2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSore winner Hillary Clinton lied to the American people about Bernie Sanders
Last edited Sun Feb 28, 2016, 03:39 PM - Edit history (1)
...in her victory speech by falsely portraying him as a "single issue" candidate who only wants to break up Big Banks.
Over the past year, Hillary Clinton has done multiple debates with Bernie Sanders, and given speeches at multiple state Democratic party fundraisers in which Bernie Sanders also gave speeches.
She knows that Bernie Sanders cares deeply about:
- free healthcare
- free tuition
- climate change
- campaign finance reform
- expanding Social Security
- reducing the number of people in prison
- paid Family and Medical Leave
Hillary Clinton said in her victory speech that we need "more love and kindness in our hearts and more respect," but she doesn't have the decency to refrain from lying about Bernie Sanders to the American people.
yourpaljoey
(2,166 posts)Response to yourpaljoey (Reply #1)
Post removed
stonecutter357
(13,045 posts)Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)And to her minions, It just doesn't matter. Only winning matters - at any cost.
If Hillary is the Nom. She looses and we have a republicans in the WH.
The most depressing discovery about the brain, ever
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/02/the-most-depressing-discovery-about-the-brain-ever/#.VtMdRZtVt0c.facebook

Duval
(4,280 posts)Dang, that is depressing. So, no matter what I have told my son (Republican) it goes in one ear and out the other in terms of critical thinking.
Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)to the lizard brain
Broward
(1,976 posts)redstateblues
(10,565 posts)Broward
(1,976 posts)rather than just some of the time then yeah, she's been easy.
DUbeornot2be
(367 posts)...has to breathe every once in awhile...
The Wielding Truth
(11,433 posts)When she could not confirm Barack as a Christian when she attended prayer breakfasts with him, she lost me last time she ran.
I can not forget that she sided with the B* mind bending trick to send us into Iraq. Why can't she just be open to the reality that if we don't make big changes we will reach a point of no return. She is not as smart as President Obama and I can only hope that her game is not to placate us and then woo the right wing and the wealthy.
She has done it before.
Bernie is honest and he can see where this country has been heading. Without a major correction we will crown King Trump and be subjects to his will.
Why are we so afraid to stop the stupid greedy and self centered?
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)you actually made me laugh out loud.
downeastdaniel
(497 posts)BreakfastClub
(765 posts)polly7
(20,582 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)polly7
(20,582 posts)Jitter65
(3,089 posts)bvf
(6,604 posts)Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)bvf
(6,604 posts)I just found the naïveté of the post so charming that I couldn't resist.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)all the lies she would have to tell to do that would take herself down. All she has done so far is to misrepresent and lie about Bernie, even when they are shown to be lies she still tells them. . .. and has her daughter do it too.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)gushing like a regional manager to make you think she gives a shit about poor people. Not.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)dchill
(42,660 posts)notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)I just can't believe how far some people will take this.
elmac
(4,642 posts)who else will trickle on us, make us grow???
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)I can now trickle on my self. No help needed from the 1%.
yuiyoshida
(45,415 posts)Bernie is such a bully... how can a bank do any serious business with that Bernie BRUTE threatening their very livelihood!!!
Bernie!!! Leave those poor banks alone!!!!!!!!!
cascadiance
(19,537 posts)
yuiyoshida
(45,415 posts)Lucinda
(31,170 posts)And money isnt the solution for everything.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)nt
Karma13612
(4,982 posts)I wish we could see how much people earn, and compare to who they support on the democratic side.
People who don't feel concerned about Hillary being our president might just fit into that category of making over $50 K per year.
If you make less than that, or are scraping by with large debt from school, etc, I cannot believe you are thrilled to have Hillary as our President.
But that's just me.
I haven't cracked 50K per year, I sweat all expenses, and am 4 years from retirement.
A Hillary presidency is scaring the crap out of me.
LibDemAlways
(15,139 posts)teacher, and I work only a few days a month because my first priority is tending to my 93-year-old mother. I took reduced Social Security when I turned 62 last year because I was barely scraping by and getting pretty desperate.
Hillary is not interested in people like me, nor does she have the faintest clue what it's like to incur late charges on a bill because it came due one day before the SS check out of which it would be paid arrived.
Bernie is the only candidate who understands the everyday struggles of the ordinary person and is willing to fight for change that will benefit the 99%. He's certainly by far our best hope this time around.
Karma13612
(4,982 posts)As others have been saying, those supporting our corporate candidate are either not hurting, or just don't realize what she stands for.
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)are primarily focused on their candidate's gender as a reason the DESERVE to serve.
Karma13612
(4,982 posts)lostnfound
(17,520 posts)We can't be "America" without a strong, large middle class.
And there are plenty of low income people who support Hillary.
