2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSo, now on DU, "Gang" = "black"??? How atrocious.
So we now have a plethora of links to a young lady holding up a sign saying "bring them to heel".
And of course we have the oft repeated, hand selected clip:
First, Here's the WHOLE speech, not just the hand selected part:
http://www.c-span.org/video/?c4557866/hillary-clinton-criminal-justice-drug-policy-circa-1996
The speech is not about "black youth" as the clip, and all the people who like to espouse it like to claim. It was about gang activity.. period.
This whole argument is based off of the Suppressed correlative that gang must = black. Which is a very fallacious argument right out of the gate!

Do those who promote these videos not see just how racist it is to correlate "gang" = "black"???
Gang activity is not a "race". Take that chart above, it correlates very closely to income inequality, and poverty. Now THAT is a great case to make.
Also, it can be demonstrated that the policy DID reduce GANG (not black) activity:

Reduced GANG activity is a very worthwhile goal, because it reduces the number of people who prey, most often, on the others who are economically disadvantaged, which will also be disproportionately people of minority groups. The best answer, of course, are better social programs that reduces the disparity, and destroys poverty.
JustAnotherGen
(38,109 posts)Matariki
(18,775 posts)thereismore
(13,326 posts)Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)Are you sure you're supporting the correct political party?
thereismore
(13,326 posts)have running. Hillary ain't it.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)You'd think someone as intelligent as Clinton and so concerned about the plight of minorities would bother to find out where the term came from.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)urban youth.
http://fair.org/extra-online-articles/superscapegoating/
http://racism.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1491:cognitivewar&catid=139&Itemid=155&showall=&limitstart=3
bushisanidiot
(8,064 posts).
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)out of a white person's mouth in current time. It is racist dogwhistle.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)Too late to walk them back now. If she was smart enough to comment on the study, then she was certainly smart enough to have read it.
Or are we saying she just latched onto a study she didn't read yet commented authoritatively on it?
Which is it?
#WhichHillary
Arazi
(8,887 posts)so yes, your comments are technically true but I think it's fair to say HRC was not referring to that 13%
http://www.statisticbrain.com/gang-statistics/
one_voice
(20,043 posts)skin heads, neo nazis or the KKK gangs. Juveniles are involved with all of those 'organizations' odd they left them off.
ɡaNG/
noun
noun: gang; plural noun: gangs
1.
an organized group of criminals.
Arazi
(8,887 posts)I chose the link that counted the MOST white gang members (13%) to rebut. I could have selected the federal link instead.
FWIW, I have no idea how many juvenile KKK, neonazis or skinheads there are but suffice it to say, I'd happily include them if I could find data on that.
The point remains that "super predator " has a context from that era and it wasn't referencing the KKK or neonazis
one_voice
(20,043 posts)didn't consider them gangs. period. that was my point.
Very few statistics consider those groups gangs. Maybe in the prison system they include them.
It's skewed against minorities. There are a lot of teen skin heads/neo nazis. to not include them is wrong. They should be considered gangs.
I wasn't arguing with you. Just pointing it out as strange.
As to your other point..
2 things.
1. I guess calling them psychopaths would have been better? Please don't act like there aren't those kids that kill puppies, rape old ladies, murder for hire etc. What would you call them? I think at this point anything she called them would have been wrong. We call rapist & murderers predators right? She said 'this is not just gangs of kids anymore'. There are kids that are beyond help. I can pull stories from google for you.
2. She was first lady. She had a certain loyalty to push her husband, the President, policies, new proposals etc. She had speech writers, she should have maybe read and rewritten that part. But again, this was done as first lady. Had she gone out and said, 'well this shit sucks' and he lost she's still be blamed for that. Pretty much a no win situation.
Bill Clinton was the President, not Hillary. She signed nothing into law. Yes, she campaigned for him as ALL first ladies do.
I think it's unfair to hand HIS presidency around her neck. What was she supposed to do? Other than change the wording of that speech.
That's my take, but I'm talking to other people. I'm not sure who I'm voting for so I'm getting input on both candidates for supporters of each and non supporters of each. I like differing opinions.
Arazi
(8,887 posts)shes been pretty proud of her activism while she was in the White House.
She didn't have to take such a role but she did.
