2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThis message was self-deleted by its author
This message was self-deleted by its author (Grassy Knoll) on Tue Feb 23, 2016, 12:20 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)If Bernie Sanders loses, his backers may not be there for Hillary Clinton in November
Gio Vanecchia is so enamored of Bernie Sanders that he made a five-hour drive with his wife and infant son from South Jersey on Saturday morning to catch a glimpse of the progressive firebrand.
But what if Sanders loses the Democratic nomination? Asked whether he will be there to vote for the Democrat in November should Sanders falter, the 34-year-old union mechanic reacts as if the question is insane. There is not a chance, he insists, that he would ever support Hillary Clinton.
Shes establishment, Vanecchia said. Most of the guys I work with think shes a criminal.
Vanecchias second choice for president is Donald Trump.
http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-clinton-sanders-20160206-story.html
FrenchieCat
(68,868 posts)so much demagoguery!
Number23
(24,544 posts)sufrommich
(22,871 posts)Response to Cali_Democrat (Reply #1)
shawn703 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Jitter65
(3,089 posts)to win the WH? Hmmm... Women "I don't vote with my v-----a But it is ok for men to vote with their d___k?
I just don't get it. If everyone had to live up to the bar we set for the Clintons...not even Bernie could run.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)News to me.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)what side his loudest, most obnoxious supporters online are on.
uponit7771
(93,532 posts)Barack_America
(28,876 posts)Few of those out there as well.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)But we are just a few
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)But yeah, we're unimportant in the general Election...right?
FrenchieCat
(68,868 posts)and are voting for trump....since Independents are anything but monolithic!
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)olddots
(10,237 posts)Yup you called it minor
Uncle Joe
(65,136 posts)Thanks for the thread, Grassy Knoll.
Grassy Knoll
(10,118 posts)Uncle Joe
(65,136 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(130,536 posts)I'm not that crazy about Hillary but I'm supporting Bernie because I like him.
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)"I Like Bernie" way more than I "Hate Hillary".
You made up that thing.
Grassy Knoll
(10,118 posts)malokvale77
(4,879 posts)you really are clueless.
It's the physical state of poverty.
I can't help you.
Grassy Knoll
(10,118 posts)And God And My Country....
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)Response to malokvale77 (Reply #22)
Post removed
daleanime
(17,796 posts)you only hear what you want to. But have a lovely night anyways.
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)"Obviously Hillary cannot run on the issues"
So she sends out the trolls.
Have fun.
msongs
(73,754 posts)BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)admiring Bernie and agreeing with him for years.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)His views reflect my views. Hers do not. I don't hate her for that though. I hate her because she's corrupt and lies. I think she must have a contempt for her constituents to think she can continue to talk out of both sides of her mouth like she does.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)Last edited Tue Feb 23, 2016, 04:19 AM - Edit history (1)
However, her policies and political bedfellows disgust me.
On the other hand, I've been following Bernie Sanders for 20 years and I find his policies much, much better.
In my opinion both the Democratic and Republican rank-and-file are being played by their respective Parties. Each group has been trained very carefully to hate the other side, and to view government action (or inaction) through a partisan lens: my side good, their side bad. We even have our own versions of the Two Minute Hate - like this: http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017332161.
It's all designed to get us to respond negatively and emotionally to those designated as our opponents. That kind of knee-jerk non-critical political thinking now dominates political discussion, and any kind of criticism of a candidate or disobedience toward our partisan overlords is cheaply labeled as "hate."
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)I don't hate Hillary, I just think she's unfit for public office.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Another DC main chancer, but oaky I guess
But when she steps toward the Presidency....
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)Cuz if Hillary had decided not to run and it was between Martin and Bernie I would still be supporting Bernie. Hillary is a non issue.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)IWR vote and her other regressive policies. Her recent falsifications have just validated my concerns that she is not fit to be President.
