Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
55 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I WILL LOOK INTO IT!!! (Original Post) Segami Feb 2016 OP
Transcripts now! nt valerief Feb 2016 #1
'Cut it out....I will look into it! Segami Feb 2016 #2
I Got A Transcript For Ya... And You'd Think She'd Want Her Paid Speeches Out There... WillyT Feb 2016 #33
Skeleton #123 yourpaljoey Feb 2016 #3
I think Trump will hold back ejbr Feb 2016 #15
thank you, segami, for this. If its true that a print journalist has her speeches and they decide to roguevalley Feb 2016 #4
I would be in hiding if I were the person Segami Feb 2016 #5
That journalist is probably face-down in a ditch in Juarez somewhere. n/t VulgarPoet Feb 2016 #9
She's supposed to be working on that honesty thing. MelissaB Feb 2016 #6
Why are U so interested in looking backwards to these trifles? R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2016 #7
Let me fix that for you.... Yuugal Feb 2016 #37
Hillary: "A Big Dog ate my transcripts. Nothing to see here" nt 99th_Monkey Feb 2016 #8
Don't you mean: THE Big Dog ate my transcripts!! Hiraeth Feb 2016 #21
LOL nt Duval Feb 2016 #28
That's exactly who I mean ate those transcripts. Grrr. Yum! Move along now. nt 99th_Monkey Feb 2016 #36
LOL! Segami Feb 2016 #47
and counting and counting,,tick, tick, tick Ferd Berfel Feb 2016 #10
Emails expose close ties between Hillary Clinton and accused war criminal Henry Kissinger (Salon) bobthedrummer Feb 2016 #11
At least one of Hillary's speeches will come at the most an inopportune NWCorona Feb 2016 #12
Looking veeeeery carefully, apparently! Helen Borg Feb 2016 #13
Give her a break, it must be a deep dark hole. n/t A Simple Game Feb 2016 #20
Awesome! Roland99 Feb 2016 #14
yes you must the bernie bros DEMAND it! saturnsring Feb 2016 #16
Actually, the REPUBLICANS demand it. Hiraeth Feb 2016 #23
same thing saturnsring Feb 2016 #45
black is white. day is night. war is peace. got it - Hiraeth Feb 2016 #53
no you dont got it saturnsring Feb 2016 #54
Something will be released by her team Scalded Nun Feb 2016 #17
I suspect they're wiping them... like, with a cloth. AzDar Feb 2016 #26
They're trying to get Rosemary Woods on the job Jack Rabbit Feb 2016 #32
ROFL!! Segami Feb 2016 #41
AWESOME.... LovingA2andMI Feb 2016 #18
The real question is: Were the investors pleased with her performance? Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2016 #19
I will look into it... Unknown Beatle Feb 2016 #22
You Moneyphobist, You! Octafish Feb 2016 #24
Bernie released his. People are going to think she's shady .... AzDar Feb 2016 #25
Hillary do not release any transcripts. asuhornets Feb 2016 #27
Be fair. grntuscarora Feb 2016 #29
From now to the end of time . . . Jack Rabbit Feb 2016 #30
HA! Y'all keep busy worrying about that ... we'll be over here winning South Carolina ... NurseJackie Feb 2016 #31
Even y'all don't deserve what Clinton would dump on you and all of us, so we all are hard JimDandy Feb 2016 #38
Ha! Y'all seem to think it's funny when your candidate takes millions from Wall street and then Gary 50 Feb 2016 #44
Because it is much better to lose to a GOP clown candidate... malokvale77 Feb 2016 #50
WHEN?? nt nc4bo Feb 2016 #34
Those transcripts will be like Mitt's 47%er comments. Waiting For Everyman Feb 2016 #35
It's a cinch the AntiHills will manufacture a Romney 47% comment on oasis Feb 2016 #39
Nope, the transcripts will suffice. Waiting For Everyman Feb 2016 #40
The Transcript Delivery Train was rerouted to the town of oasis Feb 2016 #43
That's nice Politicalboi Feb 2016 #51
Hell will freeze over before she releases anything... SoapBox Feb 2016 #42
because she doesnt have to , hey you want her underwear too saturnsring Feb 2016 #46
Gross Politicalboi Feb 2016 #52
There must be something REALLY negative in those transcripts. Vinca Feb 2016 #48
Let's take up a collection! Buns_of_Fire Feb 2016 #49
Some people need refresher training in ethics. Francis Booth Feb 2016 #55
 

WillyT

(72,631 posts)
33. I Got A Transcript For Ya... And You'd Think She'd Want Her Paid Speeches Out There...
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 05:05 PM
Feb 2016
To Buttress This Point.

