2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHow does Bernie explain his votes on crime bills, gun control bills and others?
This is how: " They where large complicated bills."
berniepdx420
(1,784 posts)Wall Street and the 1% Do they give all this money just for kicks.. no they do not.. Our system is rigged and the Clintons deserve quite a bit of the blame...
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)However, I am not at all sure Bernie should have to "explain" things like the PLCAA which seem fine to me.
berniepdx420
(1,784 posts)asses were handed to you in NH..
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Darb
(2,807 posts)Way to go Bernies!!!!
Keep BU pure!!!
Keep BU pure!!!
Keep BU pure!!!
Keep BU pure!!!
Keep BU pure!!!
Keep BU pure!!!
Keep BU pure!!!
Keep BU pure!!!
Keep BU pure!!!
Keep BU pure!!!
Keep BU pure!!!
Keep BU pure!!!
Keep BU pure!!!
Keep BU pure!!!
Keep BU pure!!!
Keep BU pure!!!
Keep BU pure!!!
Keep BU pure!!!
Keep BU pure!!!
Keep BU pure!!!
Keep BU pure!!!
Keep BU pure!!!
Keep BU pure!!!
Keep BU pure!!!
berniepdx420
(1,784 posts)answered a freaking question since y'all got your asses handed to you in NH.. it seems to be a campaign wide tactic... So pony up and answer some questions specifically why do you think a few people contribute millions to a candidate.. crickets... crickets... You all know the system is rigged and the clintons are right in the middle of that rigging... you know it , I know it, anyone applying the slightest bit of logic knows it. Sand...Head...Stick
Darb
(2,807 posts)I'd venture a guess that nearly every single Hillary supporter would vote for Sanders if it came down to it. For now anyway, but keep trying.
However, the Bernies are doing their level best to cut their noses off to spite their face and say anything to disparage Hillary Clinton, much to the pleasure of the teabag set. I'm sure they are thankful. You might want to go find some and see.
The point being, support your guy and quit acting so suspiciously with regard to the other DEMOCRATIC candidate on the DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND.
Thanks in advance. I am certain that you will ignore it.
berniepdx420
(1,784 posts)the Clinton campaign from 2008...
As I pointed out you all don't answer any more questions... like your 2 post...
It's most likely because you know the system is rigged and the clintons take a chunk of the blame.. No one in our life time has played the political money game as well as the clintons with the Bushs close by
We are trying to change that paradigm while you are trying to maintain the status quot via quid pro quot... it's understandable why you are trying everything to keep from looking into those back smokey rooms your candidate gets her money from.....
I believe in the quiet moments of your life this is clear to you as well... Don't be afraid... We are many they are few.. jump on the Revolution in American politics help elect a True Progressive
Darb
(2,807 posts)Who gives a shit what happened in '08? Not me, that's for sure. I was with Obama and saw the whole thing. Quit it. Promote your guy.
Damn you guys just don't get it do ya?
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)I would vote for him. I will NOT allow a republican into office our of spite for MY own party. I feel like I am in freeper land here.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)Because they feel passionate about our country, feel Hillary has teh qualifications and they have the funds to do it.
berniepdx420
(1,784 posts)Darb
(2,807 posts)She is quite famous and accomplished. You can fondle that quid pro quo shit until you find satisfaction for all I care. It didn't happen. If it did, document it for me, real documentation, not teabagger innuendo shit. Real, actual, documented facts, like Bernie would do.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)Snotcicles
(9,089 posts)BOD and as a shareholder of this country's largest firearms and ammo retailer either.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)That takes care of the crime bill. See post #2 concerning the PLCAA. The Brady bill is more challenging (though if I were Bernie I wouldn't have voted for it; for one thing it was clearly anti-LGBTQ).
casperthegm
(643 posts)Found this quote; However, there were too many important provisions within the bill for Sen. Sanders to cast a vote against the entire package. Importantly, the bill contained an assault weapons ban that Sen. Sanders supported which even turned him into a target for the NRA during his reelection as well as the crucial Violence Against Women Act.
Basically, it was a very imperfect bill but one that had provisions worth considering. Not everything is black and white in politics, that's for sure. I was reading the article where I found this quote and it sure looks to me like this was signed by Bill Clinton and supported by Hillary. Interesting...
But yes, the question is worthy of an answer. It's a legit issue and I wish we had more of these discussions here.
Deny and Shred
(1,061 posts)That is how money and influence works. The monied interest gets someone on the committe to insert a paragragh or two into an unrelated bill on their behalf. That is how Enron got to own water rights across South America, for example.
Any bill that has been deemed 'sure to pass' gets immense amounts of pork inserted over time. By the time is is voted on, there are dozens of riders that are unrelated to the purpose of the original bill. The beauty of being in Congress is you can support a bill for its good points, or vote against a bill because too much pork was inserted. Either way, you have a good argument to your constituents.
