2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThe Democratic Establishment can't fight the GOP. But they sure can beat down the grassroots
Last edited Sat Feb 20, 2016, 10:32 PM - Edit history (1)
Clinton hasn't won it yet.
But the way the Democratic Establishment (including the older contingent of insider "progressives"
has rallied against a challenge to the pre-selected nominee sure shows that they are able to fight when its really needed -- to beat back any ornery "leftist" grassroots movements, progressive populism, economic liberalism...anything outside of the Corporate Centrist Template.
Powerless against the Big Bad GOP, as you constantly remind us. Can't do anything because they have the power.
Thank you Harry Reid, Jim Clyburn, and all the other DC insiders who've upped your game to beat down the grassroots. Wish you could have been as effective against the GOP all these years.
Wish you'd shown as much fight and backbone against the GOP as you've shown against those who want reform and change within you own party.
Wish you were fighting as hard to beat back conservatism as you are in beating back liberalism.
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)All she can do is make sure a Republican wins.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)RKP5637
(67,112 posts)I still don't think the democratic honchos quite get what is going on in the populace.
Yurovsky
(2,064 posts)and if anyone thinks that taking all of that dirty money from Wall Street won't bite Hillary in the ass with the general electorate in the same way that it has with progressives, they are high as a motherfucker.
The only person I could see Hillary having a remote chance of beating is Ted Cruz, just because he's creepy as hell and the evangelicals scare off more voters than they actually bring to the polls in November (JMHO).
I think Bernie could challenge Trump's "can't be bought" cred, plus he's bringing a specific, broad-based set of proposals to help poor and working-class Americans. Trump just promises to toss out 11 million immigrants with the assumption that the unemployed will take whatever work the newly deported were doing.
I believe Bernie could beat Trump, and while it wouldn't be a cakewalk, I think it would bring out enough young and progressive voters to tip the Senate and maybe, just maybe the House.
If Hillary is the nominee, Democrats from coast to coast are going to be in trouble. Youth/progressive turnout will suffer, and many close races will go to the GOP in a low-turnout election (akin to midterms).
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)republican machinery will spin enormous mistrust about her. I really don't think the democratic DNC elite has any idea what is gong on in the general populace. They are in a bubble. And they don't get it that millions of Americans will say fuck it in the general election, many are so fed up with big money politics.
dchill
(42,660 posts)RKP5637
(67,112 posts)lob1
(3,820 posts)in an ad he could show the canceled check with Hillary endorsement and say,
"Hillary can be bought...because I bought her".
PonyUp
(1,680 posts)Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)Holy cow, that's fuggin' brutal.
PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)and against Trump it'll be a Reagan Landslide
as the seems to be the best of both worlds. Liberal and Conservative at the same time and won't owe his votes for the Christian Right. oh thats just gonna annoy them. They probably can't believe a bigger supporter of PP is running in front on the Right. Can't say if he's the same $$ support of PP with Hillary, I'd assume the same but with Bernie that gets Ironic. I bet my bottom dollar since he's not paid by the filthy rich , he's spend less on PP than Donald Trump has. X_X Odd bedfellows
mgmaggiemg
(869 posts)Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)Acrid and bitter. If it's Bernie, I'll go with something smooth and malty, maybe a chocolate stout. If a Republican wins... I'll break out the hard stuff.
CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)
Armstead
(47,803 posts)This has become much more than a contest between candidates.
artislife
(9,497 posts)and the results of changed hearts and minds will be the same as their earlier events.
farleftlib
(2,125 posts)the sad truth? They're united against us but can't come together enough to be an effective opposition party for us..
Shandris
(3,447 posts)What with both parties being filled with 'neo-{ideology}' (read: the other ideology), why anyone thinks they won't continue to drift closer and closer together under the Establishment's 'tender mercies' is beyond me.
gyroscope
(1,443 posts)their primary goal is to keep populists like Sanders away from the WH.
Dustlawyer
(10,539 posts)hooked their campaign's up, and they sure as Hell don't want to cut off all of that money! It's disgusting, but we have not lost yet, not for a long shot!
warrprayer
(4,734 posts)Is in the air!
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)have got a sweet gig Kabuki dancing for lobbyist payoffs. They don't want any outsiders screwing it up.
Yurovsky
(2,064 posts)you know the real money is coming in peddling influence to wealthy corporatists, not serving their average constituent. If we cut off the K Street gravy train, we would have more Bernies and fewer Harry Reids and Diane Fiensteins (whose husband's firm gets hundreds of millions in commissions by leasing office space to ... you guessed it, the Federal Government).