As for the "super predator" children, well that's what the context was - children. I'm guessing there aren't a significant number of child neonazis to be honest so I don't find it unusual they aren't included. I repeat, she didn't have to call them anything nor did she have to get involved. She chose to do this and owns those words
Lastly, the US government site doesn't break down the gangs so maybe they are included in those stats
FrenchieCat
(68,868 posts)that would tag everything at night...
and Asian Gangs out in SF.
Oakland suffered more from the ravages of Crack cocaine,
and smaller dealer car-jackings and drive byes
DemocratSinceBirth
(102,012 posts)The bonds are based on geography and not color.
Punkingal
(9,522 posts)Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)It's not hard to imagine why.
Spazito
(56,090 posts)Gangs are gangs, made up by all races and ethnicities, to put forth gangs = blacks is appalling stereotyping, to say the least.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)You can have a disagreement, of course, but asking that question here underscores
the protesters point.
Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)and presenting it with the false equivalency.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)confronting Clinton. That Clinton's use of the term super-predator was even necessary
when speaking of gang violence, it was incendiary language and some black Americans
are calling her out on it...no cherry picking there.
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)Are you saying she misunderstood Hillary or was distorting what was said?
Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)Who is most affected by mass incarceration, which Clinton helped create and promote? This isn't complicated.
FrenchieCat
(68,868 posts)Sanders voted for it
Bill signed it
Hillary promoted
as did many, many others...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/118742618
Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)and in the end voted for it for the Violence Against Women Act.
Bullshit disinformation, to deflect. Pathetic.
retrowire
(10,345 posts)cyberswede
(26,117 posts)from "When Youth Violence Spurred Superpredator Fear"
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/07/us/politics/killing-on-bus-recalls-superpredator-threat-of-90s.html?_r=0
FrenchieCat
(68,868 posts)in the main....
but not all.
Many Black folks supporteded it,
because of who was getting killed by the violence,
and terrorized by the fears....
that is, it was other Black folks, not White folks.
Prism
(5,815 posts)Come out of the Bubble into West Oakland lately?
It's not fun down here on the ground in the trenches.
Arazi
(8,887 posts)why aren't you taking it up with Ashley Williams and "educating" her?
Arazi
(8,887 posts)tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)even if I am white.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Sorry for copy and paste but these are facts
For example Michelle Alexander has said
And Ta-Nahesi Coates has said
Ben Jealous has said
"As Ex-Theorist on Young 'Superpredators,' Bush Aide Has Regrets"
PHILADELPHIA, Feb. 8 From his perch as the director of the new White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives, which he believes will help uplift many needy people but particularly the most troubled teenagers, John J. DiIulio Jr. conceded today that he wished he had never become the 1990's intellectual pillar for putting violent juveniles in prison and condemning them as ''superpredators.''
''If I knew then what I know now, I would have shouted for prevention of crimes,'' Mr. DiIulio said during an interview in the clubby University of Pennsylvania office that he is temporarily vacating to join the White House staff.
Instead, five years ago, Mr. DiIulio created a whole theory around the notion that ''a new generation of street criminals is upon us -- the youngest, biggest and baddest generation any society has ever known.''
''Based on all that we have witnessed, researched and heard from people who are close to the action,'' he wrote with two co-authors, ''here is what we believe: America is now home to thickening ranks of juvenile 'superpredators' -- radically impulsive, brutally remorseless youngsters, including ever more preteenage boys, who murder, assault, rape, rob, burglarize, deal deadly drugs, join gun-toting gangs and create serious communal disorders.''
Avalux
(35,015 posts)BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)Avalux
(35,015 posts)The young woman who confronted Hillary is courageous and spoke the truth.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)Somehow, I don't think so.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Marissa J is a racist. Yes, that has been posted here. POC voting for Clinton might be suffering from Stockholm. Yes, that has been posted here. BLM is ratfucking democrats. Yes, that has been posted here.
None hidden. All by well established posters.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)leave out the part where I and several other Bernie supporters took the lead in telling that OP where he could stick it. The fact that you exploit that thread in this way, leaving out facts to sell a narrative that lies about me and others needs to be discussed. Why do you do that? You repeatedly claim that thread was just about POC when it was not, it was about African Americans and LGBT. Specifically. And who most loudly objected? Bernie supporting LGBT, that's who, but you refuse to say that. Why?
