2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSanders LEADS Clinton 57-29 in West Virginia
You can read the complete poll here.
The survey was conducted between February 11-16, before the South Carolina Republican primary and the Nevada Democratic caucus. Trump won the South Carolina primary while Clinton was victorious in then Nevada caucus. Rex Repass, CEO of REPASS Research and director of the MetroNews West Virginia Poll, said Trumps strength in the Mountain State is highest among voters 35-44 years old, independents, and those in middle-income categories.
The economy and frustration with the status quo in Washington is helping these non-traditional candidates nationally and in West Virginia, Repass said.
Sanders biggest strength is with young people. However, he has majority support in all age categories except seniors. Among voters 65 and older, Sanders lead is 43 percent to 36 percent.
cont'
http://wvmetronews.com/2016/02/22/metronews-west-virginia-poll-has-trump-sanders-in-lead/
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Fertile ground for the Vermont Senator.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)How did I know this? LOL
Typical Bernie state.
asuhornets
(2,427 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)Depaysement
(1,835 posts)hollowdweller
(4,229 posts)However the gun control focus has really soured people on her here.
dchill
(42,660 posts)She's crooked, but don't call her a murderer!
uponit7771
(93,532 posts)Response to workinclasszero (Reply #3)
6chars This message was self-deleted by its author.
Lucky Luciano
(11,863 posts)CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)It shouldn't take long to list the others.
I am not going to list the states going for Hillary, it would take to long.
PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)sick
thereismore
(13,326 posts)Nanjeanne
(6,588 posts)Segami
(14,923 posts)Renew Deal
(85,148 posts)hollowdweller
(4,229 posts)Nanjeanne
(6,588 posts)That's why it's a big "shrug" to them that Sanders is ahead in the polls there.
Makes no sense but it's the latest meme - Sanders can't win black votes. The thing is - in the General Election - all these highly contested primary Southern states that Clinton is proud to win - will vote Republican -- she isn't going to get those states in a General Election anyway. So somewhere along the line - she is going to need to get those whiter Northern states that her supporters don't care about now.
Moostache
(11,178 posts)Clinton is pounding the proverbial chest about these "wins" and ignoring the wider crisis that her candidacy presents for the Democratic Party come November. If she is the nominee, the only thing that would prevent a 4-6% rout in the overall vote would be a 3rd party run by Trump or Cruz.
The polls now for November are not what we should be worried about though, it is the future of the party that embraces status quo when the electorate, especially the youth vote, is absolutely convinced that IS THE PROBLEM!
Al Gore used an allegory in "An Inconvenient Truth" that I believe is apt here. He talked of the frog in the boiling water and how frogs would sit there and remain in the water to fatal levels if the temperature was slowly increased versus how they would attempt to leap out if dropped in to a pot of boiling water.
Old, establishment Party? Sitting in the pot, calm as Hindu cows...no need to change a thing.
New, energetic voters? HELL NO WE ARE NOT GETTING IN THAT POT!!!!
Now, come November, those same youth voters are going to make a choice and that choice will largely be..."ah, fuck it, I am not going to vote for Clinton, she's just more of the same problem we already have."
Hillary (and more importantly her supporters) had better start recognizing that their centrist policy positions (and non-Democratic core violations - like labelling single-payer healthcare as a "unicorn" and "too divisive" and "too hard"
are going to result in their ultimate demise. Instead of attacking Bernie and his supporters, Hillary and her supporters should be thinking long game here and the fact that thay simply seem to be too petty and too power hungry to know the difference is tragic.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)It looks like Hillary has taken the Obama role from 2008. And Sanders has taken the old 2008 Hillary spot.
Remind me again who won?
Reminded me again who has been elected President twice?
Moostache
(11,178 posts)Apples to Oranges comparison mate!
Chakab
(1,727 posts)baffling after the giant shit that she and her surrogates took on black voters when the majority defected to Obama.
BTW I'm supporting Sanders in this cycle, but race is clearly a huge issue in WV and a reason for Obama's immense unpopularity there among local registered Democrats. To claim otherwise is laughable. Obama was running to the left of Clinton in '08 on a platform that people assumed represent views that were similar to Sanders', yet the voters there didn't want anything to do with him. In fact, he lost in several counties to a convicted felon that was on the primary ballot in the state in 2012.
It's just one of many unspoken and unresolved issues within the party.
6chars
(3,967 posts)really unheard of.
uponit7771
(93,532 posts)LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)Those Pesky Facts.
