Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Herman4747

(1,825 posts)
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 12:38 PM Feb 2016

If Hillary's our nominee, how shall she react to severe attacks...

...by Republicans seeking to besmirch her integrity? Will she respond with honesty, or will she instead reply with deception and thereby help make the Republicans' case?

To aid in answering these questions, let us consider Hillary's actions as First Lady when she was under sniper fire in Bosnia:
I remember landing under sniper fire" -- Hillary, March 17, 2008
(the greeting ceremony) "had to be moved inside because of sniper fire" -- Hillary, Feb. 29, 2008







So, what do you think?
44 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If Hillary's our nominee, how shall she react to severe attacks... (Original Post) Herman4747 Feb 2016 OP
She'll just lie and smear EdwardBernays Feb 2016 #1
I think she'll stand up fine compared to GOPers besmirching her integrity. Hoyt Feb 2016 #2
Will she laugh at the Navy SEAL members doing sniper ads about her? PonyUp Feb 2016 #10
She was in Bosnia, more than we can say for Sanders, Rubio or Trump. As to Navy Seals, I lost Hoyt Feb 2016 #19
Just to be clear DVRacer Feb 2016 #23
I'm responding the the poster who mentioned Navy Seals. Hoyt Feb 2016 #25
I think she will smirk and lie and wave that stuff away as "unimportant." djean111 Feb 2016 #3
I would go to the mattresses ... DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2016 #4
Might want to check your idioms HassleCat Feb 2016 #13
Respectfully, my grasp of idiomatic English, i.e., colloquialisms are impeccable. DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2016 #17
Republicans have no credibility whatsoever.. asuhornets Feb 2016 #5
Repugs have several Hillary sniper ads done by SEAL team members to be aired constantly. n/t PonyUp Feb 2016 #6
In troubled times you want to be able to trust the person that sits in the oval office. n/t Skwmom Feb 2016 #8
SEAL teams, Dog the Bounty Hunter or that old Duck Dynasty oasis Feb 2016 #11
The military is a large block of voters, with lots of minorities and their families. PonyUp Feb 2016 #18
When Bernie makes his exit, Dems gotta go somewhere. oasis Feb 2016 #21
Ohhhh anecdotal story time!!!! CorkySt.Clair Feb 2016 #35
I think we talk about the things in your OP more than they do.. one_voice Feb 2016 #7
Trump has said Clinton is in a certain way evil. That should give you a hint.... Skwmom Feb 2016 #9
did you miss this part of my comment? one_voice Feb 2016 #14
Hey, don't make fun of sniper fire. HassleCat Feb 2016 #12
Bosnia will be an issue TTUBatfan2008 Feb 2016 #15
my sense is that she'd be lucky if Bosnia were the worst of it. nashville_brook Feb 2016 #32
Hillary has been attacked by Republicans for 40+ years Arkansas Granny Feb 2016 #16
did you ever notice how closely their attacks mirror those from the RW attack-dogs? DrDan Feb 2016 #26
Exactly! BlueMTexpat Feb 2016 #27
Funny definition of "standing", politically speaking. Kall Feb 2016 #34
Holy fuckin shit! rufus dog Feb 2016 #20
"Progressives don't support liars". Ha freakin' ha. oasis Feb 2016 #22
You have no clue as to the motivation of Bernie voters rufus dog Feb 2016 #33
plenty of Ds are not progressive. nashville_brook Feb 2016 #29
Trump will not play, this will be a slaughter yourpaljoey Feb 2016 #31
Well, yes, I have wondered about this: Herman4747 Feb 2016 #40
with dignity - did you watch any of gowdy's attack-hearings? DrDan Feb 2016 #24
How highly would you rate Gowdy's level of competance? frylock Feb 2016 #36
100% partisan DrDan Feb 2016 #37
That wasn't my question. frylock Feb 2016 #38
I am not going to say he was completely incompetent - he had a partisan role to perform DrDan Feb 2016 #39
Yes, your candidate did well going up against someone who is not completely incompetent. frylock Feb 2016 #41
always enjoyed Buckley's Firing Line - he had a way with words, even though his politics were screwy DrDan Feb 2016 #42
She'll fight them gwheezie Feb 2016 #28
Seriously. I just never have known how to respond to this. highprincipleswork Feb 2016 #30
To Hillary's fine supporters unconcerned about Hillary's lies... Herman4747 Feb 2016 #43
The Knickerbockers were on to Hillary... Herman4747 Feb 2016 #44
 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
2. I think she'll stand up fine compared to GOPers besmirching her integrity.
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 12:41 PM
Feb 2016

Laughing in their racist face is all that's really needed.

