Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 07:26 PM Oct 2012

The St. Louis Post-Dispatch endorses Obama. "A second term for a serious man"

http://www.stltoday.com/news/opinion/columns/the-platform/article_c5371a41-ab43-5724-96e2-2d23eaa56589.html#.UG9r2ObF3vQ.twitter

If more Americans were paying attention, this election would not be close. Barack Obama would win going away, at least 53 to 47, perhaps even 99 to 1.

But the atmosphere has been polluted by lies, distortion, voter suppression and spending by desperate plutocrats who see the nation's changing demographics and fear that their time is almost up. They've had the help of a partisan Supreme Court.

The question for voters is actually very simple. The nation has wrestled with it since its founding: Will this be government for the many or the few?

Choose the many. Choose Barack Obama.
40 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The St. Louis Post-Dispatch endorses Obama. "A second term for a serious man" (Original Post) Drunken Irishman Oct 2012 OP
Excellent CrazyOrangeCat Oct 2012 #1
Wow, St Louis! Thanks DI nm Cha Oct 2012 #2
Wow! Beautiful! fugop Oct 2012 #3
I thought, "WOW!" and I see others had the same reaction. K&R. n/t jenmito Oct 2012 #4
Wow! DonViejo Oct 2012 #5
Yup! Wish all Democrats would vote this time around ffr Oct 2012 #12
Please thank them. rwheeler31 Oct 2012 #6
The universal reaction seems to be Wow. Let me join in on that alcibiades_mystery Oct 2012 #7
beautifully put identify Oct 2012 #8
Wonderful! ailsagirl Oct 2012 #9
Very well written! LTR Oct 2012 #10
The endorsement captures Obama perfectly: a serious man. Powerful endorsement. Justice Oct 2012 #11
It's so damned sad ... TahitiNut Oct 2012 #13
Clear and to the point. pinto Oct 2012 #14
Excellent! WI_DEM Oct 2012 #15
Wow!!! Tumbulu Oct 2012 #16
I can hardly praise this editorial enough. CaliforniaPeggy Oct 2012 #17
"Being careful and thoughtful is a good thing in a president" BlancheSplanchnik Oct 2012 #18
"Practiced the art of the possible." cr8tvlde Oct 2012 #19
Good endorsement but do they normally endorse Democrats? TroyD Oct 2012 #20
Yes normally Democrats. St Louis City votes 85% blue SaintLouisBlues Oct 2012 #22
Spot on, but wish they had said more about his accomplishments. RBInMaine Oct 2012 #21
Great to see! Thanks for sharing, DI. I enjoy your posts. writes3000 Oct 2012 #23
Thank you St. Louis Post-Dispatch for trying to pull us back from the cliff lunatica Oct 2012 #24
Well, now I'm glad St. Louis won that one-and-done game last night frazzled Oct 2012 #25
well said rsweets Oct 2012 #26
"A serious man" madaboutharry Oct 2012 #27
You're Welcome Nation (from a proud St. Louiswegian). joanbarnes Oct 2012 #28
I couldnt be more proud SmittynMo Oct 2012 #29
"A serious man." THIS I swear, came from that debate. progressivebydesign Oct 2012 #30
A very balanced editorial. Very well written. The character analysis of each man mnhtnbb Oct 2012 #31
Well-written, St. Louis. You sum it up nicely. n/t Beartracks Oct 2012 #32
Wonderful read. reflection Oct 2012 #33
Eloquent and so true. Excellent editorial. JackN415 Oct 2012 #34
Welcome to DU, JackN415! calimary Oct 2012 #36
This is a Thing of Beauty! calimary Oct 2012 #35
kick Nancy Waterman Oct 2012 #37
One of my most important takeaways: BlueMTexpat Oct 2012 #38
Comments to the Post Editorial benld74 Oct 2012 #39
Great article bushisanidiot Oct 2012 #40

fugop

(1,828 posts)
3. Wow! Beautiful!
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 07:38 PM
Oct 2012

I sure hope we start getting some of these beauties on a regular basis from now until November. I don't know that they actually sway voters, but they sure warm my heart!

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
5. Wow!
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 07:48 PM
Oct 2012

From the editorial:

To expect Barack Obama to have repaired, in four years, what took 30 years to undermine, is simply absurd. He might have gotten further had he not been saddled with an opposition party, funded by plutocrats, that sneers at the word compromise. But even if Mr. Obama had had Franklin Roosevelt's majorities, the economy would still be in peril.



ffr

(23,322 posts)
12. Yup! Wish all Democrats would vote this time around
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 08:20 PM
Oct 2012

LANDSLIDE, simply by the numbers. No more 'just say No, Rethugs!'

LTR

(13,227 posts)
10. Very well written!
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 08:13 PM
Oct 2012

Says all the things we've been thinking but didn't know how to put in the right words. I'll save this and refer back to it.

