2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumVan Jones: Bernie Was For Civil Rights When Hillary Was For Goldwater
I'm glad to see other blacks backing Bernie and calling BS on this artful smear
http://www.weeklystandard.com/van-jones-bernie-was-for-civil-rights-when-hillary-was-for-goldwater/article/2001217
haikugal
(6,476 posts)But satisfying.
Thanks!
So true.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)A smart strategist, and personable.
haikugal
(6,476 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)deathrind
(1,786 posts)The DNC would be a much better organization if he were.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)zappaman
(20,627 posts)Hillary was a Goldwater girl?
Wow, this new and breaking information is gonna change this whole race!!!!
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)As you took the time to comment.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)Wilms
(26,795 posts)No. They aren't!
daleanime
(17,796 posts)he's doing the best he can with what he's got.
Duval
(4,280 posts)And understanding, as well.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)panader0
(25,816 posts)zappaman
(20,627 posts)daleanime
(17,796 posts)and let them decide if it means anything to them.
gyroscope
(1,443 posts)people need to find out who the real Hillary is.
zappaman
(20,627 posts)But if you think that will deliver Sanders the nomination, have at it.
gyroscope
(1,443 posts)It's still early in the race and there's plenty of time for them to learn out about it.
The more they know the less they like her.
It speaks to her character which has not changed since her Goldwater days
(ie: her ugly race-baiting campaign of 2008)
nxylas
(6,440 posts)In the '80s, I was a Thatcher-worshipping Tory boy. I've changed since then, and I'm sure Hillary has too, albeit not as much.
gyroscope
(1,443 posts)Hillary has not, or not until it was politically expedient.
I'd rather someone who was consistent all their life than someone who will flip and flop at the drop of a hat.
nxylas
(6,440 posts)You can point out flip-flops from the last few years, her racist dog whistles against Obama, her ties to Wall Street. Her views from half a century ago have bugger all to do with this election
randys1
(16,286 posts)Around these parts anything you can criticize Hillary for, you do (not you personally), anything you can for Bernie is just negative campaigning and so on.
I am also a Bernie supporter, but I find many of his supporters to be problematic.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)do you have any idea how patronizing that is? Do you care?
randys1
(16,286 posts)in one way or another
"If Black people knew what they were doing"
.............................
zappaman
(20,627 posts)I forgot that the monolithic AA voters were low information voters.
Yeah, once this gets out, and they hear about Bernie, he'll waltz to the nomination.
uponit7771
(93,532 posts)Matariki
(18,775 posts)Far in the past only seems to matter when it's not your candidate.
uponit7771
(93,532 posts)Carolina
(6,960 posts)has been on the WRONG side of history!
Sure she says she has evolved, but she was wrong on Iraq, Honduras, Libya, Syria. She was wrong on the Patriot Act and the Bankuptcy Bill. And going back in time she and Bill (the two for one, the WH years she counts as part of her EXPERIENCE!) were wrong on Welfare Reform, Three Strikes, Telecommunications, Glass-Steagall... They were wrong to hire or retain these failed masters of the universe

Past is prologue! that's why it matters
uponit7771
(93,532 posts)Carolina
(6,960 posts)entirely. It's not simply that they both were once republican. Rather, Hillary claims to have evolved but continues to BE WRONG on a whole litany of issues... the ones I listed above along with fracking, Monsanto's GMOs, the TPP and more. Plus, with her lies, pandering and campaign tactics, she and her surrogates are reminiscent of Nixon and his Committee to Re-Elect the President, better and more appropriately known by its acronym CREEP!.
Warren, on the other hand, truly evolved and is absolutely correct on the issues.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)while someone in college was a liberal?
Someone should really tell John Lewis how horrible she is.
kath
(10,565 posts)dsc
(53,397 posts)Goldwater was nominated in 1964 Clinton was born in 1947. Last I checked 1964-1947 is 17, not 21. She didn't even go to the convention at all BTW.
kath
(10,565 posts)Republican Convention. Rockefeller. (Not. Goldwater.) -- this was in 1968.
When. She. Was. TWENTY-ONE.
MADem
(135,425 posts)They think that you can lose Nevada and still win the Latino vote and the caucasian vote! And they'll STICK with that lie because they need to. It adds up to them! They believe that 64-47 is 21! They'll Make Shit UP because they NEED to. The math, like the logic, is fuzzy.
And not in a good way, either.