Jitter65
(3,089 posts)Grassy Knoll
(10,118 posts)You hate Hillary more than you like Bernie, No Obvious argument,
Understood.
mikehiggins
(5,614 posts)And by many, I mean of course, enough people to make a difference within the party. Certainly, all those people who vote for her do not "hate" her and only a handful are supporting Sanders because of their hatred of Secretary Clinton. The vast majority support him because they think he is right and she is wrong. That's fair. That's America.
This is not to say that many of us do not find her politics abhorrent and, like me, find her friendship with Kissinger disgusting. We, or at least I, do not hate her however.
Where you might want to consider, of course, is how many people across the board, Democratic, Republican and Independents simply do not trust her, at least since her bizarre account of being shot at by some Bosnian sniper. It is possible Sanders might have told a lie or two over the course of his career but at least he was smart enough not to have a video recording proving he lied.
Another consideration would be how many of the GOPukes DO actually hate her with a deep and everlasting hatred that no sane person can shake (and I have tried). You can be sure that those people will turn out--one commentator suggested such people would crawl naked across broken glass to vote against her--in the GE, a consideration that might weigh more heavily on a sensible person when deciding on a Presidential nomination.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)You hate Hillary more than you like Bernie? OK.
togetherforever
(71 posts)Democratic party then we have lost our way.
What happened to us?
TIME TO PANIC
(1,894 posts)Welcome to DU.
840high
(17,196 posts)delrem
(9,688 posts)FrenchieCat
(68,868 posts)Ain't gonna work!
Folks should vote how they want, and stop trying to use their vote as a wedge.
Somebody don't want to vote for Bernie or Hillary....
I respect their freedom!
SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)Im glad youre back
gyroscope
(1,443 posts)There hasn't a been a more unlikable politician since Bush and Cheney.
Nonhlanhla
(2,074 posts)Oh boy...
Carolina
(6,960 posts)in that it's the sound of her talking down to us peons, falsely berating her opponent, and outright lying about her alleged record and his actual one.
It's not the voice per se as it is the voice coupled with words. I hit the mute button because she evokes in me the visceral reaction I had to Cheney.
treestar
(82,383 posts)We don't do that to fellow Democrats.
gyroscope
(1,443 posts)she campaigned for a Republican (Goldwater) who voted against the Civil Rights and vowed to overturn it after it passed. Not then and not now has she ever been a democrat.
treestar
(82,383 posts)This stuff is just dumb.
gyroscope
(1,443 posts)her agenda is anti-labor, anti-poor, pro-war and pro-Wall Street.
treestar
(82,383 posts)She is a Democrat. Ask any real Republicans. This Wall Street thing is starting to sound like a mantra. It's an invention. And the public in general does not hate Wall Street.
gyroscope
(1,443 posts)you need to republican's word for validation? I doubt you are a real democrat.
I don't hate Wall Street, except when they try to buy our elections and write our laws but apparently you are perfectly fine with that.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Maybe you have insulated yourself and don't know what they sound like. Yes they are valid about what constitutes a Republican and they would laugh their asses of at the idea Hillary was one of them.
Nobody thinks Wall Street "buys our elections and writes our laws." That's ridiculous. Simply repeating such oversimplified drivel over and over again does not attract voters.
gyroscope
(1,443 posts)that allows unlimited campaign contributions from corporations?
The health insurance and pharmaceutical industry literally wrote the ACA.
Forbes: ObamaCare Enriches Only The Health Insurance Giants and Their Shareholders
http://www.forbes.com/sites/robertlenzner/2013/10/01/obamacare-enriches-only-the-health-insurance-giants-and-their-shareholders/#4e1304be68c8
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)gyroscope
(1,443 posts)Hartmann was 13 years old at the time.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)The same applies to Hillary who was sixteen at the time and following her dad. It is a bad point to try to make.
gyroscope
(1,443 posts)her parents were not political, and there is a big difference between 13 and 16.
