)
21. Agree!
Let the Sanders tide surge on!
|
Response to ladjf (Reply #1)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 05:08 PM
bjobotts (9,141 posts)
74. Get it straight. It's "Democratic" Socialism
Just saying socialism is not what Bernie is or what we are as a nation. We have the freedom to decide who controls the means of production and in what areas. It's harder to place a communistic innuendo around the term socialism when you put democratic in front of it. Democratic Socialism is the only form of government which both ensures our freedom AND our survival by coming together to make sure the things we all need to survive are not controlled by one or two greedy oligarchs (like water). We decide, We vote, We join together to ensure our tranquility and our general welfare.
|
Response to bjobotts (Reply #74)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 08:38 PM
Kip Humphrey (4,753 posts)
87. ...opposing Corporate Socialism.
which is the real fight within the Democratic Party - the fight between Corporate Socialism and Democratic Socialism.
|
Response to ladjf (Reply #1)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 06:25 PM
Plucketeer (12,882 posts)
85. Indeed!
Let Sanders put the train back on it's proper tracks.
|
Response to RobertEarl (Original post)
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 08:26 PM
Trajan (19,089 posts)
2. All of the establishment universe is up in arms ...
The print media is POUNDING OUT the anti-Bernie diatribes ... The editorial hit pieces ... The preplanned statements by acolytes who apparently have some debt to pay ....
The whole bunch of them are stepping up their attacks, but, I do believe it's too little and too late ... Nobody is listening to them anyhow ... Get used to that ... |
Response to Trajan (Reply #2)
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 08:28 PM
Fawke Em (11,366 posts)
3. And it's absolutely hilarious watching them pound out these diatribes only to have it, not only NOT
matter, but result in his killing it in fund raising.
They slime him, he gets $3 million for average citizens. ![]() |
Response to Trajan (Reply #2)
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 10:32 PM
arcane1 (38,613 posts)
30. People are starting to notice that the dems and repubs use the same attacks against him n/t
Response to RobertEarl (Original post)
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 08:30 PM
rhett o rick (55,981 posts)
4. It's time to kick the damn Party Elitists out of our party.
Response to rhett o rick (Reply #4)
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 08:32 PM
Ferd Berfel (3,687 posts)
6. I'll Kick for that Kick
It's time to take the party away from the Koch Bros and Wall Street.
Those assholes can go back to the republicans party and straighten THAT out |
Response to rhett o rick (Reply #4)
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 10:23 PM
Fuddnik (8,846 posts)
27. I'll donate a couple of feet...
And a mule!!!
![]() |
Response to Fuddnik (Reply #27)
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 11:17 PM
rhett o rick (55,981 posts)
38. Some heavy kicking there. Thanks. nm
Response to rhett o rick (Reply #4)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 11:56 AM
LondonReign2 (5,213 posts)
65. It's time to kick out the faux Democrat Turd Wayers
Espousing tired Republican economic policy? Sorry, some tents are too big.
|
Response to RobertEarl (Original post)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to 1000words (Reply #5)
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 08:35 PM
rhett o rick (55,981 posts)
7. well said. nm
Response to 1000words (Reply #5)
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 08:47 PM
cui bono (19,926 posts)
8. The OP, I believe, is a 'copycat' post of a flamebait OP.
I'll leave it at that since I don't even want to repeat the idiocy.
. |
Response to cui bono (Reply #8)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to 1000words (Reply #9)
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 09:13 PM
RobertEarl (13,685 posts)
11. That other OP did give me the idea
And the thought of it is quite pleasing, eh?