...
...
...


QUESTION: Secretary Clinton, as a realtor here in Nevada I know personally how important the economy, and the housing market is to the stability of our great nation. As the Democratic presidential candidate who has delivered speeches to the largest U.S. financial institution in exchange for hundreds of thousands of dollars in speaking fees, why are you hesitant to release transcripts, or audio-video recordings of those meetings in order to be transparent with the American people regarding the promises, and assurances that you have made to the big banks?

(APPLAUSE)

CLINTON: Well, let me say this. I'm happy to release anything I have when everybody else does the same, because every other candidate in this race has given speeches to private groups, including Senator Sanders.

(APPLAUSE)

CLINTON: But let me get to the heart of your question. I was the candidate who went to Wall Street before the crash. I was the candidate who went to them and said you are wrecking our economy. What you are doing with mortgages is going to bring us down.

I called to end the carried interest loophole for hedge fund managers. I called to reign in CEO pay.
I now have the most effective and comprehensive plan to deal with the threats that Wall Street poses, and I go further than Senator Sanders does because I want to go through after all the other bank bad actors.

The bad actors like hedge funds, the bad actors like AIG, the insurance company. Like Countrywide mortgage. I take a backseat to nobody in being very clear about what I will do to make sure Wall Street never crashes main street again. And, that you can count on.

(APPLAUSE)

...
...
...


Link: http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/transcript-msnbc-telemundo-clinton-sanders-town-hall-n520781








yourpaljoey

(2,166 posts)
3. Skeleton #123
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 02:37 PM
Feb 2016

These ain't going away, and they should not.
She has some spainin' to do.
Trump will not be so kind.

ejbr

(5,892 posts)
15. I think Trump will hold back
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 04:10 PM
Feb 2016

Like with Obama's birth certificate, he was not that persistent... Oh wait...and this is a legitimate gripe!

roguevalley

(40,656 posts)
4. thank you, segami, for this. If its true that a print journalist has her speeches and they decide to
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 02:38 PM
Feb 2016

print them then her unwillingness to release them earlier will be her undoing. I cannot wait.

MelissaB

(16,595 posts)
6. She's supposed to be working on that honesty thing.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 02:55 PM
Feb 2016

Come on, Hillary. Show us you are honest.

 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
7. Why are U so interested in looking backwards to these trifles?
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 03:09 PM
Feb 2016

We need a strong candidate who can look Wall Street right between the head and not be afraid to make the hard cash deposites to ensure their future. A strong 1% will will bring the 99% along for the ride.
 

bobthedrummer

(26,083 posts)
11. Emails expose close ties between Hillary Clinton and accused war criminal Henry Kissinger (Salon)
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 03:22 PM
Feb 2016
http://www.salon.com/2016/01/12/emails_expose_close_ties_between_hillary_clinton_and_accused_war_criminal_henry_kissinger

Then there was Rwanda, not so long ago, and lies not forgotten by some of US THAT LOOKED INTO THAT.

NWCorona

(8,541 posts)
12. At least one of Hillary's speeches will come at the most an inopportune
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 03:31 PM
Feb 2016

time for her campaign and it will be a Romney moment. There's a reason Hillary's fighting the release.

Scalded Nun

(1,691 posts)
17. Something will be released by her team
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 04:12 PM
Feb 2016

once it has been recreated to fit the narrative.

Something real will be released by the GOP detailing the deception once she has the nomination.

Jack Rabbit

(45,984 posts)
32. They're trying to get Rosemary Woods on the job
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 05:04 PM
Feb 2016

She'll type the transcripts and clean the tapes at the same time. Or at least be willing to take the blame.
[center]

[/center]

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
19. The real question is: Were the investors pleased with her performance?
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 04:15 PM
Feb 2016

We're willing to invest more? Are they still investing in her now? Will they get the expected returns if she wins?

