2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumClinton Should Withdraw From The Presidential Race
FEBRUARY 18, 2016 6:20 PM
BY MIKE ABRAMS
mike@ballardfl.com
In my last column, Dont fall for the Republicans Big Lie, I accused most of the Republican candidates of creating a myth about the world being on fire. Actually only the Democratic Party may be going down in flames.
In some ways, this reminds me of 1968 when Democratic President Lyndon Johnson was running for re-election four years after being elected by an historic majority. Johnson had led the country through social change Medicare, voting rights that was popular and transformative.
But the country was horribly divided over the Vietnam War. Johnson barely won the New Hampshire primary over Sen. Eugene McCarthy of Wisconsin. Shortly after, President Johnson announced from the Oval Office that he would not seek re-election. For a man who thrived on power, it was a selfless act for his party and country.
Like President Johnson, Hillary Clinton is still the Democratic front-runner, with a solid, well-deserved base of supporters within the Democratic Party. No one doubts her qualification to run for president. She probably will win South Carolinas primary on Saturday, but a CNN poll has her and Sanders tied in the Nevada caucuses.
Nevada was not supposed to be close because of Clintons historical support among its Hispanic voters.
Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/opinion/op-ed/article61164382.html#storylink=cpy
MIKE ABRAMS IS FORMER CHAIRMAN OF THE DADE DEMOCRATIC PARTY, A FORMER STATE LEGISLATOR AND CURRENTLY A POLICY ADVISER TO BALLARD PARTNERS.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)FarPoint
(14,765 posts)Let's all say it together... " Madam President "....
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)What is wrong with these people?
amborin
(16,631 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Turns off the liberal base, zero appeal to independents and the repigs will do everything short of coming out of graves just to vote against her. Epic blowout and a horrendous blow to the party.
And that's assuming she is NOT indicted.
scottie55
(1,400 posts)Who knows.
The folks out there will not vote for HRC.
I know a bunch of them.
Independents pretty much.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)opposite is true. Too many people have a visceral dislike for her.
BreakfastClub
(765 posts)bobGandolf
(871 posts)I'm more concerned Bernie, with limited national scrutiny experience, and a vagueness in responses will be nailed by republicans ala McGovern.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)And no one on the Republican side has national "scrutiny" experience
SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)...
onehandle
(51,122 posts)The 'Not Hillary' Party has little interest in democracy.
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)hopefully the Senate.
With clinton at the top of the ticket, neither of those are possibilities, imo.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)beedle
(1,235 posts)and they are not going to vote against themselves because Sanders is at the top of the ticket. You question makes no sense.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)Candidates are interested in getting re-elected; they have opinions on which Presidential candidate is better for that outcome. None of the many candidates I've talked to say they want Sanders at the top of the ticket.
DUbeornot2be
(367 posts)...for someone as active as you've been in establishment politics over the years...
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)and BTW, I'm a big supporter of Elizabeth Warren. AS long as you don't hit one of my deal breaker issues (currently women's reproductive rights, gun control and Syrian refugees), I'll support your campaign as long as you're competitive.
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)Like Hillary being open to a Constitutional amendment to ban late term abortion? Or her actions to turn away South American refugees when she was Secretary of State? And does the nickname Annie Oakley ring any bells?
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)brooklynite
(96,882 posts)...like Elizabeth Warren on Republicanism
...or Bernie Sanders on immigration reform.
Rocky the Leprechaun
(222 posts)Changing from HRC to Bernie by March 2nd.
After Bernie successfully captures the majority of the SuperTuesday states, with zero path to the nomination for Clinton AGAIN.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)...when my opinion about his electability changed.
Are you open to the same?
Rocky the Leprechaun
(222 posts)and so far, she has unimpressed me.
She won't get the nomination, and the path for Bernie will be a shocker for you.
Rocky the Leprechaun
(222 posts)and clinton is out of cash (again), with more states to go, how far do you think she'll go? Certainly not without any cash flow coming her way.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)I said I didn't think he was electable; I still don't.
The former secretary of state brought in over $37 million in the final three months of 2015 and started the year with $38 million in the bank. At the same time, the campaign spent $35 million in those three months. She continues to benefit from millions of dollars raised by her super PACs, including Priorities USA, which said Friday it has raised $50 million through this month. Two other groups supporting Clinton, American Bridge and Correct the Record, brought in an additional $6 million total.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/31/politics/sanders-clinton-trump-cruz-campaign-finance-super-pacs/
SidDithers
(44,333 posts)Sid
Rocky the Leprechaun
(222 posts)Here. Put this in your Google, "Bernie" "brooklynite" site
emocraticunderground.com
Not that complicated.