Bernie as the president will take charge of the party as much as one person can. Of course it is the People who will tell the tale in the long run, because the People are the party. All our best leftist leaders have been ... well ... somehow or another, removed. The lack of leftist leaders has left a vacuum which we imagined Obama was going to fill. The People did respond, did they not? Truly, now, in Bernie, we have a left leader than we can rally around and get on with the business of creating a more perfect union. Sell not short the idea that we need a leader, just remember that a leader is nothing without a following, |
Response to RobertEarl (Reply #11)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to RobertEarl (Original post)
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 09:04 PM
padfun (1,141 posts)
10. That saying that goes...
First they ignore you
then the laugh at you then they fight you then you win. We have just left the laugh part and am now fully in the fight part. |
Response to padfun (Reply #10)
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 09:24 PM
RobertEarl (13,685 posts)
16. A fight it is, then
The great part is that already our numbers are overwhelming. I have never, in my 30 some odd years of activism, seen such an explosion. A pent up demand is being given a way up and out.
Bernie, as a leader and being the Real Deal, is the catalyst that the future has been searching for. It is good to be alive these days and seeing this in real time. And welcome to DU, padfun. |
Response to RobertEarl (Original post)
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 09:16 PM
Matariki (18,775 posts)
13. As long as they don't really and truly own all the voting machines
Response to Matariki (Reply #13)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 01:04 AM
RobertEarl (13,685 posts)
42. That's a concern
The best way to win that is huge turnout.
They do own the voting machines ... the machines are not publicly owned, they are owned by corporations. |
Response to RobertEarl (Original post)
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 09:18 PM
Beacool (29,968 posts)
14. NH?
Please, don't jump the gun too soon. Yes, he will win NH. Let's see where the race is after Super Tuesday. It's too soon for either side to crow.
![]() |
Response to Beacool (Reply #14)
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 09:36 PM
zentrum (9,607 posts)
18. Win or lose
…Bernie has already transformed the Party. The things he is addressing will not go back in the box and be mollified by incremental lip service half measures.
It's not about personalities. It's about policy and he's put us at the table with a discussion of issues that would never have happened without him. |
Response to zentrum (Reply #18)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 04:40 PM
bvar22 (39,909 posts)
73. Bernie has certainly transformed Hillary.
She has "evolved" on a lot of issues since Bernie started closing the gap in the polls.
Somebody who didn't know her would easily mistake her for a Democrat today. Of course, those are all "promises" that will disappear on Day One if she ever makes it to the Oval Office. |
Response to Beacool (Reply #14)
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 10:15 PM
DaveT (687 posts)
24. Agreed sincerely
We have a contest. And winning a primary or a caucus is good for one side and bad for the other -- but no one State is going to decide this primary election.
I have to note that I have seen a whole lot of crowing about polls on this site for the last six months, and I know I got laughed at repeatedly when I would try to ask such crowers to get real about polling months before the voting. My very favorite example is one happy soul who offered to bet their life on Hillary's ultimate victory. Whew. I don't know if I'd invoke the Faust story for my side of anything -- but, hell, it is just politics. I also concede that a lot of Bernie supporters can be that way, too. Assuming the polling from New Hampshire holds up, my side will get to have the fun of winning something -- and there will probably be some crowing. Not cool in my book. Of all the ways for us to mix it up about our different candidates, I have to say crowing in either direction is pretty damned dumb. |
Response to DaveT (Reply #24)
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 11:23 PM
RobertEarl (13,685 posts)
40. Might you forgive some crowing?
After all, from the very first, we early Bernie supporters were denigrated, told there was no chance, that we were hurting the party... on and on and on.
We did not get here by being shrinking violets. We got here by crowing that Bernie can and would, and that someone like Bernie was just what the doctor ordered for an ill-democracy. Really, we fought crowing with crowing. And here we are, still, and about to be fledged and begin a wonderful flight. |
Response to Beacool (Reply #14)
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 10:35 PM
bravenak (34,648 posts)
32. How many times have those poor chicken been counted?
They are probably very annoyed. They have not even hatched! I wish folks would leave them be.
|
Response to RobertEarl (Original post)
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 09:23 PM
elmac (4,642 posts)
15. I caught the Bernie bug years ago
and even though 100's of millions of dollars have been spent by the GOP & DNC billionaires there is no known cure. Now everyone has caught the bug, its one of the largest outbreaks in history. It will take a political revolution for it to run its course.
|
Response to RobertEarl (Original post)
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 09:32 PM
zentrum (9,607 posts)
17. Going left will
…grow the party and help us win elections more than we have in years.
