2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhy do y'all think I (as a black man) care all that much about what Bernie did over 50 years ago?
Last edited Sat Feb 20, 2016, 02:24 AM - Edit history (2)
I (as a black man) get to make a determination of my own as to how much Bernie's civil rights activities in Chicago mean to me...
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/02/17/1486622/-Quick-Hit-White-folks-be-funny-sometimes
Bernie Sanders civil rights activities in the 1960s were never a very significant criteria for me in predicting whether and how President Sanders might approach the problems that African Americans face.
The relationship of Sanders with his African American constituents (and they have been his constituents for over 25 years) is hundreds of times more significant than whether he marched with King or not.
Because Sanders constituents know him and his work far better than I do; they are better judges than you or I.
And the answer from Sanders African American constituents to the question of Sanders concern for blacks: Meh.
Sanders isn't an innocent victim of his state's demographics, suggests Brattleboro-based Reed. "He's from Brooklyn and grew up with black and brown folks," he notes. Sanders' record of largely avoiding the topic of race "is simply a choice on his part that invalidates the presence of black and brown people," contends the African American activist. "Sen. Sanders suffers from a disease called color blindness."
Colston adds, "If his career had emanated from Brooklyn, he'd have a completely different perspective" on race.
Clarence Davis, a black Shelburne resident* who worked for Sanders in the House, adds that he would like to see "more discussion of race" in which his former boss would participate. It's wrong to regard the country as having achieved a post-racial consciousness, Davis suggests. "We don't live in a color-blind society and never have," he says.
The national campaign will likely push Sanders to be more forthcoming on race. Up until now, however, it has been "as if he's running again for office in Vermont rather than for national office," says Rafael Rodriguez, a Puerto Rican from the Bronx who works as a student services administrator at the University of Vermont. "He's not explicit about racism."
Sanders had a poor record as mayor in appointing minority-group members as well as women to high-level positions, says Hines, who has lived in Burlington since 1963. The core of his progressive entourage has been entirely white and almost exclusively male, Hines adds.
"I have a great amount of respect for Bernie," she says, "except I wouldn't vote for him." Hines is supporting Clinton, whom she regards as preferable on issues of concern to women and African Americans.
In the SevenDaysVT (a publication that Ive come to love!) theres at least two stories that noted that Sanders had no people of color that worked for him.
I do know that since African immigration to Vermont has become a bit of an issue, Sanders has stepped up to the plate a bit: I dont feel like hunting down those links right now but that was a point in his favor.
And the conversation continues:
MONTPELIER, Vermont Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders may be about to hit a "black firewall" in South Carolina, as one Vermont activist on race issues put it Friday, but support for him appears to run deep in Vermont's tiny black community.
While progressive politics and home-state loyalty appeared to boost support for the state's U.S. senator at a Black Lives Matter event at the Statehouse on Friday, some observers said he could have done more during his time in the U.S. House and Senate to cement relations with residents of color and thereby keep more current on race relations in America.
Dozens of activists gathered Friday to call for a racial justice agenda in Vermont, including more hiring of black teachers and school administrators and having more accountability for state agency hiring practices.
~~~~~
Mark Hughes, leader of the group Justice For All-Vermont, said he understood why many blacks in South Carolina, site of the next Democratic primary, and members of the Congressional Black Caucus were taking an approach to Sanders that might be summed up with the phrase, "Hello, who are you?"
Because Vermont is 93.5 percent non-Hispanic white, the second-whitest state after Maine, and because Sanders has not done a lot to reach out to people of color during his time in the U.S. House and Senate, "I think there's a lot of folks from his home state where they might be having the same discussion," he said.
"We don't have a lot of interaction with our congressional delegation," Hughes said.
FTR, I think that Hillary Clinton is meh on this topic as well.
UPDATE: A POC supporter of Bernie Sanders, J17, "gets it."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1279926
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)because that's what you just said.
But regarding those folks in Vermont who felt ignored, you know a reporter can go there and interview 10 people, get 10 different viewpoints, and then write an article that tells any damn story he wants it to tell.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)The obsessiveness with what he did 50 years ago is a little nerve wrecking...both on the part of Sanders supporters an Jonathan Capeheart's shadiness.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)But he just keeps on doing the same...40 years ago, 30, 15, now. He's a pretty solid guy, and I'm guessing one of these days, 50 years won't seem like a glacially long time to you. It doesn't to me anyway.
trillion
(1,859 posts)One respected civil rights leader said he didn't see Bernie there, and then the pictures emerged and Bernie was there and the the civil rights leader gave a tepid apology and went back to supporting Clinton.
Sounds like you're the only one obsessing about it now.
Kokonoe
(2,485 posts)Its about everyone else that day, and now its our turn to make it happen.
His judgment made it happen 50 years ago.
berniepdx420
(1,784 posts)He's been fighting in the trenches.. for poor people, working poor, poor.. no matter how your melanin is distributed in your skin cells. To throw this type of shade at this man is a low blow.. patently false.. he is a warrior for those without economic power. This is unquestionable... and I hope folks call it out when they hear it. IMHO
This video shows it... without question....
Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)berniepdx420
(1,784 posts)Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)the closest that I might get to that would be Salvador Allende...and I haven't read THAT much about Allende...but in America, no...some politicians might do heroic things but that's as far as I go with it.
berniepdx420
(1,784 posts)Xipe Totec
(43,888 posts)Why do you care so much that we know and understand that you don't care?
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)Weird OP.
even it was yesterday, it still somehow wouldn't count. That's the game.
aikoaiko
(34,163 posts)YMMV.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)but I don't think that it's as important a predictor as, say, what his black constituents think of him and how he works with them.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)But it was when my mama was a small child. Not much since then.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)... and you.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Bohunk68
(1,364 posts)anything? And how's about Hillary? She has, I suppose worked soooooo hard and accomplished sooooo much. And didn't do it on the public dole? Is that what you are saying? Or, implying?
trillion
(1,859 posts)What are you looking at, exactly, for progressive issues? Have you vetted any with Bernie OR Hillary?
Or are you going off how she saunters in and says she's going to stop mass incarceration and skipping how she kept the Geo Group which is the biggest for profit prison lobbyists in her super pac for 6 months after she said she would stop mass incarceration?
Did you find it massively back stabbing?
How did you feel when she dumped the GEO group after the Huffington Post exposed them as one of her major donors?
It was agreed on that she wouldn't have dumped it otherwise.
Did you feel like kicking her out of any black event?
Or did you miss the whole thing and never vet?
I notice half the blacks in South Carolina are voting for her STILL and half are voting for Bernie. I bet anything the half voting for Bernie vetted because he sure as heck didn't show up and court the black vote like Hillary has.
I bet it was.... oh, her support of Fracking, the TPP, the fossil fuel industry, the banksters, the hedge funds, the private prison industry, the war industry, and so many more. I bet is WASN'T his pandering to blacks by marching with King 50 years ago. In fact he wasn't even saying he did. It was that guy who indicated he didn't that brought up the issue.
