Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 08:54 PM Feb 2016

Clinton Should Withdraw From The Presidential Race

FEBRUARY 18, 2016 6:20 PM
BY MIKE ABRAMS
mike@ballardfl.com

In my last column, Don’t fall for the Republicans’ Big Lie, I accused most of the Republican candidates of creating a myth about “the world being on fire.“ Actually only the Democratic Party may be going down in flames.

In some ways, this reminds me of 1968 when Democratic President Lyndon Johnson was running for re-election four years after being elected by an historic majority. Johnson had led the country through social change — Medicare, voting rights — that was popular and transformative.

But the country was horribly divided over the Vietnam War. Johnson barely won the New Hampshire primary over Sen. Eugene McCarthy of Wisconsin. Shortly after, President Johnson announced from the Oval Office that he would not seek re-election. For a man who thrived on power, it was a selfless act for his party and country.

Like President Johnson, Hillary Clinton is still the Democratic front-runner, with a solid, well-deserved base of supporters within the Democratic Party. No one doubts her qualification to run for president. She probably will win South Carolina’s primary on Saturday, but a CNN poll has her and Sanders tied in the Nevada caucuses.

Nevada was not supposed to be close because of Clinton’s historical support among its Hispanic voters.

Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/opinion/op-ed/article61164382.html#storylink=cpy

MIKE ABRAMS IS FORMER CHAIRMAN OF THE DADE DEMOCRATIC PARTY, A FORMER STATE LEGISLATOR AND CURRENTLY A POLICY ADVISER TO BALLARD PARTNERS.