I expect the GOP to fuck me over. It would be nice if the people running the Democratic Party weren't so damn busy cashing in and spent a little more time helping the hundreds of millions of Americans who AREN'T connected get ahead. Hillary is just another rich pseudo-liberal who wouldn't piss on you or I if we were on fire.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)occurs under the banner of the Democratic party they need to be called out. I don't want that shit on my team.
freebrew
(1,917 posts)Bribery used to be illegal...Now, it's lucrative!
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)And sanders would be in their way. This country used to be about 'we the people,' now it's about 'we the uberwealthy.' Just a brief look at the wealth distribution in the US shows how badly F'ed over the great majority of Americans are.
TheProgressive
(1,656 posts)Had to laugh... We are citizen Democrats - they are establishment democrats.
Even when Democrats have power, they do very little or nothing for the American people...
And yes, they are better than republicans, but not much more...
Kang Colby
(1,941 posts)He's an independent socialist ideologue who has tried to commandeer the Democratic Party infrastructure by promising anyone and everyone payment for their vote in the form of various freebies. But thankfully, the voters are seeing through his charade and will nominate someone who can properly lead this country instead.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Kang Colby
(1,941 posts)malletgirl02
(1,523 posts)and here you are insulting Bernie Sanders supporters.
Kang Colby
(1,941 posts)malletgirl02
(1,523 posts)You are just like the Bernie Bros that you dislike, by insulting all Sanders supporters.
LibDemAlways
(15,139 posts)would be needed in November if Hillary becomes the nominee? Why deliberately antagonize them? Don't be shocked if Hillary becomes the nominee and those Bernie supporters decide to sit on their hands.
jhart3333
(332 posts)Kang Colby
(1,941 posts)But I do recognize that there is a contingent of Sanders supporters that just don't vote or don't vote for Democrats. They are loud, they are all over social media, but for whatever reason they aren't showing up to cast votes. My theory is that they are an entitled class, who believes (foolishly), that Bernie will be elected which will allow them to be showered with free goodies at the expense of hard working taxpayers. Sanders wants to implement Tobin taxes which would impact both market liquidity and would materially harm everyone's 401K savings, especially young workers. It's such a stupid idea, even Sweden repealed their Tobin tax program. That style of program has been shown to LOWER tax revenues by reducing tax revenue from capital gains. Anyone who has any basic understanding of economics reads Sanders "plan" and has to laugh with disgust. It's shameful that there are so many gullible people out there.
To recap:
1) Sanders ENTIRE campaign is based on quid pro quo ("vote for me, and everything will be free!"
2) Even pretending that his policy proposals could make it through congress this side of 2024, the numbers just don't add up. They don't even begin to make sense.
3) His Chavez-esque anti business rhetoric and proposals would do nothing more than chase away U.S. based multinational corporations, leaving us with less tax revenue and more importantly less jobs.
NRaleighLiberal
(61,838 posts)Seen posted at DU for some time.
Jenny_92808
(1,342 posts)Thank you for writing what I was thinking.
ultragreen
(53 posts)The purpose of the Tobin tax is the reduction of short-term speculative trading of financial securities, of which there is a vast over-abundance. This has been a source of major financial instability throughout the world. Because the material impact of such a tax on long-term investment is negligible, its impact on 401k retirement savings would also be negligible. That's assuming, of course, that those retirement savings have been invested sensibly, rather than on the short-term casino gambling that has become so typical of Wall Street and other exchanges these days. Anyone with even a basic understanding of how economic systems function should be able to understand this.
As for your other criticisms of Bernie's proposals: All other developed nations in the world provide affordable or free college education and health care to their citizens. The United States is the only developed nation that doesn't do this. This is one of the reasons why we are lagging behind other developed, and even not so developed, nation-states on so many social indicators, such as economic inequality and the prevalence of poverty. If current trends continue, the United States will provide only third-world living standards for the vast majority of its residents.
Kang Colby
(1,941 posts)trading. I have to make an analogy here that I think you will appreciate.
Plankton. Your average Joe walking around town probably doesn't know much about plankton, what it is, or how it supports the marine ecosystem. But I would hope like hell, that no one gets any ideas to go and actively try and kill off all of the plankton over mathematically unfounded populist concerns that they are just pesky nuisance critters. Same thing with "high frequency traders" and equity market speculators. These HFTs and speculators face off against each other everyday on an algorithmic arms race to take tiny fractions of a penny from each other. Knowing that as an average Joe Mackerel I have no chance in the world against those "plankton" - which in this analogy are HFTs and speculators, I stay the heck away from them. As far as possible by using sensible investments. But I still benefit from the planktons' effect on the market ecosystem. As they wage war against each other ripping pennies apart, they are also reducing the bid/ask spread so that 401K investors are getting the best price possible when contributing to their 401k. There is evidence that these plankton have reduced trading costs for Joe Mackerel's by about 1%. Sounds small right? But when calculated using compound returns and decades of regular 401K contributions, you are talking about tens of thousands of dollars for a middle class 401k saver. So hell no, I think Tobin taxes are just an emotional idiotic response to a "problem" that people don't understand.