How many Hillary supporters have read Naomi Klein or listen to Democracy Now or read much of Noam Chomsky?
There are times when I picture the middle and bottom rungs of American society as being dead or nearly dead, and the 0.5% intend to keep feeding off the decaying carcass. It's not a very pretty picture but the politicians argue about whether to keep the body on life support or to go for the kill.
Hell, I COULD have been a libertarian if I hadn't witnessed 36 years of unrestrained lethal greed. The ship has sailed on that one, starting with the "Free Trade Agreements".
Karma13612
(4,982 posts)Eric J in MN
(35,639 posts)...do all involve money. But they're three issues. Almost every political issue involves money.
Karma13612
(4,982 posts)everything in this country.
Our social safety nets are in jeopardy, and we have to pay for healthcare.
As the old saying goes:
"Money talks, nobody walks".
In this country, the only way you even get on radar is if you can 'carry your own weight'.
If you aren't an especially intelligent person, or maybe disabled, you will struggle in a very money-centric society.
In other European countries or in Great Britain, at least you know your healthcare is covered even if you are unemployed. And people are more apt to pick jobs and careers they want instead of the one that will pay them the most, and also provide them healthcare coverage.
For a huge portion of the 99%, enuf money to survive is a solution.
It might not bring happiness, but it will reduce stress.
JBoy
(8,021 posts)You can reduce everything to money if you want to. The human body has a value, either in salvageable functioning organs or raw chemicals.
Hillary is trying to paint Bernie as a "single issue" income-redistributor. It's bullshit, Hillary knows it, and any thinking progressive knows it.
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)More often than not, every question he answers, seems to come back to the evils big money.
He may be branching out now that the criticism has been made, so the last debate may be different, but it is what has been happening.
PADemD
(4,482 posts)He talks about climate change, a woman's reproductive choice, reforming the criminal justice system, student debt, fixing our crumbling infrastructure, homelessness and childhood poverty in the richest country in the world, and opposition to our disastrous trade deals (NAFTA, CAFTA, and the TPP), among other things.
Most important, I like that Bernie voted against the Iraq war. He's not a war monger.
Yes, Bernie talks about offshoring of jobs, corporations paying zero taxes, and the 1% hiding their money in the Cayman Islands. What's wrong with that?
It's time to take care of our own country and stop meddling in other countries' (Latin America & Middle East) affairs for our "interests."
mdbl
(8,650 posts)like all the domestic positions have.
dimple
(56 posts)JoeyT
(6,785 posts)and isn't worried in the slightest about being hungry in the future. For people that don't have it? Money *IS* everything.
Karma13612
(4,982 posts)laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)Are the opressors in this just for fun?
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)when they told him money wasn't the answer to all their problems.
Money is only a part of the issue in dealing with systemic racism in this country.
cascadiance
(19,537 posts)Need to study your history a bit. It was when he was working on both inequality and civil rights that he spiritually believed in both that the PTB felt even more threatened in their dominance over us and when he coincidentally was taken out then sadly for all of us.
Bernie's trying to fight that fight, but apparently some feel that we should ignore economic disparity as a solution just because those in power feel that we shouldn't tackle the inequality which is at the root of civil rights and so many other problems in our country.
They like socially dividing us, because they know that's the way they keep their power that could unite to change things...
Especially for all of those many AA people in prison now for non-violent drug crimes disproportionately that Bernie IS listening to, but Hillary's campaign IS NOT when she accepts funding from prison industrial complex lobbyists.
I could go on, but the point is, if you are going to try and say he's not listening to AA voters, listen yourself to those like Killer Mike who understands like MLK did, that this is all of our battle, and need to work with someone that really means for us to have changes, and not just be pandered to.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)Clinton has a huge, undesrved advantage with Black voters because her supposed black husband and his hood pass. Sanders has the most complex and comphrensive racial justice plank. I was impressed wgen I read it, and not much impresses me. Bernie needs not only to get his message out, but he also has to overcome the disinformation from the Clinton camp and its surrogates. They have been working to distort from the beginning.
Arazi
(8,887 posts)"Who is Bernie Sanders?...I don't have time to do any research"
Jitter65
(3,089 posts)He really is working hard for only them and they know it. That is where most of his support comes from plus hating Hillary.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)Really...not even worthy of a response.
cs1058
(18 posts)You are absolutely correct.
The guy in the off the rack suits, self funding via individual contributions, refusing PAC money who has to defend the label of democratic socialist who wants free college tuition is SECRETLY working behind the scenes for white males in the high middle income bracket. The guy pushing for a $15 minimum wage.
Yes, all the above is so he can be a clandestine advocate for those high middle income white males.
FangedNoumenom
(145 posts)Aka "Fuck you, I got mine!"