100 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Clinton Should Withdraw From The Presidential Race (Original Post) Purveyor Feb 2016 OP
Agreed. She is embarrassing the Democratic party by being Repug-lite. JonLeibowitz Feb 2016 #1
Get use to it.... FarPoint Feb 2016 #30
I'll call her by Hillary. n/t JonLeibowitz Feb 2016 #31
I can't. 840high Feb 2016 #54
Repuglite... Lies Like Crazy! CorporatistNation Feb 2016 #49
she would lose in the GE and destroy the Democratic party amborin Feb 2016 #2
This. She is a Titanic or Hindenburg waiting to happen in the GE. hifiguy Feb 2016 #8
My Sister Is A Conservative, Will Never Consider Hillary, and Likes Bernie scottie55 Feb 2016 #39
She has zero chance in the GE. I still hear people justify supporting her because they say the GoneFishin Feb 2016 #41
People said that about Obama too. I will bookmark this and come back to it in Nov. :-) nt BreakfastClub Feb 2016 #95
Not sure she would lose in GE, but Bernie..... bobGandolf Feb 2016 #97
The situation in 1972 was completely different from today Art_from_Ark Feb 2016 #99
Clinton should at least embrace the landslide of enthusiasm in the party SoLeftIAmRight Feb 2016 #3
Millions of votes ahead in almost 50 states and she should withdraw? onehandle Feb 2016 #4
No. We have an interest in retaining the WH come 2017 and Purveyor Feb 2016 #7
Tell me which Senate candidates want Bernie Sanders at the top of the ticket... brooklynite Feb 2016 #11
Senate canadates only get one vote beedle Feb 2016 #32
Not my point... brooklynite Feb 2016 #33
Not surprising... DUbeornot2be Feb 2016 #34
...that list included Russ Feingold. brooklynite Feb 2016 #35
Deal breaker issues... Lordquinton Feb 2016 #71
Annie Oakley was big shooter; should fit in with Bernie Sanders, right? brooklynite Feb 2016 #72
Unlike some people, I'm open to people changing... brooklynite Feb 2016 #73
.....or Rocky the Leprechaun Feb 2016 #80
I changed from Clinton to Obama after Super Tuesday in 2008... brooklynite Feb 2016 #85
Certainly. If she can prove herself worthy Rocky the Leprechaun Feb 2016 #90
Last year you dismissed Bernie as insiginificant. Now Bernie is leading Rocky the Leprechaun Feb 2016 #79
When did I dismiss him as insignificant? brooklynite Feb 2016 #81
Last year?... SidDithers Feb 2016 #82
I do my research. Rocky the Leprechaun Feb 2016 #84
Go Broncos!...nt SidDithers Feb 2016 #89
Thanks. Rocky the Leprechaun Feb 2016 #92
LOL...nt SidDithers Feb 2016 #94
They haven't really instilled a lot of confidence that they know what they're doing. frylock Feb 2016 #62
Yes they are! Bohemianwriter Feb 2016 #67
As if Queen of the super delegates gives two shits about votes. CBGLuthier Feb 2016 #68
for the good of the party and the country grasswire Feb 2016 #5
Hah, that's not for whose good she acts. Jester Messiah Feb 2016 #86
I think it's a wee bit early to proclaim that. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Feb 2016 #6
I think the point is for Hillary to get out now so someone NWCorona Feb 2016 #19
she is in it to win it olddots Feb 2016 #9
As a Sanders supporter, I disagree. Qutzupalotl Feb 2016 #10
The author ejbr Feb 2016 #14
It's an embarrassment having one of our candidates under 2 investigations. HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #52
Once again, I question who really wants the coronation KingFlorez Feb 2016 #12
Um, the Democrats lost in 1968. malthaussen Feb 2016 #13
It didn't...it is interesting politics involving Kennedy, an assassination and McGovern..and Nixon.. yawnmaster Feb 2016 #17
Don't forget that traitor Kissinger and Claire Chennault (and Thieu) - nt KingCharlemagne Feb 2016 #43
Had RFK lived he would have beaten Nixon and Wallace hifiguy Feb 2016 #18
Actually Humphrey would have been the nominee book_worm Feb 2016 #24
Are you sure about that? Had RFK lived, his California Primary victory would have KingCharlemagne Feb 2016 #47
oh there was so much more politics in the 1968 Democratic primary that is in the OP above... yawnmaster Feb 2016 #15
No she shouldn't mcar Feb 2016 #16
Agree with you rpannier Feb 2016 #45
Bah Flying Squirrel Feb 2016 #20
The author is probably pining for Joe Lieberman to jump in the race rpannier Feb 2016 #46
Lol. n/t JTFrog Feb 2016 #21
Yes, the candidate who leads by commanding margins in 10 Super Tuesday states Tarc Feb 2016 #22
No candidate should withdraw until they want to n/t eridani Feb 2016 #23
! stopbush Feb 2016 #25
This message was self-deleted by its author antigop Feb 2016 #26
Johnson won over McCarthy by at least 7 points. That is not barely winning, although it's not merrily Feb 2016 #27
An exciting proposition but timing saltpoint Feb 2016 #28
Awesom prose poem. Should be its own OP - nt KingCharlemagne Feb 2016 #48
Good luck with that one Mike... Yog-Sothoth Feb 2016 #29
Well it is good to know that I am not the only one thinking 1968 nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #36
It's funny when someone says the front-runner should quit lovemydog Feb 2016 #37
No one said Sanders should quit Lordquinton Feb 2016 #77
Clinton is no LBJ. Cassiopeia Feb 2016 #38
+1,000,000,000,000 GoneFishin Feb 2016 #42
..+1 840high Feb 2016 #55
Excuse me, if anybody is trying to burn down the party is the "democratic Socialist" Beacool Feb 2016 #59
Excuse me, Cassiopeia Feb 2016 #64
I disagree. Beacool Feb 2016 #65
Bernie stands for Cassiopeia Feb 2016 #66
Oh, I know! I know one! Jester Messiah Feb 2016 #91
The ones burning down the party... Bohemianwriter Feb 2016 #70
Absolutely not Lazy Daisy Feb 2016 #40
After her performance in the Town Hall meeting tonight . . . Major Hogwash Feb 2016 #44
I have this awful picture of her in the Oval Office acting like she did tonight... Punkingal Feb 2016 #50
Oh hell I thought I was the only one that was having these visions... Purveyor Feb 2016 #51
She scares a lot of people. 840high Feb 2016 #56
I didn't get to watch. Is 840high Feb 2016 #57
Wuuuaaahhaaa!!! Beacool Feb 2016 #53
woof-woof. 840high Feb 2016 #58
Take a cough drop. Beacool Feb 2016 #60
ok 840high Feb 2016 #63
Delusional. Starry Messenger Feb 2016 #61
In case anyone needs a reminder about 1968: NuclearDem Feb 2016 #69
Funny story. When I began to hear about her speaking fees to Wall Street banks FlatBaroque Feb 2016 #74
How about we let the voters decide NobodyHere Feb 2016 #75
So, you then agree that the "super delegates" matter not? Good. seaotter Feb 2016 #76
Yeah she should quit! NOT! OhZone Feb 2016 #78
She should officially resign from the Democratic Party Rocky the Leprechaun Feb 2016 #83
We have Hillary Clinton, who has been with the part since 1970 or so, vs "Rocky the Leprechaun" Tarc Feb 2016 #93
Why? OhZone Feb 2016 #87
this kind of thing is just dumb treestar Feb 2016 #88
Bowing out gracefully or going down and taking the party down in her fall. Betty Karlson Feb 2016 #96
lol DrDan Feb 2016 #98
It's probably too late to make much of a difference. Vinca Feb 2016 #100
 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
8. This. She is a Titanic or Hindenburg waiting to happen in the GE.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 08:59 PM
Feb 2016

