2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSo we got a generational divide...
Polls across the country show overwhelming support amongst Millennials and Gen-Xers for Bernie Sanders, while Baby Boomers and the Greatest Generation overwhelmingly support Hillary Clinton. This trend also seems to be same (generally speaking) across races / ethnicities.
So what (if anything) can Sanders do to attract more Baby Boomers and what (if anything) can Clinton do to attract more Millennial and Gen-Xer support?
And winning the nomination is not a valid response...
Just to hear your input...
Xipe Totec
(44,555 posts)Baby boomer here, supporting Bernie.
So is my mom.
TM99
(8,352 posts)even if there are some Millennials voting for Clinton and some Baby Boomers voting for Sanders. The numbers are clearly lining up like this.
Xipe Totec
(44,555 posts)TM99
(8,352 posts)pretty much confirm this as do other polls. Young women turn to Sanders more than older. Older white's making six figures and above turn to Clinton. Young Hispanics gave Sanders the overall higher Hispanic voter turn-out in Nevada. AA's went for Clinton more there but it will remain to be seen whether they are older or younger once SC is complete.
I am definitely not trying to insult you. These are just the stats thus far. This the reality we have to face. Hopefully the youth vote will hold strong. It made the difference in Iowa.
tazkcmo
(7,419 posts)But it does fit the nation's reality. We live in a country where 20-40% of the population decides elections and that's in a "good" year. 2008 was a "terrific" year for turn out but compared to other democracies very weak. Our population is not involved, educated or interested in politics for the most part and only skim the info available or get it from their more active friends who may or may not be neutral and well informed. It's true, we have a generational divide.
Love to see a DU poll on this. Any Star members care to start a generation poll?
djean111
(14,255 posts)I think the age demographic is getting useless, because we all have access to the same information now. JMO, of course.
Gender, same thing - gender is not even on my list of issues for supporting a candidate. This is not for prom king or queen, or junior high class president. Not something to "make a point" with.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)to their elders. It is so condescending to them. Old folks don't owe their vote to anyone. They have a relationship with Hillary that started long before a lot of these Bernie yelps were even born.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Vattel
(9,289 posts)And don't start talking about how in the 60s Bernie helped an old person safely cross the street. What has he done for us lately?
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)It's a political discussion board...where opinions are expressed. Don't like mine? Put me on Ignore...
Vattel
(9,289 posts)The ageism of Bernie supporters knows no boundaries.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)My radar's usually better attenuated than this.
Bye, now...
Vattel
(9,289 posts)Did I misread? If so, I apologize for not using a sarcasm indicator or something.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Sometimes people miss it, hopefully you didn't actually end up on their ignore list.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)Ghost Dog
(16,881 posts)dimple
(56 posts)Response to Vattel (Reply #5)
cyberpj This message was self-deleted by its author.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)stop the corporatism and needless wars older generations have heaped upon us.
If that's too much to ask than feel free tell us to go our separate ways.
Response to Nuclear Unicorn (Reply #20)
cyberpj This message was self-deleted by its author.
Tanuki
(16,439 posts)you have had your whole life, before you were old enough to contribute, and were glad to do so. We are all in this together. No point in pitting one against the other or pretend it is a one-way flow of benefits from one group to the other.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)So don't expect the 'puppies' to vote for Hillary in the general.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)I really need to remember to use the sarcasm thingy.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)Vattel
(9,289 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Vattel
(9,289 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)ladjf
(17,320 posts)started long before I had ever heard of Bernie. But, I've had a malaise about American politics since Jack Kennedy, Bobby Kennedy, Malcolm X and Martin Luther King were murdered. I vividly recall the rigged election of 2000 when Republican thugs obstructed the vote counts in Florida and the SC gave the election to Bush. Justice O'Connor later in an interview said that she regretted her vote.
Then 9/11, the anti-Ir ag hysteria, the 24 hr period when the only civilian flights were the Bid Laden family members fleeing from the U.S, Bush flying around in his plane all day, the fact that it took our fighters hours to get to New York from their bases,
on the same day as 9-11, our air force was carrying out a training mission simulating an attack on one of your cities, all the FAA traffic control tapes were immediately erased because we need the tape space, CIA connections to a Berlin Bank that involved stock transactions related to pre-knowledge of 9-11.
And, moving on into the present, Republican candidates who are so dangerous, ignorant and obviously unqualified to led America makes is appear that maybe Republicans weren't in charge of their own campaign. A narcissistic, politically ignorant carnival barker is in the lead to likely become President, while the Dem field a candidate who has become fabulously wealthy by donations from big business because "she is such a talented speaker" is leading the Dems primary. My long political relationship with Sec. Clinton has convinced me that she is not the person we need at this time. She seems to have cast her lot with her benefactors.
