2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSanders: 'One of us ran against Obama; I was not that candidate'
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/dem-primaries/269217-sanders-one-of-us-ran-against-obama-i-was-not-that-candidateBoom.
thereismore
(13,326 posts)DonCoquixote
(13,960 posts)and he sure as hell did not imply that Obama should have been getting him coffee either
Iggy Knorr
(247 posts)"A few years ago this guy would have been carrying our bags" Bill Clinton
SammyWinstonJack
(44,316 posts)brooklynite
(96,882 posts)...as suggesting someone run against someone who IS the President.
EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)Wait...that sort of is the same either way, isn't it?
Bobbie Jo
(14,344 posts)The comment was really kind of lame.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)And her sleazy attacks against him are highly relevant, because it shows her to be a major hypocrite.
jfern
(5,204 posts)azmom
(5,208 posts)Shame on her.
in_cog_ni_to
(41,600 posts)amborin
(16,631 posts)the woman is abhorrent
Iggy Knorr
(247 posts)lots of 3am phone calls, naturally!
in_cog_ni_to
(41,600 posts)SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)Hillary stands strong with Kissinger
Empowerer
(3,900 posts)SidDithers
(44,333 posts)Which one was that?
Sid
tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)Because he thought Obama was a weak disappointment and a a poopy head? Or is it possible that he actually articulated some policy disagreements?
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)uponit7771
(93,532 posts)... first black president to be primaried because he thought he was weak and rightward...
That would be honest
I'm sure Sanders will be saying that over and over again in the next month or two ... no?
Matt_in_STL
(1,446 posts)Bernie disagreed with policy issues and wanted someone to push President Obama to the left. That's a far cry from the racist dog whistles and outright racism displayed by the Clintons in 2008, especially in SC. How do you think the voters in SC would feel when reminded they should be carrying Bill's bags?
uponit7771
(93,532 posts)... in my post?
tia
Matt_in_STL
(1,446 posts)It is out there that he suggested a primary opponent for President Obama. I highly doubt he brings it up unless asked because that isn't something that you throw in a speech. Hillary wouldn't throw in her Kissinger issues or where her money comes from and I wouldn't expect her to, unless asked.
Now, answer my question. Where does race fit in his suggestion of a primary opponent unless Bernie suggested that he be primaried for being black?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)That made it OK.
EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)AzDar
(14,023 posts)" It's What They Offered..."
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)... I liked yours much better. I realize I can't top it.
Well played!!
jillan
(39,451 posts)amborin
(16,631 posts)NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)Democrats run against each other in a primary race so voters can determine who they want as their nominee in the presidential race.
THAT'S how it's done, Bernie. THAT'S why you're running, isn't it?
To equate that with wanting to primary a sitting Democratic president is beyond ludicrous.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)It made him look ridiculous. HE is running in a primary race right now, which is part of our process for electing a nominee. He made it sound as though Hillary did something untoward by having been part of that process when Obama was running.
Is he suggesting that Obama - or any other candidate - should run unopposed in a primary contest?
It was a childish, petty remark - and made no sense whatsoever.
Bernie's not stupid. I'm sure he thought better of that comment the minute it was out of his mouth. It only served to underscore the fact that HE wanted to primary a sitting Democratic president - and was foolish enough to suggest it when he KNEW the Dem Party (of which he is not a member) would never have gone along with it.
jonestonesusa
(880 posts)One election season Obama's inexperienced and unqualified, eight years later she's riding his coattails. Pandering. Shamelessly.
You say Sanders' remark was childish and petty. One thing's for certain. It's true! Clinton ran against Obama and now she's claiming to be Obama. Hardworking people, white people was so long ago. Who remembers???
Want a childish and petty remark? Try "artful smear." Or implying that Sanders was a champion of deregulation due to his vote on that Bill Clinton finance bill. That insinuation won't even work for a speech event at Goldman Sachs. Even they know better!
NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)... to say that she wants to build on the legacy of a very successful president - a president she campaigned for, and served under as SoS?
What should she be saying about Obama, according to you? That she never liked him, disagrees with his policies, and wants to take the country in a completely different direction?
HRC and Obama have worked closely together and are friends. She' be a damned fool to NOT campaign on wanting to follow his very remarkable and productive presidency.
"Clinton ran against Obama."
And your point is what? Bernie is running against HRC. If she becomes POTUS, does that count against Bernie in some way? Would that mean he'd done something wrong by running against her?
jonestonesusa
(880 posts)Stop implying that Sanders is the enemy of Obama's legacy, especially when he contributed to the Affordable Care Act, Dodd Frank and other signature legislation of this administration. If its her preferred approach to emphasize her work in the administration as part of her campaign strategy so be it. But I don't appreciate racial smears during campaigns, and that definitely happened in 08, and in reference the legislation that I mentioned, I prefer credit where credit is due rather than distortion of the record. It's politics, I get that, stances change. But trying this hard to claim the Obama record and leave out the Sanders' contributions is over the top.
NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)... that Sanders is the enemy of Obama's legacy?
jonestonesusa
(880 posts)But your candidate sure does. Talking point #1 in Iowa: Bernie wants to dismantle Obamacare and start over. Bernie voted for the bill and helped shape it. Simple fact, but anything goes in a campaign, right?
NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)He wants to start over and replace it with something he thinks is a better system. He doesn't deny that - in fact, he's running on that idea.
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)Bernie believes that a Medicaid-for-All system would be better, which would replace Obamacare.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)And it is simply an act of law. So yes, if Bernie gets a better plan through, the act MIGHT be replaced with a new name and better coverage. Or, they could keep the same name only enhance the act to include Medicare for all instead of MANDATORY INSURANCE for all. My bet is they do rename it but in either case we all win and it is a vast improvement over the Affordable Care Act.
You know, kind of like the coverage you get in Canada. And Obama would still get credit for what he had done. Bernie isn't running on taking Obama's credit away.
Dawgs
(14,755 posts)Or was that some kind of smear against a single payer system?
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)uponit7771
(93,532 posts)... but they're not will to go into the SEC states saying that because they know they don't have the strength of their convictions nor the support of dems in those stats with the consummate Obama bashing
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)and now support Bernie. In fact, I suspect that if you actually do some research, you will find that most DUers that didn't support Obama during his run are supporting Hillary now.
This ridiculous meme has rung its course.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)mhatrw
(10,786 posts)for everyone who remembers the poo she flung at Obama in 2008.
NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)... that was Death Blow #26,422.
And yet she's still standing, she's still the front-runner, and she'll still be the next POTUS.
mhatrw
(10,786 posts)Flying Squirrel
(3,041 posts)36 pledged delegates to 32. All the rest can change their minds and many will if he ends up with more pledged delegates.
Are you angling for a Fox News position?
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Besides being a lie?
uponit7771
(93,532 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)push for what the people want including the right to run against someone in a primary. What the hell is the problem with that? What are elections for if nobody is going to run?
Silly meme!
dchill
(42,660 posts)You don't like more Democrats?
NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)What I am suspicious of is "Democrats of Convenience".
Read my sig line - you'll get the point.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)a progressive, I take it?
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)and neither is accepting politicians have to be polite in all sorts of company, as part of their job.
I know people love the idea of a DC reduced to rubble, but they need to grow up.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)And everyone should be polite, especially foreign dignitaries. It is called diplomacy for friggen sake.
Nobody wants a DC reduced to rubble. We are trying to spare the country from that but some here seem to want to insist upon it before they get the message.
polly7
(20,582 posts)Military men are just dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy.
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)Damn straight.
As we all know, sitting presidents need to rest comfortably and should never be subjected to the cheeky indignity of objections or refinements to their policies.
When the president is a member of our party, whatever s/he says goes!
NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)... "sitting presidents resting comfortably".
It has to do with a non-Democrat who wanted the Democrats to primary a sitting Dem president, knowing full well the Party wasn't about to entertain any such idea. He was grandstanding, trying to draw attention to himself at the time.
Equating two primary opponents vying for the Party's nomination and his wanting to primary Obama came off as sounding like he doesn't even understand the difference between the two. And that's sadder still.
jonestonesusa
(880 posts)when you can choose a party leader and follow them no matter what? Is that your implication?
Dissent is healthy, even in the DEM party and among its allies. Nothing wrong with being independent, especially when you take principled stands on difficult votes. Kudos to Sanders for putting principles first, during and after political campaigns.
NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)When Obama faced re-election in 2012, there was no "no matter what" involved.
He was a popular president, the Democrats were happy with his policies and direction, he was admired the world over, he had restored the country's image globally after BushCo had tarnished it so badly, the economy was better, great strides had been made despite the obstructionism of the GOP - I could go on.
Stop making it sound like the Party just shrugged its shoulders, sighed, and said "Well, we're stuck with this Barack loser, so let's just make the best of it."
Sanders thought it a wise move to suggest that Obama be primaried, KNOWING FULL WELL that suggestion would NEVER have been acted upon given Obama's popularity among Democrats.
So one can only wonder what his motivation was in doing do - other than grandstanding in a bid for attention.
jonestonesusa
(880 posts)Implying that potentially, a primary challenge might be healthy? Worse political offenses have occurred. Exploiting a short term news story for political points four years later? Let me guess, another Clinton campaign.
Was it OK when Ted Kennedy primaried a DEM president? Didn't just talk about it, did it?