Maybe 1/2 the blacks aren't voting for him because he courts them is what I'm, saying. Maybe they're going on more. And maybe the other half is stuck on some shallow courtship. That's kind of what I'm getting out of you. You're sorta saying you don't care that he was in civil rights and how dare they expect you to care. Nobody expects you to care. We're just disappointed you haven't vetted enough to have substance to know what you do care about and then say your position on it. There is PLENTY to vet. And his civil rights consistency isn't one of the top issues even though for some unimaginable reason you are calling some beef with it. Actually it sounded more like an attention grabber to yourself because I didn't see any substance in your reproach of him and nobody is saying blacks should vote for him because he's consistent in civil rights - which he has been.
Response to Chitown Kev (Original post)
Post removed
farleftlib
(2,125 posts)I do. We cancel each other out. Glad that's all settled now.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)The Democratic party absolutely needs to get over the 1960s, but this contest guarantees everything about this nomination will be cast in 1960s terms.
Stuff from a half century ago won't get people to the polls in November. And, yeah, Clinton is also "meh", in different ways. For that matter I think her support among minorities is not very deep, and will probably equate to relatively low minority turnout. Which is a bad sign for us in the fall.
Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)and even though POC seem to have provided Clinton with the margin of victory in Iowa, I think that those polls also indicated that support for Clinton among PO is...well, "meh."
Recursion
(56,582 posts)This has not remotely been a good primary season for the party so far.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Ever.
No matter what.
trillion
(1,859 posts)You must be a Clinton supporter. Just seems like the MO.
I think we can divide the two camps easily into, people who use google and vet and know exactly why they're voting for someone for president and people who won't vet someone to save their life and can't give any concrete examples of problems with either candidate if they tried, but decides they loathe one.
Just saying.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)now reread it with new eyes.
trillion
(1,859 posts)Massive gaping hole in vetting and then getting mad when I vet the candidate on an issue and post links. They run instead of address it.
Sorry, I misunderstood your post for one of them.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)cheapdate
(3,811 posts)think about Bernie Samders.
Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)My feelings about Senator Bernie Sanders candidacy are similar to my feelings about the potential mayoral candidacy of Chicago Teachers Union President Karen Lewis last year. Lewis was a single-issue candidate, in my view, but she had the right single-issue to run on in 2015: public education in Chicago.
Like Ms. Lewis, I feel that Sanders is pretty much a single-issue candidate; the issue of income inequality and the very related issue of campaign-finance reform. In the age of Occupy, though, those are two damn good issues to run on and Sanders speaks eloquently and effectively on those issues; those issues are the primary issues that he has advocated for decades.
cheapdate
(3,811 posts)trillion
(1,859 posts)Undecided. Right. If ya ever get your google out and pick and issue and look up each candidate, I think you'd become a much more interesting writer. I doubt you would be undecided.
There's a lot more at stake here than just campaign fiance reform and income equality. If you bother to vet, everything else is at stake.
Climate change, War, the TPP, Banksters and WallStreet corruption, Fracking, Monsanto, Student Loans, Health Insurance, Private Prisons and so much more. You haven't vetted either of these two. It's like you watched CNN and that's it.
Come on, google the issues with their names next to it. See who's getting paid by whom. The corruption comes right out and you'll never write such a shallow empty piece about an election again. You'll never take their words seriously while they campaigning again (most candidates lie in campaigns.) 1/2 the white AND blacks in this country are voting for a whole different agenda than you even mentioned. They vetted.
Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)and for those who think that I've forgotten about the 90's...well, there s this...
I still get the sense that Hillary Clinton is stuck in the politics of the 1990s, both in terms of specific policies and in the way that she does politics. I have also greatly enjoyed the relatively scandal-free Obama Administration. Ive been spoiled enough where I am not ready for round 2 of As the White House Turns.
Times have changed since the 1990s and I dont think that Hillary Clinton has changed with the times.
I didn't write in that much depth in that piece but I wanted to give people a general idea of what I was thinking...for example...
I have thought for a long time that Hillary Clinton experience with health-care reform in the 1990's totally changed the way she viewed Washington and you can see it in nearly everything thing that she does; I actually think that she was traumatized by that experience.
With Bernie...well...
I do think that given the current environment, many of Sanders proposals are implausible. Ive also felt, from the start, that there is a path to the presidency for a self-proclaimed democratic socialist in 2020 but not in 2016.
electability matters and I don't think that Bernie is electable...that's only one small piece of it, though...
trillion
(1,859 posts)Google.
If you saw the insurance companies in her super pacs you wouldn't being thinking anything about her and healthcare but how corrupt she is on health care reform. It's all about directing money to the insurance industry.
Here, google this:
hillary clinton insurance industry
Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)I am not a low-information voter: don't forget, I do not support Clinton.
trillion
(1,859 posts)I don't think any sanders supporters are pushing civil rights as a reason for voting for Bernie.
Google any issue with hillary and the word super pac. That's the reason to not vote for Hillary. Then if you change the name to Bernie it's like good vs. evil running.
Just saying.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Absolutely. That's kinda the point, IMO.
This demographic assumption that any members of any group are monolithic and beling to any candidate bugs the hell out of me (I'm a Bernie supporter).
People like Bernie. Great. Or people like Clinton instead. Okay.
Decisions shouldn't be based on race, gender, age or height or hair color.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)But that's not all of "the data" either.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)It happened so long ago, why should I care about it?
Tell that to everyone inspired by Rosa Parks or Martin Luther King Jr... "But it was so long ago; why should I care?"
Your Ancestors were enslaved. MINE were killed for sport. Hunted like FUCKING ANIMALS. I cannot begin to tell you how fucking insulted I am by your post.
pablo_marmol
(2,375 posts).......is that it ignores the obvious fact that a person's moral wiring remains consistent over time.
The way I see it, if Bernie cared deeply about civil rights back then, it's unlikely his caring has diminished. He just refuses to insult folks' intelligence by pandering and resorting to cliche talking points.
My two pennies.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)pablo_marmol
(2,375 posts)Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)So why have so many Sanders supporters done exactly that and have been doing that for months.
I've said and maintained that I like the way that Sanders carried himself with it (most of the time, anyway)
pablo_marmol
(2,375 posts)Firstly, I'm not sure I would describe the behavior of (many?) Sanders supporters as pandering. I suspect that there is a level of frustration felt regarding the undeserved reverence Hillary receives from many AA's; and that frustration has led Bernie supporters to underline his history with the civil rights movement.
Have you the excellent book by Ian Haney Lopez Dog Whistle Politics? I think it should be required reading for all Democrats, as it illustrates that even Dems like the Clintons and Jimmy Carter haven't been above capitalizing on white racial anxiety.
We don't grow as a people or political party without admitting where we have failed.
Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)I don't see that all, esp. the reverence part (Obama gets that but the Clintons don't)...some black women may be an exception to that.
I think that (some) white folks have this idea that in order to vote for a person, this sort of "reverence" has to be present. The black experience with regard to voting is almost always "the lesser of two evils".
The inability of white folks to understand this is a big part of the problem.
pablo_marmol
(2,375 posts)I understand that -- and would never dispute it. Sadly, with the way Democrats have sold their souls to corporate interests the same could be said for citizens other than AAs. Which is why I'm a proud "BernieBot".
