Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
52 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The really good news from the NH primary? Record voter turnout. The winner is America! (Original Post) merrily Feb 2016 OP
THIS is what Occupy Wall St. sparked. valerief Feb 2016 #1
Damn straight -- I'm SO PROUD of this new generation who really get it. pacalo Feb 2016 #6
Yep. The time is right. The time is now. For the people. senz Feb 2016 #8
Occupy the Vote.... Dont call me Shirley Feb 2016 #24
I love that. +1000 nt Live and Learn Feb 2016 #30
Thank you, L & L, it just came to me. You can use it. Everyone can use it, except for Wall St! Dont call me Shirley Feb 2016 #33
Thank you. I don't think you are in any of danger of Wall Street using it . LOL nt Live and Learn Feb 2016 #34
But we know how much Wall St wallows in thievery. Dont call me Shirley Feb 2016 #35
Yes! Joe Shlabotnik Feb 2016 #40
WOW! Thanks, merrily! Zorra Feb 2016 #2
My pleasure, Zorra. merrily Feb 2016 #4
That's worth a K&R! winter is coming Feb 2016 #3
Thanks! merrily Feb 2016 #5
YES!! America won tonight. senz Feb 2016 #7
Yes, that is good news. malthaussen Feb 2016 #9
he addresses this in his speech at the end hopemountain Feb 2016 #45
Bernie in the WH is only a beginning. Beartracks Feb 2016 #48
.... hopemountain Feb 2016 #50
Are we sure it is a record turnout for Dems? We had 284K in 2008. LonePirate Feb 2016 #10
That's what I heard on the Tee Vee machine. merrily Feb 2016 #12
Delayed reaction: The OP says nothing about only Dems. merrily Feb 2016 #17
In 2008, Dems beat Repubs by 50K on primary day. We're currently 10K behind w/ ~50% in. LonePirate Feb 2016 #20
I don't know how to say it more clearly: The OP says nothing about only Dems turnout. merrily Feb 2016 #22
Great News Go Vols Feb 2016 #11
record voter turnout has a lovely ring to it. mopinko Feb 2016 #13
No, the winner is Bernie Sanders. Beacool Feb 2016 #14
Thanks, but turnout is on all candidates (even the you know whos) and all NH voters. merrily Feb 2016 #15
Again, this is NH. Beacool Feb 2016 #18
Um, the OP is totally non partisan and so was my prior post to you. merrily Feb 2016 #19
Then, I beg to differ with the OP. Beacool Feb 2016 #21
The OP is not about Sanders' winning. It's about voters of all parties turning out to vote. merrily Feb 2016 #23
Yes it did. Thank you. 840high Feb 2016 #38
Sanders himself has said turnout would favor him. R B Garr Feb 2016 #42
The only thing I "argued" is what my very own OP is about. It's a nonpartisan rejoicing merrily Feb 2016 #44
merrily is right. please listen to the last few minutes of his hopemountain Feb 2016 #49
Bernie kicked Trump's ass in terms of total votes! bullwinkle428 Feb 2016 #16
K & R, merrily! Dont call me Shirley Feb 2016 #25
I think tonight will spread like wildfire, no matter what the M$M does to tell us otherwise litlbilly Feb 2016 #26
And this is why we (NH) deserves to go first. bunnies Feb 2016 #27
Good for New Hampshire voters for getting to the polls. merrily Feb 2016 #46
Absolutely! Punkingal Feb 2016 #28
Reminds me of a line from an old movie. BigMin28 Feb 2016 #29
The spice must flow? May the Bern be with you? ;) Bubzer Feb 2016 #32
Yes. Feeling the Bern! BigMin28 Feb 2016 #43
With pustules and all. Bubzer Feb 2016 #47
And it's so very awesome! I can't wait to see more! Bubzer Feb 2016 #31
This is YUUUUGE! Kip Humphrey Feb 2016 #36
Woot! Hulk Feb 2016 #37
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #39
Yes, yes, yes! Iwillnevergiveup Feb 2016 #41
"occupy the vote!" hopemountain Feb 2016 #51
Just got go ahead to add extra person to my election panel Divernan Feb 2016 #52

malthaussen

(17,187 posts)
9. Yes, that is good news.
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 10:43 PM
Feb 2016

Turnout will be the key to a victory for Mr Sanders, if he wins. But it must be sustained, not just for the primaries, not just for the election of POTUS, but for the 2018 midterms as well. If America wants to clean house, everyone is going to have to pitch in.

-- Mal

hopemountain

(3,919 posts)
45. he addresses this in his speech at the end
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 01:37 AM
Feb 2016

that his campaign's purpose is to get as many people involved in the democratic process as possible because we must to save the country from a republican in the whitehouse and that the higher the voter turnout - the more power we have in our government to effect change.

Beartracks

(12,809 posts)
48. Bernie in the WH is only a beginning.
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 01:41 AM
Feb 2016

I sure hope all the enthusiastic voters get that. I was sorely disappointed when Dems stayed home for the previous round of mid-terms.

We NEED to get as many Dems as we can -- progressives if possible -- back into Congress, pronto.

For that matter, everyone: VOTE even if your state's only Dem choices are conserva-Dems or Blue Dog Dems... because we need as many (D)s back on Capitol Hill so that the ones who really ARE liberal/progressive (think Warren, Franken, etc.) can get back into chairing committees. THAT only happens if there are more (D)s than (R)s, and the math doesn't care if the (D)s are all progressives or not -- we simply need a majority of them.



