Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
1. Superdelegates are the establishment's firewall against grass-roots
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 07:02 PM
Feb 2016

non-establishment approved candidates....like Bernie.

Nanjeanne

(6,566 posts)
2. And the Republicans don't even have Super Delegates
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 07:05 PM
Feb 2016

Who'd a thunk it?

Response to Nanjeanne (Reply #2)

 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
5. The establishment has no issue with Republicans as, for them, pretty much any GOP'er will do.
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 07:17 PM
Feb 2016

The Democratic Party however is a different story. If they could GUARANTEE that ONLY Triangulating DLC New Dem types could be allowed to compete then Superdelegates would not be needed.

Bernie represents precisely what the Superdelegates are meant to guard against. What other reasonable purpose could Superdelegates be meant to serve if it isn't to decide the outcome of a primary contest in favor of the establishment? None.

DesertRat

(27,995 posts)
4. The Democratic party has had superdelegates for over 40 years
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 07:13 PM
Feb 2016

Response to DesertRat (Reply #4)

DesertRat

(27,995 posts)
10. Bernie knew about how the Democrats
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 07:37 PM
Feb 2016

choose their nominee and leader of their party when he recently decided to join the party.
But, It's still very early, many more state primaries coming up. Supers may not even be an issue.

 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
6. We've been using superdelegates for almost half a century. Why the sudden freakouts?
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 07:17 PM
Feb 2016

They're not going to be an issue.

Response to Codeine (Reply #6)

 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
9. I'm neutral on them.
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 07:35 PM
Feb 2016

I believe it's reasonable to give a political party some latitude on how they select their candidate; this could help avoid a McGovern situation. We seem to forget that political parties aren't really obligated to allow voters to choose their nominee.

That said, I honestly see superdelegates as a non-issue in the modern era; the Party knows better than to alienate its voters at the start of a general election campaign, so they will be released to line up with the winner of the majority of pledged delegates at the convention.

Bottom line -- if Sanders wins more pledged delegates than Clinton then he'll be the nominee, superdelegates notwithstanding.

Response to Codeine (Reply #9)

 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
12. Party politics and democracy are two different things. nt
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 07:46 PM
Feb 2016
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Message auto-removed