And 'reverence' was a poor word choice in retrospect. What I was actually thinking about was 'support'. I must say, though, that I've been moved by the writing/thinking of Michelle Alexander.
Time for this old boy to get to bed. Be well, CK!
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)After the better part of 200 posts, I'm starting to get it. I see you. It's not going to work.
pablo_marmol
(2,375 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)One of many wounds the Native people of this hemisphere have endured.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)People can be so narrow minded sometimes, thinking they're the only ones who've been mistreated.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)rebutting the smears has been a great history lesson. SNCC, Willis Wagons, civil rights leaders and Black Panthers, Bobby Sands and the IRA, and now on to the Dawes Roll. And that's just within the past week!
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)Words aren't worth shit. Bernie can talk the talk because he's been walking the walk his entire adult life. Hillary, not so much. Someone in a different thread posted this evidence:
That's why. If you still feel like throwing your vote away on someone who will maintain the status quo, you have only yourself to blame four years from now when nothing has changed.
If you want more of this, go right ahead.
Kittycat
(10,493 posts)Apparently it's not important.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Not.
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)It's that there is more data for me to evaluate that exists; data that is even more important in order for me to make an assessment.
desmiller
(747 posts)no matter what data is shown before you, you'll never be satisfied. This discussion is pretty much a waste.
MellowDem
(5,018 posts)is how a politician's black constituents feel about them, but not the politician's whole portfolio of policies or actions, then I don't think that will be a very wide perspective of the politician.
I don't think Sanders civil rights history will matter to much anyone, nor do I think it should, all it really shows for many Sanders supporters is one example of consistency, and if a person values consistency, his stance on a wide range of issues will look a lot more consistent than Clinton's, but not everyone prioritizes that, many voters don't agree with Sanders policies because they're too liberal for them, and many don't care how honest a politician is as long as they're better than the other side and they think they can win, many just assume they're all equally dishonest anyways, but that does seem to be the biggest divide between the perception of the candidates, for Sanders supporters, they think Clinton is not honest or authentic, for Clinton supporters, that may not matter much.
The perception from many Clinton supporters I see is that Sanders isn't electable and that his policies are too liberal to work. If that's the perception, then Sanders civil rights history doesn't matter at all, and there really isn't anything he can do beyond look more electable to gain those sorts of votes.
Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)not the entire measure.
Response to Chitown Kev (Original post)
2banon This message was self-deleted by its author.
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)Republicans have been doing it for years. Good luck.
Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)farleftlib
(2,125 posts)Where have we heard this before? It's the greatest hit of GDP.
Onlooker
(5,636 posts)Last edited Sat Feb 20, 2016, 04:29 AM - Edit history (1)
... sometimes I think it's hard to distinguish between Trump supporters and Sanders supporters, but know that many Sanders supporters do see your point of view, but in the end support Sanders because even with his flaws he is challenging a status quo that has not really done all that much since Reagan restored the special rights of whites.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)Empowerer
(3,900 posts)It matters that you said it.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)know.
Number23
(24,544 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)FIFY
SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)And ones color has nothing to do with what I think about what they strive for
Doing the right thing is good - I hope you know that
Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)which had something to do with race.
SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)...
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)don't really care much what you do or don't believe. I only care about people who actually value history
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)what Bernie was doing back then all over the TV and Twitter, sort of tirelessly. He did so as a black man, and he cared so much it blew up in his face. That sort of tactic demands endless counter proof. Your complaint should be with Capehart, his tactics and his obsession with talking about the past. He made an issue of it. As you well know, making you less than credible here.
Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)But I remember when that que...uh, Mr. Capeheart was writing all of these columns against grassroots LGBT groups that were putting President Obama's feet to the fire...so I am not feeling Capeheart's role in stirring up this drama.
Empowerer
(3,900 posts)or even that he didn't help to plan the protest that got him arrested. He simply said that the person in one of the photographs was not Sanders.
Two different things.
Funny that so many people screamed that Capehart had somehow libeled or slandered Sanders - which he didn't - yet people are consistently repeating a completely false allegation about what Capehart supposedly wrote.
Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)and he doubled and tripled-down on it too...
Empowerer
(3,900 posts)something Caphart did not do.
If someone is going to claim that Capehart supposedly slandered Sanders, they shouldn't lie about what he actually wrote . . .
bravenak
(34,648 posts)It did not matter one dame bit if it was Bernie or bruce in that photo. They both spoke at the podium. Looked alike. Waste of time.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)It's going to cost him his job--several of us are making certain of that.
Empowerer
(3,900 posts)If you think that his behavior was so reprehensible, just stick to the facts rather than claiming he did something he did not do - which actually puts his detractors in the same category they think he fits.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)And that's how that one goes. Have a good night.
Empowerer
(3,900 posts)Anyone who claims that he did is lying. Period.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)SMC22307
(8,090 posts)Last I checked the WaPo for his original hit piece, there were over 800 comments, the majority nailing him. No idea what the number of comments are up to now.
Empowerer
(3,900 posts)Kind of messes up their credibility, not to mention their moral authority, on the issue . . .
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2016/02/11/stop-sending-around-this-photo-of-bernie-sanders/
Up to 957 comments now. Heckuva job, Jonathan!
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Maybe I should have alerted, but I decided to just counter the spin instead. I've spent the last couple of weeks becoming very familiar with Capehart's lies. He blocked me on Twitter, but someone showed me how to get around that. And he gets no rest until his lying ass is fired. But Capehart most certainly is, in fact and not based on opinion, a liar.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)Camp Weathervane is coming at Sanders with both barrels, and it'll be the same with the GOP if/when he wins the nomination. Better to be prepared.
Capehart won't be fired... Bezos and the new WaPo don't seem to care much about journalistic integrity.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Lots of the tweets go to Bezos too, reminding him that there are other companies with free 2-day shipping. It may never work, but this lying hack is damaged goods.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)you know it's coming.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)...waiting in the wings to attack, and I'm pretty sure they're having second thoughts after seeing every liar get chewed up and spat out. We can keep doing this, but presumably some of those surrogates wish to keep their reputations intact. The smear machine may start to dry up on her soon.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)You're going to need to have some proof next time you wish to try this, and I'm here to tell you that proof does not exist. So I'd suggest that you don't personally disparage me in these pages again.
Laughing Mirror
(4,185 posts)And when proven wrong, after proven that it was Sanders, Capehart still would not retract or apologize for beating that broken drum, he just kept on beating it. He has completely disgraced himself as a columnist because of this.
We know what Capehart wrote. It's all there in black and white. There's no "supposedly wrote" to it.
Empowerer
(3,900 posts)Some Sanders supporters keep saying that Capehart wrote that Sanders did not participate in the civil rights movement.
Those Sanders supporters are lying.
Laughing Mirror
(4,185 posts)Which is a smear, however you want to slice it, and which cancels out whatever else Capehart might say to mitigate his discrediting a civil rights activist using a photo in his presidential campaign.
In the same breath, Capehart says Sanders "participated" in the movement but the picture of him adressing a meeting is not him, but somebody else. And he stuck to his story and that is what he's taking flack for.