People want this. The population is always more progressive than the WH or Congress in poll after poll. Go Bernie! |
Response to RobertEarl (Original post)
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 09:36 PM
Cary (11,513 posts)
19. Pride goeth before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall.
Response to RobertEarl (Original post)
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 09:37 PM
Lazy Daisy (928 posts)
20. It doesn't stop with Bernie
Bernie’s Army Is Running for Congress
https://newrepublic.com/article/129047/bernies-army-running-congress Something we need to keep an eye on. Something to nurture and feed. |
Response to Lazy Daisy (Reply #20)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 01:09 AM
RobertEarl (13,685 posts)
44. This has to happen
The senate most likely will be D in 2017, and then we work to get the house. I think if we win 30 house seats we'll have a majority?
I sure will be telling my elected officials they should hitch their wagon to the Berning star! |
Response to Lazy Daisy (Reply #20)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 12:40 PM
jwirr (39,215 posts)
68. Thank you for another name on my donor list.
Response to RobertEarl (Original post)
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 09:57 PM
Rebkeh (2,450 posts)
22. Funny, I thought the party was supposed to respond to us
What do I know?
![]() |
Response to Rebkeh (Reply #22)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 01:11 AM
RobertEarl (13,685 posts)
45. We are the party
Our problem is the heads of the party, like Bernie says, respond to those with money. Time that changes, eh?
|
Response to RobertEarl (Reply #45)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 07:51 AM
Rebkeh (2,450 posts)
54. Yes, it's a change long overdue
Response to RobertEarl (Original post)
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 10:12 PM
RoccoR5955 (12,471 posts)
23. The pebbles are moving
The avalanche is soon to start.
|
Response to RobertEarl (Original post)
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 10:15 PM
SmittynMo (3,544 posts)
25. Everything will change if Bernie wins
Everything. And all for the good of humanity, and the middle and lower class. Forever!!!
|
Response to RobertEarl (Original post)
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 10:23 PM
RKP5637 (60,332 posts)
26. TPTB in the democratic party are obsolete and behind the times. The democratic party needs a
swift kick in the ass and Bernie's doing it! Go Bernie!!!
|
Response to RobertEarl (Original post)
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 10:29 PM
guillaumeb (42,102 posts)
28. Does this mean that the voters might have a real choice? eom
Response to RobertEarl (Original post)
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 10:30 PM
WillyT (72,631 posts)
29. HUGE K & R !!! - Thank You !!!
![]() ![]() |
Response to RobertEarl (Original post)
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 10:33 PM
bravenak (34,648 posts)
31. I love this new show!
Better than comedy chnl. This is so fun, guys.
I wish snacks came out of my ipad. I could read all day this funny stuff. Love it! |
Response to bravenak (Reply #31)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 11:53 AM
Quayblue (1,045 posts)
64. Jury Results
![]() On Tue Feb 9, 2016, 10:39 AM an alert was sent on the following post: I love this new show! http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1177713 REASON FOR ALERT This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. ALERTER'S COMMENTS No comments added by alerter You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Feb 9, 2016, 10:46 AM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT. Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT Explanation: Whadda troll Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE Explanation: No explanation given Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT Explanation: No explanation given Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE Explanation: I see you guys are out to target bravenak once again. There is absolutely nothing offensive about this post. Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE Explanation: No explanation given Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE Explanation: snide remark, not a rule violation. Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE Explanation: are you kidding...? |
Response to Quayblue (Reply #64)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 05:52 PM
bravenak (34,648 posts)
78. Sigh.
This is remarkable. Or not. Normal now.
|
Response to bravenak (Reply #78)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 08:44 PM
Quayblue (1,045 posts)
88. "It's gon be alright"
![]() |
Response to bravenak (Reply #31)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 05:44 PM
Lucinda (28,977 posts)
76. I may just follow you around all evening while we wait for results
I'm not feeling too well today, and you are cracking me up!