This is what happens when your candidate's path to victory begins to narrow, and then crumble. People start inventing crazy stories, accusing others of doing the "kitchen sink" thing when they are the ones who are actually doing it, the surrogates go out in force, using disreputable right wing websites as "proof" of their assertions, or claiming that Trump is gonna win and will indict HRC, or all manners of foolishness.
It's sad. The grapes are sour, the dogs are in the mangers. They are feeling a burn, not a "Bern," and it's turning into a very uncomfortable itch.
They need to be soothed, poor dears.
zappaman
(20,627 posts)Yes, where having less votes is actually a tie.
Herman4747
(1,825 posts)...while every single member of my family was supporting either Eugene McCarthy or Bobby Kennedy.
And by the way, 1968-1947 = 21.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Since it seems to me Rockefeller was in NY, and Hillary was in Wellesley, MA at the time.
But hey, you go ON with your bad self....I will wait.
Sure you haven't been sniffing around those Conspiracy sites? Be careful, a lot of those have a rather bigoted aspect to them.
Oh, and lift with your legs, now! Those sinks can be very heavy!!
Herman4747
(1,825 posts)Or read this from one of the books she wrote:
she attended the 1968 Republican convention to work for New York Gov. Nelson Rockefellers unsuccessful effort to get the GOP presidential nomination (pages 34-35).from her book, Living History http://www.factcheck.org/2008/03/hillary-worked-for-goldwater/
MADem
(135,425 posts)shit on the big R--but that kinda ruins your little thesis, dunnit? Oooooh, that SELECTIVE editing!!!!!

George II
(67,782 posts)....and in campaigns for the experience of working in politics, not because of the ideology of the candidate they're working "for"?
Plus, many many congressional intern positions are apolitical, too.
Petrushka
(3,709 posts)With Bing as a friend, here's one source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton#Early_life_and_education
Carolina
(6,960 posts)it's useless pointing out mere facts to the willfully blind
dragonfly301
(399 posts)Matariki
(18,775 posts)I have the same values now that I did when I was 14.
MADem
(135,425 posts)of those bitter grapes you're chomping on.
Matariki
(18,775 posts)Duval
(4,280 posts)Getting tired of this crap. Thanks Matariki!
MADem
(135,425 posts)HALF a paragraph you chopped off!!! The MOST IMPORTANT half, too!!!
Anyone who doesn't believe me, go to the link that Matariki has provided above, and see the ENTIRE PARAGRAPH, in context.
Hmmm.
You can kind of speculate as to how old people are by the way they regard political labels like "Republican" and "Democrat." The GOP was not perceived as "evil" until Richard Nixon got moving with the dirty tricks. In fact, particularly in the northeast, there were many "liberal" Republicans. Nelson Rockefeller was one of them. He took a lot of heat for it, too.
Here's a little 'learning' for you on the matter, which might prevent you from making that mistake about characterizing people who supported Rockefeller during that timeframe in future:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rockefeller_Republican
The Rockefeller Republicans, otherwise called Liberal Republicans, were members of the Republican Party (GOP) in the 1940s-1970s who held moderate to liberal views on domestic issues, similar to those of Nelson Rockefeller, Governor of New York (19591973) and Vice President of the United States (19741977). Rockefeller Republicanism has been described as the last phase of the "Eastern Establishment" of the GOP, which had been led by New York governor Thomas E. Dewey. The group's powerful role in the GOP came under heavy attack in 1964 and it lost most of its influence. At a discouraging point in the 1964 California primary campaign against Barry Goldwater, political operative Stuart Spencer called on Rockefeller to "summon that fabled nexus of money, influence, and condescension known as the Eastern Establishment. 'You are looking at it, buddy,' Rockefeller told Spencer. 'I am all that is left.'"[1]
Matariki
(18,775 posts)Just wanted to focus on that fact to correct your record
MADem
(135,425 posts)"political identity" -- rather ironic, too, given your candidate's long journey through political philosophies down the years--and the fact that he didn't even VOTE until he was forty.
Let me "focus" your attention on this comment of yours:
And then provide you with this little interview:

Now, pray tell, WHO is confused about their "political identity?" The woman who has been supporting Democrats for public office since her junior year in college in the sixties, or the guy who never voted before he turned forty and voted for himself, and became a Democrat last year?
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)[url=http://postimg.org/image/9vcjcth5r/][img]
[/img][/url]
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Goldwater was a severe racist who fooled lots of young innocents, But not me or even most DUers. However there are some who, well, let's just say, may be deluded, still?