Empowerer
(3,900 posts)Have at it.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)malokvale77
(4,879 posts)about what any of us did 50 years ago or yesterday.
Nacho-_-Bandito
(8 posts)and that it's perfectly reasonable and understandable for you to want to question what Sen. Sanders is going to do and has been doing on the front of fighting for equality and for the black community.
I would also urge anyone to look at all the information, including history, when they make their determination for who they want to see nominated and who they will cast their vote for.
Bear in mind that there are but a handful of individuals quoted in the articles you referenced for you op-ed, and some might view such a small sampling size and take those opinions as maybe not the general consensus among Sen. Sanders peers as to whether or not he's been tone deaf to the problems that the A.A. community has been facing in recent years.
I think if we scrutinize any person hard enough, regardless of the content of their character, that eventually we'll find something that we don't agree with, or don't like. I, for one, never want to give the impression that I think that Sen. Sanders is a perfect candidate or perfect human being. That said, the next president of the U.S. is going to either be him, Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump, or Ted Cruz. So the question isn't, is Bernie Sanders the perfect candidate for everyone. The question is, is Bernie Sanders the best candidate from that group.
islandmkl
(5,275 posts)hell...it's all okay, now...
especially if you are incarcerated, have no welfare support, llike NAFTA taking more jobs in minority communities than anywhere else...ahh, screw this...read this and either ponder the take or keep to your view:
http://www.thenation.com/article/hillary-clinton-does-not-deserve-black-peoples-votes/
Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)The new nice-white-progressive-Bernie Sanders supporter black intellectual flavor of the month...I have a piece coming out this weekend (I hope) on this gratuitous citing of black intellectuals by white progressives.
Truth be told, I do care, after all I link to another DK diary in here that states some of the reasons that I don't support Clinton...watch out wih your assumptions.
islandmkl
(5,275 posts)50, 40, years ago, whatever point in time you want to establish to understand what it took IN THE STREETS AND NEIGHBORHOODS to push against the system...
you seem to be intellectually-challenged to deem Michelle Alexander as 'flavor of the month'...who are you to call some form of "Uncle Tom' on someone who just might have real insight to the plight of a minority that you portray yourself as being a viable part of?..from a viewpoint inside that very same community...
I think her bona fides might trump your keyboard bullshit...
I am guessing, which I admit is foolhardy on such a site as this since no one knows anyone, that you haven't been in the street, haven't had your head knocked while facing a phalanx of cops on the street, haven't been to jail beyond some overnight stay for being mischievous, haven't lost your local industrial job to a factory in Mexico, haven't had to even take two swings to have two strikes so the next one sends you away for a long time...
old protest saying FROM 50 YEARS AGO, give or take a few:
Have you been hit by the cops or the National Guard, have you been teargassed, have you been sent to jail?...no, then you aren't protesting, you are merely complaining...
Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)I never said that Michelle Alexander was simply a "flavor of the month."... although that is they way that some people have been treating her since she wrote that Nation article and that FB posting...she's nothing like an Uncle Tom either.
islandmkl
(5,275 posts)with any agenda...'
I apparently misread: "The new nice-white-progressive-Bernie Sanders supporter black intellectual flavor of the month"..
I will just acknowledge that I probably won't read that some other way than it is stated...
Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)It means that white supporters of Bernie Sanders are using Michelle Alexander as a club to browbeat black people who may (or may not, which is my case) support Clinton.
Some of you are not aware of when you do it, how you do it an why (i.e. Alexander's isn't the only opinion on the subject that's out there, fr example...)
islandmkl
(5,275 posts)I am way beyond needing to assuage my what, white guilt?, by finding a person of color to tell me that what I think is a valid view of the cultural/social situation in our society.
I am very aware when i quote Michelle Alexander, not because of her race, but because of her message...if you choose to differ, so be it...
you don't like her message, then refute it...don't pull some kind of bullshit defense attacking the messenger...
"Some of you are not aware of when you do it, how you do it an(d) why"..yeah, well some of us have been there, have the scars to prove it...and we know exactly what, why, when, where and how....
PotatoChip
(3,186 posts)This was long before I knew that Bernie would be running. So no. This Bernie supporter is not "using" her on Bernie's behalf.
I suspect I'm not the only Sanders supporter who took note of Prof. Alexander's work quite some time ago. It is extremely important stuff that every American should take the time to educate themselves on.
panader0
(25,816 posts)Were you around and aware when Bernie was being arrested?
Things are much, much different now in some ways, and much the same in others.
There is a lot of progress to be made in race equality, income equality.
But Bernie has remained the same guy that got arrested, fighting for the
equality we all need. For we are all equal, money or color doesn't make anyone
better than their brothers and sisters.
sheshe2
(83,655 posts)Were you around and aware when 'John Lewis' was being arrested?
Things are much, much different now in some ways, and much the same in others.
There is a lot of progress to be made in race equality, income equality.
But 'John Lewis' has remained the same guy that got arrested, fighting for the
equality we all need. For we are all equal, money or color doesn't make anyone
better than their brothers and sisters.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)sheshe2
(83,655 posts)Open board and I still have a voice here.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)2banon
(7,321 posts)Just to make a small (yet huge) correction you made down thread.
The civil rights movement in the 60's may have be a mere blip in history to you, that's fine I have no idea how old you are, maybe it's just something you heard about on tv once in a while....but it was a really BIG deal and the struggle for socio-economic equality and racial justice as most of us are painfully aware, continues to this day.
Socio-economic equality and racial justice is not a single issue struggle.
Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)The other poster isn't attacking, isn't being out of place, nothing like that. And the other poster gets to have an opinion. It weighs precisely what mine does, and precisely what yours does. Let's just discuss, huh?
2banon
(7,321 posts)which is incorrect.
Btw, I gave no lecture on this or any other subject. But corrections on factual matters seems to be in order, and you invited it.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)Protesting is not a qualification for being President.
trillion
(1,859 posts)"
MONTPELIER, Vermont Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders may be about to hit a "black firewall" in South Carolina, as one Vermont activist on race issues put it Friday, but support for him appears to run deep in Vermont's tiny black community.
While progressive politics and home-state loyalty appeared to boost support for the state's U.S. senator at a Black Lives Matter event at the Statehouse on Friday, some observers said he could have done more during his time in the U.S. House and Senate to cement relations with residents of color and thereby keep more current on race relations in America.
Dozens of activists gathered Friday to call for a racial justice agenda in Vermont, including more hiring of black teachers and school administrators and having more accountability for state agency hiring practices.
"
I don't agree with the firewall and vote for Hillary now. I mean they can vote for their shoe laces if they want. I'll just stand there as a white woman going, wow. Bernie didn't do enough so you vote for the person responsible for mass incarcerations and helping the banksters with the mortgage fraud and who is not going to do anything about climate change but instead support fossil fuels, fracking and the war machine. That will show him for not doing more for blacks!