This "old person" greatly admires the judgment of our young people, who are flocking to hear about a revolution that must begin soon if we are ever going to have any hope of regaining control of the Government for all the people. They don't want another 40 years of general political decline where the rate of wealth acquisition for the very rich is multiplying exponentially, a situation that if allowed to continued can only end in the most devastating serious of events.
The body of this revolution will continue to grow and mature. If not now, in the future, I believe that they will prevail because they are among the first to have fully realized what a criminal enterprise our Government has become and will have the intellect, energy and COURAGE to do whatever it takes to bring down the greedy, crazy, megalomaniacs who are now in control.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)ladjf
(17,320 posts)some thoughts I've been having lately. If space had permitted I would have expanded. But, I'm not a good enough writer to feel that I can just fill up space on DU with my philosophical ramblings.
Ghost Dog
(16,881 posts)Thanks.
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)Response to Vattel (Reply #2)
liberal_at_heart This message was self-deleted by its author.
Qutzupalotl
(15,811 posts)by lifting the cap. Hillary has also recently started talking about this, but we need down-ticket success to make it happen, and I doubt she can deliver there.
ladjf
(17,320 posts)The relative extra money then paid by the rich will be "pocket change". But, to the insanely greedy, that far too much. Not so much the value of the money itself, but the strict control that the rich desire over the masses. The egotistical rich love their special social status and will fight vigorously to maintain status quo.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
ladjf
(17,320 posts)in the future , I'm never voting for any candidate who I believe to be politically dishonest.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
SamKnause
(14,891 posts)I support Bernie 100%.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Bernie, all the way (and "no" on Hillary, regardless).
SamKnause
(14,891 posts)Write-in Bernie or vote green for me.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)For Hillary but will NOT destroy the country I love and let repukes have it. I will vote For Bernie should he be the nominee.
ladjf
(17,320 posts)Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)<yawn>
datguy_6
(176 posts)What can be done?
ladjf
(17,320 posts)Which leads me to comment that I believe the root of racism is as an effective tool for dividing and conquering. If just by innuendo one can convince many others that the members of a certain race are somehow inferior to "our race", then the competition for social resources such as jobs, political offices, and other important social connections is dramatically decreased. (The late Malcolm X discussed this idea extensively and intelligently). For the haves, this leads toward a caste system , that once in place, serves and the social structure blueprint that can remain for many years. (India , for instance)
kgnu_fan
(3,021 posts)So with my own experience, various polls on news do not reflect reality. Today, I went to a coffee shop where Bernie volunteers are coming to pick up materials. Those volunteers were of all ages, gender and class... so there are some gap between polls and the reality on the ground. Everyone seems happy and gun-ho about their task knocking neighbor's doors....!!!!
ladjf
(17,320 posts)that is higher than one usually finds in the Southern states. (I was born and raised in the South.)
olddots
(10,237 posts)shall us boomers blame this on the Bosa Nova ?
TIME TO PANIC
(1,894 posts)Older voters are likely to rely more on corporate media, while younger voters get most of their info from the internet/social media. This is why the establishment candidate is doing better with the older voters, and the anti-establishment candidate is doing better with the younger voters.
ladjf
(17,320 posts)might be over-generalizing the thought processes of older voters.
I believe the more accurate statement would have been "Many older voters are likely to rely more on corporate media."
I've got some good news people who are not , as yet, one of the "older people".
Many maturing people, if their physical health is good, will continue to improve their cognitive processes for as long as the good health continues. Those continued cognitive processes allow them to connect relationships between all things that are directly observable.
And that includes such social activities as politics. Their thinking skills may also include experiences of love, creativity and world view enabling them to achieve a wonderful sense of being connected to everything, or to put it another way, to feel "at one" with
the Universe in a realistic way. This is not quite up to the level of "Nirvana" as the Buddhist teach but close.
TIME TO PANIC
(1,894 posts)There are quite a few senior-citizens on DU, many of them are a zillion times sharper than I could ever hope to be.
One thing I failed to mention in my previous post is that, it's not just generational when it comes to who gets their information from where. Income may have just as much an influence on where people get their information from. The poor have to rely more on corporate media because they can't afford access to other sources. Ever noticed how poorer states (especially in the south) vote against their own interest.
ladjf
(17,320 posts)to do my "rant" about what many older people experience. I called myself adding to your very good post. Thanks.
TIME TO PANIC
(1,894 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Which is better than nothing, but not by much, and really only benefits the big pharma companies. It does not provode any protection under federal statute to medical marijuana patients, who can still be sent to federal prison for using cannabis in their own homes.
She has made an oral committment to not proactively go in and overturn various states legalizatiom regimes, but the conflict between federal and state law- not just in the 4 (and counting) states that have legalized for recreational use, but also the half or so that have medical mj laws- will need to be resolved sooner or later.