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Fukushima.
Damn time-traveling radiation.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)For all the space it occupies in your head.
Thank gawd Goldwater was crushed by LBJ. If Goldwater had won we'd not have the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act that LBJ made happen.
Indeed, had Goldwater been elected, the Blacks in the south would have had federal troops attacking them instead of protecting them.
Hillary: Wrong then, wrong now. Consistently.
panader0
(25,816 posts)frazzled
(18,402 posts)And I like Van Jones, but it's just stupid. So a 17-year-old, who 2 years later, when she was in college, would become an activist democrat, organizing anti-Vietnam teach-ins, spearheading the movement on her campus for admitting more students of color, hiring more black faculty, and successfully getting the administration to start an Upward Bound program on campus for disadvantaged urban youths, and who led the campus activities after Martin Luther King was assassinated ... you're going to damn her because her parents were Republicans in a small suburb when she was a teenager?
How does he feel about Elizabeth Warren, who supported racist Republican candidates ... till she was 46 years old? And because she thought "they were better for the markets"?
Bernie Sanders has basically two things on his resume. He attended a school protest for which he received a $25 fine for resisting arrest; and he went, along with 500,000 other people, to Washington. Then he moved to Vermont which has next to no minority population, and so never had to directly deal with issues of race on an immediate basis at all for the next 45 years?
cali
(114,904 posts)Taking your cues from Capehart.
Shame on you.
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)that he did for civil rights for black people for decades thereafter.
That "Bernie marched with Martin and worked on civil rights for a couple of years in Chicago so he earned the Lifetime Civil Rights Achievement Award" brag is played out and the only people who are impressed by it are those who know so little about the 1960s civil rights movement that they think Sanders was on the forefront of it and who already support him.
There's a reason that black voters aren't buying into this en mass and aren't flocking to support Sanders. And it's not because they aren't aware of what he did in the '60s. And how could they not aware? They've been told about it countless times already.
Response to EffieBlack (Reply #130)
Post removed
SheenaR
(2,052 posts)Hillary has done quite a share of race baiting in her campaigns. And her surrogates do her no favors there.
It's fairly hypocritical of Clinton supporters to deny this.
Did Hillary not call black kids super predators and moms on welfare deadbeats?
I believe these things happened
AzDar
(14,023 posts)jillan
(39,451 posts)Tanuki
(16,448 posts)supporter of Sanders for quite some time. Google is your friend.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)He was very concerned with what was going on outside his little bubble.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Too busy writing those odd, off-putting "articles" I guess?
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)A segregation Republican at that!
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)NWCorona
(8,541 posts)PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)NWCorona
(8,541 posts)Tanuki
(16,448 posts)Convention that summer as a part of her college's Wellesley in Washington internship. She did not choose her internship placement. The program director, Allen Schecter, has said that he made the placement.
dragonfly301
(399 posts)and we rejoiced because we had 61 votes in the senate to be filibuster proof - guess who was counted in "our" 61 votes? He has always caucused with the Dems - enough of this nonsense.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)Trajan
(19,089 posts)That are New Deal in nature - far more 'Democrat' than the posers who now occupy the Democratic Party leadership ...
Given a choice between the 'real' Democrats who have transformed themselves into 'GOP-Lite', and the Independent that is beholden to New Deal values throughout his WHOLE LIFE?
I'll take the New Deal policies ...
I presumed you would have already made that distinction, but, alas, you apparently support 'GOP-Lite' ...
And, with that, .... Gone
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)Carolina
(6,960 posts)the willfully blind who cannot see that past is prologue and that Hillary has been on the wrong side of history. Her Goldwater Girl days are but one example.
Sure she says she has evolved, but she was wrong on Iraq, Honduras, Libya, Syria. She was wrong on the Patriot Act and the Bankuptcy Bill. And going back in time she and Bill (the two for one, the WH years she counts as part of her EXPERIENCE!) were wrong on Welfare Reform, Three Strikes, Telecommunications, Glass-Steagall... They were wrong to hire or retain these failed masters of the universe

WRONG, WRONG, WRONG
Trajan
(19,089 posts)I don't put a lot of stock into the 'Goldwater Girl' criticisms, but, it's a reality .. it is a truism, and those who find such a fact objectionable should have their day ...