 

PonyUp

(1,680 posts)
10. Will she laugh at the Navy SEAL members doing sniper ads about her?
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 12:49 PM
Feb 2016

Those that risk their lives under sniper attack.
Laugh at them.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
19. She was in Bosnia, more than we can say for Sanders, Rubio or Trump. As to Navy Seals, I lost
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 01:33 PM
Feb 2016

respect for them when they were sending photos home to their wives and girlfriends of them beating up handcuffed and blindfolded Iraqis for fun.

DVRacer

(734 posts)
23. Just to be clear
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 02:14 PM
Feb 2016

Those were pictures from young Army members. Not SEALS big difference in the military community.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
3. I think she will smirk and lie and wave that stuff away as "unimportant."
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 12:42 PM
Feb 2016

Stuff about Bernie from 30 0r 40 years ago is dredged up, but anything Hillary did last week is "old news".
And, really, that stuff IS unimportant to her and her supporters.

DemocratSinceBirth

(101,850 posts)
4. I would go to the mattresses ...
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 12:43 PM
Feb 2016


I would go to the mattresses with Hillary:


go to the mattresses

(idiomatic) To go to war; to use ruthless tactics; to act without restraint.



Clinton's best traits as a candidate are her resilience and her perseverance. She will not give up. She will not stop working because she is tired. She will not back away. Ever.

- Chris Cilizza

DemocratSinceBirth

(101,850 posts)
17. Respectfully, my grasp of idiomatic English, i.e., colloquialisms are impeccable.
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 01:11 PM
Feb 2016
Hassle Cat
13. Might want to check your idioms
View profile
That first one seems a little off to m




My grasp of idiomatic English, i.e., colloquialisms are impeccable, ergo:


https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=go%20to%20the%20mattresses

"I agree with all the above descriptions, however, in a more colloquial manner, it can mean an issue or belief that an individual is willing to fight hard for to defend. Put it all on the line, so to speak. Politics and Religion are two topics people "go to the mattresses" with, all the time."
 

PonyUp

(1,680 posts)
6. Repugs have several Hillary sniper ads done by SEAL team members to be aired constantly. n/t
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 12:44 PM
Feb 2016

Skwmom

(12,685 posts)
8. In troubled times you want to be able to trust the person that sits in the oval office. n/t
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 12:46 PM
Feb 2016

oasis

(53,693 posts)
11. SEAL teams, Dog the Bounty Hunter or that old Duck Dynasty
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 12:53 PM
Feb 2016

fart can't crank out enough negative ads to convince women, Latinos and AAs to turn to the hate monger candidate of the GOP.

 

PonyUp

(1,680 posts)
18. The military is a large block of voters, with lots of minorities and their families.
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 01:26 PM
Feb 2016

It's anecdotal, but I have twin brothers-in-law, both in the army. They are Vietnamese and obtained US citizenship. They tell me no one in their barracks support Hillary. They are either Sanders supporters or Trump supporters.

oasis

(53,693 posts)
21. When Bernie makes his exit, Dems gotta go somewhere.
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 01:36 PM
Feb 2016

Military folks that I have known had a tendency to lean GOP. If Hill splits the vote with them in the GE, that'll be good enough.

 

CorkySt.Clair

(1,507 posts)
35. Ohhhh anecdotal story time!!!!
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 02:29 PM
Feb 2016

Some of us will work for the Dem nominee because we're not afraid, and frankly don't GAF, about what the GOP baddies are going to throw out there.



But you have a nice day

one_voice

(20,043 posts)
7. I think we talk about the things in your OP more than they do..
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 12:44 PM
Feb 2016

I expect more about Benghazi and her time as SoS from them. Unless their nominee is Trump...then he'll talk about Bill, Monica, etc.

one_voice

(20,043 posts)
14. did you miss this part of my comment?
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 12:59 PM
Feb 2016
Unless their nominee is Trump...then he'll talk about Bill, Monica, etc.


I agree about Trump.
 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
12. Hey, don't make fun of sniper fire.
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 12:56 PM
Feb 2016

I have been shot at by snipers, so I know about these things. First time was War of 1812, but those old smooth bore muskets were not accurate at long distances, so it wasn't a problem. It wasn't until Vietnam that I actually got hit, but the bullet could not penetrate the six Congressional Medals of Honor on my uniform, so I was saved.

TTUBatfan2008

(3,623 posts)
15. Bosnia will be an issue
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 01:01 PM
Feb 2016

Obama never attacked her on it and neither did Bernie. But the Republicans love to attack Democrats on war and national security. Remember the Swift Boat attacks on John Kerry even though GWB and Cheney were draft dodgers? Difference here is Hillary was caught lying by a major network. Kerry wasn't lying.

