Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NWCorona

(8,541 posts)
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 01:59 PM Feb 2016

U.S. judge weighs deeper probe into Clinton’s private email system

"US. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan of Washington will hear arguments over whether State Department officials and top Clinton aides should be questioned under oath about whether they intentionally thwarted federal open records laws by using or allowing the use of the private server throughout Clinton’s tenure at State from 2009 to 2013."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/us-judge-weighs-deeper-probe-into-clintons-private-email-system/2016/02/23/9c27412a-d997-11e5-81ae-7491b9b9e7df_story.html

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
3. The presumed Candidate is about to be indicted. Thanks, Hillary, you timed this just right.
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 02:11 PM
Feb 2016

Following a political character assassination, this will throw it to decisions made in back rooms at a brokered Convention by the DNC, and the Party leaders who brought us HRC to begin with. A formula for a remake of '68.

President Nixon was the outcome.

More from this morning's WaPo report:

By Spencer S. Hsu February 23 at 8:01 AM

A federal judge on Tuesday will weigh calls raised in a civil lawsuit to probe deeper into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email system as secretary of state, posing new legal and political risks for Clinton and her inner circle.

U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan of Washington will hear arguments over whether State Department officials and top Clinton aides should be questioned under oath about whether they intentionally thwarted federal open records laws by using or allowing the use of the private server throughout Clinton’s tenure at State from 2009 to 2013.

The 10 a.m. hearing comes as Clinton seeks the Democratic presidential nomination and three weeks after the State Department acknowledged for the first time that “top secret” information passed through the server.

[State Department says Hillary Clinton’s email correspondence contained ‘top secret’ material]

The FBI and the department’s inspector general are continuing investigations into whether the private setup mishandled classified information or violated other federal laws.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
5. If this hearing was held at 10am this morning, there may be a statement out there.
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 02:18 PM
Feb 2016

The decision to impanel a federal Grand Jury is ultimately political calculus.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
11. FBI acknowledged just a few weeks ago that there's a criminal investigation. Stretch out the clock
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 02:37 PM
Feb 2016

and maybe it will go away (or be pardoned) seems to be the defense and Administration strategy. This happened before with the similar investigation of CIA Director John Deutch's mishandling of classified materials.

There's plenty of precedent for this approach.

sadoldgirl

(3,431 posts)
8. It is obvious by now that
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 02:32 PM
Feb 2016

the party apparatchiks don't give a hoot about
a democratic WH; their main aim is to keep
Bernie out of it, and the status quo intact.

NWCorona

(8,541 posts)
14. Wrong!
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 04:05 PM
Feb 2016

Breaking news!

"Federal judge rules Clinton aides should be questioned under oath

Aides to Hillary Clinton and state department officials should be questioned under oath about Clinton’s use of a private email server during her four years as secretary of state, a federal judge ruled Tuesday."

“There has been a constant drip, drip, drip of declarations,” said US district judge Emmet G. Sullivan of Washington. “When does it stop?”
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2016/feb/23/us-election-nevada-caucus-trump-rubio-cruz-sanders-clinton-live?page=with:block-56ccb013e4b00807d43ab92e#block-56ccb013e4b00807d43ab92e

razorman

(1,644 posts)
15. Whatever's going to happen needs to happen soon.
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 04:06 PM
Feb 2016

If the convention is over, and she is the official nominee, it will be disastrous for the party if she is indicted.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»U.S. judge weighs deeper ...