Everything but the real issues. Is there a lesson here for why a huge Clinton lead has become a horse race?
jillan
(39,451 posts)We do have the right to criticize our President.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)uponit7771
(93,532 posts).... like it always has in history (roll eyes big time)
Come on people, we've gone over this.. Sanders did NOT show good judgment in his call to have Obama primaried... it was stupid
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)be a bad idea to primary him in order to bring him back to the left. It is called DEMOCRACY. I applaud him for saying it and I am a big Obama fan.
uponit7771
(93,532 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)I am crushed.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)I guess you win the argument.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)... for the person who posted said typo?
Yeah, that makes sense.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)... as being some kind of victory, please proceed. Whatever gets you through the night - ya know?
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)I mean, why would a writer be so obsessed with their typo as to miss the entire theme?
uponit7771
(93,532 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)TTUBatfan2008
(3,623 posts)She better be prepared for some scrutiny on the 2008 campaign, namely the racist stuff that her campaign did at the time.
uponit7771
(93,532 posts)....but there's no way Sanders is going to embrace people like Killer Mike and Cornell West and then think somehow people are going to forget his consummate bashing of Obama...
Calling him weak and rightward.
Screw that, be honest Sanders and tell people what you REALLY have thought of Obama throughout the years
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)John Poet
(2,510 posts)End of argument.
Hillary's professed devotion to Obama's program doesn't ring true, when she pays consultants and lobbyists who tried to stop ACA/ "Obamacare from becoming law.
AzDar
(14,023 posts)taught_me_patience
(5,477 posts)Getting angry, red faced, flustered, and flailing about with his arms. Then he went off the rails with a statement that does not relate to what she was talking about.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)phleshdef
(11,936 posts)No one has campaigned longer and put Barack Obama though the ringer more than Hillary Clinton... it just happened to be before he ultimately beat her.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)livetohike
(24,282 posts)EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)SammyWinstonJack
(44,316 posts)BeyondGeography
(41,101 posts)It seemed liked the kind of half-formed response that you make when you're rattled.
Myrina
(12,296 posts)... herself with BLM. But you can't say you're all about him, BFFs, "meet my black friend Barack. See how much I love black people?" etc when you ran against him & engaged in the semi-veiled smear attacks that her camp ran with in the 2008 primaries.
BeyondGeography
(41,101 posts)"It's a little funny hearing this unconditional support of Barack Obama after all the criticisms you had of him in the 2008 campaign," or some such retort would have completed the circle.
riversedge
(80,808 posts)Hydra
(14,459 posts)We all know they don't like each other and aren't on the same page, and she absolutely will try to overwrite his legacy if she makes it into office.
jonestonesusa
(880 posts)Restraint under a Clinton presidency as under Obama? Maybe. But if you think this is a certainty, you're fronting.
FrenchieCat
(68,868 posts)Is that the similar to "some say"?
Hydra
(14,459 posts)It's not like it's a big secret that they aren't best of friends...and I hear one of them thinks the other is going to ruin everything if they don't figure out how to turn it around.
rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)zappaman
(20,627 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)"Should North Carolinians also ponder whether to vote for someone who's husband is a serial adulterer, a disbarred attorney, and an admitted liar to millions? I mean, really, which spouse is immoral here?"
"Hillary says what Hillary wants to say......."Screw 'em," she told her husband. "You don't owe them a thing, Bill. They're doing nothing for you; you don't have to do anything for them."
" Fellow Democrats who promotes racism......isn't a Democrat in my book.Please don't quote Aretha Franklin. Bill Clinton has not respected a soul this primary season."
These are all from one thread titled "Michelle Obama on Bill Clinton: "I want to rip his eyes out!"
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x5835470
Renew Deal
(85,148 posts)He was clearly beaten at that point.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)Flying Squirrel
(3,041 posts)Geronimoe
(1,539 posts)if you wanted to force Obama to move to the left instead of just being challenged by the radicate right.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)uponit7771
(93,532 posts)Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)to negotiate with Republicans. It wasn't his finest hour.
pugetres
(507 posts)to have a simple reminder about how ugly the 2008 democratic race was.
JVS
(61,935 posts)as she did, and given a couple examples.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)And we can't forget the low nature of that campaign, either.
http://jackpineradicals.org/entry.php?209-Democratic-Primary-2016-Will-religious-bigotry-work-this-time
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)whereisjustice
(2,941 posts)on her and shame on a cynical Democratic National Committee for shoving her down our throats. Over and over I find people want to like her, but then they her words and research her past, she's clearly unelectable.
Skid Rogue
(711 posts)If my memory serves me right, Hillary formally announced her intention to run for President before Obama. So, if anything, he ran against her. Not that it matters, the whole thing is a non-issue.
BKH70041
(961 posts)Just sayin'.
I thought the whole topic was silly from both sides. Neither came out looking particularly strong.
EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)She knows she has a record of opposing Obama on numerous issues, and is trying to split hairs when Bernie has also disagreed with Obama.
Not her finest moment.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)It's not like she set out to take him on or anything. Quite an irrelevant point.