I'm so glad that Bernie is running ... No reason to feel compromised when pulling that handle in the voting booth ... He is for real and always had has been...
livetohike
(24,283 posts)TIME TO PANIC
(1,894 posts)Politically she's center-right.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)TIME TO PANIC
(1,894 posts)PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)TIME TO PANIC
(1,894 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Hillary runs left but governs to the center. So did her husband.
Want 'Welfare Reform'? Elect another Clinton. Go ahead. She won't veto it. Want NAFTA redux as the TPP? Elect another Clinton. Go ahead.
Etc.
No, Rude Pundit is very, very wrong. It DOES matter, between the current front runners in our primary. There's a LOT of daylight between them on issues.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)And the main point of that piece is in the title. The divide between supporters here and elsewhere on the internet has been ridiculously toxic and that's a shame.
I like you, AC. I respect you. I stand so very solidly with you on many issues and I celebrate those and try not to let the disagreements turn the other stuff sour. I won't let it.
Anyway, carry on. And fuck the Pope.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)My fear, my one fear with Hillary, is that she won't use her veto pen as often as Bernie will.
That's all we've got for now, given the makeup of the Congress.
So yes, I am very desperately in the tank for Bernie. Compromise isn't a word he'll use much, I think. And that's all I've got to cling to now.
If Hillary is your choice, I respect that, and no worries.
I'm going with my preference until the primary is over. Then I will support the nominee. I have little choice in the matter.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)I won't get into my reasons for supporting Clinton over Sanders here because I know full well I will get pounced on telling me how wrong or stupid I am (not by you).
I also don't get involved in the bashing of Sanders here because I think it sucks. I definitely have voiced concerns about the methods of supporters of both. Yeah, I fully about that I call out/get snarky with the Sanders supporters more because I see so very many right wing and/or libertarian smears being thrown. Or silly stuff like hey political affiliation when she was a teen-ager.
Yup, I'll support either nominee. Proudly, in fact. I think SCOTUS is far too important to play with. And I'm in a swing state. I take that seriously.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Was the "D" next to her name all that mattered?
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)I win!
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)Flex your big ol muscles in the mirror, you earned it!!
Nonhlanhla
(2,074 posts)Wham and Duran Duran when I was 17. That doesn't mean that my music taste did not improve when I became an adult.
LOL, Bernie fans must be desperate. This is such a silly attack on Hillary.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)Nonhlanhla
(2,074 posts)NWCorona
(8,541 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)NWCorona
(8,541 posts)do with it?
MADem
(135,425 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)Whoever Smelt It Dealt It is a true thing! They made the Kitchen Sink accusations...and here they are, toting it, faucets and all!
LOL!
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)youthful politics. Jones is responding to a set of smears launched at Bernie by making a very valid point. A point that he would not be making if this whole 'Bernie is a fake and a racist' crap had not been a cottage industry for a few devoted Clinton supporters.
Seriously, you should tell Van exactly how you feel about it. He's prone to respond. He's capable of doing so.
MADem
(135,425 posts)In a few months, this will be a little dust up about people on the internet getting all WAAAH WAAAH WAAH about a former presidential candidate and the Democratic nominee.
More to the point, THE WEEKLY STANDARD--the source for this shit thread--is a virulently wingnut rag, that HATES Democrats, liberals, progressives, and anyone who has any care for the poor or disenfranchised, so I think it's funny as hell that anyone would defend them, tout them, and get all hot-breathed about them.
I tend to know people by the company they keep--and the WEEKLY STANDARD is a bad companion. Seriously!!!
Look at the glamour shot on this week's cover:

Carolina
(6,960 posts)Hillary has been on the wrong side of history. Her Goldwater Girl days are but one example.
Sure she says she has evolved, but she was wrong on Iraq, Honduras, Libya, Syria. She was wrong on the Patriot Act and the Bankuptcy Bill. And going back in time she and Bill (the two for one, the WH years she counts as part of her EXPERIENCE!) were wrong on Welfare Reform, Three Strikes, Telecommunications, Glass-Steagall... They were wrong to hire or retain these failed masters of the universe

WRONG, WRONG, WRONG
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)Herman4747
(1,825 posts)Number23
(24,544 posts)He is usually much, much sharper than this. He is still one fine looking man though.
Oh, and awesome source by the way.
randys1
(16,286 posts)than most.
Van has a bright future if the racists dont win, again.
Bernie or no Bernie, Van is the man.
Van for president, actually.
If not now, soon
Beacool
(30,518 posts)Sanders was already an adult. She became a Democrat after her first year in college.
What the HELL is the matter with some of you who keep repeating this B.S. like a mantra?????????