If you want to use it as a cudgel, feel free. Then find me any member of Congress that hasn't voted on a bill that contains some aspect they didn't campaign on.
intrepidity
(8,575 posts)Exactly. Imagine him trying to go into those details during a debate or rally? He could, of course, but the audience would cry foul or fall asleep. I have no doubt that he could explain in significant detail why he voted the way he did on every bill. He seems to be quite detail oriented about such things.
Deny and Shred
(1,061 posts)It is to his credit that he has kept his message succinct. As you say, not too wonky for a TV debate.
For Clinton to have attacked him on these votes, Phil Graham's sneak-in of the Commodities' Modernization Act, for example, is disingenuous. She knows every Senatorial vote accepts some bad elements with the good for which you are voting.
I am impressed that a 74-year old accustomed to speaking his mind has been this disciplined so far and has rarely 'popped off. 'I do think he will have to broaden his stump speech soon. I have no doubt it will be equally succinct and effective.
And a hearty Welcome, might I add.
intrepidity
(8,575 posts)but I know he can't. Yes, his discipline is exemplary and almost unfathomable to me. That just speaks more to his qualification for the office he seeks.
Thanks for the welcome; I am a long-time lurker.
berniepdx420
(1,784 posts)By Katie Sanders
Sen. Bernie Sanders is wearing a bad grade as a badge of honor.
The Democratic presidential candidate is under fire since Sundays debate for his votes on gun legislation, with chief rival Hillary Clinton eagerly highlighting his flip-flops on immunity for gun dealers, among other issues.
Sanders got his chance to explain himself in Underwood, Iowa, when an audience member asked him about his past positions, which she said seemed more Republican. Sanders said that impression wasnt right.
"I have a D-minus voting record from the NRA," he said. "Does that sound like a tool of the NRA? D-minus."
We wanted to know if his statement earned perfect marks.
A spokesman for Sanders campaign said Sanders NRA grade came during the 2012 election cycle, as shown in the lobby groups subscriber-only database. The group awarded Republican John MacGovern, Sanders unsuccessful challenger, an A.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/jan/20/bernie-s/bernie-sanders-nra-report-card-d-minus-most-recent/
You can also check out his stance on the issues here... if it is facts you want..
http://feelthebern.org/bernie-sanders-on-gun-policy/
Armstead
(47,803 posts)I wish people would get their memes straight.
Is Sanders a rigid ideologue who simplistically votes without regard for the consequences?
Or is he an opportunistic creep who votes whatever will benefit him personally?
Truth is he has a strong ideology and stands up for it and follows his beliefs and values. But he is also an intelligent politician who understands the need for compromise and negotiation.
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Or to be much clearer they are far too left-authoritarian on guns. You can be a left-libertarian on guns too: you just choose not to own one
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)was included in that bill. He voted with the vast majority of Democrats many of whom voted yes because of the VAWA aspect. Only 64 House Democrats voted No on that bill, only 2 Senate Democrats voted no on that bill. This means of course that Kennedy, Biden and Kerry all voted yes and neither Biden nor Kerry were asked about when they were candidates. Hillary Clinton strongly promoted before the fact and both touted and defended it in all the years since, sometimes in very strong terms.
In actual fact, of all the people involved Bernie is probably the only one who has explained his vote and his position on that bill in great detail many times over the years.
Just yesterday on DU, I saw a Clinton supporter who has criticized Bernie's vote on the Crime Bill list the Violence Against Women Act as a Clinton accomplishment. So how does that work, exactly?
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)You have to COMPROMISE. A lot of what Hillary has voted on was compromising just like Bernie but none of y'all will recognize that. You ignore it.
bigtree
(93,730 posts)...none allowed for Hillary.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)When you roll your sleeves up, serve our country and work hard there will be more to criticize, naturally. When you sit back and do nothing but vote oh a senate for 30 years there will be less to be critically about. I mean, you can't criticize nothing.
Darb
(2,807 posts)Gotta keep the BU clean from strife.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Darb
(2,807 posts)Jussayin'. I mean, we can't have those damn Hillary supporters around here now can we?
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Darb
(2,807 posts)calling out those with no nose.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)addressed...
Darb
(2,807 posts)I find the "it's too complicated" excuse fine. That is not the point. The point is that Bernies are thin skinned and have made DU into BU and it is unrecognizable and without a nose.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)Remember when Jane stood on stage with a list of mean things that all those meanies said about Bernie?
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)He lost his cool and started yelling. Refused to answer many questions and instead said, " health care for all Americans."
frylock
(34,825 posts)TCJ70
(4,387 posts)...vote against minorities? Kind of a rock and a hard place, right? You tell me what the right answer is.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Her weathervaning when it comes to guns and pandering to the NRA?

