2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumTV Pundits Fail to Disclose Their Work For Clinton Campaign:
etc.....
https://theintercept.com/2016/02/25/tv-pundits-praise-hillary-clinton-on-air-fail-to-disclose-financial-ties-to-her-campaign/
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)What you see on tee vee appears one way, but is really another.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)A senior advisor for Pres Clinton in 1993. I am sure there was no Clinton bias there. None at all. Zero. Nada. Zilch.
Just like there was no disclosure that he had been a senior advisor to Bill Clinton.
jillan
(39,451 posts)No political leanings whatsoever? Just news and other trending stories.
Those were the days.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)The Wielding Truth
(11,415 posts)jillan
(39,451 posts)One last year and another coming up soon.
CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)Not hardly....
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)mariawr
(348 posts)democrank
(11,100 posts)Establishment influence in overdrive.
That`s one reason Bernie is so refreshing.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)full disclosure of these facts. Thanks for the info! Not that I ever trust ANYONE on the Corp Media, they will naturally go with the Corp Candidates.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)I hope the ghosts of Cronkite, Murrow, Chancellor and Brinkley haunt these cheap shills to the end of their days.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)whatever other excuse they tell themselves, their ethics just go right out of the fucking window.
delrem
(9,688 posts)The floodgates were released, and some of those "pundits" and "experts" don't come cheap.
And since there's no way to know, to prove it - except maybe in time a sliver of the truth might come out years or decades from now - it's best to keep our eyes on the issues, and on what is verifiable as of right now.