![]() |
Response to Lucinda (Reply #76)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 05:51 PM
bravenak (34,648 posts)
77. You make me wanna post today like yesterday.
I love helping people feel better.
And we can watch folks rant about Hillary like they were married to her and she left them and took the house. |
Response to bravenak (Reply #77)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 06:03 PM
Lucinda (28,977 posts)
80. I feel bad for the ones clearly misinformed, and I "get" the ones that have genuine policy
differences with her and are pissed off about it, so as a rule I avoid the more pot stirring posts, but I'm getting a little cranky that GDP becomes Invective Underground on steroids on primary day. If I can't find information, I'll settle for humor.
|
Response to Lucinda (Reply #80)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 06:08 PM
bravenak (34,648 posts)
81. I'm gonna just go ahead and steal that phrase, if you don't mind?
Invective...
![]() Yeah. Me too. I am usually cracking up when I post because if not: TEARS OF SHAME. Is this how we act now? Damn the internet!!! We shoulda killed it when we had the chance. |
Response to bravenak (Reply #81)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 06:13 PM
Lucinda (28,977 posts)
82. What slays me is that we are probably turning voters off. DU, though not the center of the universe,
turns up as the first result on Google when I search for Democratic message boards. So any new voters, looking to find people to talk to about the election come here. And this is what they get.... Invective is the proper word for sure. Steal away!
![]() |
Response to Lucinda (Reply #82)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 06:14 PM
bravenak (34,648 posts)
83. Thats what I was thinking too
People probably look and say oh hell no. No.
|
Response to RobertEarl (Original post)
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 10:36 PM
Uncle Joe (50,305 posts)
33. Kicked and recommended.
Thanks for the thread, RobertEarl.
|
Response to RobertEarl (Original post)
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 10:40 PM
humbled_opinion (4,421 posts)
34. Bernie's message resonates
with the 99 percent....What's not to love, he certainly doesn't give paid speeches while yucking it up with Goldman Sachs like some Democratic politicians that we know.....
|
Response to RobertEarl (Original post)
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 10:41 PM
H2O Man (65,441 posts)
35. I hope so!
Recommended.
|
Response to RobertEarl (Original post)
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 10:42 PM
kerry-is-my-prez (8,078 posts)
36. Hopefully, there are enough people (including Independents) who see the light......
He is absolutely right with what he says.
|
Response to RobertEarl (Original post)
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 10:52 PM
johnlucas (1,250 posts)
37. It's about time. Bernie's gonna do what Obama was SUPPOSED to do
And by that primarily I mean to turn the Democratic Party into something WORTH supporting.
Instead of supporting just because the "opposition" is that much worse. The Nixon/Reagan trajectory is over. It's time for a new paradigm. On FIRE for BERNIE!! ![]() John Lucas |
Response to RobertEarl (Original post)
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 11:19 PM
cantbeserious (13,039 posts)
39. This Revolt Has Been Building For Years - The DWS, DNC, DLC, Third-Way Has Only Themselves To Blame
eom
|
Response to cantbeserious (Reply #39)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 01:15 AM
RobertEarl (13,685 posts)
46. Indeed
It does seem they have been directing the Party to the right of center and trying hard to keep the left subdued. And that is why Bernie is such a shock; they thought they had it all under control.
|
Response to cantbeserious (Reply #39)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 03:06 AM
Trajan (19,089 posts)
52. Now what happens to that elite cadre ...
When their prized, favored candidate bites the dust ?