Turns off the liberal base, zero appeal to independents and the repigs will do everything short of coming out of graves just to vote against her. Epic blowout and a horrendous blow to the party.

And that's assuming she is NOT indicted.

 

scottie55

(1,400 posts)
39. My Sister Is A Conservative, Will Never Consider Hillary, and Likes Bernie
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:34 PM
Feb 2016

Who knows.

The folks out there will not vote for HRC.

I know a bunch of them.

Independents pretty much.

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
41. She has zero chance in the GE. I still hear people justify supporting her because they say the
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:43 PM
Feb 2016

opposite is true. Too many people have a visceral dislike for her.

bobGandolf

(871 posts)
97. Not sure she would lose in GE, but Bernie.....
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 05:44 AM
Feb 2016

I'm more concerned Bernie, with limited national scrutiny experience, and a vagueness in responses will be nailed by republicans ala McGovern.

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
99. The situation in 1972 was completely different from today
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 09:03 AM
Feb 2016

And no one on the Republican side has national "scrutiny" experience

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
4. Millions of votes ahead in almost 50 states and she should withdraw?
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 08:57 PM
Feb 2016

The 'Not Hillary' Party has little interest in democracy.

 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
7. No. We have an interest in retaining the WH come 2017 and
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 08:59 PM
Feb 2016

hopefully the Senate.

With clinton at the top of the ticket, neither of those are possibilities, imo.

 

beedle

(1,235 posts)
32. Senate canadates only get one vote
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:04 PM
Feb 2016

and they are not going to vote against themselves because Sanders is at the top of the ticket. You question makes no sense.

 

brooklynite

(96,882 posts)
33. Not my point...
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:07 PM
Feb 2016

Candidates are interested in getting re-elected; they have opinions on which Presidential candidate is better for that outcome. None of the many candidates I've talked to say they want Sanders at the top of the ticket.

DUbeornot2be

(367 posts)
34. Not surprising...
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:17 PM
Feb 2016

...for someone as active as you've been in establishment politics over the years...

 

brooklynite

(96,882 posts)
35. ...that list included Russ Feingold.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:21 PM
Feb 2016

and BTW, I'm a big supporter of Elizabeth Warren. AS long as you don't hit one of my deal breaker issues (currently women's reproductive rights, gun control and Syrian refugees), I'll support your campaign as long as you're competitive.

Lordquinton

(7,886 posts)
71. Deal breaker issues...
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 01:48 PM
Feb 2016

Like Hillary being open to a Constitutional amendment to ban late term abortion? Or her actions to turn away South American refugees when she was Secretary of State? And does the nickname Annie Oakley ring any bells?

 

brooklynite

(96,882 posts)
73. Unlike some people, I'm open to people changing...
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 01:57 PM
Feb 2016

...like Elizabeth Warren on Republicanism

...or Bernie Sanders on immigration reform.