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)Beacool
(30,518 posts)Is this the campaign that Sanders really wants? Because in that case, he wasn't even a Democrat until about 5 minutes ago.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)Beacool
(30,518 posts)Uncle Joe
(65,134 posts)Beacool
(30,518 posts)She also consulted with every other SOS.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/02/hillary-clinton-kissinger-vacation-dominican-republic-de-la-renta
Uncle Joe
(65,134 posts)Hillary Clinton and Henry Kissinger: It's Personal. Very Personal.

(snip)
"I happen to believe that Henry Kissinger was one of the most destructive secretaries of state in the modern history of this country," Sanders huffed, adding, "I will not take advice from Henry Kissinger." He referred to the secret bombing of Cambodia during the Vietnam war as a Kissinger-orchestrated move that eventually led to genocide in that country. "So count me in as somebody who will not be listening to Henry Kissinger," Sanders roared. Clinton defended her association with Kissinger by replying, "I listen to a wide variety of voices that have expertise in various areas." She cast her interactions with Kissinger as motivated by her desire to obtain any information that might be useful to craft policy. "People we may disagree with on a number of things may have some insight, may have some relationships that are important for the president to understand in order to best protect the United States," she said.
What Clinton did not mention was that her bond with Kissinger was personal as well as professional, as she and her husband have for years regularly spent their winter holidays with Kissinger and his wife, Nancy, at the beachfront villa of fashion designer Oscar de la Renta, who died in 2014, and his wife, Annette, in the Dominican Republic.
This campaign tussle over Kissinger began a week earlier, at a previous debate, when Clinton, looking to boost her résumé, said, "I was very flattered when Henry Kissinger said I ran the State Department better than anybody had run it in a long time. So I have an idea about what it's going to take to make our government work more efficiently." A few days later, Bill Clinton, while campaigning for his wife in New Hampshire, told a crowd of her supporters, "Henry Kissinger, of all people, said she ran the State Department better and got more out of the personnel at the State Department than any secretary of state in decades, and it's true." His audience of Democrats clapped loudly in response.
(snip)
This campaign tussle over Kissinger began a week earlier, at a previous debate, when Clinton, looking to boost her résumé, said, "I was very flattered when Henry Kissinger said I ran the State Department better than anybody had run it in a long time. So I have an idea about what it's going to take to make our government work more efficiently." A few days later, Bill Clinton, while campaigning for his wife in New Hampshire, told a crowd of her supporters, "Henry Kissinger, of all people, said she ran the State Department better and got more out of the personnel at the State Department than any secretary of state in decades, and it's true." His audience of Democrats clapped loudly in response.
(snip)
The Clinton campaign did not respond to a request for comment. Neither did Henry Kissinger or Annette de la Renta.
When awarding herself the Kissinger seal of approval to bolster her standing as a competent diplomat and government official, Hillary Clinton has not referred to the annual hobnobbing at the de la Renta villa. So when Sanders criticized Clinton for playing the Kissinger card"not my kind of guy," he declaredwhether he realized it or not, he was hitting very close to home.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/02/hillary-clinton-kissinger-vacation-dominican-republic-de-la-renta
great white snark
(2,646 posts)"Goldwater Girl" is good as...well...gold.
livetohike
(24,283 posts)school years? He hasn't been scrutinized nearly enough.
Tanuki
(16,448 posts)Imagine their bitterness after the SC primary and SuperTuesday.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Range Rover so shortly after having insisted that one's youthful political efforts were hugely important and in need of dissection if not a Independent Investigator because Bruce Rappaport's ex wife said so. Shameless crowd they are indeed.
PeterGM
(71 posts)A 16 yo. is much more likely to reflect the political views of the environment that person grew up in... Clinton comes from a rich white family so no surprise that they might have been Goldwater supporters... She did grow up and become more reasonable... The fact that Sanders got it right from the start is a plus for him, not a negative for Clinton...
What is much more disturbing are Clinton's views as a grown woman which reflect her subconscious (at least i hope it is) racism, such as her comment on super predators in 94 or hard working Americans, white Americans in '08, that is some disturbing stuff.
As a Sanders supporter I really hope people stop using what Clinton said or did as a minor and focus on what she has done as an adult and start asking the right questions: how much do people "evolve" ideologically when they're 50+ years old? not 16...
TIME TO PANIC
(1,894 posts)Trajan
(19,089 posts)You don't have to do a thing ... Let others fight that battle if it doesn't interest you ...