To your other point, Bernie supporters always say other countries have all these freebies, why can't we? But Bernie Supporters ALWAYS overlook all of the strings attached and nuances of how these other countries have what they have. Unless you are willing to concede that we should be making determinations about a 4th graders aptitude and whether or not they should become low income/middle income/or high income earners later in life...then no I don't think you are truly advocating the meritocracy that's common in European educational systems.
With that said, welcome to DU.
amborin
(16,631 posts)These folks? If not, you might reconsider your position.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/30/business/economy/for-the-wealthiest-private-tax-system-saves-them-billions.html
Kang Colby
(1,941 posts)When it comes to market mechanics Sanders and his supporters remind me of climate change deniers. Sure, they have a 10th grade education and no scientific training, but by golly they sure do "feel" a certain way.
amborin
(16,631 posts)you self-identified as small biz, right? historically, that is a reactionary group
Kang Colby
(1,941 posts)Jenny_92808
(1,342 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts)Anything after that is ignored as all you are doing is pushing a right wing meme that you know is not true.
.
liberalhistorian
(20,904 posts)vote! They are hugely for Sanders, and to be beat down and back like this may very well alienate an entire generation of voters that could have gone Democratic. My son is a millennial and I gotta say that I have never, ever seen such enthusiasm among the young for a candidate as I have the millennials and youth for Sanders. Because they get the need to change a completely rigged system, a system rigged largely against them, and they get that he really is in for changing that system, that it's not just words. They want change and an outsider, and they know that Clinton is simply part of that same rigged system.
Like me and many DUers here of all ages, they really resent the fact that the party PTB have pre-selected the nominee regardless of what any voters, especially them, have to say, and that said party establishment is intent on shoving said pre-selected nominee down our throats and squashing any protest, no matter what. That will, as I've said, lose an entire generation of voters and the party poo-bahs will have no one but themselves to blame. I guess the stereotype really is true, that our party is really good at snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.
ultragreen
(53 posts)Yes, how dare the rabble in the USA expect affordable college education and health care! Never mind the fact that all other developed nations in the world already have this!
Kang Colby
(1,941 posts)There are much better policy options for improving our country than what Sanders has been able to come up with. I agree we need to overhaul education and health care. There are just better options than Tobin taxes.
What people have to take into account is the size of the United States, our culture and diversity (which is a key strength), our globally benchmarked economy, and the sheer size of our global equity market. In other words we aren't Denmark, which is something that I don't understand why Sanders supporters can't comprehend. We are Americans, we need to embrace that and work for changes using public policy options that make sense....meaning options that take into account the unique characteristics of the United States aka our big GDP and all the mouths we have to feed, educate, and take care of.
k8conant
(3,038 posts)Where is Hillary guiding you?
Do you share her Wall Street greed?
I believe in guiding principles of equity and decency and humanity.
farleftlib
(2,125 posts)Thanks for regurgitating that old meme.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)I don't care what label Bernie has, he has the integrity and policies I look for in a president.
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)LiberalArkie
(19,768 posts)ReallyIAmAnOptimist
(357 posts)And the 'freebies' nonsense, seriously?
It's not about free stuff.
It's about priorities:
There are three clear places the American people are being robbed:
1) The first is simple tax evasion by corporations and billionaires.
2) The second is tax breaks for corporations and billionaires: We basically SPEND more on tax breaks than the entire discretionary spending category (which is 1.1 trillion).
3) Furthermore military spending is 53% of 1.11 trillion in 2015 discretionary spending!
And that is excessive, wasteful, and unaccountable (we can't even identify where many billions actually end up).https://www.nationalpriorities.org/.../federal.../spending/
So real progressives just want tax dollars spent on We The People and The Commons, rather than to line the pockets of corporate America.
ultragreen
(53 posts)than the monstrous for-profit healthcare system that is now in place. Our health care system costs twice as much money as the single-payer healthcare systems of other developed nations, its health care outcomes are mediocre, and it doesn't even cover everyone. Another problem is that employers often pay for the health care premiums of their employees, making their businesses less competitive abroad. Thus, Bernie's proposed single-payer healthcare would save the United States trillions of $$$ while making it more competitive abroad. From these health care savings, the United States could easily make education at public colleges free. Thus, Bernie Sander's isn't offering "freebies" at all, contrary to what the Clinton "no we can't" supporters like to claim.
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)Chief US inspector of dog kennels.
All the arm twisting I did, and such a minor promise to show for it!
I could have held out for so much more if only I had known he is not that hard to corrupt!