 
80. .....or
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 02:26 PM
Feb 2016

Changing from HRC to Bernie by March 2nd.

After Bernie successfully captures the majority of the SuperTuesday states, with zero path to the nomination for Clinton AGAIN.

 

brooklynite

(96,882 posts)
85. I changed from Clinton to Obama after Super Tuesday in 2008...
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 02:31 PM
Feb 2016

...when my opinion about his electability changed.

Are you open to the same?

 
90. Certainly. If she can prove herself worthy
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 02:33 PM
Feb 2016

and so far, she has unimpressed me.

She won't get the nomination, and the path for Bernie will be a shocker for you.

 
79. Last year you dismissed Bernie as insiginificant. Now Bernie is leading
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 02:24 PM
Feb 2016

and clinton is out of cash (again), with more states to go, how far do you think she'll go? Certainly not without any cash flow coming her way.

 

brooklynite

(96,882 posts)
81. When did I dismiss him as insignificant?
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 02:27 PM
Feb 2016

I said I didn't think he was electable; I still don't.

Clinton's fundraising prowess
The former secretary of state brought in over $37 million in the final three months of 2015 and started the year with $38 million in the bank. At the same time, the campaign spent $35 million in those three months. She continues to benefit from millions of dollars raised by her super PACs, including Priorities USA, which said Friday it has raised $50 million through this month. Two other groups supporting Clinton, American Bridge and Correct the Record, brought in an additional $6 million total.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/31/politics/sanders-clinton-trump-cruz-campaign-finance-super-pacs/
 
84. I do my research.
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 02:31 PM
Feb 2016

Here. Put this in your Google, "Bernie" "brooklynite" site emocraticunderground.com

Not that complicated.

 
92. Thanks.
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 02:34 PM
Feb 2016


I'm anxiously waiting for the next choice for the Broncos QB. I know it won't be Manning, because he'll retire.

 

Bohemianwriter

(978 posts)
67. Yes they are!
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 09:56 AM
Feb 2016

And if they insist on NOT being re-elected, all they have to do is to follow the Titanic called Hillary...

Her and her corporate buddies time is over no matter how much Wall Street worshipers whine about it...

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
6. I think it's a wee bit early to proclaim that.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 08:58 PM
Feb 2016

I'm not her greatest fan, but I do see her as useful in toughening up Bernie for the GE, given how she's pre-testing all of the RW attacks she can against him.

Qutzupalotl

(15,824 posts)
10. As a Sanders supporter, I disagree.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 09:04 PM
Feb 2016

I don't want either candidate to sail through to the nomination unopposed. Debate is healthy for democracy. The contrast with Bernie is striking. However, I think Clinton should sever ties with Brock and stick to the issues. That will ensure her loss.

ejbr

(5,892 posts)
14. The author
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 09:18 PM
Feb 2016

actually wants to replace her with another mainstream candidate per the article.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
52. It's an embarrassment having one of our candidates under 2 investigations.
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 01:20 AM
Feb 2016

Having her head the ticket would be disaster enough. If she gets indicted just before Election Day would be devastating.

malthaussen

(18,572 posts)
13. Um, the Democrats lost in 1968.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 09:18 PM
Feb 2016

So, how exactly did Johnson withdrawing help the Party?

-- Mal

yawnmaster

(2,812 posts)
17. It didn't...it is interesting politics involving Kennedy, an assassination and McGovern..and Nixon..
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 09:25 PM
Feb 2016

won (so did it really strengthen the party???)

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
18. Had RFK lived he would have beaten Nixon and Wallace
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 09:26 PM
Feb 2016

like a pair of gongs. 1968 was sui generis, and may it ever remain so.

book_worm

(15,951 posts)
24. Actually Humphrey would have been the nominee
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 10:36 PM
Feb 2016

Even by the time of the California primary he had far more delegates than RFK or McCarthy. There were far fewer primaries in 1968 and most delegates were won in state conventions and thru organized labor. Finally, LBJ, though not a candidate still controlled the convention.

http://chicago68.com/c68myths.html

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
47. Are you sure about that? Had RFK lived, his California Primary victory would have
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:58 PM
Feb 2016

given him the momentum to secure the nomination. (At least that's the version of history I've inherited from folks like Arthur Schlesinger.)

