2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumU.S. judge weighs deeper probe into Clinton’s private email system
"US. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan of Washington will hear arguments over whether State Department officials and top Clinton aides should be questioned under oath about whether they intentionally thwarted federal open records laws by using or allowing the use of the private server throughout Clintons tenure at State from 2009 to 2013."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/us-judge-weighs-deeper-probe-into-clintons-private-email-system/2016/02/23/9c27412a-d997-11e5-81ae-7491b9b9e7df_story.html
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)and this is the supposedly unbeatable inevitable candidate.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)leveymg
(36,418 posts)Following a political character assassination, this will throw it to decisions made in back rooms at a brokered Convention by the DNC, and the Party leaders who brought us HRC to begin with. A formula for a remake of '68.
President Nixon was the outcome.
More from this morning's WaPo report:
A federal judge on Tuesday will weigh calls raised in a civil lawsuit to probe deeper into Hillary Clintons use of a private email system as secretary of state, posing new legal and political risks for Clinton and her inner circle.
U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan of Washington will hear arguments over whether State Department officials and top Clinton aides should be questioned under oath about whether they intentionally thwarted federal open records laws by using or allowing the use of the private server throughout Clintons tenure at State from 2009 to 2013.
The 10 a.m. hearing comes as Clinton seeks the Democratic presidential nomination and three weeks after the State Department acknowledged for the first time that top secret information passed through the server.
[State Department says Hillary Clintons email correspondence contained top secret material]
The FBI and the departments inspector general are continuing investigations into whether the private setup mishandled classified information or violated other federal laws.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)If The FBI does recommend indictment.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)The decision to impanel a federal Grand Jury is ultimately political calculus.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)speaktruthtopower
(800 posts)leveymg
(36,418 posts)and maybe it will go away (or be pardoned) seems to be the defense and Administration strategy. This happened before with the similar investigation of CIA Director John Deutch's mishandling of classified materials.
There's plenty of precedent for this approach.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)AzDar
(14,023 posts)sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)the party apparatchiks don't give a hoot about
a democratic WH; their main aim is to keep
Bernie out of it, and the status quo intact.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)NWCorona
(8,541 posts)Breaking news!
"Federal judge rules Clinton aides should be questioned under oath
Aides to Hillary Clinton and state department officials should be questioned under oath about Clintons use of a private email server during her four years as secretary of state, a federal judge ruled Tuesday."
There has been a constant drip, drip, drip of declarations, said US district judge Emmet G. Sullivan of Washington. When does it stop?
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2016/feb/23/us-election-nevada-caucus-trump-rubio-cruz-sanders-clinton-live?page=with:block-56ccb013e4b00807d43ab92e#block-56ccb013e4b00807d43ab92e
razorman
(1,644 posts)If the convention is over, and she is the official nominee, it will be disastrous for the party if she is indicted.