Barack_America
(28,876 posts)I wouldn't dismiss this so easily, ESPECIALLY if your candidate becomes the nominee.
You can say this is a race issue, but the reality is Hillary's problems with youth and independents.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)I don't think we have chance there unless we change our position on coal and global warming.
LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)Take South Carolina Beyond A Primary With Nikki Haley As Governor....
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)Take South Carolina in the General Election Either With Nikki Haley As Governor But It's Not Stopping The Hillary Supporters From Propping All Things South Carolina Up As The End All Be All In A Primary.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)And They Will Speak Again In The General Election, Along With The Entire Nation. Nominate The Wrong Candidate, and South Carolina and The Nation Will Speak Real Loudly....
But some will not like the results.
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)Romney beat Obama there, 62% to 36%. The state hasn't voted for the Democratic nominee since 1996, when Bill Clinton got 51.5% of the vote.
Given the importance of coal in the West Virginia economy, this fall's Republican nominee will probably have an easy ride there simply by adhering to the party line of climate change denialism. Sanders has been more militant on the issue than Clinton, but even she has talked (however gingerly) about reducing the use of fossil fuels. That should be enough to sink her in West Virginia if she's the nominee.
basselope
(2,565 posts)What's the point you are struggling to make?
LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)And Was A Member Of The Civil Rights Movement. Someone will say they saw her there.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)But Bernie is a strong candidate and doing really well with that group... good for him but it wont be enough to win a Democratic nomination.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)especially in light of the fact that they still make up a majority of voters in the nation and in the Democratic party.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/160373/democrats-racially-diverse-republicans-mostly-white.aspx
The same goes for sexes and ages. We need everybody so we really shouldn't be dividing each other by groups and tossing entire groups under the bus.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)This is a discussion board to discuss issues relevant to the election. if you don't like it go elsewhere.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)I take it, you have no valid argument.
ALBliberal
(3,338 posts)she is generally better liked by AA? Are you saying the white voters in WV when choosing between the two white candidates see one as blacker than the other and therefore vote against her? This makes no sense to me. I would guess that WV has a large population of working class poor and maybe this could be why Sanders polls higher. Maybe they have caught on to his populist messages especially the one of income and wealth disparity.
Quite honestly this entire theme of yours has racial overtones.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Bernie does better in homogeneous white states.
ALBliberal
(3,338 posts)End cause of electing HRC. Counter productive at best.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)I am simply making observations about a candidate's strengths and weaknesses which I believe is normal on a political discussion board. Go somewhere else if you don't like it.
Ciao.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)support. That is good because I think they have lost a lot of it. I hope they can make it up with the few groups they haven't tossed yet.
MellowDem
(5,018 posts)at least she did in 2008.
Robbins
(5,066 posts)west virginia is primary not caucus.
like NH another state she won in 2008 but they now like bernie more.
kgnu_fan
(3,021 posts)Nanjeanne
(6,588 posts)libdem4life
(13,877 posts)certain narrative.
I watched HRC at some press conference put down the polls as worthless. Then, I couldn't believe my ears, in the next sentence she started quoting polls that were in her favor. It's on video...she never missed a beat. It just comes natural now. Spewing out flip-flop after flip-flop.
SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)These people "want" more of the same.
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)It's not that West Virginia loves Sanders, it's just that he's not Obama or anyone tied to Obama. Read between the lines.
hollowdweller
(4,229 posts)Sanders is stronger there. He's also from a rural state and Hillary has been beating him up over guns.
LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)And NAFTA. We vote March 8th.
Chakab
(1,727 posts)'08?
Don't be obtuse. Racism is one of the primary reason for Obama's unpopularity there among registered Democrats.
cali
(114,904 posts)Quite simply, although trade was an issue then, it is a bigger issue now. And it's not just the TPP
Response to Segami (Original post)
Post removed
LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)Does This Shit Mean?
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)will gravitate to whomever is opposing the 'black candidate'--if either the candidate is black or the candidate is seen as embracing the black community.
If you look at the primary results from Alabama and Mississippi from 2008, Clinton won staggeringly high percentages of the white vote there. It wasn't because of her health care plan.
This time around, she's seen as the candidate of black people.
LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)"Candidate of The Black People"? So are you saying Bernie Sanders is the "Candidate of the White People"? And worst, why are YOU playing the RACE CARD....
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)A lot of white people have been raised such that they feel threatened whenever a political candidate embraces the African-American community and receives support from them.
LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)It Is A Crying Shame That Some In The Democratic Party Are Now Sounding Just Like Republicans....Pulling Out The Race Card.
Were done here....
Chakab
(1,727 posts)want to vote for Obama?
If there's somebody who sounds like a Republican, it's YOU for playing dumb about what's a plainly obvious phenomenon in the South.
ETA Actually, I'm being a bit unfair and dishonest myself. It's not just the South. There's also plenty of evidence relating to how racism hurt Obama among white registered Democrats above the Mason-Dixon line in places like Western Pennsylvania and Upstate New York.
https://newrepublic.com/article/112883/study-racism-cost-obama-millions-votes-unlikely
SunSeeker
(58,283 posts)Having lived in the South, I experienced exactly what geek tragedy is talking about.
LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)Chakab
(1,727 posts)Republican-like behavior confirmed.
Robbins
(5,066 posts)your calling bernie supporters racists.
I would say clinton is seen as candiate of wall street not blacks even though blacks support her.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Which, if you hearken back to 2008, they pretty clearly are. They HATE Obama there. HATE him.
Joe Manchin shot a piece of Obama legislation in an ad down there.
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)You have no clue what you are talking about. You should shut up now before you embarrass yourself further.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)phleshdef
(11,936 posts)Bill Clinton carried West Virginia twice and was much loved by African Americans during that era.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Let me answer that--yes!
2004:
National: Bush plus 2.4%
WV: Bush +12.9%
WV partisan factor: +10.5% Republican
2008:
National: Obama +7.2%
WV: McCain +13.2%
WV partisan factor: +20.4% Republican
2012:
National: Obama +3.9%
WV: Romney +26.8%
WV partisan factor: +30.7% Republican
It's not like John Kerry and Mitt Romney were salt of the earth working class types. So what explains the gross discrepancy?
It's right there on Barack Obama's face.
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)And we can get into why thats stupid and how coal companies have been raping the land and has the WV economy by the balls. But that would require an honest discussion about West Virginia politics instead of the ignorant bullshit you are pulling out of your uninformed ass. When Obama said that he would run new coal fired plants out of business, he became public enemy #1.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)phleshdef
(11,936 posts)He was doing an interview in 2008. He was speaking within the context of new plants that refused to use the best anti-carbon technology. It was all in the context of cap and trade and that sort of thing.
The sound byte itself... "So if somebody wants to build a coal power plant, they can. Its just that it will bankrupt them because they are going to be charged a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas thats being emitted."
He meant if they want to build it with old technology. But that was lost in translation for West Virginia. The Democratic party is now the minority party in the WV legislature for the first time in ages because "Obama is killing coal" sells down that way.
uponit7771
(93,532 posts)Beacool
(30,517 posts)The young, liberals and white folks are the ones voting for Sanders.
uponit7771
(93,532 posts)... but the racial, gender and gender preference establishment.
This revolution reminds me of a temper tantrum of those in the establishment having to cede power to the marginalized in society.
Sanders revolution is class related... some that don't want to give their status up
Armymedic88
(251 posts)As someone who lives in a neighboring state Bernie can win WV in a GE. Guns matter but paychecks trump guns for most!
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)I hope they do in West Virginia, and elsewhere.
Armymedic88
(251 posts)The older generation remembers all the good FDR did for the small communities there.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)especially with regard to labor. As mentioned up-thread, trade agreements and "the war on coal" will be variables. Guns, too. A family member moved to Martinsburg about a decade ago and another attends WVU, so I do get a little taste of WV on occasion.
Armymedic88
(251 posts)SMC22307
(8,090 posts)Robert Byrd brought home the bacon?
Armymedic88
(251 posts)Just enough of the Southern flair for me!!
HillDawg
(198 posts)And only has 29 delegates, this really doesn't mean much.
LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)Okay....Uh Huh....
Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)Hold on to that nice lead!
Wish Maryland was doing so well.
Last I saw, it was 70% HRC, 55% Trump.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)Looks like an 11-7 split. Not going to offset giving up on the Southern States.
book_worm
(15,951 posts)huge margins against him in the primary of 2008 and both general elections.
Chakab
(1,727 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Cal33
(7,018 posts)population of 1.85 million people.
DemocraticWing
(1,290 posts)ladjf
(17,320 posts)dchill
(42,660 posts)JK.
Response to Segami (Original post)
stopbush This message was self-deleted by its author.
Nanjeanne
(6,588 posts)California and NY?