2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumTop Latino Politicians Say Bernie Sanders Has a Terrible Record on Immigration
A couple of days before Democrats caucus in Nevada, two of the nations top Latino political figures tore into Sen. Bernie Sanders immigration record, accusing the Vermont independent of peddling the same-old Republican ant-immigration playbook.
Senator Sanders consistently wasnt there when we needed him most, said Julian Castro, the Housing and Urban Development secretary, in a conference call with reporters this afternoon. He voted with the anti-immigrant right against immigrants.
Mr. Castro and Congressman Luis Gutiérrez of Illinois, a national leader on immigration reform, spoke in a call organized by the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign. Both Clinton supporters, along with immigrant advocates, eviscerated Mr. Sanders for voting against an immigration reform bill in 2007 and voting to protect the Minutemen, a private militia which patrolled the Mexican border to keep immigrants from entering the United States illegally.
The truth is, look, he was absent from most of the critical immigration debates, Mr. Gutiérrez said. Unfortunately, when he did show up, his record is troubling.
Mr. Gutiérrez said that it was just as troubling that Mr. Sanders never improved his record in the years following his 2007 vote. The question Latinos have to ask themselves is: where was Senator Sanders when we needed him most?
http://observer.com/2016/02/top-latino-politicians-say-bernie-sanders-has-a-terrible-record-on-immigration/
this post is dedicated to the censored lunamagica. You can alert, but you will not shut us up.
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)BainsBane
(53,432 posts)Hillary has consistently voted for pro-immigration Bills. He has voted several times against immigration reform, for the Minutemen and on some Occassions for the wall. http://votesmart.org/candidate/key-votes/27110/bernie-sanders/40/immigration#.VseZ0fBOKrU
No honest look at the issue can possibly claim Bernie is more pro-immigrant, unless one believes the GOP are right on immigration policy.
You will not find a single nativist vote from Clinton.
http://votesmart.org/candidate/key-votes/55463/hillary-clinton/40/immigration#.VseaLPBOKrU
cascadiance
(19,537 posts)WHY? Is that a Democratic Party stance? NOT MY DEMOCRATIC PARTY!!! I'm proud of Bernie not compromising his principles on issues like this! And especially not rationalizing that pro-slavery stance as being pro-immigration rights, when these guest worker programs have NOTHING to do with *immigration* as these are temporary work positions where they don't *immigrate* here to become citizens, and are far more likely to get kicked out if there visas aren't being held hostage. Fortunately some were able to sue for those kind of conditions after they were exploited as Katrina cleanup workers.
http://www.thenation.com/article/these-workers-came-overseas-help-rebuild-after-hurricane-katrina-and-were-treated-prison/
Why don't the debate moderators or other "news" reporters ask Clinton why she supported a Republican bill to build a fence along the border? She have any good excuses for doing that? Of course the corporatized media is being paid to avoid putting her on the spot the way they are being pushed to go after Bernie for wanting to do things that work against their drive towards corporate oligarchy.
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2006/10/wall-o04.html
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)Using people from other countries just so they can be abused by the system and at the same time drive down wages for people in this country is not pro-immigration. It's pro anything in the name of protecting the 1%. Shame on you for not getting that.
![](/emoticons/clap.gif)
litlbilly
(2,227 posts)azmom
(5,208 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)Yeah, those are some impartial voices there.
Yeah, what the hell would they know about Latino or immigration issues.
Too effin' funny.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Gutiérrez had his 15 minutes when he was on the teevee machine talking about that socialist guy, what's his name? And Julian is on the short list to be her veep, so you'll have to forgive me if I don't take their opinions at face value.
KMOD
(7,906 posts)You're funny.
In the tank. bwahahahahaha
but we should take you word.
Feeling the Bern
(3,839 posts)You are not even attacking the poster's position, just the poster.
frylock
(34,825 posts)![](/emoticons/clap.gif)
cascadiance
(19,537 posts)Hillary thai is! Not those foreign workers made in to slaves that Bernie cares about more than they do!