BuelahWitch
(9,083 posts)And that's what (real) affordable healthcare, schooling without fear of going into debt and raising the cap on Social Security does. It brings quality of life. But there are those who "think it's time for a woman President" because "it's HER TURN" who would reduce our wish for quality of life to the free toys we get out of a cracker jack box.
With Hillary it's SSDD. Sorry, been there, done that, we can do better.
406-Boz
(53 posts)It's just not going to happen, she and her Wall St buddies can't buy it.
ultragreen
(53 posts)leveymg
(36,418 posts)Hubert Humphrey was rhe losing establishment candidate we were stuck with then. Hillary is the one we will likely be handed again. No thank you.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)yodermon
(6,153 posts)Can't be both
CrispyQ
(40,938 posts)You're as bad as the republicans & the media perpetuating this lie.
Now, can he get elected telling Americans they are going to pay more in taxes, even if some of those are hedge fund managers & corporations? I don't know. I've never seen such a well-to-do population so stingy about putting money in the community pot.
Kang Colby
(1,941 posts)Property taxes, sales taxes, state, local, and county income taxes in some cases, federal income taxes, FICA, capital gains, and the list just goes on and on.
Carolina
(6,960 posts)the difference that corporations used to pay, we're paying what Hillary's Wall Street BFFs should be paying
And that's not going to change with HRC
cui bono
(19,926 posts)stupidicus
(2,570 posts)that's why he's running as one in the party primary
and we've all been hearing those "freebie" arguments from rightwingers for decades now.
and they have no say as to who is or isn't a "democrat".
rynestonecowboy
(76 posts)I can't stand the word freebies. All it does is tell me that the person using it really has no idea how rigged our economy is. I really feel like most HRC supporters are willing to stand with her to the end is they are just comfortable with taking the marching orders and hoping that electing a democrat will ensure they can hold on to their current quality of life. Almost every Sanders supporter I've talked too is far more educated on how badly our tax dollars are being managed and how legislation is sold to the highest bidder.
iandhr
(6,852 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)Bernie supporters are whiter then the crowd of a University of Vermont hockey game (I attend more than a few of those) and are not a representative of the nation.
Bernie supporters don't get to be the gatekeepers of who is a progressive or who is grassroots. I have knocked on hundreds of doors for Hillary.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)iandhr
(6,852 posts)You think you can win an election with only white liberals.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Sanders is steadily broadening his original base...Time may not be on his side but his message is resonating with a wide swath of people.
And if you want to be 'realistic' it is POLITICALLY counterproductive for The Democratic Establishment to try to crush the enthusiasm of white liberal support -- and the potential of it spreading.
iandhr
(6,852 posts)I know EXACTLY who his message is resonating with now. And I know enough about politics to know that those folks are not a representative of the country.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)It isn't Mars.
And there is no reason that Sanders can't resonate with minorities, if familiar with him
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Shaan Mouliert, an activist who founded the African-American Alliance of the Northeast Kingdom, recalled approaching Sanders at a state fair and asking him about a bill sponsored by Michigan Rep. John Conyers that would have examined the issue of reparations for the ancestors of slaves. Sanders, she says, was dismissive, telling her that he didnt and wouldnt support it.
amborin
(16,631 posts)her willingness to perpetrate a smear that hrc supporters gleefully amplify
Nite Owl
(11,303 posts)What exactly has she done for them lately, or ever?
tommcc99
(48 posts)and Bernie did pretty good here today. Only 5% off and thats a pick up of 20% in 4 weeks. So say want you want, believe what you will and the numbers don't lie. The more people that hear the Progressive message - the better Senator Sanders does. See you at the convention.
amborin
(16,631 posts)based on your posts, you seem to suggest that PoC support hrc (which is not accurate, since latinos support Bernie).
But if PoC do support clinton over bernie, why? If you say it's b/c she will continue Obama's policies, then how does that make sense? How are those policies helping? Can you name some areas or specific policies and provide evidence of their benefit?
what is objectively clear is that the policies seem to NOT be helping in this area:


if you calculate the slope or derivative, it surely looks as if the policies are having zero effect, or perhaps even a negative effect. In fact, for blacks, the rate of decline of income is greater between 2010 and 2013 than it is between 2007 and 2010, the period most impacted by the meltdown. And black poverty has increased between 2013 and 2014. So, are there other areas or arenas where the effects are sufficiently positive that they compensate for this?
azmom
(5,208 posts)Brown people broke for Bernie in Nevada and they will all over the US.
