2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumIf Hillary's our nominee, how shall she react to severe attacks...
...by Republicans seeking to besmirch her integrity? Will she respond with honesty, or will she instead reply with deception and thereby help make the Republicans' case?
To aid in answering these questions, let us consider Hillary's actions as First Lady when she was under sniper fire in Bosnia:
I remember landing under sniper fire" -- Hillary, March 17, 2008
(the greeting ceremony) "had to be moved inside because of sniper fire" -- Hillary, Feb. 29, 2008


So, what do you think?
EdwardBernays
(3,343 posts)And flip and flop...
Why would anything change?
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Laughing in their racist face is all that's really needed.
PonyUp
(1,680 posts)Those that risk their lives under sniper attack.
Laugh at them.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)respect for them when they were sending photos home to their wives and girlfriends of them beating up handcuffed and blindfolded Iraqis for fun.
DVRacer
(734 posts)Those were pictures from young Army members. Not SEALS big difference in the military community.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)djean111
(14,255 posts)Stuff about Bernie from 30 0r 40 years ago is dredged up, but anything Hillary did last week is "old news".
And, really, that stuff IS unimportant to her and her supporters.
DemocratSinceBirth
(101,850 posts)I would go to the mattresses with Hillary:
go to the mattresses
(idiomatic) To go to war; to use ruthless tactics; to act without restraint.
Clinton's best traits as a candidate are her resilience and her perseverance. She will not give up. She will not stop working because she is tired. She will not back away. Ever.
- Chris Cilizza
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)That first one seems a little off to me.
DemocratSinceBirth
(101,850 posts)13. Might want to check your idioms
View profile
That first one seems a little off to m
My grasp of idiomatic English, i.e., colloquialisms are impeccable, ergo:
https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=go%20to%20the%20mattresses
"I agree with all the above descriptions, however, in a more colloquial manner, it can mean an issue or belief that an individual is willing to fight hard for to defend. Put it all on the line, so to speak. Politics and Religion are two topics people "go to the mattresses" with, all the time."
asuhornets
(2,427 posts)Hillary will do just fine.
PonyUp
(1,680 posts)Skwmom
(12,685 posts)oasis
(53,693 posts)fart can't crank out enough negative ads to convince women, Latinos and AAs to turn to the hate monger candidate of the GOP.
PonyUp
(1,680 posts)It's anecdotal, but I have twin brothers-in-law, both in the army. They are Vietnamese and obtained US citizenship. They tell me no one in their barracks support Hillary. They are either Sanders supporters or Trump supporters.
oasis
(53,693 posts)Military folks that I have known had a tendency to lean GOP. If Hill splits the vote with them in the GE, that'll be good enough.
CorkySt.Clair
(1,507 posts)Some of us will work for the Dem nominee because we're not afraid, and frankly don't GAF, about what the GOP baddies are going to throw out there.
But you have a nice day
one_voice
(20,043 posts)I expect more about Benghazi and her time as SoS from them. Unless their nominee is Trump...then he'll talk about Bill, Monica, etc.
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)one_voice
(20,043 posts)I agree about Trump.
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)I have been shot at by snipers, so I know about these things. First time was War of 1812, but those old smooth bore muskets were not accurate at long distances, so it wasn't a problem. It wasn't until Vietnam that I actually got hit, but the bullet could not penetrate the six Congressional Medals of Honor on my uniform, so I was saved.
TTUBatfan2008
(3,623 posts)Obama never attacked her on it and neither did Bernie. But the Republicans love to attack Democrats on war and national security. Remember the Swift Boat attacks on John Kerry even though GWB and Cheney were draft dodgers? Difference here is Hillary was caught lying by a major network. Kerry wasn't lying.
GOP will hammer her for this. You want to be Commander-In-Chief after you lied about your war zone experience? Mind you, they would also attack Bernie for dodging the draft. Luckily for Bill Clinton (a dodger in his own right), Ross Perot screwed the GOP by stealing 8-10% of the vote.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)With the play for pay evidence stacking up in the email scandal, there could be actions taken that make her extremely unattractive in the General.
Arkansas Granny
(32,265 posts)and she's still standing.
It's disappointing to see so many attacks coming from Democrats.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)BlueMTexpat
(15,690 posts)Kall
(615 posts)Terrible unfavorable numbers, and polls as less honest and trustworthy than Donald Trump. I'd hate to see what "crippled" looks like.
rufus dog
(8,419 posts)Not one post from a Clinton supporter even coming close to considering she lied.
Every post dismissive of the lies.
The OP raises a valid point, she is very vulnerable to the attacks AND HERE IS THE FUCKING PROBLEM, Clinton supporters will get angry at progressives when the attacks occur, claim progressives are not supporting her, mock the Bernie supporter and ask where is the Bernie revolution, and blame progressives for her failures.
WAKE THE FUCK UP! Progressives don't support fucking liars, it is a part of our core DNA to despise liars, you have a better chance teaching an owl to catch a football, we ain't made that way.
People are trying to pound this point home daily, she lies, habitually, progressives will stay back. Some of us will hold our nose and vote for her, others will be too disgusted to vote. Be dismissive all you want.
oasis
(53,693 posts)They DO support candidates who make promises on which they know they can't deliver.
A false promise isn't a lie when you make it with yout fingers crossed.
rufus dog
(8,419 posts)It is not a hidden agenda.
Was JFK lying when he said we would put a man on the moon in ten years?
In today's environment Republicans would have a knee jerk reaction and say it costs too much, while Centrist D's would hop right on the message stating it is a cool idea but Republicans are right.
Here is one thing everyone should have learned, especially anyone over thirty-five, Republicans are always wrong. If you find yourself supporting a Republican viewpoint or statement, then you are wrong.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)yourpaljoey
(2,166 posts)Her litany of lies write their own attack ads... all of them true.
Hillary will sit and spin and step and fetch and Trump will have
a grand ol' time.
He might have to pour himself a martini while he watches her
self destruct again and again and again.
If he can mold a populist stand on several issues
he may well draw Independents.
She's got nothing.
Herman4747
(1,825 posts)DrDan
(20,411 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)DrDan
(20,411 posts)(I would like to comment on his haircut - but will remain above that. I will let it speak for itself.)
frylock
(34,825 posts)DrDan
(20,411 posts)and that is what he did.
And I think my candidate did well in that grilling.
frylock
(34,825 posts)It was like watching Vidal and Buckley up there.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)gwheezie
(3,580 posts)What is the choice? Why run if you don't intend to fight? She knows what's coming.
highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)It is just off the charts, and so easy to demonstrate.
Herman4747
(1,825 posts)...I ask you how well the gentleman pictured below did, despite running against a president notably handicapped by near 9% unemployment:
![]()
Mitt loved to lie, didn't he, but that didn't work out for him.
In addition, I ask you to consider whether we Democrats truly want a candidate who readily deceives if it suits her, and is even most unwilling to apologize for deception.
Is this the type of role model we want for America's children?