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)It's not one of those things to discuss and decide whether or not it's valid--it just is.
artislife
(9,497 posts)Can't wait to caucus for him in March!!
KMOD
(7,906 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)to caucus with me. We are in a republican neighborhood, so we are gearing up to fight it out!
We have watched the videos on how to caucus, I am looking at what it takes to be a pricinct captain. No flipping coins or dubious votes on my watch.
Response to artislife (Reply #23)
Post removed
Response to Post removed (Reply #30)
Post removed
Response to Post removed (Reply #32)
Post removed
ForgoTheConsequence
(4,903 posts)You don't care how poorly you come across and don't care how many people you turn off from Hillary. Calm the hell down.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Most important have ever seen, be on vacation for a while it looks like.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)I think you need a break before you get yourself too many hides. I'm not alerting on you...just letting you know you're losing it. You aren't helping your cause any.
frylock
(34,825 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)but won't be
frylock
(34,825 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)Been really busy and just came and saw all of this.
Makes me quite cheerful, truthfully.
frylock
(34,825 posts)lovemydog
(11,833 posts)I'd be interested in an reading an account of what it's like to caucus. If you feel like writing a description of how it goes and feel like posting it in gdp or elsewhere I'd definitely read it!
artislife
(9,497 posts)lunamagica
(9,967 posts)Of course he knows more, cares more; therefore is better for Latinos than any Latino!
Trajan
(19,089 posts)Won't shut you up?
Click
KMOD
(7,906 posts)another funny one.
It sucks that you can't censor this, eh?
awwwwww
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)snip
Sanders was basically one of our only allies
especially for low-skilled workers in 2007, said Ana Avendano, a former top immigration official at the AFL-CIO. He adamantly put his foot down and said these kinds of programs [allow] employers to bring in more and more vulnerable workers.
snip
The problem for Sanders was a guest-worker program that some immigration advocates and Democratic lawmakers begrudgingly accepted as part of a comprehensive deal but was abhorred by labor unions and their allies on Capitol Hill.
What concerns me are provisions in the bill that would bring low-wage workers into this country in order to depress the already declining wages of American workers, Sanders said in May 2007. With poverty increasing and the middle-class shrinking, we must not force American workers into even more economic distress.
The guest-worker program proposed in the 2007 bill would bring in foreign workers for two years at a time, but force them to leave the United States for a year in between each renewal. It also offered few protections for those workers, labor advocates said.
In early June of that year, Sanders proposed an amendment with Grassley that would ban companies that have laid off workers en masse from being approved for new worker visas.
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/06/bernie-sanders-and-immigration-its-complicated-119190#ixzz40b1Sq9lW
Clinton is worried about NV.
Number23
(24,544 posts)She will always be welcome in the AA group.
Response to Number23 (Reply #12)
Post removed
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)that's why it was deleted.
KMOD
(7,906 posts)How about this post?
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)i posted the reasons why sanders opposed the bill in this thread. so your post is not inaccurate, but it does not tell the whole story. the whole story is not as interesting to clinton supporters. and, btw, you did rec a factually inaccurate post.
KMOD
(7,906 posts)My post does not tell the whole story? Please fill me in.
And my goodness, what post did I rec that was inaccurate? I would like to correct that error as soon as possible. That stuff should never happen here. lol
Just so you know, I won't change my rec, and you are ridiculous to think I would.
Here's a big NEWSFLASH: Not everyone is buying Bernie Sander's Bullshit.
Sorry if that hurts your feelings.
Perhaps you should try to censor me?
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)re: the dates, i was referring to the post you rec'd that was deleted, not your post newsflash: not everyone is buying clinton's bullshit. 2 hidden posts? it seems you are the one who is having trouble controlling your feelings. you might want to take it down a notch.
Response to KMOD (Reply #31)
passiveporcupine This message was self-deleted by its author.
cascadiance
(19,537 posts)lunamagica
(9,967 posts)It really makes me feel good to be welcomed in the AA group.
You are so kind!
Number23
(24,544 posts)There are too few minorities on DU. Not that that's in any way hard to understand given the crap that gets posted here regularly...