Given that most Americans now support legalization, including heavily skewed numbers towards younger voters, this is an issue she could "evolve" on sooner rather than later.
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)Arazi
(8,885 posts)Bernie got 15%.
He's generating excitement amongst the millennials. We destroy that at our peril
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Bernie... all the way to the convention.
Trajan
(19,089 posts)A solid Bernie VOTE at age 59 .... There was never any question ....
Response to datguy_6 (Original post)
cyberpj This message was self-deleted by its author.
datguy_6
(176 posts)So hoe can Bernie change that?
Response to datguy_6 (Reply #47)
cyberpj This message was self-deleted by its author.
Dem2
(8,178 posts)Who knew?
Response to Dem2 (Reply #57)
cyberpj This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to datguy_6 (Original post)
cyberpj This message was self-deleted by its author.
anotherproletariat
(1,446 posts)There are some hard-core Bernie supporters who clearly would rather see a repub win than vote for Hillary, but by and large, I think this problem will solve itself.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)It's that we think Hillary IS a repub.
Robbins
(5,066 posts)destrucon of social security and medicare.nothing will be done to save them.Clinton has made clear she won't raise a penny in taxes
so the future bankruptcy of ss and medicare are now on schedule.
people on SS can forget about ever getting a cost of living increase again.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)Last edited Sat Feb 27, 2016, 10:37 PM - Edit history (1)
Do you have a link to her platform that does?
Robbins
(5,066 posts)both will go bankrupt.and she has shown she is unwilling to raise the cap to make rich more more.
where do you think money will come for to pay for more wars? Cuting social safety net that's where.
I don't care what her so called platform says I know the truth of clinton.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)Robbins
(5,066 posts)now that they handed nomination to her.
Nomination fight and election is over.clinton won nomination,and trump wins election.
after i vote for bernie in Missouri primary i stay home.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)for your choices...unlike how black voters have been treated by Bernie supporters.
Shameful!
I'll me here to remind you of your decision should Trump win and you complain about how things are as a result.
Have a great evening.
Robbins
(5,066 posts)I will be screwed over regardless.
I live in Missouri.my vote as liberal is just about useless.
but there you go calling bernie supporters racist just like clinton supporters did to bernie and those who support him.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)votes? Now you tell me that you live in a Red state.
I would never discount your vote because of that.
I live in an overwhelmingly Blue state and I believe that my vote matters just as much as yours.
Robbins
(5,066 posts)trump like romeny will carry missouri easily.I am stuck in f-ing tea party congressional district.of course bill clinton called me one.
why should a support another prosecutor for governor.one of those who gave blind eye to ferguson whitewash.yep not all bernie
supporters are the racists we have been called.some even voted for obama.
Clinton as nominee makes it easy for me to stay home.
Ghost Dog
(16,881 posts)... And, are your stats from MSM exit polls, which are all I've seen so far, or from the official count?
Cobalt Violet
(9,976 posts)She can start acting like a Democrat even when she thinks no one is looking.
CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)I have many friends my age who support Sanders. The old guard is on its way out. After Clinton clinches the nomination and then loses the general election maybe there will be more change.
As for the current state of the democratic party vs the republican party I give you this final line from Animal Farm
The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
monicaangela
(1,508 posts)Baby Boomers and even some Gen-Xers should think seriously about who is going to have to live under the rules and regulations of government the longest. Who the policies of those elected to office are going to effect the most in the long run, and take into consideration the reasons why more Millennials prefer one candidate over the other.
I am a Baby Boomer, my children are Gen-Xers, my grandchildren are millennials, and we are all voting for Bernie Sanders.
BainsBane
(57,751 posts)datguy_6
(176 posts)Given last night results, I would stunned if Sanders got more than 35% in GA, AL, MS, LA or TN...
betsuni
(29,054 posts)RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)My hunch is that many people who grew up in the era of the Fairness Doctrine remain under the mistaken impression that television is still a reliable source for news. Unfortunately, it isn't. But it's a great source for corporate propaganda.

(As is National Petroleum Radio, by the way.)
krawhitham
(5,072 posts)BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)I am a boomer who does get Bernie Sanders despite being reasonably well off financially. I understand why millennials get him. This article is right on the money.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)Zorra
(27,670 posts)if we want to attract more Baby Boomers and GG to the Bernie campaign.
(Speaking from experience gleaned over many decades of observation)

DrDan
(20,411 posts)they just don't show up
BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)I don't get why a generation that is getting shafted like they are would not be storming the polls.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)then get out your damned vote. :shrug; You have all these "overwhelming" numbers in those demos -- make 'em count! I'll vote for Bernie if you guys can win the nom, but you're not doing a great job right now.
Samantha
(9,314 posts)and so are most of my friends.
Sam