Fri Feb 19, 2016, 11:45 PM
M Kitt (208 posts)
Can anyone name a "Liberal" site kicking members off without good reason?This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by one_voice (a host of the 2016 Postmortem forum). Think about it. Any site at all, give it a minute. If that were the case, if you had been kicked off without recourse or reason give, if emails were not replied to and site management completely ignored personal requests, what would you do? Per the above post, some of us have logged back on as "New Users" in violation of site policy, for purposes of complaint. Which would of course be used as rationale for further "Violation" under site management authority ![]() But hey, if you were running a "Group" and had complete control, if you could essentially snuff out all opposing viewpoints base on entirely partisan criteria, wouldn't you "Indulge"? Wouldn't you (perhaps) kick a member out of that group without notice, even if it were their first post on that Group? Membership on any site isn't worth "Indulging" site management if they're prone to complete abuse of their authority. If group rules, when opposed, lead not only to being locked out of a group, but eventual lockout from the entire site for 12 days, would membership be worthwhile? I'll eventually remove all of my posts from the particular site I'm referring to, it's not simply worth my efforts across 3 years to be kicked off of an entire site for a disagreement with a group "Manager". Essentially, that dictatorial "Power" is being supported by "Site Management", and to answer the question asked above, membership isn't worth being subjected to that kind of abuse. Laterz. Other sites, posting available people ![]() https://www.thomhartmann.com/users/mfkmail7/blog/2016/02/can-you-think-any-liberal-sites-kicking-valued-members
|
16 replies, 2338 views
Cannot reply in locked threads
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
M Kitt | Feb 2016 | OP |
The Velveteen Ocelot | Feb 2016 | #1 | |
bravenak | Feb 2016 | #2 | |
oasis | Feb 2016 | #3 | |
H2O Man | Feb 2016 | #4 | |
leftofcool | Feb 2016 | #5 | |
Arazi | Feb 2016 | #6 | |
lovemydog | Feb 2016 | #15 | |
angstlessk | Feb 2016 | #7 | |
ScreamingMeemie | Feb 2016 | #8 | |
NBachers | Feb 2016 | #9 | |
bravenak | Feb 2016 | #10 | |
stevenleser | Feb 2016 | #11 | |
betsuni | Feb 2016 | #12 | |
DemocratSinceBirth | Feb 2016 | #13 | |
lovemydog | Feb 2016 | #14 | |
one_voice | Feb 2016 | #16 |
Response to M Kitt (Original post)
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 11:51 PM
The Velveteen Ocelot (105,690 posts)
1. It's just an internet message board, not worth so much agony.
Also, you don't need to spam every forum and group complaining about whatever it was.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to M Kitt (Original post)
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 11:52 PM
bravenak (34,648 posts)
2. Why is this here?
Post it to ata.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to M Kitt (Original post)
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 11:54 PM
oasis (48,714 posts)
3. If posters have problems following the rules, then adios.
It's as simple as that.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to M Kitt (Original post)
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 11:56 PM
H2O Man (70,597 posts)
4. Democratic primary?
I thought that DU:GDP was our forum to discuss the Democratic Party's primary contest. I am unsure how your OP is related?
Thanks! |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to M Kitt (Original post)
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 11:56 PM
leftofcool (19,460 posts)
5. No doubt, it's all Hillary's fault. Or Obama's fault.
I'm sure you will let us know.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to M Kitt (Original post)
Arazi This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to Arazi (Reply #6)
lovemydog This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to M Kitt (Original post)
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 11:57 PM
angstlessk (11,862 posts)
7. M Kitt.......YOU ARE HERE...not kicked out
You got a problem with that?
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to M Kitt (Original post)
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 12:02 AM
ScreamingMeemie (68,918 posts)
8. Seriously... my 17-year-old rants better than that.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to M Kitt (Original post)
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 12:06 AM
NBachers (15,550 posts)
9. This is too brief - Please elaborate in greater detail.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to M Kitt (Original post)
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 12:33 AM
bravenak (34,648 posts)
10. Um
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to M Kitt (Original post)
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 12:35 AM
stevenleser (32,886 posts)
11. You can be on a site that admits all and kicks off almost no one. Discussionist.com
Have at it.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to M Kitt (Original post)
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 12:39 AM
betsuni (21,681 posts)
12. What.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to M Kitt (Original post)
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 12:40 AM
DemocratSinceBirth (98,641 posts)
13. Some of us complain and do, but at the end of the day it's not our site!.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to M Kitt (Original post)
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 12:40 AM
lovemydog (11,833 posts)
14. Wait. What?
You're still posting here. According to your story you posted a pro-Bernie post in the Barack Obama group. Then you were locked out of that group. Then you sent an administrator a note saying 'You suck!' Then you wrote on Thom Hartmann's site that he is a 'butt munch.' Then you posted this post a bunch of places here. Is that correct?
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to M Kitt (Original post)
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 12:46 AM
one_voice (20,043 posts)
16. Locking...
doesn't meet SoP for GDP
Statement of Purpose
Disruptive meta-discussion is forbidden. |
Cannot reply in locked threads