Or maybe it was from 2008 when she painted Obama as being "too liberal" on guns?

Or was it her outright flip flop?
One thing is for sure though, this is certainly the case.

Darb
(2,807 posts)where is your nose again?
Darb
(2,807 posts)Same thing though, right? Don't answer.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)where most people agree with Bernie http://www.politicususa.com/2015/06/03/polls-americans-socialists-bernie-sanders.html
But you wouldn't know that would you.
When in doubt go ad-hom like you did, says it all
Darb
(2,807 posts)Just promote your guy and let that be enough. Is he not wonderful? Is he not the perfect candidate? Then why all the attacking of Hillary. Promote your guy and................

Darb
(2,807 posts)Good luck with that. Trump and Cruz and Rubio love it, you can bet on that.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)but reality



Fearless
(18,458 posts)fun n serious
(4,451 posts)She was lied to by the Bush admin.
Robbins
(5,066 posts)bernie didn't believe bush.neither did ted kennedy,robert byrd,and paul wellstone.
she was very much pro-iraq war.and has shown since then she would do it again.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)fun n serious
(4,451 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)I didn't, and I'm on record here at DU.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)Your profile shows that you joined in 2005.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)There are other people HERE I knew from other boards who know me. I don't have to disclose that to you.
polly7
(20,582 posts)I remember you from that 'other place' and I remember you from years and years ago here. You're a good person, Fun, and will always be my pal. We did fight in the trenches there, didn't we!
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)I guess I am next to have Hussain's baby.
polly7
(20,582 posts)So, we did good! I've been preggers with my Saddam baby for ... omg .... 13 years now and am still not even in maternity clothes! We'll have to go on baby play dates when our little ones finally arrive.
(I remember once when I brought up a whole bunch of facts re why they were going to bomb Iraq vs. their propaganda crap how a few of them threatened to come up and kill me! Those were a craaaaaazy bunch.)
Carry on, I just wanted to verify that yes, you are exactly who you say you are.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)Fearless
(18,458 posts)And bush co lied to everyone. Some, like Sanders, realized what it was.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)All the credit, none of the blame
uponit7771
(93,504 posts)Robbins
(5,066 posts)often voted for bills bill clinton supported and signed into law.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Perogie
(687 posts)you might want to try the edit button
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)d_legendary1
(2,586 posts)But keep spreading those lies. You make camp weather vane look authentic:

WhaTHellsgoingonhere
(5,252 posts)This is another reason Bernie can get Independents. I don't understand why this hasn't been mentioned by anyone, anywhere.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)WhaTHellsgoingonhere
(5,252 posts)Your response = point conceded
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)Why didn't Bernie run as an independent? Take a step back and look at how Bernie supporters have behaved here on DU before you lecture me about my behavior.
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
(5,252 posts)1. Go take a nap. You're acting like someone whose been defending Hillary around the clock for a week. You're getting delirious, now. You need to sleep.
2. I can't believe this isn't a rhetorical question. You're probably the biggest Nader Haters and you're wondering why Bernie didn't run as an Independent. Seriously, you need to take a nap. Who can take you seriously at this point?
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)You would be telling him to go take a nap.
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
(5,252 posts)I don't know why you guys are worried about Hillary and Bernie. I really paid no attention to the "black vote is Hillary's firewall" meme. So I did my research. Turns out they really are. Blacks are going to save(?) America from white people, like me. I've come to terms with another (barf) Clinton presidency. I hope you guys, have, too. Maybe after Saturday?
Bernie may not get past Clinton, but he's at least as electable as a black Kenyan socialist with a terrorist name and a radical reverend. People don't take the Rs and their labeling seriously, anymore. But some people remember the old days when it was effective, and are terrified. Can't let the media gin up fear. Socialist polls favorably today.
bigtree
(93,730 posts)...don't need no stinking questions.
LexVegas
(6,955 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)SheenaR
(2,052 posts)That a guy who actually reads all of the provisions of a bill and votes with his conscience is badgered. A bill is not simply the name of the bill. People willfully choose to ignore that fact
uponit7771
(93,504 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Should he have voted against the violence against woman's act?