Unknown Beatle

(2,691 posts)
22. I will look into it...
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 04:22 PM
Feb 2016

She can say she looked in to it but decided not to disclose it. With Hillary, anything is possible.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
24. You Moneyphobist, You!
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 04:23 PM
Feb 2016

You're prejudiced against rich people. Really, really, really rich rich people.

grntuscarora

(1,249 posts)
29. Be fair.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 04:55 PM
Feb 2016

It takes time to edit, delete, and redact.
Please think of the overworked interns!

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
31. HA! Y'all keep busy worrying about that ... we'll be over here winning South Carolina ...
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 05:03 PM
Feb 2016

... and the entire freakin' Democratic nomination.


JimDandy

(7,318 posts)
38. Even y'all don't deserve what Clinton would dump on you and all of us, so we all are hard
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 05:34 PM
Feb 2016

at work phoning voters and campaigning to get Bernie Sanders, the best person for the job of US President, in the job. He is the best choice for President that we have EVER had in my long lifetime!

Yes indeed, recycling Clinton back to the dust bin of history!

YAY Sanders!!!

Gary 50

(490 posts)
44. Ha! Y'all seem to think it's funny when your candidate takes millions from Wall street and then
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 06:01 PM
Feb 2016

tries to tell us that she is going after them. Yeah, that's what they paid her $3750 a minute for. Ok, if that's what the speeches were about let's hear them. If not, give us one plausible reason why not. If she can give no reason for her stonewalling and doesn't release the transcripts she is not fit to occupy the office. I'm sorry, I can't fathom the level of cognitive dissonance necessary to believe Hillary's story that she criticized Wall Street as they were paying her hundreds of thousands of dollars an hour but she wont prove it because what? We told those people enough already? She seems to be channeling the Romneys. The ball is in your court Hillary.

malokvale77

(4,879 posts)
50. Because it is much better to lose to a GOP clown candidate...
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 09:18 PM
Feb 2016

than a really decent Democratic candidate?

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
35. Those transcripts will be like Mitt's 47%er comments.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 05:11 PM
Feb 2016

I hope someone brings it up at the next Town Hall.

oasis

(53,693 posts)
39. It's a cinch the AntiHills will manufacture a Romney 47% comment on
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 05:37 PM
Feb 2016

anything they can cobble together.

So sorry, you can cancel your fishing expedition.

 

Politicalboi

(15,189 posts)
51. That's nice
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 10:03 PM
Feb 2016

So you approve I take it. She did say she would release hers if Bernie did. It's unrealistic for her to wait for the GOP. I'm sure she won't release her taxes till the last minute either. More lies, but some don't care about the truth.

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
42. Hell will freeze over before she releases anything...
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 05:54 PM
Feb 2016

Because that is the way Clintons roll.

No...More...Clintons.

 

Politicalboi

(15,189 posts)
52. Gross
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 10:05 PM
Feb 2016

I guess her word means NOTHING, but you still support her. These are what you call lies.

Vinca

(53,994 posts)
48. There must be something REALLY negative in those transcripts.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 06:50 PM
Feb 2016

The reported bankster love fest must be true.

Buns_of_Fire

(19,161 posts)
49. Let's take up a collection!
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 07:21 PM
Feb 2016

I've got $38 bucks in my account that ain't doing nothin' -- if 6,849 more people will all just chip in an equal amount, we can BUY her speech, and she won't even have to give it again!

But to be fair, at this point, she's damned if she does and damned if she doesn't. If she does now, who's going to believe that TeamClinton hasn't spent the last 17 days polishing them up for public display? If she doesn't, at least everything speculated about what's in them will be just that -- speculation, and easily dismissed. Just stonewall like hell and wait for it to blow over. It's the Clinton way!

I still maintain that the content isn't the killer anyway -- it's why whatever content there is was considered worth a quarter-million bucks. And I think I already know the answer to that.

Francis Booth

(162 posts)
55. Some people need refresher training in ethics.
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 02:10 PM
Feb 2016

It is not ethical to accept hundreds of thousands of dollars from people who you will be expected to regulate once in office.

Unless you live in bizarro world.

I don't really care who people support, but to pretend that there's nothing fishy about this arrangement is an insult to everybody's intelligence.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I WILL LOOK INTO IT!!!