yawnmaster

(2,812 posts)
15. oh there was so much more politics in the 1968 Democratic primary that is in the OP above...
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 09:24 PM
Feb 2016

Also...didn't Nixon win that one??

rpannier

(24,924 posts)
45. Agree with you
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:55 PM
Feb 2016

She should not drop out
Both should see it through as long as they feel they can win or influence the convention

 

Flying Squirrel

(3,041 posts)
20. Bah
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 09:56 PM
Feb 2016

Center-right article saying people are not excited about Sanders either, and advocating a new competitor for him within the Democratic Party. He can go to hell..

Tarc

(10,601 posts)
22. Yes, the candidate who leads by commanding margins in 10 Super Tuesday states
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 10:00 PM
Feb 2016

Should quit.


Response to Purveyor (Original post)

merrily

(45,251 posts)
27. Johnson won over McCarthy by at least 7 points. That is not barely winning, although it's not
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 10:49 PM
Feb 2016

great for a war time incumbent, either. However, after the NH primary, RFK entered the race. Then Johnson dropped out.

saltpoint

(50,986 posts)
28. An exciting proposition but timing
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 10:49 PM
Feb 2016

is everything. She probably shouldn't resign right after Clyburn's endorsement, for example.

I don't think the Democratic Party is in harm's way. The GOP, on the other hand, has let quite a few unstable people rise in its ranks. They're at the control panel and the party is a food fight. There's no discourse on ideas or political philosophy. There's the buzz of the tax-cut saw. There's the clank of Dark Ages tools of torture to carve up the safety net. There's the Bible-thumpers yelping in megachurches. There's the racists and bigots trying to ban Muslims and build walls on our southern border.

The Republicans are taking on water. Pretty quickly.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
36. Well it is good to know that I am not the only one thinking 1968
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:26 PM
Feb 2016

for me it is the supers issue. They go there. well release the kraken and blow up the party.

I am sure I will order ink by the bucket full.

lovemydog

(11,833 posts)
37. It's funny when someone says the front-runner should quit
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:32 PM
Feb 2016

and supporters of the one in second place go 'Yeah! She should quit!'

Cassiopeia

(2,603 posts)
38. Clinton is no LBJ.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:34 PM
Feb 2016

She will do everything possible this cycle to win. If that means burning the party to the ground in the process, so be it.

It's about her and nothing else.

Beacool

(30,518 posts)
59. Excuse me, if anybody is trying to burn down the party is the "democratic Socialist"
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 02:07 AM
Feb 2016

who only decided to become a Democrat to run for president.

No, it's not about her. It's about electing the most qualified candidate, and that's Hillary. Not the candidate who promises the moon and the stars and has zero chance of getting his agenda through this Congress and any other Congress in the foreseeable future.

Cassiopeia

(2,603 posts)
64. Excuse me,
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 03:00 AM
Feb 2016

if Bernie wanted to harm the party he would have run as an Independent splitting the Democratic vote.

Hillary is not running because "she's the most qualified candidate." She is running for personal gain.

If Hillary were running to better the country or the world she would pick a solid platform and let the chips fall where they may. No, Hillary is in this for one reason, herself. She already has more money than she knows what to do with and it no longer excites her. The only thing left is POTUS and the only reason she wants it is because money can't buy it outright.

Cassiopeia

(2,603 posts)
66. Bernie stands for
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 03:12 AM
Feb 2016

A fair minimum wage
Health CARE as a right, not insurance
rebuilding our infrastructure
ending the prison industrial complex
Taxpayer funded education


To name a few positions Bernie has spent a lifetime trying to achieve.

What does Hillary want? Seriously, name one damn thing Hillary has spent her political career fighting for and she has never wavered on.

 

Jester Messiah

(4,711 posts)
91. Oh, I know! I know one!
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 02:33 PM
Feb 2016

Hillary Clinton is a firm believer that Hillary Clinton should be president. In this, she has never wavered, nor shall she!