Your edited version of those events repeated without all of the facts makes your posts about that OP similar to that OP, a dishonest and exclusionary thing.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)How many recommends did it have. And yes, it was outright bigotry as well.
I have repeatedly stated it is about bigotry and racism. Please stop with your dishonest line of attack here. Thanks.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251727280#post1
A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)Hispanics and Latinos too.
Bad Thoughts
(2,657 posts)Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)Bad Thoughts
(2,657 posts)Just google portrayal media gangs minorities .
morningfog
(18,115 posts)I take offense at suggesting not any kids must be brought to heel.
I oppose mass incarceration.
In context, comments were directed at inner city youths in gangs, minorities. It was racist. Deal with it.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)in truly helping these kids get the help they need to become productive and successful. Kids are not super predators. They are a product of the broken systems we put in place.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Clinton is not the only person who used the term "superpredator".
Hell Hath No Fury
(16,327 posts)remember the larger context many of those statements were made under. The LA gang wars had been HUGE news, as were the beginnings of the east coast west coast hip hop rivalry that involved violence. N.W.A. had sung "Fuck Tha Police". Sister Soulja had been rebuked by Clinton. 2 Live Krew had gotten arrested in Florida on obscenity charges. Hip hop and rap were rising in American culture and it SCARED THE SHIT out of older white America. The crack epidemic had happened. "The Bell Curve" had been released, claiming blacks were intellectually inferior to whites. Limbaugh was on the radio saying the most hideous and inflammatory things about black Americans, fueling rising white fears.
So, for those of us there and listening, we knew exactly who "super-predator" and gangs and welfare reform were referring to and aimed at.
It sure as SHIT wasn't referring to towheaded white boys and it was aimed squarely at scared white people.
tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)if you weren't already scared, the teevee sure wanted to try to make you feel scared
Hell Hath No Fury
(16,327 posts)and the Central park jogger and that Bernie guy in the subway who shot an "attacker" -- there was SERIOUS fear of black people, especially males, being stoked in the media.
tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)Hell Hath No Fury
(16,327 posts)beedle
(1,235 posts)That there was just as much fear mongering of inner city KKK gangs ... Or so we are expected to believe.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)This black vs white narrative is bullshit. The vast majority of people living in the rough areas were good people, and they clamored hard for increased police presence. POC don't love drug dealers more than white people do. They wanted the streets to be safer more than anyone.
Hassin Bin Sober
(27,497 posts)Come on.
Politicians speak in code.
Thugs, urban youth, gangs, caddilac driving welfare queens.
By the way:
Gang activity is not a "race". Take that chart above, it correlates very closely to income inequality, and poverty. Now THAT is a great case to make.
This is why economic issues are also racial issues.
forjusticethunders
(1,151 posts)Either you're the exact person that the Reagan/Bush/Clinton dogwhistles were aimed at, or you're just willfully distorting the long history of that phrase as a cudgel to beat young black men with (almost literally given how that kind of rhetoric was used to support a war against POC).
"Superpredators have nothing to do with black people, just like welfare queens and law and order". This is going to ANY lengths to deny that your candidate appealed to white racism in order to gain political capital. What irks me even more is that it's not like she stopped in 1996. Not all of us forgot the 2008 primary.
DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)so it goes with our melting pot.
for a very long time, the theory went "let those people kill each other", and look the other way. that was ALSO considered racist.
DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)the general public wanted violent people to take over the streets. and anytime there is a crime wave, at least on a local level it gets blamed on group or groups. once upon a time, they were Irish.
I am sort of stunned that anyone made the leap to black people, because in NYC it was heavily Latino immigrants in the 80s that ran the most violent gangs. And for the first time in history, we were finding lower grade school kids with guns working for drug dealers. Not HS and older, as it had been. Shit was crazy.
And other Latino groups not involved in the drug trade in NYC fucking hated them for it, and wanted them put away. the people who lived in the ghettos in the Bronx were clamoring for the NYPD to go after gangs, because they had been ignored for years. History matters.
DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)I know authoritarians will never be able to wrap their authoritarian minds around it, but warehousing individuals doesn't deter the next in line. Most of those violent street crimes aren't because someone is a psycho, it's because his livelihood is made outside the legal framework. Violence is his only method to address grievances. When's the last time you say two beer distributors shoot each other to death? 1933. And it happened a lot.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)I think when one lucrative illegal trade dries up, some people will go onto the next one. I don't know if there is any reasonable solution to all of that in a place like NYC where we have welcomed so many immigrants who will find it harder to be part of the straight economy. I am just giving the time and place context. It was never a black thing in NYC, and it was never just white people asking for the police to do something.
bushisanidiot
(8,064 posts)I am truly amazed at all of the racists that are claiming she was talking about black kids instead of kids in gangs.
She wrote "It Takes a Village". Her life's work has been to help children, women and families. She isn't out to get anyone's kids, especially the children of african americans who she has worked so closely with all of her life.
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)Do you know who Lee Atwater is? Do you not remember the sentencing differences between cocaine and crack.
EVERYBODY who know ANYTHING about the issue at the time knew what she meant. She didn't just stumble on that bullshit dog whistle by accident. Don't piss in my ear and tell me it's raining.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Crack was a whole different world for NYC. I am sorry, but people seem so ignorant about the extreme violence the trade and the addicts themselves caused.
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)when the lesser sentences go to the drug of primarily white users and greater sentences to the drug of primarily black users?
Or do you agree with the myth that was the superpredator?
I get it. Crack's was a problem. Then it was meth. Now we are back to heroine is now. The plans to through them all in jail worked SO well didn't it?
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)If you think it was all bigots getting bigots to do their bidding you are grossly over simplifying what went on just to score points. It was not black vs white as presented here on DU. That is bullshit they have picked up on the net.
Crack changed everything, heroin addicts had never been that violent. I do not agree that the penalty should be different for the same amount of drugs, nope.
But the city was completely unprepared for coping with the craziness that came from crack. The NYPD was supposed to basically just ignore stoned people and leave the dealers to the Narc squad.
It was not a great way to handle shit, but there was a lot less violence in the streets. Muggings were the big crime because of drugs before crack, robberies. But the 80s brought new turf wars for crack dealers who started literally arming children and mowing down innocent people in gun battles. Not teenagers, kids with guns became a thing. And people on crack were literally going nuts everywhere, no one wanted the job of arresting them for fear of what they would do if you tried to. IN NYC, you really had to be doing something more than being high to get arrested back then. It was a very different world.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)and not even really a dog whistle so much as a flat out statement. She is talking about kids, who need to be brought to heel. Her word: kids. Those words do not match up, kids and words for training dogs.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)(Note: Both campaigns are pretending to care about black people. Yes, BOTH! Many black people are well aware of how both campaigns are exploiting race and pretending to care about race/racism by using black surrogates. This is something that we notice and fully understand is happening.)
Aerows
(39,961 posts)Yes or No?
Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)Come on Aerows, I'm trying to keep it positive here, but think back to some of the very things you said back in in early August when the ladies from BLM in Seattle stormed the stage. Were you wrong then and right now? Bernie was supposed to answer those questions? Like I said, I'm trying to keep it clean and positive, so I won't link and quote, but do please consider how you felt then and maybe understand a little why some who are on the opposite side of the Primary now feel the same way you did then.
Do you feel Bernie is a Racist? I don't. Despite all of the cherry picked evidence to say otherwise, do you REALLY feel that Hillary's comments in that full video was specifically targeting a race? I honestly don't.
I do fault the entire subject matter of that speech, and the resulting crime bill, which Senator Sanders voted yes on, and Bill Clinton signed into law was a travesty of justice.
As I pointed out above, using real statistics, Blacks are not even an overwhelming majority of gangs in the US. What's more, using that graph alone is what REALLY masks the REAL problem:
Income inequality, and poverty, especially extreme poverty breeds crime. Not race, and not culture.
Look again at this chart that shows REAL gang statistics by race.

Now take a look at poverty statistics.. by race:

Very hard to ignore the REAL root cause of gang activity imo, and THAT is what I'm saying the REAL conversation needs to be about.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)Citation, please.
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)Reagan didn't literally say black, so clearly he meant white people!!!
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)this discussion?
jeff47
(26,549 posts)"Superpredators" is a racially-loaded term, just like "Welfare Queens" is.
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)rock
(13,218 posts)It's amazing how many DUers will not except the truth when it berns!
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)I'd say his references to gangs were about the same.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)but we understand how it works.
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.