I can't honestly to pick on blacks though. 1/2 the whites are voting for Clinton too. They didn't vet her either and spout some pipe dream that she's going to correct all the problems when she IS the problem bought and paid for by the problem makers. And, the exact same amount of blacks have woken up as whites. 1/2. It's more of a wth! Half the people vetted and found out. You don't come to Bernie without vetting. Voting for the old white guy is NOT something people come naturally into. Not even whites. Not even me. So let half the black make a fire wall. Half the whites are trying to too. Their choice. I'll just stand there going wow... and you say you're for .. and list all the progressive issues and wonder how they didn't bother to vet.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)It encourages me to thoroughly vet all candidates I vote for, not just President/Senator/Congresscritter.
I agree generally with all that you have said.
trillion
(1,859 posts)We need to push everyone to google the candidate and the issue.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)I view Bernie's past as a history lesson, informing/educating/reminding the great unwashed masses of his role in the civil rights movement. It might not matter to you, but the point is to get through to those who for whom it will matter. And by "those" I mean folks of all races and ethnicities.
His letter to Thatcher re: the IRA hunger strikers is a good example... it speaks volumes as to who he is as a human being. No one can force anyone, particularly an Irish Catholic, to care about his stance on '80s Ireland, but why not bring it to light? It's fascinating history, just like the SNCC.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/us-election/12163172/Bernie-Sanders-made-plea-to-Thatcher-on-behalf-of-IRA-hunger-strikers.html
Voters can make their own determination. And something tells me we won't hear Irish Catholics kvetch about his involvement with the Vermont Committee for Irish Human Rights.
More this, please, less divisive internet bullshit.
Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)is here
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/02/13/1484355/-Look
And we've been "looking at it" for almost a year now.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)*You've* been looking at it. But there are insane number of individuals in this country who can't name the Vice President at any given, so this information -- Sanders' civil rights involvement -- needs to be brought to light until the bitter end. Not everyone is a political junkie like those of us hanging out on DU or Kos. Look outside the bubble...
Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)You make a legitimate point, but I do have to ask that question.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)thousands of employees, diverse workforce, and all education and income levels. Can't reach all of 'em, but I love one-on-one's or small group conversations.
Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)but I converted a relative of mine to "feeling the Bern" doing this over the summertime.
This relative was interested in what Bernie had to say. During the course of talking to this relative, I was asked about Bernie Sanders and I gave taht relative the information about Bernie's civil rights history.
This relative of mine remains a Sanders supporter.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)Laughing Mirror
(4,185 posts)That's my first laugh of the morning and it will carry me through the day. Thanks so much!
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)I'm rarely in a good mood at 6:48 a.m.
Laughing Mirror
(4,185 posts)Have been all day.
You don't want to be anywhere around me either in the AM. But I'm a sucker for sly succinct wit. And yours truly made my day.
Whereabouts in VA are you?
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)A hardcore Republican coworker likes to call it that, while he reaps the benefits of high wages, insanely appreciated real estate, every cuisine imaginable, etc.
Laughing Mirror
(4,185 posts)As far as incomes are concerned. If communism can generate such wealth as in NOVA, your coworker must secretly admire it somehow.
I grew up in the area and go back often because of family. My mother's family, on both sides, have called that area home since time eternal. And they're all still there, shiftless bunch of commies like you never saw.
I guess the numbers in your screen name are your zip code. Yep, right there deep in the heart of Bolshevik country.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)Folks are engaged, and we vote.
Laughing Mirror
(4,185 posts)Wish 22191 and 22026 were as engaged in the primaries as they are in the general. Hoping the good winds will blow down their way come March, for a change.
But that's just between you and me!
trillion
(1,859 posts)I'm going down and finding a list of articles and comments and not to what you say there.
Perhaps quote a piece of sentence so I can search for it?
Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)ain't no telling what you saw.
Here's the link
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/02/13/1484355/-Look
and here is my basic conclusion:
The real thing is this: Please dont attempt to browbeat black people (and of all people, John Lewis) into how important and vital Sanders civil rights activities were: Sanders history is admittedly impressive and, as someone else stated, its rather nice that we now have one more known face of the movement...so many more faces remain unknown.
But Sanders has never drawn that much attention to it and neither should you.
Be honest and admit that its not so much whether black folk are as impressed by it as you are, acknowledge instead that you are impressed with his history.
Frankly, I find Sanders civil rights activities every bit as impressive as Hillary Clintons work with the Childrens Defense Fund or Clintons work on Senator Walter Mondales subcommittee on migrant workers.
In varied degrees, both Senator Sanders and Secretary Clinton have moved on.
And so should the rest of us.
trillion
(1,859 posts)I'm so far past the civil rights issue in this campaign that you can't imagine.
Get OVER the civil rights thing long enough to find out where these candidates stand on EVERYTHING. Find our who they are in bed with.
IE, Hillary gets the student loan industries money supporting her and Bernie wants free college and would end student loans.
Come on, substance. Find out about theTPP, fracking, the fossil fuel industry, climate change, the war industry, wall street corruption, health care industry, student loans, Israel. Heck even monsanto has reared its ugly head in this election as well as the oxycotin industry and tobacco. Did you miss all that because you only look at civil rights?
It's like you're in a tunnel. Open your eyes, they're tied into much bigger things and all support each other or hurt each other. Civil rights matter but when your screwed because you can't get fresh water and the bottling companies took it all your entire race will suffer. Ie. Flint - corporate corruption with who polluted the Flint river. Ever bother to see where that corporations money is going for president? How about that city manager changing the water supply to on that costs more - no corporate corruption there, Bull. Candidates who speak nice to minorities during campaigning season are LYING. It's what they do not what they say when they're trying to get elected. Get over that crap and move on to all the issues, and add civil rights as a part not the beginning and the end. As a woman, I care, but I don't stop there.
And don't ever accuse someone like me of shoving bernies civil rights down anyones throat. Sorry, I'm too busy shoving Hillary's money connections that would put her on par with SATAN down peoples throats. Google. It's a lot different campaign and what's at stake than you can imagine. But ya gotta let go of it being all about blacks for a few mins.
Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)Other than calling for Snyder to resign, what has sanders really done about it.
At the black forum in Minnesota, Sanders was specifically asked a question about environmental racism (as it pertained to Flint and to the trash compactor in Minneapolis) and he ducked the question...part of that was because one of the questioners derailed to talking about reparations and was unclear...i did a post at DK on that forum where I had several follow-up questions for Sanders...
trillion
(1,859 posts)shes saying what the black out reach director on her campaign is telling her to say. (lets not forget she has a bigger campaign staff than all other presidential candidates combined and that includes specific people for each segment of the population)
(Hillary's staff: http://www.p2016.org/clinton/clintonorg.html)
and Bernie is a white guy who doesn't have a black agenda down, and said the best that his white privilege life could come up with. He didn't really know enough about the issue and would likely have to look into it. Remember from the start he was awkward with Black Lives Matter. He didn't study them to campaign lie to them. He's a white guy. I'll bet he's oblivious about environmental racism. I'm sure because even I hadn't heard the term before Flint and I got it from watching DemocracyNow.org.
I would say that between the two, looking at their record, Hillary doesn't give a damn about any people drinking poison water or she wouldn't be in bed with the fracking industry, and Bernie would likely see how he could fix it on the federal level.