"she related in Living History that she had to persuade her father to drive her and a friend to hear Goldwater speak when the GOP nominee made a campaign swing by train through the Chicago suburbs."
she said in her book she wanted to vote for Goldwater but couldn't due to her age.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Was a Democrat, she was not old enough to vote, neither was Hartmann, and you do not get to excuse one without the other, both was making youthful decisions.
gyroscope
(1,443 posts)Hartmann is not his dad, and Hillary campaigned for Goldwater on her own as she described in her book.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)gyroscope
(1,443 posts)Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton are.
Its a question of character. In his youth Sanders was fighting for civil rights at the same time Clinton was fighting to deny people their civil rights. See the difference?
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Goldwater before she could vote, and now since Sanders was a candidate in the Liberty Union party, he ran as an Independent and did not become a Democrat within the last year so he I disqualified also.
Dem2
(8,178 posts)A person is limited their entire life to how they thought when they were 17 and raised in a Republican family? People can't ever change or grow in 50 years?
That's so ridiculous it's not even funny. Now how do you like idea that it's going to be difficult to take anything you say seriously after a post like this?
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)activities and believes talking points rather than facts. I don't even understand why this is an issue is promoted since Sanders has not even said he was a Democrat for less than a year.
gyroscope
(1,443 posts)we should have the highest standards for our candidates.
Sanders has shown moral consistency and character throughout his entire life. Clinton flip flops and changes her position at the drop of a hat whenever it is politically advantageous for her to do so.
Dem2
(8,178 posts)So there's the official definition of who to pick for a candidate.
Thanks for enlightening me.
gyroscope
(1,443 posts)we're talking about President of United States not a telemarketing job.
merrily
(45,251 posts)damned enthusiastic about Obama in 2008.
Bradical79
(4,490 posts)Both started off supporting Trump and Sanders, despite having economic views more inline with Clinton. Their logic basically went: Trump is honest and tells it like it is, Clinton and Obama are communists, Sanders is a socialist and socialists are "good people". I try not to think of it too much.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)And as for Third Way and all the other things Clinton represents: it's perfectly reasonable to hate the company Clinton keeps.
jack_krass
(1,009 posts)that I hate
I actually like Hillary
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)proves your point:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=profile&uid=307836
Notice the lovely threat to Hillary supporters at the end of his vile screed. Even Earl G. points to it as a good reason for banning him in his PPR comment.
Madam Mossfern
(2,340 posts)than a threat. A warning that after their usefulness to the Clinton campaign, they will be tossed like dross.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)who calls Clinton the "c" word is beyond the pale.
Madam Mossfern
(2,340 posts)and a threat.
SecularMotion
(7,981 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Are well aware of CDS. The affliction is felt by her supporters as well. It is unhinged and people like Rush, Hannity, and republicans have bee fomenting it for decades. Anything to stop progress. They are simple minds with powerful voices.
shawn703
(2,712 posts)He was able to get some of the poorer Republicans to vote for their own best interests for a change. Where have you been?
liberal N proud
(61,194 posts)People love to hate something or someone, strong black men and strong white women are prime targets for hate.
Have you ever met someone and hated them before you knew them or knew about them? NO! Something/someone put that hate in your mind. So you impression is tainted by what someone else said to you about that person.
OkSustainAg
(203 posts)Hillary. I am anti big corporation always have always will.
cali
(114,904 posts)He's represented me for 25 years. I think he'd be a very good president.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)But I do know that I don't want her to be president.
treestar
(82,383 posts)For the most part, Bernie is just being used as an anchor for Hillary hate. If he had not run, it would have been O'Malley.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)The GOP, Rove, and Koch Bros must be tickled pink.
pengu
(462 posts)I've admired Bernie for years and years. I've been disgusted with Clinton for years and years.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)I think her policies and ideas are incredibly destructive, both for the country and humanity as a whole, and that she's focused on herself and what she wants, not the rest of us and what we need.
Heck, I don't even hate any of the declared Republicans, either. I just think the statement above applies to them as well.
Logical
(22,457 posts)vi5
(13,305 posts)..which is a continued rightward shift in the Democratic party on many of the core issues that made me become a Democrat 35 years ago and support the party in every way I could during that time.