 

Bohemianwriter

(978 posts)
70. The ones burning down the party...
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 10:10 AM
Feb 2016

Are DWS, Hillary, DLC and DNC. Their "3rd way" charade has been unmasked by a REAL democrat coming back from exile.

But if you insist she becomes the nominee, I wish you good luck in getting back al the voters you and your candidate have done your best to alienate.

Hilary does NOT represent PROGRESSIVE values! Hilary does NOT represent the core values of the democratic party unless taking money from Wall Street and do double talk is two of those core values...

I wish you good luck in trying to convince a veteran who knows a bit too much about the war crimes that Bill and Hillary has supported the last 20 years to openly endorse someone who speaks of Libya in terms of "we came, we saw, he bombed!"

It's more like "we came, we bombed, they drowned!"

The thousands of refugees in Mediterranean are a result of your candidates poor judgment and misplaced priorities. She's not alone, but she and her supporters touts foreign policy experience. Right! Experience in screwing things up!
Not a sign of someone knowing what they are doing. And Hillary has been acting like a novice! A student of Dick&George!

 

Lazy Daisy

(928 posts)
40. Absolutely not
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:41 PM
Feb 2016

I'm a Bernie supporter, but there is no reason for her to withdraw at this point. And anybody who is looking to step in now, now that they see she is struggling I say screw em'. If they didn't have the nerve to go up against her and get in on this from the beginning how can anybody support them? If they didn't feel they were strong enough to take her on before, why should we think they are a strong enough candidate after she's gone?

To anybody who comes into the race at this point I say "up yours"

This primary may be heated, but both candidates will come out stronger for it.

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
44. After her performance in the Town Hall meeting tonight . . .
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:55 PM
Feb 2016

. . . I concur.

She's an embarrassment to the Democratic Party.
Her angry display of contempt for that one guy at the Town Hall meeting, the one who said he was a realtor, was enough right there to conclude that she doesn't have what it takes to be the next President of the United States.



Punkingal

(9,522 posts)
50. I have this awful picture of her in the Oval Office acting like she did tonight...
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 12:47 AM
Feb 2016

And bombing the shit out of some country. I think she acted unhinged. And the anger she has is palpable. She scares me.

 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
51. Oh hell I thought I was the only one that was having these visions...
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 12:50 AM
Feb 2016

Almost sci-fi like.

FlatBaroque

(3,160 posts)
74. Funny story. When I began to hear about her speaking fees to Wall Street banks
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 01:59 PM
Feb 2016

I thought to myself "thank goodness she is not running for President again". Because in my simple mind if she was even considering running she would certainly not be collecting fat checks from the miscreants of the American economy.

 
83. She should officially resign from the Democratic Party
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 02:29 PM
Feb 2016

and withdraw from her candidacy and re-register with the Republican Party and deal with Trump in the primaries.

She's a Republican in Democratic clothing.

Tarc

(10,601 posts)
93. We have Hillary Clinton, who has been with the part since 1970 or so, vs "Rocky the Leprechaun"
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 02:38 PM
Feb 2016

who is all of 183 posts at the Democratic Unterground, a forum for promoting and supporting all Democrats.

I think i know who I roll with.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
88. this kind of thing is just dumb
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 02:32 PM
Feb 2016

why the hell should she do that?

That's what it would take for Bernie to win?

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
96. Bowing out gracefully or going down and taking the party down in her fall.
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 05:35 AM
Feb 2016

Those are her two major options.

Our one option: making her so irrelevant that it doesn't matter whether she agrees to bow out or not. Thank goodness there is still one other candidate left.

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
98. lol
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 09:00 AM
Feb 2016

this place (GD-P) gets nuttier daily

projections VERY positive, most super-delegates committed - so ask her to exit the race

rich

Vinca

(53,994 posts)
100. It's probably too late to make much of a difference.
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 09:06 AM
Feb 2016

She should have thought twice about running given the legal problems hanging over her head. She didn't, though, and the field was cleared to give her a straight shot to the nomination. Or so they thought. As a result, many qualified Democrats who might have run did not. We could pay a big price in November and if we do I hope it's a lesson learned and not repeated.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Clinton Should Withdraw F...