You're turn. Google: hillary clinton fracking industry
And then tell me she cares about Flint. She even supported fracking in Africa on the list that comes up.
Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)I don't support her...for some reasons that I've stated and some that I haven't.
Take my word for it, Bernie is not oblivious to environmental racism...knowing that the black vote is important in attaining the Democratic nomination for President, Bernie needed to be better informed as opposed to oblivious (and I don't think that he is oblivious, in any event).
trillion
(1,859 posts)There is a systematic approach behind it(just like charter schools in poor black neighborhoods replacing public schools) and it will be called something else. I bet it will also have a group of people profiteering off of it and mostly be the same people across the country.
And I bet Sanders would know that and probably hasn't spent time on it yet.
I think he answered honestly for what he knows now, and it would have been better had he had a better answer. From the federal level he could stop this corruption with policy. I noticed on democracy now there were more communities drinking bad water than Flint. The EPA would have to get specifically involved in that one, too. This might be about allowing corporations to pollute but it's also blatant corruption at the state level. And, it's systematic across states because it's happening in more states and specifically to poorer black communities. It needs more depth and time to be looked into.
But I'll agree, he should have given a better answer and clearly had not looked into it enough.
Somebody needs to look into it and write an expose on it. I'll be doing cursory looks now and grabbing info, but I'm looking up so much and chasing different directions that I'm not likely to stick to it and it needs someone focused on it. Just saying, it's a bigger issue than what meets the eye and it should be handled in a follow the money way.
desmiller
(747 posts)here's what I want to know. Since you're so critical of Sanders and Clinton, my question is this:
are you voting or staying home?
Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)I've been looking at some of the downballot stuff...I'm voting for everything in every position but for President.
Laughing Mirror
(4,185 posts)Yes, far from it. It's just that he is the only one now running for President.
Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)A very different sort of work and activism from the type that Sanders did, but equally as impressive.
Laughing Mirror
(4,185 posts)Equally impressive to you. Not so much to me.
Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)A young woman with a profile like Hillary's could have worked elsewhere making more money (the same could be said for Obama coming right out of Harvard Law School and gong to work for civil rights groups).
Instead, she worked for an advocacy organization and had a black female boss...that's very impressive for the early 1970's
...and that says nothing about Clinton's "evolution" since then...of course it's not as dramatic as Bernie being arrested but it is as impressive
Laughing Mirror
(4,185 posts)I sat there and watched her speak at Empire State Pride banquet in 2000, shook her hand and voted for her in 2000, enthusiastically. Shortly thereafter, it was buyers remorse when I saw what her game was. Everything she did do, everything she didn't do. And then 9-11 and her incessant war mongering. That's all she was good for, it looked like to me, as one of her constituents who voted for her. Promoting war, arms sales, the whole works. That's what I remember about her. Good for her and her business, surely. Not good for me. The product that her merchandising department had promised during her campaign -- promises promises -- was the opposite of what it was cracked up to be. It was plain to see.
Too bad we can't pull up old threads about her from DU then.
But in New York, I saw close up who she was, and what she was. And I saw a woman who does not represent me, nor anybody I know, and I learned that what she is selling is not now what I want in a president. To me, it's the elite she's for, because that's who she is, and that's fine for her and those who aspire to that. The system in place is working well for that sector and she and them want it to stay that way.
Well I don't. Simple as that. She wants me to accept her 12/hr. I'll go with the guy who thinks I'm worth at least 15.
Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)I mean, I have my own qualms about Clinton.
Laughing Mirror
(4,185 posts)Am glad that I have now the choice to vote for somebody who better suits me this time around. When I voted for Hillary, felt as if I had to. What choice did I have? That other jerk the Republicans had running for the seat? I had to vote for her. Now I don't.
It is very rare to have an opportunity to actually have a viable choice in whom I am voting for, for president, at least in my long long experience. Whenever given a choice, I take it.
jillan
(39,451 posts)Hillary because what she did in the past.
We all have the right to look at each candidate and find what we like or do not like about a particular candidate, whether they are running for President or for the local school board.
No explanation is needed. That is our right.
Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)I never said that it wasn't significant...simply that this an his votes, for example, isn't the only data that's out there...and that's true for both Sanders and Clinton (an I'm no Hillary Clinton fan but I don't think that she's an evil bitch either)
trillion
(1,859 posts)do it on black rights. do it! do it! to it! just google.
But really start doing it on every progressive issue you think is important. It will be an eye opener. Do it for Bernie too.
Make a list, in 10 mins you can wipe out a lot of things.
Climate change
Fracking
War industry
Monsanto
wall street corruption
for profit prison industry
and put her name with the subject in the list and then Bernie's. See what google comes up with.
then come back and tell me about evil
lovemydog
(11,833 posts)I agree that both candidates are 'meh' on this topic. They're better than republicans and that's about it.
For example, substantive changes in criminal justice reform will take place at local, city and state levels. I don't think either democratic candidate would impede reform the way republicans do. But the presidency itself is limited in that regard.
trillion
(1,859 posts)the for profit prisons. She only took them out of her super pacs because she had to since the Huffington Post exposed her 3 months ago.
As we've found out with her, she has many places where they can donate without showing up on her super pac list. The Clinton Foundation itself that is formed with her and her husband makes up a who lot of the dirty money she receives. That's were we get the Monsanto and Fracking links to her. I wouldn't be surprised at all if the GEO group moved from her campaign to giving her money though her foundation. They aren't going to give up on buying out who ever becomes president and making sure Criminal Justice reform doesn't happen. It's like if she dropped Goldman Sachs because of bad press, they wouldn't actually go away no matter what. She'd drop it in name only. I'll also mention the super pacs make it easy to hide who the corporations donating are and she has a lot of super pacs now where we don't know who is behind her. I have strong suspicions koch money is for instance because her support of Fracking and the Keystone XL can only tie right to Koch lobbyists.
lovemydog
(11,833 posts)islandmkl
(5,275 posts)am I what, you might ask.
are you really trying to determine some degree of Bernie Sanders civil rights involvement that will satisfy you enough to support him...or are you merely searching for memes that, due to what I could say are of a limited scope, call into question some actions that happened sometime before yesterday to be of importance and meaning? just so you can say he shows you nothing...
forget 50 years of constant endeavor...what has he done lately, right?
if you want to quote people, do yourself a favor and seek out all the voices...or not...it's up to you...but cherry-picking comments has its own liability...others might just find comments, possibly more valid and less agenda-driven, that would help to expand the whole community's view...
oh yeah, the Hillary disclaimer at the end was a nice touch, too...
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)Before I give you my answer to your question I want to point out something you might have missed.
"theres at least two stories that noted that Sanders had no people of color that worked for him. "
But in the link you supplied,
"Clarence Davis, a black Shelburne resident* who worked for Sanders in the House, "
That should clear that up and now to your question.
"Bernie Sanders civil rights activities in the 1960s were never a very significant criteria for me in predicting whether and how President Sanders might approach the problems that African Americans face. "
-Not to be rude but I think that is kind of a short sided statement and I think it really answers itself.