SidDithers
(44,333 posts)Sid
Rocky the Leprechaun
(222 posts)I'm anxiously waiting for the next choice for the Broncos QB. I know it won't be Manning, because he'll retire.
SidDithers
(44,333 posts)Sid
frylock
(34,825 posts)Bohemianwriter
(978 posts)And if they insist on NOT being re-elected, all they have to do is to follow the Titanic called Hillary...
Her and her corporate buddies time is over no matter how much Wall Street worshipers whine about it...
CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)grasswire
(50,130 posts)YES
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)She's for Hillary, first last and only.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)I'm not her greatest fan, but I do see her as useful in toughening up Bernie for the GE, given how she's pre-testing all of the RW attacks she can against him.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)Can jump in.
olddots
(10,237 posts)we are just back ground in her movie .
Qutzupalotl
(15,824 posts)I don't want either candidate to sail through to the nomination unopposed. Debate is healthy for democracy. The contrast with Bernie is striking. However, I think Clinton should sever ties with Brock and stick to the issues. That will ensure her loss.
ejbr
(5,892 posts)actually wants to replace her with another mainstream candidate per the article.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Having her head the ticket would be disaster enough. If she gets indicted just before Election Day would be devastating.
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)malthaussen
(18,572 posts)So, how exactly did Johnson withdrawing help the Party?
-- Mal
yawnmaster
(2,812 posts)won (so did it really strengthen the party???)
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)like a pair of gongs. 1968 was sui generis, and may it ever remain so.
book_worm
(15,951 posts)Even by the time of the California primary he had far more delegates than RFK or McCarthy. There were far fewer primaries in 1968 and most delegates were won in state conventions and thru organized labor. Finally, LBJ, though not a candidate still controlled the convention.
http://chicago68.com/c68myths.html
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)given him the momentum to secure the nomination. (At least that's the version of history I've inherited from folks like Arthur Schlesinger.)
yawnmaster
(2,812 posts)Also...didn't Nixon win that one??
mcar
(46,058 posts)rpannier
(24,924 posts)She should not drop out
Both should see it through as long as they feel they can win or influence the convention
Flying Squirrel
(3,041 posts)Center-right article saying people are not excited about Sanders either, and advocating a new competitor for him within the Democratic Party. He can go to hell..
rpannier
(24,924 posts)or Michael Bloomberg
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)Tarc
(10,601 posts)Should quit.
eridani
(51,907 posts)Wait...you're serious?
Response to Purveyor (Original post)
antigop This message was self-deleted by its author.
merrily
(45,251 posts)great for a war time incumbent, either. However, after the NH primary, RFK entered the race. Then Johnson dropped out.
saltpoint
(50,986 posts)is everything. She probably shouldn't resign right after Clyburn's endorsement, for example.
I don't think the Democratic Party is in harm's way. The GOP, on the other hand, has let quite a few unstable people rise in its ranks. They're at the control panel and the party is a food fight. There's no discourse on ideas or political philosophy. There's the buzz of the tax-cut saw. There's the clank of Dark Ages tools of torture to carve up the safety net. There's the Bible-thumpers yelping in megachurches. There's the racists and bigots trying to ban Muslims and build walls on our southern border.
The Republicans are taking on water. Pretty quickly.
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)Yog-Sothoth
(29 posts)[img]
[/img]
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)for me it is the supers issue. They go there. well release the kraken and blow up the party.
I am sure I will order ink by the bucket full.
lovemydog
(11,833 posts)and supporters of the one in second place go 'Yeah! She should quit!'
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)But I agree it's a silly article.
Cassiopeia
(2,603 posts)She will do everything possible this cycle to win. If that means burning the party to the ground in the process, so be it.
It's about her and nothing else.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)Beacool
(30,518 posts)who only decided to become a Democrat to run for president.
No, it's not about her. It's about electing the most qualified candidate, and that's Hillary. Not the candidate who promises the moon and the stars and has zero chance of getting his agenda through this Congress and any other Congress in the foreseeable future.