Loudestlib
(980 posts)Bernie Sanders leads 53-45 with Latino voters in Nevada Entrance Polls
Try to keep up please...
http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/2/20/1488339/-Bernie-Sanders-leads-54-43-with-Latino-voters-in-Nevada-Exit-Polls
yuiyoshida
(45,396 posts)AND I AM NOT WHITE.
ultragreen
(53 posts)The current racial makeup of Bernie vs. Hillary supporters is unimportant. The important thing is this: Bernie represents the 99%, while Hillary represents the 1%. And so, if you are a liberal or progressive, you have only a single viable candidate to choose from in the Democratic primary. In most election cycles, there is nothing but 1% candidates to choose from and so the voters have no real choice.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)They are more worried about a left-winger overturning their corrupt gravy train than the GOP winning.
gyroscope
(1,443 posts)answer to the same Wall Street corporate paymasters.
donf
(87 posts)Particularly when he said, "There is only one party in the United States, the Property Party . . . and it has two right wings: Republican and Democrat."
BuelahWitch
(9,083 posts)OhZone
(3,216 posts)libtodeath
(2,892 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)This will be a change election. But the Democrats will offer more of the same.
Karmadillo
(9,253 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)bbgrunt
(5,281 posts)LibDemAlways
(15,139 posts)Autumn
(48,952 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)insurgencies within the Democratic Party
AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)The Republicans' extremism is needed for Democrats to get the Democratic Party's constituents in lockstep. The party members are in it for the same reason the Republicans are in it for, the easy money and the fast track to wealth. Harry Reid is a perfect example.
Two actions created suspicion afterward. First, Reid sponsored an $18 million earmark for a bridge that would connect Laughlin, Nev., and Bullhead City. (Reids office responds that readers deserve the context of knowing it was actually a bipartisan, bicameral coalition supporting the New Laughlin Bridge.) This bridge would likely increase property values in the area. (Reids office pointed to past articles showing plenty of experts think the opposite and have said so on record.)
Reid also introduced legislation that would benefit Haycocks lubricant company. (Reids office: It wasn't just Reid, it was a bipartisan coalition, pointing to two articles describing the legislation and those who supported it. Further, he pointed out that the Haycock family has denied any relationship between the sale and the legislation.) Reid aides denied that his support for the earmark or lubricant dealer bill was related to the land purchase. As of 2012, Reid listed the property as worth between $250,000 and $500,000 on his financial disclosure form.
Read more: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2014/04/24/harry_reids_long_steady_accretion_of_power__wealth.html#ixzz40l7A5dan
Follow us: @RCP_Articles on Twitter
Democrats only pretend to be weak. They have to, because they really are not on the same side as us.
Robbins
(5,066 posts)we know for sure any state with caucus has been fixed for clinton.turnout will be depressed in november and GOP wins.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)I think they call that a Primary Election.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)This is much bigger and mopre symbolic than, say Clinton v. Biden or Kerry.
This is having discouraged a wider selection of contenders long before the primaries even began by anointing the long time insider.
Then shooting down the basic tenants of liberalism when someone actually had the nerve to challenge the anointed candidate and capture both the idealism of young people and the frustration of older liberals with a party that had become complacent and corporate.
Not just contesting a candidate -- shooting down all liberal goals and values and ideals and replacing it with ''trust me. I have experience and will get some little things done, if the GOP allows it.''
I suspect if a Sherwood Brown or Elizabeth Warren had challenged Clinton instead, they wold have been subjected to the same demonization.
They cite the GOP as a Big Bad Monster whop won;lt let them do anything. But they sure do know how to exert power when it comes to forces of change within the Democratic Party.
Broward
(1,976 posts)Others surely fear retribution from the Clintons if Hillary wins the nomination. With Bernie, there's no such concern.
olddots
(10,237 posts)N.T.
Todays_Illusion
(1,209 posts)Sanders' supporters.
SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)it is time to fight harder - we now have a voice
Starry Messenger
(32,380 posts)Only disgruntled white voters get to claim the mantle of progressive.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)The ''grassroots'' are not monolithic. It's about what policies, values, messages and affiliations (Big Bidness) drive our politics and government and the Democratic Party.
People who are frustrated by the status quo of all races creeds and colors are part of that.
Starry Messenger
(32,380 posts)If you think the people most crushed by capitalism are in teh arms of big business as fifth columnists against the grassroots, then yes. You are ignoring the racial angle of this.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)But go ahead. Follow the GOP and Clinton playbooks and deny that people are individuals who can think for themselves, whatever their combination of demographic qualities
Starry Messenger
(32,380 posts)Coalitions are about demographics, but honestly. Done doing your homework for you. On to the SC primary and Super Tuesday where the further foolishness of the approach used in the OP will be qualitatively demonstrated.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)You may be right about the overall alignment in terms of governing principles regarding what Sanders and Clinton represent. You may be wrong. Time will tell.
But making it all about race is wrongheaded.
Starry Messenger
(32,380 posts)Not really my problem that one side refuses to see that, but whatevs. Sure, time will tell.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Demographic composition is not the point. Common interests are.