"The relationship of Sanders with his African American constituents (and they have been his constituents for over 25 years) is hundreds of times more significant than whether he marched with King or not. "
-He's gotten some endorsement's form some black groups in his home state so that should help.
I've never really understood the Janet Jackson mentally from some in the black community. This isn't the What have you done for me lately video and to not give credit to Bernie for his work is ridiculous IMHO.
That's just my two cents.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)It was about his time as Mayor.
And we have the Janet Jackson mentality because we get promises of a New Day (paula abdoul) from everybody but no actual focus on our issues in particular. If he is to be the nominee, he will need to focus on our issues in particular instead of pretending american is running on a color blind philosophy. We never have been colorblind yet and until we get there, we have to demand our due from any politician who wants our vote. Hillary is getting pressed too, that's why she is going around giving speeches on racism in Harlem.
We (many of us) are no longer satisfied with being told nothing can b done about racism. When did we every try? Time to do it now, not leave it for our children to suffer through. We can make strides in the meantime just by getting our voices out there.
Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)but on at least two occasions, Seven Days investigated whether their elected Congressional officials had any POC working for them and found at the time of their investigations that sanders had none...one investigation was in the early 90's (after he entered Congress) and another way in the late 90's...you can stroll through the Seven Days archives and find that information.
There are at least two people on sanders' senate staff (one black) who were hired from John Lewis' office; you can even find statements of Lewis "wishing his former employees well" in the Congressional Record. That's why I, personally, was rather stunned at how hard Lewis's statement was against Sanders.
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)I imagine others are just trying to let you see who has been on your side always. But for me, if you prefer to fall for Hillary's lies, go for it. It's your own choice.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)and I don't see this as an issue about Bernie or Hillary. This is obviously you being honest about how you are feeling about a multitude of things.
The world keeps turning, and every once in a while, we have these elections. I don't think people have to pick a side or have some personal epiphany--just because the campaigns kick it into high gear and are trying to get votes.
I think votes have to be earned. And I think who a person supports--and everything they've endured--is very personal.
You're entitled to your feelings and I hope that somehow, one of the candidates speaks to you and helps you to feel like they will serve your interests and that they are listening to you.
Everyone, including you, deserves that.
nilesobek
(1,423 posts)come down with an acute case of nihilism eh? Suspiciously, it coincides with the Chicago Tribune refuting the allegations that Bernie lied about marching for civil rights and his subsequent arrest.
There might not be a way to save face on this one.
Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)long predate the Tribune piece
JI7
(89,241 posts)it's more about white people who lecture and make demands on black people with these things and usually in assholish ways.
it ends up turning what is positive into a joke.
Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)I will add this link to the main potion of the post.
JI7
(89,241 posts)i support Sanders but i'm not black. i am of south asian descent.
Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)quantumjunkie
(244 posts)Because he cares about the issues i care about...healthcare, climate change, campaign finance reform, roe v wade, science.
PatrickforO
(14,559 posts)and pick the one whose positions best represent what you want for yourself and your family.
That's what I've done, and why I'm supporting Bernie. But there's absolutely no reason you have to do anything, nor am I going to try and convince you.
mhatrw
(10,786 posts)But if you are "meh" on Sanders. how are you not also "meh" on Obama?
And how are you not protesting the Clintons for how badly they played black people while fucking them over during Bill's 8 years as President?
gwheezie
(3,580 posts)I think the dem party has been slightly better than the GOP in moving this country towards equality for all. Our government did too little, too late and while I can't speak for black folks, it's been a pretty dismal performance by the government we elect. My general impression from the people I know is that they can't expect much from white people to correct the white folks being dragged with heels dug in to fix themselves of their racist past. That is not to say that some of the civil rights legislation wasn't significant or that individual white allies didn't put their bodies on the line but let's face it, how did it turn out for black people? That is the discussion I have with my friends. And maybe it is a generational thing, because I'm in my 60's and brown or Prince Edward county, or the voting rights act, or equal housing or affirmative action did not level the playing field, it just produced different ways to continue racism on the down low. So, when Bernie presses on with the same message for the past 40 years, it's hard to believe it or if my girl Hillary talks about her wonky and well researched policy positions, it's hard to believe it. I'm not seeing a radical change coming, not when you have about half the country supporting a bunch of right-wing racists.
I admit I don't talk to enough young folks, I did have some contact with ows and young women when we had our vagina probing fight in Virginia. Very impressed with them but I've seen it before, not saying don't push forward because otherwise what is the point and I do have hope for the future, but my style is head down, shoulder to the wheel, push,push,push and know it's a big rock that doesn't want to move.
gyroscope
(1,443 posts)you would have no problem with that?
Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)I said that they weren't very significant to me.
If you think that they should be very significant to me, then that is your problem and not mine
gyroscope
(1,443 posts)past behavior is the best predictor of future behavior. any company worth their salt will tell you that which is why they perform through background checks on you when you apply for any decent job. you apply for a job in a police department, you think they're not going to be checking into your history and be very concerned with your background?
as a black person would you not care if a candidate running for office had a racist past?
or had a history of passing laws that were detrimental to black people?
its incredibly stupid to me to say you don't care about someone's past, especially when you are considering voting for that person for a very important office.
Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)for example, there are white people that NEVER stopped being on the front line for civil rights; there are other that never stopped being on the frontlines of anti-war protests (e.g. one of the famed Chicago Seven was arrested in Sanders Burlington office for doing a sit-in while protesting the war in Kosovo)...
Sanders stopped being on the front-lines.
He has been in Congress for over 25 years and is in Congress today. How he treats his black constituents is more predictive and more recent than his activities in the 1960's.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)I've seen your screen name out and about here, but no memories of much of your involvement in things.
Suffice it to say, think what you want, vote for Hillary, vote for Mickey Mouse, I don't give a diddly-squat.
So this New Yorker is asking you, the Chicagoan, to turn on his irony alert and sing to himself in his best Connie Francis rendition, "who's self-important now?"
Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)closeupready
(29,503 posts)Strike while the iron is hot.
eridani
(51,907 posts)First visit of official campaign people to Seattle featured several 20-somethings--all POC except for 1.
Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)Reading is fundamental, you know.
eridani
(51,907 posts)Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)prior to Sanders being hired.
There are two very specific pieces i the Seven Days VT Bernie archives about Bernie's lack of POC staffers in the 1990's; you can go look for them.
eridani
(51,907 posts)Why wouldn't his staff resemble his state. In a national campaign, the staff should resemble the nation, and id does.
Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)that lived in his state OR who lived in DC...since I worked for Congress in a former life, I know a little bit about these things like staffing up a Congressional office either in DC or in the home state.
Jeffords and Leahy had no problems with this...and remember, this was the Vermont press that was asking these questions.
eridani
(51,907 posts)Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)and I didn't ask these questions, the Vermont press did back in the 1990's on at least two occasions.
eridani
(51,907 posts)Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)At this time (1993) Leahy had 3 black staffers, Jeffords 1, and Sanders 0
http://www.sevendaysvt.com/vermont/congressional-staff-check/Content?oid=2435078
eridani
(51,907 posts)In 2000, every Representative hired 14 staff members, while the average Senator hired 34. In 2000, Representatives had a limit of 18 full-time and four part-time staffers; Senators had no limit on staff
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_staff
So Leahy and Jeffords get props for being able to hire many more people? The more you get to hire, the more likely it is that one or more will be black.
mhatrw
(10,786 posts)And how are you not protesting the Clintons for how badly they have played black people while royally fucking them over during Bill's 8 years as President?