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)Thanks for addressing the beef in the post, Art.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)desperate last-ditch effort, i might add.
Response to noiretextatique (Reply #29)
Post removed
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)the inevitable one is tied with the democratic socialist who just joined party. i'd be desperate too. you are going to have to step up your game to gotcha me.
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)jfern
(5,204 posts)KMOD
(7,906 posts)How cute.
Can I say Berniebro's are delusional? Seems fair game to me.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Response to KMOD (Reply #24)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)home to teach people a lesson? Bernie would never do that. What a disgusting platform.
Fearless
(18,448 posts)snot
(10,618 posts)ForgoTheConsequence
(4,903 posts)noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)Response to ForgoTheConsequence (Reply #34)
Name removed Message auto-removed
jillan
(39,451 posts)MaeScott
(880 posts)tokenlib
(4,186 posts)If you can't win on the issues..you blow smoke and distort the record of the opposition.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)so i posted his reasons in this thread. no response yet.
AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)It is exposing the rotting foundation of the hopelessly corrupt Democratic establishment.
artislife
(9,497 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
merrily
(45,251 posts)Sancho
(9,073 posts)His record on immigration is mostly silent with a few jabs thrown in that went against the interests of most immigrants and undocumented.
We can argue the details (again!), but Bernie doesn't really have a solid path to citizenship and even in yesterday's town hall all he could say was "I'm going to work on that".
Bernie's visa reforms are sometimes "pro-citizen" but "anti-immigrant". Many immigrant business owners and international traders are in FAVOR of trade agreements, or at least the parts that help small businesses. Bernie openly said that his health care plan will include the undocumented? (NO!) The ACA does in a sense, because employers have to insure employees regardless of status (or else they have to admit hiring illegal workers!), which is one interesting sideline of Obamacare. Medicare for all would likely require a government ID which may be denied to undocumented. Immigrants think about those things.
Vermont does not have tuition equity, and Bernie has never mentioned his education plan being open to dreamers or undocumented. Hillary spoke specifically about this education issue at the town hall. She gets it!
In fact, Bernie has been largely invisible for a long time in the immigrant community. Contrast that with Hillary, the Clinton's, and the Clinton foundation who have been working for decades with the immigrant community both in the US and in other countries. Just google the Clinton's on Univision or check out the Clinton Foundation programs.
It's a fair criticism that Bernie has 25 years in Congress, but little action on behalf of the immigrant community.
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)I've just started looking into Bernie's record on this and it's great to have some perspective!
artislife
(9,497 posts)whose government is in chaos due in part to actions she took as SoS.
Her actions in the world v her rhetoric are worlds apart.
Sancho
(9,073 posts)Read the facts:
http://2015.clintonfoundation.org/#!/
and they have done much of the work through generosity outside of government. You can bash all you want, but it just shows ignorance of the truth.
If you have lived it, you know what you see with your own eyes. I'd be wiling to bet you have not ever seen the Clintons or Hillary programs, or you would not repeat silly criticisms.
Hillary cares more about children than any Presidential candidate in my lifetime or yours. It's real action - not rhetoric like loud mouth Bernie and his claims.
artislife
(9,497 posts)and that is silly.
She does some good, but she also does a lot of bad.
Sancho
(9,073 posts)and she does not "do a lot of bad".
That's mostly RW talking points.
No current politician has spent so much time and effort out of office doing actual, front-line work for good: children, women, social justice, legal aid.
The fact that she has also been a successful lawyer, politician, and mother is terrific by itself. She is wicked smart and experienced both domestically and internationally.
I've been involved with politics and worked for campaigns since the early 70's. I've never seen a harder worker who believed in social justice more than Hillary Clinton. The RW has gone after her for a long time, and created many CTs that never prove to be any more than rumors. Maybe you believe some of the stories, maybe not.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)African Americans are not that single issue either.
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)campaign started. Luis' red baiting was about as ham handed as one could imagine, and Julian was on last week telling everyone that Hllary's "15 point loss" in NH "exceeded expectations".