I don't love Bernie. I like him and think he's a flawed alternative to an even more highly flawed candidate as far as my own personal core democratic values go.
JackInGreen
(2,975 posts)the running joke in the house was 'Unless Warren or Sanders jumps in, then buh-by Hill.', and that's the way it went.
I've heard some uses of the word hate about Hillary, but all stated as subjective opinion with reasoning I might not agree with, but can't gainsay their perspective.
What I'm not getting is the hate against what appears to be ALL Bernie supporters. I hear 'Bernie people are aweful/stupid/naive/young/stoned/undercover republicans/woman hating he-men' more often than I hear 'I hate Hillary'.
Maybe we could do a site search, see how those numbers break down?
Bet you a box of donuts that you'd see 'Bernie supporter' hate more often then you do 'Hillary Clinton' hate.
Now, if you're defining hate as being critical, you might have a point...
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)People make up their minds on whom to support in ways that are not subject to -ANY- rules.
If you like HRC because you don't like the patriarchy, no one can object to that. It's personal choice.
If I support Sanders because I think HRC is a triangulating, wealth server who compromises the needs and values of common people that too is personal choice.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)it must be "make up your own thing" day
but lets be clear...vehemently disagreeing with someone's atrocious, dangerous, destructive and discriminatory policies is not personal hatred. but i can understand how people wrapped up in identity politics and personality might see it that way.
Vote2016
(1,198 posts)votes.
"I like Bernie" is why she may lose the primary; "I hate Hillary" is why she would DEFINITELY lose the general election if we are foolish enough to nominate her.
These are two separate problems. Hillary's super delegates may mask the first problem but the second problem is fatal to her ambitions.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)jillan
(39,451 posts)I'm going to go eat some worms.
That's exactly what this thread sounds like to me. Kindergarten.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)I think it's quite sad really.
MrWendel
(1,881 posts)I've read allot from other websites stating that they would rather vote for Trump. In a heartbeat.
tazkcmo
(7,419 posts)Has a sad? Need hugz?
All betterz now?
Orsino
(37,428 posts)AzDar
(14,023 posts)very poor decisions (IWR). I also think she is callous ( 'we came, we saw, he died' ) and holds no deeply-held belief that she wouldn't compromise ("evolve on"
in a heartbeat to win an election...
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I've never met either, so liking or hating either one would be creative fiction on my part. Supporting (or not) policy and platform after analysis (rather than editorial) however, is what my vote is eventually predicated on.
No doubt, trendy "Things" are all over the place... I still have Pet Rock from 1979.
SDJay
(1,089 posts)I just think she maximized her opportunity within the system as it's currently constituted. It's an inherently corrupt system, but Hillary didn't invent the system or make it corrupt. The system corrupted her along with many others.
When Obama ran in 08, he said things that I had been dying to hear be said for a long time. I have some of the same reactions to things that Bernie says. And unlike Obama, I don't see Bernie accepting the obstructionists for what they are and not following through with what was discussed during the campaign in some ways. Don't get me wrong - I have nothing but respect and admiration for President Obama for a litany of reasons. That doesn't mean I don't disagree with some of the things he's done and not done, though, and that's just the nature of these situations.
Back to Bernie - FINALLY, someone is repeatedly and specifically pointing out how the game is rigged. FINALLY, someone is forcing those who profited massively from this rigged game to explain themselves. FINALLY, our debate is about important things like debt, income disparity, wealth disparity, our economic system, our political system, our wars, etc.
Remember campaigns like 04 when the 'big' issues were swiftboating and the obvious lie about a Constitutional amendment banning gay marriage?
Regardless, if Hillary is the nominee, I'll gladly vote for her as the alternative is simply unacceptable. And that's basically what it is for me - I'd be voting for Bernie in the GE, but against whatever repuke asshole is on the other side if Hillary is on the GE ticket. And if Hillary were to win, I'd feel a sense of relief that our Supreme Court would not be totally fucked and then a sense of resignation that we'd have several more years of the same rigged game. You take the good with the bad, I guess.