Cassiopeia
(2,603 posts)if Bernie wanted to harm the party he would have run as an Independent splitting the Democratic vote.
Hillary is not running because "she's the most qualified candidate." She is running for personal gain.
If Hillary were running to better the country or the world she would pick a solid platform and let the chips fall where they may. No, Hillary is in this for one reason, herself. She already has more money than she knows what to do with and it no longer excites her. The only thing left is POTUS and the only reason she wants it is because money can't buy it outright.
Beacool
(30,518 posts)I think that it's not about herself.
Cassiopeia
(2,603 posts)A fair minimum wage
Health CARE as a right, not insurance
rebuilding our infrastructure
ending the prison industrial complex
Taxpayer funded education
To name a few positions Bernie has spent a lifetime trying to achieve.
What does Hillary want? Seriously, name one damn thing Hillary has spent her political career fighting for and she has never wavered on.
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)Hillary Clinton is a firm believer that Hillary Clinton should be president. In this, she has never wavered, nor shall she!
Bohemianwriter
(978 posts)Are DWS, Hillary, DLC and DNC. Their "3rd way" charade has been unmasked by a REAL democrat coming back from exile.
But if you insist she becomes the nominee, I wish you good luck in getting back al the voters you and your candidate have done your best to alienate.
Hilary does NOT represent PROGRESSIVE values! Hilary does NOT represent the core values of the democratic party unless taking money from Wall Street and do double talk is two of those core values...
I wish you good luck in trying to convince a veteran who knows a bit too much about the war crimes that Bill and Hillary has supported the last 20 years to openly endorse someone who speaks of Libya in terms of "we came, we saw, he bombed!"
It's more like "we came, we bombed, they drowned!"
The thousands of refugees in Mediterranean are a result of your candidates poor judgment and misplaced priorities. She's not alone, but she and her supporters touts foreign policy experience. Right! Experience in screwing things up!
Not a sign of someone knowing what they are doing. And Hillary has been acting like a novice! A student of Dick&George!
Lazy Daisy
(928 posts)I'm a Bernie supporter, but there is no reason for her to withdraw at this point. And anybody who is looking to step in now, now that they see she is struggling I say screw em'. If they didn't have the nerve to go up against her and get in on this from the beginning how can anybody support them? If they didn't feel they were strong enough to take her on before, why should we think they are a strong enough candidate after she's gone?
To anybody who comes into the race at this point I say "up yours"
This primary may be heated, but both candidates will come out stronger for it.
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts). . . I concur.
She's an embarrassment to the Democratic Party.
Her angry display of contempt for that one guy at the Town Hall meeting, the one who said he was a realtor, was enough right there to conclude that she doesn't have what it takes to be the next President of the United States.
Punkingal
(9,522 posts)And bombing the shit out of some country. I think she acted unhinged. And the anger she has is palpable. She scares me.
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)Almost sci-fi like.
840high
(17,196 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)there a video?
Beacool
(30,518 posts)Thanks for the laugh........
840high
(17,196 posts)Beacool
(30,518 posts)You sound hoarse.
Starry Messenger
(32,381 posts)NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)I thought to myself "thank goodness she is not running for President again". Because in my simple mind if she was even considering running she would certainly not be collecting fat checks from the miscreants of the American economy.
NobodyHere
(2,810 posts)who gets out of the race.
seaotter
(576 posts)OhZone
(3,216 posts)
Rocky the Leprechaun
(222 posts)and withdraw from her candidacy and re-register with the Republican Party and deal with Trump in the primaries.
She's a Republican in Democratic clothing.
Tarc
(10,601 posts)who is all of 183 posts at the Democratic Unterground, a forum for promoting and supporting all Democrats.
I think i know who I roll with.
She's the only Democrat running!
treestar
(82,383 posts)why the hell should she do that?
That's what it would take for Bernie to win?
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)Those are her two major options.
Our one option: making her so irrelevant that it doesn't matter whether she agrees to bow out or not. Thank goodness there is still one other candidate left.
this place (GD-P) gets nuttier daily
projections VERY positive, most super-delegates committed - so ask her to exit the race
rich
Vinca
(53,994 posts)She should have thought twice about running given the legal problems hanging over her head. She didn't, though, and the field was cleared to give her a straight shot to the nomination. Or so they thought. As a result, many qualified Democrats who might have run did not. We could pay a big price in November and if we do I hope it's a lesson learned and not repeated.