We think it's relevant...
PeterGM
(71 posts)Last edited Sat Feb 27, 2016, 12:46 AM - Edit history (2)
If you think that if actions committed ed as a minor are fair game, then anything is fair game. And that is a can of worms you should be careful about opening.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)NWCorona
(8,541 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)But not in a good way. It'll be because of people like you and the utter splintering of our own party.
Kang Colby
(1,941 posts)In other words, who cares?
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)riversedge
(80,810 posts)NWCorona
(8,541 posts)But that doesn't change the embedded video in the link.
Merryland
(1,134 posts)GoneOffShore
(18,021 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Civil Rights in the 60's, what about the years since then?
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)But to say that he gave up is a bit disingenuous. He was infact the ONLY white senator to show up in 2000 when the CBC sent out an SOS in Florida. Clinton was a no show.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)the issues have been resolved? I just want to know what he did after the 60's in relationship to civil rights issues.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)NWCorona
(8,541 posts)She was far from being a kid.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)NWCorona
(8,541 posts)and he was working for us not someone trying to move us to the back of the bus.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)NWCorona
(8,541 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)But she was in HS. Comparing a grown man and a HS kid dont fly. So, at the age she was for AUH2O, what was he doing for civil rights?
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)Hillary didn't convert until college so you are making a moot point.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)If you account for the time frame, they started at a similar age in activism.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)NWCorona
(8,541 posts)College? You can't have it both ways.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Just like her. Until college BOTH were not doing anything much for civil rights. She started at the same AGE he did by getting her dorms unsegregated to share a room with Grant Hill's mother.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)Again she was a goldwater girl and was working against civil rights.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)NWCorona
(8,541 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)He spent a few years at civil rights before returing from that activism. She has done much in the intervening years to make up for that. I was doing forties and blunts at that age. She was better than I even if wrong. She changed. I do not care about what she did a 17, even if she was a prolife republican that believed in segregation. As long as she changed I'm good. I changed. I dont hang with gangs no more. I do not want to be defined by my seventeen year old hood bangin self doing rumbles and running from drive bys. That was then. Who am I now? Thats what matter most. She corrected herself just as I did.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)Her and Bill gave zero fucks locking up people younger than 16 for life. If you want to give her a pass so be it but not me. She probably would have called you a superpredator lol! Besides her record after the conversion isn't that great anyway.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)If she is defined by her teenage self, I may as well go back to putting in work and hittin licks.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)The Green Manalishi
(1,054 posts)Metric System
(6,048 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Well, it should.
senz
(11,945 posts)Petrushka
(3,709 posts)Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)Great to have his intellect on the right side once again. True Democrat and true progressive.
Hekate
(100,133 posts)....once you went off to college? Were all your opinions set in concrete by the time you left high school? Was there nothing more for you to learn about the world by age 18 or 20?
My my my, what godlike powers of perception Van Jones and the other harsh critics of the onetime Goldwater Girl must have had at such a tender age themselves.
A few years can make an incredible difference between the teens and 20s. In 1964 Bernie Sanders was a grown man of 23 or 24, not a 16 year old schoolgirl.
By the time Hillary turned 21 and was able to register to vote, she was ready to work for the presidential campaign of Democratic Senator Eugene MCarthy, and she has been an active Democrat the rest of her life.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)She changed? Yeah, I get that but that doesn't change the fact that she was a goldwater girl that pushed a segregationist platform. It's not like she was 10 or something.
senz
(11,945 posts)Hekate
(100,133 posts)The first we really hear of him being compared to Hillary Rodham, she is a 16 or 17 year old schoolgirl and he is a grown man of 23 or 24.
Voting age was 21, age of majority was also 21, she had not even left her parents' home yet.
By the time Hillary Rodham was legal to register to vote and to vote, she was a DEMOCRAT and embarking on a life of activism on behalf of liberal causes.
Well, bully for Bernie Sanders getting a head start on Hillary Rodham. Being born several years earlier will do that for a guy.
senz
(11,945 posts)Check it out here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511324268
Your candidate does not even come close. Surely you know that.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)Obama and the Dem Establishment threw Van Jones in the dumpster because the Republicans were whining.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)Unfortunately Obama has a tendency to shed anybody who could come off as an angry black man. It's sad as Van was one of the ones I was excited about.
dr60omg
(283 posts)playing Goldwater girl. She is pure DLC making the Democratic party into a corporate party rather than one that stands for and about the people.