Who chooses party leadership? |
Response to RobertEarl (Original post)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 12:35 AM
Todays_Illusion (1,209 posts)
41. The elites ought to be thankful for the ballot instad of the old pitch style revolution. nt
Response to RobertEarl (Original post)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 01:07 AM
Iggy Knorr (247 posts)
43. K&R
The Turd Way is that way, out the door to the right. Just follow the red arrow on the Big H.
|
Response to RobertEarl (Original post)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 01:30 AM
Spitfire of ATJ (32,723 posts)
47. It's really sad that things like jailing bankers for actual crimes has become "Lefty".
Response to Spitfire of ATJ (Reply #47)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 01:57 AM
RobertEarl (13,685 posts)
48. Like Bernie says
Kids are in jail for a marijuana cigarette but bankers who have ruined others' lives walk around free.
|
Response to RobertEarl (Reply #48)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 02:04 AM
Spitfire of ATJ (32,723 posts)
49. Meanwhile Hillary blames places that are already out of business.
Response to Spitfire of ATJ (Reply #49)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 02:07 AM
RobertEarl (13,685 posts)
50. And home buyers who just wanted a piece of the dream
|
Response to Spitfire of ATJ (Reply #47)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 02:08 AM
AgingAmerican (12,958 posts)
51. Or undoing economically disastrous right wing tax policy
Sad how much fascism has crept into our party
|
Response to RobertEarl (Original post)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 04:51 AM
Lorien (31,935 posts)
53. It's becoming the party the it was before Reaganomics sucked
the lifeblood out of America and the death of the Fairness Doctrine gave rise to far rightwing 24/7 propaganda. it's been a long time coming!
|
Response to RobertEarl (Original post)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 09:05 AM
Helen Borg (3,963 posts)
55. Bernie wants the juicy infrastructure!
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Response to RobertEarl (Original post)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 09:20 AM
Myrina (12,296 posts)
56. I think it would be more accurate to say that PEOPLE are taking over the party
... rather than any one individual.
|
Response to RobertEarl (Original post)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 09:30 AM
Impedimentus (898 posts)
57. Only a political revolution will ...
change the Democratic Party and the nation. It's now or never. Eight years of a Republican-Lite or Republicans in the White House will destroy the country and children' futures. |
Response to RobertEarl (Original post)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 10:30 AM
ChiciB1 (15,435 posts)
58. Adding My K&R... n/t
Response to RobertEarl (Original post)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 10:32 AM
NurseJackie (36,692 posts)
59. He shoots! He SCORES!! Wait, wha, huh? Oopf!
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Response to RobertEarl (Original post)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 10:45 AM
secondwind (11,053 posts)
60. great OP.. you get a heart :-)
Response to secondwind (Reply #60)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 11:00 AM
RobertEarl (13,685 posts)
61. Sweet! Thanks for all the hearts, folks
Response to RobertEarl (Original post)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 11:45 AM
randr (11,025 posts)
62. In reality the Clintons are the last of the BlueDog Dems
a distinction lost on many who do not know what that means.
|
Response to RobertEarl (Original post)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 11:45 AM
Pharaoh (8,209 posts)
63. what about South Carolina?
doesn't look too promising for Bernie.
|
Response to Pharaoh (Reply #63)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 12:15 PM
hueymahl (1,889 posts)
66. South Carolina is a very conservative state
Most the Dems there are basically conservative. That said, I expect Bernie to outperform what the (very limited) polling shows.
|
Response to RobertEarl (Original post)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 01:30 PM
TryLogic (1,462 posts)
69. Check out this important article
Response to RobertEarl (Original post)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 02:37 PM
Ivan Kaputski (528 posts)
70. Oh come on now ...just because we kiss oligarchy ass for money so we can stay in power
doesn't mean we don't care about the little people. Just remember if you don't vote for us then you'll end up with Rump. Why does everyone hate the DLC Third Way? They're Democrats too aren't they?
