Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 12:05 AM Feb 2016

FBI confirms Clinton probe

The FBI formally confirmed that its investigation connected to Hillary Clinton’s private email server remains ongoing in a letter released on Monday.
http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/268688-fbi-confirms-probe-clinton-probe-is-ongoing
The letter from FBI general counsel James Baker comes one day before the New Hampshire primary.

The message does not offer new details about the probe, which the bureau has been reluctant to discuss. However, it represents the FBI’s formal notification to the State Department that it is investigating the issue.
Since last September, “in public statements and testimony, the Bureau has acknowledged generally that it is working on matters related to former Secretary Clinton’s use of a private e-mail server,” Baker wrote to the State Department.

“The FBI has not, however, publicly acknowledged the specific focus, scope, or potential targets of any such proceedings.

“Thus … we remain unable [to] provide [details about the case] without adversely affecting on-going law enforcement efforts,” he concluded.

The letter was sent on Feb. 2 but released on Monday as part of an ongoing lawsuit related to the disclosure of Clinton’s emails from conservative watchdog Judicial Watch.


?itok=zVy3RhIH
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
FBI confirms Clinton probe (Original Post) MrMickeysMom Feb 2016 OP
Impossible!! Press Virginia Feb 2016 #1
I horse-laughed when she called it that the other day. Fawke Em Feb 2016 #4
I am shocked that people actually believed it Press Virginia Feb 2016 #6
Why does this story run every week? And why is conservative propaganda posted here at DU? Todays_Illusion Feb 2016 #2
It's NOT "the same story", as the FBI did not confirm it before. John Poet Feb 2016 #3
The same MSNBC that did an hour-long Hillary butt kiss tonight? Fawke Em Feb 2016 #5
Yes, THAT MSNBC... MrMickeysMom Feb 2016 #9
.. Cheese Sandwich Feb 2016 #7
kick frylock Feb 2016 #8
Look, this may be nothing in the end... casperthegm Feb 2016 #10
Neither can I see that, casperthegm... MrMickeysMom Feb 2016 #11
Please clean up your garbage before u run jillan Feb 2016 #12
You know, I've been thinking about the subject of impeachment. Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2016 #13
 

John Poet

(2,510 posts)
3. It's NOT "the same story", as the FBI did not confirm it before.
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 01:18 AM
Feb 2016

NOW they have. THAT is the story.

MSNBC is not a recognized organ for conservative propaganda, so that's kind of a ridiculous assertion.




Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
5. The same MSNBC that did an hour-long Hillary butt kiss tonight?
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 01:25 AM
Feb 2016

That's right-wing propaganda?

On edit: the first place I saw it today was on MSNBC, not the Hill. Apologies.

casperthegm

(643 posts)
10. Look, this may be nothing in the end...
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 10:52 AM
Feb 2016

But what if it is? And what if it happens after Clinton has received the nomination?

I can't believe that when you look at this ongoing concern and all of the other negatives surrounding Clinton (Wall Street, Iraq, Keystone, gay rights, Glass Steagall, etc) and contrast that with Bernie's authenticity why anyone would consider her a better option.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
13. You know, I've been thinking about the subject of impeachment.
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 12:37 PM
Feb 2016

Impeachment doesn't require the same legal standards as a criminal indictment. It's pretty much a political affair. Got the votes? You got the ability to impeach over pretty much anything. There's no rules requiring discovery or the right to cross examine accusers or any standard such as "guilty beyond the shadow of a reasonable doubt." An up or down vote after some perfunctory arguing is all that is entailed in an impeachment proceeding. Under such considerations a trial in a court of law would be less imperiling even if it were to prove politi

I'm pretty sure Secretary Clinton knows this as well.

I can't help but think that the urgency to not be impeached immediately upon assuming the presidency would weigh heavily upon anyone seeking the office. It would probably drive them to distraction. It might even drive them to try and mollify those who hold the keys to the impeachment process, to try and persuade them by appeasing their political objectives. They might even try sacrificing things that have formerly been near and dear to the party's heart; things like -- oh, say -- universal healthcare.

How much would it cost to make this go away?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»FBI confirms Clinton prob...