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Over ten million people currently living in the shadows would be citizens today. Sanders literally fought to stop it from an up or down vote. It would have passed if it would have made it past cloture in the end. That is how much Sanders was against it. He didn't even want an up or down vote.
So he said no to citizenship for over ten million people for economic reasons and a decade later is running for President because of our economic system. Even he knows he didn't do a damn bit of good economically in his fight against a pathway to citizenship.
FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)LMFAO. What? What'd you say?
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)![](/emoticons/hug.gif)
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Senator Sanders consistently wasnt there when we needed him most, said Julian Castro, the Housing and Urban Development secretary, in a conference call with reporters this afternoon. He voted with the anti-immigrant right against immigrants.
cascadiance
(19,537 posts)WHY does the Hillary campaign feel the necessity of instituting foreign slavery on our soil, and want to lump these TEMPORARY "guest worker" programs in to a bill that is supposed to be about IMMIGRATION, where these riders don't belong, other than to placate the big money donors that want to profit from them and damn what happens to these foreign workers, and also the American workers they displace to jack up corporate profits!
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)cascadiance
(19,537 posts)Yes, Trump and Cruz, and many Republicans are xenophobes, and leave it to the corporate media to help the Hillary campaign to facilitate labeling taking a stance against INDENTURED SERVITUDE (aka ***SLAVERY***) as somehow being xenophobic.
Yes, it ALSO costs American jobs, and that also has many populist Republicans PO'd. But the corporatized media with no objection from the corporatized campaign of Clinton's chooses to ONLY focus on blaming foreign workers from taking our jobs and not the mechanisms by the PTB to exploit foreigners here who are either being exploited as undocumented workers where they count on who's in charge not prosecuting those exploiting lower wage and exploited undocumented workers, or not the guest worker slave laborer programs which institutionalizes that same relationship so there employers don't have to worry about hiring people illegally to still be able to exploit foreign workers for lower wages, and in both cases costing American workers (AND legal immigrants who aren't being exploited) their jobs because employers are able to get away with exploiting foreign workers by either of these two methods.
Bernie wants to get rid of the exploitation of BOTH sets of workers, but not create new slave laborers the way those who are FALSELY accusing him of being against immigration reform want to change the system.
Do you see Trump or Cruz criticizing these programs for the way that these foreign workers are exploited? I don't. That's because they don't care so much about that as their voters want to blame the foreign workers rather than the PTB that want to institutionalize this exploitive slavery through guest worker programs. So, keep listening to that Trump speech. He's not going to appeal to us all for the rights of workers not to have to come here under slave labor conditions.
What is your understanding of Hillary's viewpoint. We haven't heard ANYTHING from her since she supported that slave labor back in 2007!
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)StevieM
(10,510 posts)AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
On Fri Feb 19, 2016, 09:59 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Top Latino Politicians Say Bernie Sanders Has a Terrible Record on Immigration
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511271567
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
This part makes the thread an attack on other DUers: "this post is dedicated to the censored lunamagica. You can alert, but you will not shut us up. "
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Fri Feb 19, 2016, 10:32 PM, and the Jury voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Maybe I'm naive, but I do not know what "lunamagica" is referring to. I will therefore come down on the side of not censoring, because even though I don't like the post and suspect the subject is misrepresenting Senator Sanders, there are enough of these types of posts about both candidates, which unfortunately is fair game during a primary.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No, this thread is not an attack on other DUers and is clearly visible that the alert stalkers are busy against this member. I'm not going to give a fifth hide to a poster because someone doesn't like the opinion stated in a published article.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: eh, not the nicest thing but not a terrible attack. the article itself is of course ridiculously misleading but posters in the thread have addressed that. some of OP's posts in thread are way out of line but those are hidden already.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)The thread brought up some great information on this issues that I wasn't aware of!
Appreciate it.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)voted against the 2007 immigration reform bill. He is being dishonest in his support of Clinton.
...thanks for the post, KMOD!
![](/emoticons/donkey.gif)
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Boy that potential matchup is looking worse and worse for Sanders.