Response to Chitown Kev (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
mikehiggins
(5,614 posts)are happy that he started out being a troublemaker BUT this is 2016. What is important to us is looking forward to gaining some of the progressive ideals that SHOULD be important to the Democratic Party. Having to waste time with arguments over or not Sanders was seen by somebody back then or accusing him of lying about that photograph doesn't serve anyone's best interests.
What we would like to talk about are economic issues, and how to advance our agenda. Instead a lot of time is wasted due to arguments about how there were too many white people in the audience when Sanders announced in Vermont, and so on and so forth.
You don't care? I was politically active on a lot of fronts back then and I really don't think it is what we have to talk about.
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)& you get left being insulted & lectured.
polly7
(20,582 posts)ReallyIAmAnOptimist (206 posts)
Most moving testimony (for Bernie) yet; brought tears to my eyes.
re-CORRECTED LINK:
https://www.facebook.com/nationalnurses/videos/10153860722462973/?hc_location=ufi
Nurse honors great-grandmother who died in civil rights moveme...
Martese Chism, a registered nurse from Chicago, honors her great-grandmother's legacy by volunteering and supporting Bernie Sanders. In 1966, her great-grandmother, Birdia Keglar, a civil rights leader and voting rights activist, was run off the road and killed in Mississippi by the Klan for registering black voters.
"When I found out that Bernie participated in a sit inthat he was , I think about how the last person who was in the car with my great-grandmother was an SNCC student, Chism said. "He was there with us in the 60s. . . . . I want to be there for him.
Video: National Nurses United
Vinca
(50,237 posts)His beliefs aren't formed based upon the prevailing political winds.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)#smellthebern
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)tularetom
(23,664 posts)That's the longest post I ever read to try to explain something nobody cares about in the first place.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)No, that's not what he's spending his energy typing about, but he did claim it somewhere in the mess above. Looks to me like he just wants to complain.
Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)I am discussing how I prioritize various bits of information and my criteria insofar as making judgments about Sanders and Clinton.
A lot of the Bernie flks seem not to like it but that's too damn bad.
Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)Bernie has been consistent. Hillary flops around like a fish out of water.
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)I can't really get inside your head and say why you as a black man should support Bernie or "care all that much" for what he did 50 years ago. But for me, I support him because 50 years ago he was fighting for the same equality and rights that I believed in then and still do today. You can make light of the contributions and sacrifices that white supporters and allies made back in the day, but they took their lumps, some died, some got called n****r lovers (like I did in Houston, Texas) simply for having black friends. You can vote for and support whomever you want, but you shouldn't disrespect white people who have been on your side for 60 years. In my opinion.
Number23
(24,544 posts)somewhere in the 60s.
We already know this. This is not news. And the fact that photo seems to mean EVER so much MORE to Sanders' white supporters than it does to everybody else you would think would provide them with a clue.
But they just keep posting that pic. Over and over and over and over and over and over again. Now people are actually making graphics from it as though it comes close to addressing or explaining... something. That pic is CLEARLY incredibly important to them for some reason. And when they're not doing that they are tying him into MLK's legacy. It seems that alot of these people think that not only do black people not know and understand our own history or what's important to us, but that we must think it's still 1967 just like they apparently do.
charliebinky
(1 post)Bernie's history is important because for the last 50+ years he has been fighting for Social Justice for not just blacks, but for all people. Without Social Justice for all, there can be no real Racial Justice, there can be no real Economic Justice, no real Gender Equality, no real Educational Equality. Bernie does it not by pointing to himself, he does it by what he stands for, the same thing he has stood for all along, all the way back to when he fought discriminatory housing practices at the University of Chicago in the early 1960's.
Today I was lucky to see a Public Television Show on Vel Phillips, a black civil rights leader in Milwaukee, WI beginning in the 1950's. She was the first black female graduate of the University of Wisconsin Law School. She was also the first black Alderman on the Milwaukee, Wisconsin City Council. She fought valiantly for years to roll back segregated housing practices in Milwaukee but was unsuccessful. She participated in non-violent civil disobedience over various issues of the time. The fair housing rules were finally put in to effect after various Federal Protections were passed in 1968. In the 1960's In Chicago Bernie fought housing discrimination by his University. He was a member of CORE (Congress on Racial Equality)
He was at the March on Washington in the 1960's and if Senator John Lewis had turned around he would have seen a few rows back and to his left as shown in this image.
Not so sure about Hillary's "Honesty" especially after she stood on a debate stage before New Hampshire and outright lied about Senator Sanders writing a Foreword for Bill Press's book. Looking at the index on-line THERE IS NO FOREWORD IN THE BOOK!! This is what Bernie said on the back cover of the book:
"Bill Press makes the case why, long after taking the oath of office, the next president of the United States must keep rallying the people who elected him or her on behalf of progressive causes. That is the only way real change will happen, Read this book." Bernie Sanders
That statement was then twisted into this on the front: "Bill Press makes the case--read this book" Bernie Sanders
The name of the book is "Broken Promises: How Obama Let Progressives Down" by Bill Press It is interesting to note that Mr. Press closes his book with a three page letter to Hilary Clinton should she win the presidency. In the letter, Mr. Press reminds Hilary of her progressive past, the work she has done, the causes she has championed and asks her to please be bold going forward in addressing the needs of the American Public. He also includes a letter to Bernie, this is what it says: Dear Senator Sanders, Congratulations! You defied the odds. You made it to the White House. Now, be yourself, that's all we ask. Hillary's is three pages, his is three lines. He is who he says he is and he does not have to be reminded of what he has been fighting for for the last 50 or so years.
This is post by Bill Press verifying that Hillary misrepresented what Bernie said
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bill-press/the-blurb-heard-around-the-world_b_9237814.html
I am a supporter of President Obama. I have been outraged by the ridiculous way he has been treated by the republicans in CONgress. My States own senator was the worst, pledging to make sure Obama would be a one term president. Bad enough to pledge that, but to pledge that in the midst of the worst recession since the Great Depression should have led to McConnell's impeachment. Instead he and his fellow republicans blocked and refused to compromise on anything of substance with the president. President Obama made one crucial mistake early on that I think most of us can agree on, he held out for the hope of compromise with the republicans way longer that they deserved and it wound up limiting what he could actually accomplish. Once McConnell said what he said, that should have been the end of any thought of compromise on the president's part. Also, far to many times he seemed to me to lead off with his compromise position. Kind of like Hillary and the minimum wage. She is on board for $12/hour which should in all reality be her final compromise position instead of her lead off position. She and President Obama sometimes seem like they would be terrible poker players. Bernie is at $15/hr and I believe he will be able to get us close to that.
I will close with one of the best spokespeople for Bernie I have seen yet.
Nina Turner, former Ohio State Senator and former Hillary Clinton supporter, now a Sanders spokeswoman.