Starry Messenger
(32,380 posts)I don't really care. I have no interest in helping you.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Naw don't think so.
Starry Messenger
(32,380 posts)It's doing nothing but winning for my candidate.
Doing great, A. Head of the class.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Worked for the GOP too.
Starry Messenger
(32,380 posts)With non-whites. The other people feeling "polarized" are losing.
Loudestlib
(980 posts)Starry Messenger
(32,380 posts)Loudestlib
(980 posts)n/t
Starry Messenger
(32,380 posts)Loudestlib
(980 posts)Nate Cohn didn't like the way that exit polling went and would rather look at the districts that people live in rather than the people that actually voted.
There is a difference....
Starry Messenger
(32,380 posts)Whatever you folks need to tell yourselves. Really don't give af.
Loudestlib
(980 posts)n/t
Starry Messenger
(32,380 posts)Number23
(24,544 posts)Hispanic vote in Nevada. That didn't make any sense to me. Your post brings a completely different perspective.
Starry Messenger
(32,380 posts)I am sleep-deprived. I'll go find bigtree's thread.
Firebrand Gary
(5,044 posts)sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)are disgruntled whites?
Starry Messenger
(32,380 posts)YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)Depaysement
(1,835 posts)But honestly it is true.
Tonight, I am questioning why I am a Democrat. What is the point?
jhart3333
(332 posts)See if you can hang in until then.
Depaysement
(1,835 posts)You don't have to worry about.
jhart3333
(332 posts)Not worried at all.
Nite Owl
(11,303 posts)that they are more afraid of us, the change we want, the money they would no longer get than whatever the GOP will do---wars, selling
out even more to the corporations etc. is far more acceptable. And they wonder why people think both parties are the same?
Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)All colors. They prove Bernie's point -- it is all about money.
mainer
(12,549 posts)It makes me sick, but I now think he's inevitable.
Skeezer the Kat
(41 posts)If the present level of face-biting/eye-gouging I've witnessed in this site over the last few months continues until we know for sure who our chosen candidate will be, I call this election for the GOP.
Too many people here who are prepared to scorch the earth for their own choice of candidate and then pout and refuse to vote if their candidate doesn't prevail.
A GOPers wet dream if ever one could be imagined.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)I totally get your message, it resonates with me too. One take away is how
much clearer things are...Democrats are taking note...especially millennials.
shawn703
(2,712 posts)But with the amount of support Bernie has, if the establishment wants our votes they'll need to make some concessions to earn them in the GE.
scottie55
(1,400 posts)Now you get it?
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)reform and change within you own party."
Well said!
Clearly they can fight when they want to. They just don't want to fight for the 99%.
Markus Che
(9 posts)congrats to the Hillary campaign today. I will vote for her in the general, but please stop saying Bernie is not a Democrat. If Bernie is not a Democrat, then I am not a Democrat and neither are his supporters. You are pushing me and people like me out of the party.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)jalan48
(14,914 posts)antigop
(12,778 posts)Berntheoligarchs
(4 posts)Was at the East Career & Technical Academy for the caucus and have never been apart of a more disorganized and chaotic situation. They had 4 computers to register people from 13 precincts! Had to be close to 2,000 people. It was run by a handful of volunteers who had no idea what they were doing. I saw at least 100 people get fed up and leave and 100's were forced to re-register to vote because they had registered to vote within the last 2 weeks and were not coming up in the system. I'd estimate 95% were Bernie supporters.
I was not allowed to do my duties as a precinct captain for Bernie because I had to run around and make sure people were not giving up or be given a hard time by the people in charge of registration. On top of that the Bernie signs I put up legally in our caucus room to designate what side of the room would be ours to gather were taken down by Clinton supporters while I was out letting people know what room their precinct was in.
I then come home to see local Democratic leaders and Harry Reid on the news calling today a success with a "few glitches". I have been a Democrat my entire 16 years of adult life and am embarrassed to admit that now. I am done with this party that has been hijacked by these corporate sell outs in the mold of 1990's republicans that will do anything to prevent a real Democrat in the mold of FDR from having a chance at the top of the ticket.
Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)Thanks for posting your experience. That much chaos isn't an accident.