TahitiNut

(71,611 posts)
13. It's so damned sad ...
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 08:46 PM
Oct 2012

... that such a sane, rational, and truthful editorial has to be an exception rather than the norm nationwide. Everything it says should be such common knowledge that it need not even be cited.

CaliforniaPeggy

(155,999 posts)
17. I can hardly praise this editorial enough.
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 10:03 PM
Oct 2012

Superbly written, well thought through, just amazingly good.

And it is just as good in its scathing assessment of Romney/Ryan.

Thank you, my dear Drunken Irishman, for posting this!

K&R

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
18. "Being careful and thoughtful is a good thing in a president"
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 10:17 PM
Oct 2012

Wow, thanks for that, what an excellent essay.

I really appreciated the honest review of policy over the last 4 years. Not hero-worship--which I can fall into, actually--that's why I particularly appreciated the article. I haven't been up on everything (I'm a slow reader and I don't watch much teevee), so this filled in gaps too.

TroyD

(4,551 posts)
20. Good endorsement but do they normally endorse Democrats?
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 01:12 AM
Oct 2012

Just wondering what their history is. I'm not familiar with it.

What will be most impressive is if Obama can get endorsements from papers that don't normally endorse Democrats, or only seldom do.

That will give us clues as to who is winning the middle ground.

SaintLouisBlues

(1,257 posts)
22. Yes normally Democrats. St Louis City votes 85% blue
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 09:56 AM
Oct 2012

Metropolitan St. Louis (2 million plus on the Missouri side) goes blue as well, close to 60 % I believe.

The Post-Dispatch has been mostly liberal going back to its founding by Pulitzer.

If the Globe-Democrat was still in business, they'd be all about the teabaggers.

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
24. Thank you St. Louis Post-Dispatch for trying to pull us back from the cliff
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 10:06 AM
Oct 2012

This is much appreciated.

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
25. Well, now I'm glad St. Louis won that one-and-done game last night
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 10:31 AM
Oct 2012

What a crazy call on that "infield fly rule" thing in the 8th. And all the cans and bottles and trash thrown on the field!

My husband was kind of rooting for Atlanta (just because, I don't know, his sister lives there and there isn't a better reason). But, in the end, this fine endorsement from St. Louis is probably what added to the Cards winning.

SmittynMo

(3,544 posts)
29. I couldnt be more proud
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 02:29 PM
Oct 2012

Living in St Louis, I was pleased to see this make DU. I called all my so called republican friends and rubbed it in their faces. Go Obama. Go Cards!!!!

progressivebydesign

(19,458 posts)
30. "A serious man." THIS I swear, came from that debate.
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 02:32 PM
Oct 2012

While other people were wringing their hands, the rest of us were noticing how OFF Romney looked.. how utterly deranged or high he came off.. and how ridiculous he was. The President? well he came off Presidential and serious. He has gravitas, Romney does not.

mnhtnbb

(33,079 posts)
31. A very balanced editorial. Very well written. The character analysis of each man
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 03:15 PM
Oct 2012

is particularly important.

calimary

(88,831 posts)
36. Welcome to DU, JackN415!
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 06:54 PM
Oct 2012

Glad you're here, and you know we need you! This election is not won yet and we CANNOT allow the bad guys to gain ground.





Now get to work.

calimary

(88,831 posts)
35. This is a Thing of Beauty!
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 06:47 PM
Oct 2012

I'm gonna print it out and give it to a couple of people who aren't so sure, one of whom uttered the ol' cop-out - "meh, he hasn't done anything."

I BEG TO DIFFER.

BlueMTexpat

(15,652 posts)
38. One of my most important takeaways:
Sun Oct 7, 2012, 02:07 AM
Oct 2012
Mr. Romney's business career is the only way to judge his foundational beliefs: He did not run a company that built things and created jobs and strong communities. He became fabulously wealthy by loading up companies with tax-deductible debt, taking millions out up front along with big management fees. Some companies were saved. Others went bankrupt. Mr. Romney's firm always got out before the bills came due, either in lost jobs, bankruptcies or both.

If the nation's most pressing issue is debt, why elect a president whose entire business career was based on loading up companies with debt?


The bolding is mine.

benld74

(10,242 posts)
39. Comments to the Post Editorial
Sun Oct 7, 2012, 04:11 PM
Oct 2012
Carol Size · Top CommenterOMG - LOL - How the PDEB endorses this man after Thursday's debate performance is astonishing, but expected none-the-less. Some people clearly have no pride and harbor no shame in being poltical hacks. Well, as the saying goes, doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result, is the definition of insanity.
· Top Commenter
Ladies and gentlemen, Betty Crocker has endorsed Romney.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The St. Louis Post-Dispat...