===========================

LonePirate

(13,417 posts)
10. Are we sure it is a record turnout for Dems? We had 284K in 2008.
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 10:44 PM
Feb 2016

Have the most populous and/or Democratic precincts reported in yet? We're at 84K with 40% in so far. Unless the Dem heavy precincts are still unreported, it will be tough to obtain 200K in the final 60%.

LonePirate

(13,417 posts)
20. In 2008, Dems beat Repubs by 50K on primary day. We're currently 10K behind w/ ~50% in.
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 11:06 PM
Feb 2016

It may be a record when combining both parties if populous precincts are still to report. Otherwise, these turnout numbers are not good news for Dems at all as it won't be anywhere near a record for the party.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
22. I don't know how to say it more clearly: The OP says nothing about only Dems turnout.
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 11:08 PM
Feb 2016

It's intended to be a nonpartisan OP, celebrating good voter turnout in a country where only a small fraction tend to vote.

If you want a pessimistic thread about Dem turnout only, please feel free to start one. Thanks.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
15. Thanks, but turnout is on all candidates (even the you know whos) and all NH voters.
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 10:53 PM
Feb 2016

This is a victory over voter apathy, a very sad fact of American life, IMO.

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
18. Again, this is NH.
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 10:58 PM
Feb 2016

It's as if I chortled like a canary when Hillary wins NJ. She has the home field advantage over here. NH is a good win for Sanders, but it doesn't predict how he'll do in future states. That's why I'm keeping my jets cool until after the SEC primaries. That's when we'll see how this race is really shaping up.

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
21. Then, I beg to differ with the OP.
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 11:07 PM
Feb 2016

I don't think that "America won" because Sanders won NH. I think that HE won. One candidate, not all Democrats or the country as a whole.



merrily

(45,251 posts)
23. The OP is not about Sanders' winning. It's about voters of all parties turning out to vote.
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 11:11 PM
Feb 2016

The OP and Reply 15 spelled it out clearly. Sorry this seems to be so difficult for you.

R B Garr

(16,950 posts)
42. Sanders himself has said turnout would favor him.
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 01:13 AM
Feb 2016

He said it again on his little walkabout in New Hampshire just this morning. It's been heavily discussed that was directed towards young people showing up since they are not always reliable, and polling showed they favor him in New Hampshire.

Sanders himself has said this. Hard to believe you are now arguing that. So Beacool is right.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
44. The only thing I "argued" is what my very own OP is about. It's a nonpartisan rejoicing
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 01:37 AM
Feb 2016

in voter turn out in a country where only a fraction of potential voters care enough to get to the polls.

Read the OP. It's not about Bernie or Hillary or Democrats or Republicans. It's about New Hampshire voters doing the right thing and going to the polls. See also Replies 15, 19 and 23.

I have no clue why Hillary supporters are having trouble grasping that. I've said it about five times now. I also have no clue what you're on about, but I'm fine with having no clue about that.

hopemountain

(3,919 posts)
49. merrily is right. please listen to the last few minutes of his
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 01:45 AM
Feb 2016

speech tonight - the sanders campaign (as stated by him) is to get more people involved in the democratic process to take the country back from citizens united and the corporations. he means for all americans.

the record breaking voter turnout in new hampshire by all of her voters is for everyone - all of american and is a beginning many of us hopes burns like fire across the country inspiring and motivating record numbers of voters.

 

Hulk

(6,699 posts)
37. Woot!
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 12:58 AM
Feb 2016

This is what we need to see happen across America!

And VOTE OUT the repuKKKes, teabaggers and DINO's!

Take America back for the people once again...if it ever was.

Iwillnevergiveup

(9,298 posts)
41. Yes, yes, yes!
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 01:12 AM
Feb 2016

Even our shabby media loves to report high voter turnouts in total. Hopefully, the NH primary will set an example for the rest of the states: Bernie can and will win when people VOTE!

Divernan

(15,480 posts)
52. Just got go ahead to add extra person to my election panel
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 02:50 PM
Feb 2016

I'm a judge of elections in Allegheny County (Pittsburgh & suburbs) and just requested and got approval to add an extra worker to my election panel for my ward and district (that will make us 6 instead of the usual 5). My contact in the county election office confirmed my expectation that a huge turnout is expected.

I also just set up a voter registration session at a senior assisted living high rise in my ward/district. They've had a considerable turnover in residents since last year, which means a lot of the seniors aren't registered in their new location, and will not be in the voter register - which in turn means they'd have to vote a very time-consuming, paper provisional ballot (also have the option of returning to their old polling place and machine voting there - but that's extremely impractical and nobody ever does it).

It takes a good half an hour to assist a senior voter in all the steps for filling out a provisional ballot - plus those ballots aren't even counted for several days after an election. So it's time well spent for me to get them correctly registered and listed in the voter register so they can vote on the machine.

I also expect a record number of absentee ballots. We can't open and count them until after the polls close - that will easily add another hour to a 16 hour day for election workers.

We have a fair number of contested primary races down ticket this year (U.S. Senator; Congressman, state legislator) so I think this primary election will be more work than the general for poll workers.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The really good news from...