![]() |
Response to RobertEarl (Original post)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 03:25 PM
DownriverDem (4,691 posts)
71. So Much for Bernie Not Taking the Money
Personally I think it's dumb to not take the money until the game is changed. I post this because it's lame to attack Hillary for taking the money.
http://www.politicususa.com/2016/02/01/bernie-sanders-super-pac-money-democratic-rivals.html |
Response to DownriverDem (Reply #71)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 04:06 PM
DFW (41,208 posts)
72. It is definitely time to change that game!
Our current system makes soliciting money an integral part of winning and holding office. That is just perverse, and I don't care how S.O.P or entrenched it is. We need publicly financed elections, period. Sanders' refusal to form a Super-PAC is laudable, and a shining example, but it also means that my email box is cluttered with requests from his campaign (as well as others) for donations. It shouldn't be that way.
|
Response to RobertEarl (Original post)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 05:38 PM
gordyfl (598 posts)
75. Ralph Nader Was Interviewed On Tavis Smiley Feb 1, 2016
Here are some excerpts...
Nader: "I think the most important thing coming out of this is Bernie Sanders’s average contribution is between $27 and $30 per person, and he’s raising enormously more money than he or anyone else expected, including Hillary Clinton. She didn’t expect that. So that’s a very refreshing thing. He doesn’t go to fat cat parties in Beverly Hills or Park Avenue. He refuses." Nader: "I think they’re looking for someone who’s on their side, someone who is going to challenge Wall Street’s control over Washington, someone who’s going to challenge these job-destroying trade agreements, someone who is going to change the tax system so they don’t pay more than they have to and the big rich and global corporations pay more." Tavis: "What do you make of the fact that this year there seems to have been an accident, quite frankly, a collision on the establishment highway and that these outsiders are having the kind of impact they’re having this year?" Nader: "I think that probably surprised everyone. I don’t think anybody thought Jeb Bush was going to be so low in the polls and maybe on his way out in another couple of weeks. But it does reflect the lack of respect that the voters have for those people who are running our government or running it into the ground or running it on behalf of Wall Street against Main Street. You know, there’s a kind of grapevine that operates through millions of peoples’ minds and sometimes it coalesces into a kind of rejection of traditional politics. But the problem is, the outliers are pretty traditional too, except for the clean, honest, progressive campaign of Bernie Sanders..." Tavis: "What should Bernie Sanders say as he continues to get asked whether or not he can win, whether or not his agenda is so liberal, so progressive, so socialist, that the American public won’t go for it?" Nader: "Nonsense. Just poll it. He’ll get a lot of left-right support for a lot of things like full Medicare for all, like living wage. Conservative workers at Wal-Mart don’t want a living wage? But when you hear Hillary Clinton talk about her experience and expertise in foreign affairs, that means more war, more empire. She’s a hawk. When you hear her talk about how she’s going to be pragmatic at home, that’s another code word for allowing the concentration of power to continue in the hands of the few, Wall Street over Washington, the same Wall Street that paid her $5,000 a minute to give speeches in closed-door conventions around the country, which she has refused to disclose. What did she say to these closed-door conventions noted briefly in The New York Times a while back? What did she say in closed-door where there was no press and they were paying her $5,000 a minute? Why doesn’t the press ask that question? Disclose it, Hillary." (Well, Chuck Todd finally asked that question.) http://www.pbs.org/wnet/tavissmiley/interviews/consumer-advocate-author-ralph-nader/ |
Response to RobertEarl (Original post)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 05:56 PM
PatrynXX (5,668 posts)
79. more to the point the people are taking the Democratic Party back to it's roots
and away from the Conservatives
|
Response to RobertEarl (Original post)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 06:20 PM
dpatbrown (368 posts)
84. I've waited along time for this!
Many, many of us here, have waited along time for an election like this. Sanders is NOT the better of two evils. He's the real deal.
|
Response to dpatbrown (Reply #84)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 07:09 PM
RobertEarl (13,685 posts)
86. I've waited a long time too
And the early returns from NH show Bernie with a 28% lead.
I can't wait until I finally have the chance to actually vote for Bernie. I have a paper ballot here and you can be sure I will sign it. |