GOP will hammer her for this. You want to be Commander-In-Chief after you lied about your war zone experience? Mind you, they would also attack Bernie for dodging the draft. Luckily for Bill Clinton (a dodger in his own right), Ross Perot screwed the GOP by stealing 8-10% of the vote.

nashville_brook

(20,958 posts)
32. my sense is that she'd be lucky if Bosnia were the worst of it.
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 02:25 PM
Feb 2016

With the play for pay evidence stacking up in the email scandal, there could be actions taken that make her extremely unattractive in the General.

Arkansas Granny

(32,265 posts)
16. Hillary has been attacked by Republicans for 40+ years
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 01:08 PM
Feb 2016

and she's still standing.

It's disappointing to see so many attacks coming from Democrats.

Kall

(615 posts)
34. Funny definition of "standing", politically speaking.
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 02:28 PM
Feb 2016

Terrible unfavorable numbers, and polls as less honest and trustworthy than Donald Trump. I'd hate to see what "crippled" looks like.

 

rufus dog

(8,419 posts)
20. Holy fuckin shit!
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 01:34 PM
Feb 2016

Not one post from a Clinton supporter even coming close to considering she lied.

Every post dismissive of the lies.

The OP raises a valid point, she is very vulnerable to the attacks AND HERE IS THE FUCKING PROBLEM, Clinton supporters will get angry at progressives when the attacks occur, claim progressives are not supporting her, mock the Bernie supporter and ask where is the Bernie revolution, and blame progressives for her failures.

WAKE THE FUCK UP! Progressives don't support fucking liars, it is a part of our core DNA to despise liars, you have a better chance teaching an owl to catch a football, we ain't made that way.

People are trying to pound this point home daily, she lies, habitually, progressives will stay back. Some of us will hold our nose and vote for her, others will be too disgusted to vote. Be dismissive all you want.

oasis

(53,693 posts)
22. "Progressives don't support liars". Ha freakin' ha.
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 01:46 PM
Feb 2016

They DO support candidates who make promises on which they know they can't deliver.

A false promise isn't a lie when you make it with yout fingers crossed.

 

rufus dog

(8,419 posts)
33. You have no clue as to the motivation of Bernie voters
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 02:25 PM
Feb 2016

It is not a hidden agenda.

Was JFK lying when he said we would put a man on the moon in ten years?

In today's environment Republicans would have a knee jerk reaction and say it costs too much, while Centrist D's would hop right on the message stating it is a cool idea but Republicans are right.

Here is one thing everyone should have learned, especially anyone over thirty-five, Republicans are always wrong. If you find yourself supporting a Republican viewpoint or statement, then you are wrong.

yourpaljoey

(2,166 posts)
31. Trump will not play, this will be a slaughter
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 02:23 PM
Feb 2016

Her litany of lies write their own attack ads... all of them true.
Hillary will sit and spin and step and fetch and Trump will have
a grand ol' time.
He might have to pour himself a martini while he watches her
self destruct again and again and again.
If he can mold a populist stand on several issues
he may well draw Independents.
She's got nothing.

 

Herman4747

(1,825 posts)
40. Well, yes, I have wondered about this:
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 02:36 PM
Feb 2016
Not one post from a Clinton supporter even coming close to considering she lied.

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
37. 100% partisan
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 02:31 PM
Feb 2016

(I would like to comment on his haircut - but will remain above that. I will let it speak for itself.)

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
39. I am not going to say he was completely incompetent - he had a partisan role to perform
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 02:34 PM
Feb 2016

and that is what he did.

And I think my candidate did well in that grilling.

frylock

(34,825 posts)
41. Yes, your candidate did well going up against someone who is not completely incompetent.
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 02:38 PM
Feb 2016

It was like watching Vidal and Buckley up there.

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
42. always enjoyed Buckley's Firing Line - he had a way with words, even though his politics were screwy
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 02:44 PM
Feb 2016

gwheezie

(3,580 posts)
28. She'll fight them
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 02:20 PM
Feb 2016

What is the choice? Why run if you don't intend to fight? She knows what's coming.

 

highprincipleswork

(3,111 posts)
30. Seriously. I just never have known how to respond to this.
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 02:22 PM
Feb 2016

It is just off the charts, and so easy to demonstrate.

 

Herman4747

(1,825 posts)
43. To Hillary's fine supporters unconcerned about Hillary's lies...
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 03:08 PM
Feb 2016

...I ask you how well the gentleman pictured below did, despite running against a president notably handicapped by near 9% unemployment:



Mitt loved to lie, didn't he, but that didn't work out for him.

In addition, I ask you to consider whether we Democrats truly want a candidate who readily deceives if it suits her, and is even most unwilling to apologize for deception.

Is this the type of role model we want for America's children?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»If Hillary's our nominee,...