Berntheoligarchs
(4 posts)and let me add that everyone was supposed to be registered by noon and the caucus done by 1. People were still registering at 2 and some precincts did not even wait for everyone to be registered and went ahead with their caucuses. My precinct ended at 2:45 with 5 delegates for Hillary and 3 for Bernie.
tommcc99
(48 posts)I was at Spring Valley High school and had the same experience. Registration was a mess. move from line to line to line. being preregistered meant nothing. There was no coordinated direction or help. People were let into the caucus room and then moved back. I'm sure there were people who did not fill out ballot cards. My temporary precinct chair was so incompetent he dismissed the 67 voters in our precinct before we selected delegates. WHICH WAS THE WHOLE FUCKING POINT. Some of us jumped in and got the delegate cards from him (he had no idea they needed to be completed) and got both Bernie and Hillary delegates signed up. (Bernie supporters do the right thing) The Nevada Democratic Party should be ashamed of what they did today. I am sure this cost Bernie. I am sure it will cost the Democratic party.
mountain grammy
(29,006 posts)will scare the Democrats into not nominating Bernie.. Because we're soooo scared.
bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)Casino workers, Teamsters, service employees, nurses, teachers, immigrants, veterans, miners, ranchers and retired persons.
I guess you can tell them that they are the "Establishment". Or that they are too stupid to think for themselves. I'm sure they will appreciate that.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)But I do care about how they won. Harry Reid jumps in at the last minute to call in favors to beat back Bernie.
It's part of the overall circling the wagons of the power brokers to win at any cost and beating back of everything Sanders and the millions who agree with him stands for, incl;uding basic liberalism.
mhatrw
(10,786 posts)amborin
(16,631 posts)SixString
(1,057 posts)MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)He does not.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)The grassroots is not monolithic. I acknowledge that.
But he has obviously resonated with a huge swath of people, so far almost as many as Clinton.
It is the monolithic way that the Democratic Establishment has circles the wagons around Clinton, and the way they have gone out of their way to belittle Sanders and his supporters AND BASIC LIBERAL GOALS AND VALUES AND ASPIRATIONS that I object to. Plus the racializing and genderizing of a campaign in which both candidates are committed to social justice.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)OF course, one must have been a Democrat a few years ago to work to change the rules.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)it should be receptive to change and opening up. But when the system works hard to cling to old systems -- WHICH ARE NOT WORKING POLITICALLY IN THE LARGER SENSE -- that is a system is will continue on its downhill slope.
And when I say working politically in the larger sense, that is what the Clinton message is an admission of. "We can't get anything done because the GOP is so powerful."
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Next few weeks will be rough in the confederate primary, but it will only harden our resolve. After mid March Sanders gets into better territory in the NE, Rustbelt, Midwest, and west coast.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Probably should stay away from DU when discouraged.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)There will be plenty to cheer about. This isn't over till the convention.
amborin
(16,631 posts)wait until Michigan, and wait until California; Bernie bumper stickers all over the freeways in SoCal, along with a few No Clinton/No Bush. There's hope!
Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)All that will affect the Dem primary is the delegate count, which as you said can be made up in other states.
grntuscarora
(1,249 posts)TBF
(36,577 posts)sufrommich
(22,871 posts)minorities and women.Clinton leads with all those groups.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)The "inevitability meme" has been at play since long before the primary began. That is a part of the stifl;ing of alternatives./
Women -- I know several women who are supporting Clinton but prefer Bernie on a gender neutral basis. "I love Bernie and prefer his positions. But I really think we need a woman to be president."
Labor -- That's a wash largely because the leadership threw their chips in with the anointed candidate early.
Minorities -- As with all "demographic groups" they've been sold the inevitability meme since long before the primary began.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)to decide who to vote for.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)amborin
(16,631 posts)many rank and file want Bernie
DemocratSinceBirth
(101,842 posts)If they are part of the establishment this plebeian proudly stands with them.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)There are Latinos/AAs/White voters who swoon for Clinton. There are Latinos/AAs/White voters who swoon for Bernie.
This is not merely about Bernie vc. Clinton.
It is the stranglehold on the message and machinery of the Corporate centrist Democratic Establishment I am referring to.
They are weak and ineffectual and admit they are under the thumb of the GOP ("We have to settle for the crumbs we can get"
...Or else they agree with the GOP on issues of Wealth and Power too often.
But they effectively unify and play hardball to stifle a liberal/progressive populist movement within their own party.
artyteacher
(598 posts)I seem to remember President Clinton and President Obama winning general elections.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)They didn't run as "Gee let's pass bad trade agreements, deregulate Wall St and turn the keys over to Corporate America."
Once they got in they were a mixed bag. Clinton was a closet Republican. Obama found a brick walkl because the GOP were politically stronger. And the Democrats in Congress wilted too often.
artyteacher
(598 posts)Then why does the GOP hate the Clinton and have made up decades of lies about them.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)The degree of politics of personal destruction reflects how much difference there is in substance.
If there is an actual contrast in policies (liberal populism vs. corporate conservatism) the fights are over ideas and issues.
When the policies of opponents are similar, the personal aspects become more important.
Bill Clinton did not really represent a challenge to the Corproate CONservative agenda or GOP policies on issuesd of wealth and power. So to combat him politically the GOP had to dredge up personal stuff and attack him, or use narrow wedge issues.
artyteacher
(598 posts)Threaten GOP policies massively.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Jenny_92808
(1,342 posts)itsrobert
(14,157 posts)That's who beat down Sanders yesterday.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)the Republicons. Mr. Goldman-Sachs boldly told everyone that the Olgarchy wanted Clinton. The Oligarchy has invested between 30 and 50 millions of dollars in HRC and about three times that in her husband. They badly want her to win.
There is nothing the Oligarchs hate more than an empowered People.
"The choice is stark, keep living under corporate rule under Hillary and watch things get worse, or go with Bernie and fight TPTB to regain our Representative Democracy!"
CrispyQ
(40,938 posts)


It's a big club...
Jenny_92808
(1,342 posts)That says it all.
dchill
(42,660 posts)The GOP are their good friends.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Well said, Armstead...
Populist_Prole
(5,364 posts)Lots of snarling contemptuous invective directed at the grassroots by the PTB of the party: As opposed to the bi-partisan, reaching out he tried with the GOP through all their obstructionism
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Populist_Prole
(5,364 posts)Well perhaps not, that this was/is THE ONE issue the GOP was all buddy-buddy with this administration on.
mgmaggiemg
(869 posts)Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)If nominated Hillary will have to rely on what supporters she has now. The rest won't campaign for her - some might vote for her but it is not enough for the general election. She would be spread very thinly. She would be BBQ'd by the GOP.
mgmaggiemg
(869 posts)why did bernie vote to deregulate swaps and derivatives etc?
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)that Hillary won't get much help if she makes it to the general election. In 2008 didn't make people in the party angry.
mgmaggiemg
(869 posts)Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)burning her bridges
mgmaggiemg
(869 posts)Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)mgmaggiemg
(869 posts)there's no crying in baseball ....why are you posting on this site if you hate her so much?
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)I don't hate her personally
Armstead
(47,803 posts)It was passed by a sweeping majority to keep the government running
stupidicus
(2,570 posts)imaginary timidity can hide a lot of collusion
Armstead
(47,803 posts)The GOP made me do it.
I'm here today to sign a bill that is a major step forward...
stupidicus
(2,570 posts)he knows how to get his bread buttered http://www.bing.com/search?q=bill+clinton+and+Bush+sr+bffs&src=IE-SearchBox&FORM=IESR02&pc=EUPP_
CanonRay
(16,161 posts)So I guess that makes them brothers-in-bucks.
Jopin Klobe
(779 posts)Amen to that ... amen to that ...
redruddyred
(1,615 posts)to how clearly freaking incompetent and clueless that woman was. "let's vote these DINOs out!"
trump is taking on the GOP machine and winning. why can't we do what the tea party did? has anyone studied the problem?
humbled_opinion
(4,423 posts)for establishment Hillary supporters the ends justifies any means they will tear the party down grass root by grass root telling lie after lie just so Hillary will be the nominee and lead her blindly led sycophants to her ultimate GE failure... I guarantee that Donald Trump already has recordings of her comments to Goldman Sachs execs and it is going to tear our party apart when he goes public with them... I for one will never forgive her that lie when I hear her schmoozing with Wall Street execs and knowing that our true champion got snookered because she is a liar and a thief who would steal this election hiding behind her millions in contributions from wall street.
Carolina
(6,960 posts)GreatGazoo
(4,601 posts)democrank
(12,586 posts)where the bosses had you over a barrel.They made all the rules, didn`t allow dissent, controlled any and all outcomes.You worked for them, contributed to them, shopped for what you needed ONLY in their store because they had you convinced you had nowhere else to go.
Clinton supporters run the company store for the Democratic Party.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)senators and congressmen.
If they truly cared about any of us they would stop endorsing candidates before the primary is over and would be fighting for the things we need.
Both of my senators have said they are against the TPP and have endorsed Hillary. Hard to believe.
DrBulldog
(841 posts). . . every vote now for Hillary will be transformed into a vote for Donald Trump.
Why? Does anyone honestly think that the insults and abuse and lies heaped upon Bernie and his supporters ALREADY by Hillary Clinton's gang will be forgotten come November? Millions of Democrats will now absolutely not vote for her under any circumstances, including me.
Come November, if Bernie is not on the Presidential ballot, I will abstain. What's difference between a woman of gross dishonesty and a man of gross dishonesty? NONE.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)a religious zeal as has Hillary Clinton.
kas125
(2,483 posts)I have always said it's all just a play put on for the American people. I've said a hundred times that they stand on the floor of congress and rail against each other, call each other names, and act like they are enemies fighting for completely different things. Then they laugh and go out for dinner together because they're all on the same side, and it's not our side.
The harder they fight, the stronger it makes us.