AllyCat
(18,842 posts)"You can't just throw money at the problem and expect it to go away". Usually, that type of voter is talking about giving money to schools and other public entities. Here is a Democrat saying we can't pay people a fair wage and expect to solve our problems.
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)bullshit out of it this time.
After all it's not like facts matter to a certain group.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)lostnfound
(17,520 posts)Why are the luxuries portrayed in that movie unavailable to the American people?
geardaddy
(25,392 posts)Amazing movie.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)Hillary supporters seem to live in an alternate universe where money is irrelevant to their lives. I don't live in that universe.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)The Clintons are in the top 1% of the top 1% and some think they really care about something other than wealth and power. Maybe they will let the peons have "cake".
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)and headed for a beach somewhere. Or maybe dabbled in painting like Junior.
Instead we have The Clinton Global Initiative, Hillary working for the citizens of New York in the US Senate, and then her joining the administration as SOS. Like it or not, Hillary is a public servant down to her toes.
When she retired at State, she did what just about any one of us would have done, she took the opportunity to earn money speaking while there was still any interest in what she had to say. I have no idea what she intended to do before she was encouraged to run for POTUS again, but I suspect she had plans for the money she earned, beyond sitting around and eating bonbons.
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)All she does is lie. I will not give a shit what she does if she's the nominee. It's going to fun watching her melt.
840high
(17,196 posts)Nyan
(1,192 posts)There are two politicians I can't stand watching or hearing for more than 5 seconds. And that's Hillary Clinton and Ted Cruz. I've had enough of her lying.
msongs
(73,754 posts)Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Shocking, huh?
Karma13612
(4,982 posts)Petrushka
(3,709 posts)jonestonesusa
(880 posts)Alienation from the political process at that level, despite the full court press by James Clyburn and others.
I hope the Clinton voters and surrogates make sure she follows through with access and policy support if she wins.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Sanders is trying to shine a light on the truth. She's doing her damnedest to obscure it.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)Let's hope it is before the GE, not after.
oasis
(53,694 posts)way too many stunts by his campaign. Weaver and Tad Devine had better cool it.
polly7
(20,582 posts)whose sole goal has to make a movement by and for the people invisible from the start - then when it was finally noticed, chose to fucking lie about anything and everything they thought they could get away with? Do you think Sanders should be some kind of martyr? He knows suffering, he's fought against it and inequality all his life. He's never strayed off message and has more integrity and honesty in his little finger than Clinton and all her wealthy backers at a Goldman Sachs Christmas party do combined .
(I'd go for the jugular) - but as to 'going negative' Sanders has really NOT. He's brought forth history that voters have a right to know and talks about the issues that will decide they and their grandchildren's fates. Too bad, too sad if that's considered negative (and I imagine only by those comfortable with the status quo).
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)You can get red in the face about DU comments, as we just love to give each other what for, however, it is baseless to name one stunt.
A real stunt is taking those blinders off.
oasis
(53,694 posts)union impostors wasn't a stunt.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)... that is, if you can actually find the incident. Reference?
Take the blinders off. Don't bait people to talk about Nevada stunts, or Iowa stunts where caucus goers were allowed in before declaring who they were committed to. You also don't want to talk about the stunts of stealing the actual positions on issues that Sanders has taken, which morph into issues that Clinton suddenly agrees.
oasis
(53,694 posts)for accidentally accessing Hillary's campaign data? You DO remember that, don't you?
C'mon now.
liberal from boston
(856 posts)Please-- Suggest you do not go there. Sanders Campaign was the one who notified DWS of the problem (BTW happened before & again Sanders campaign alerted DWS.) Debbie Wasserman Shultz immediately shut down access to files. Senator Sanders was able to get a Federal Judge that day for a hearing. What happened next -- DWS backed down & access was granted. In the debates Senator Sanders repeatedly asked for an independent thorough investigation. Hillary did say yes. Where are the results of that investigation--crickets??? Sad that Clinton campaign uses Karl Rove methods.
oasis
(53,694 posts)MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)Still awaiting the source...
oasis
(53,694 posts)Now the goalpost gets moved further back. I'll take your non denial of the two as proof of my assertion, and move on.
Have a nice day
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)You have no source... goes along with credibility.
You are posting lies that are based on your favorite liars. That's got to be such a low bar for mentality... You sure you aren't stumping for the Trump? What an embarrassment.
oasis
(53,694 posts)MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)... has been where your head is.
I hope you've inspected it well!
oasis
(53,694 posts)He forgot why he was fired. Must be contagious.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)Why don't you form a committee and look into contagions...
Another stupid waste of time, so welcome to the ignore list I've long cared to remember.
May you find meaning there.
jfern
(5,204 posts)oasis
(53,694 posts)MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)Just baiting...
I call it mentally masturbating, and I'm through talking to people who throw out unsubstantiated "drive-by" claims without basing it on any source.
Go back to 5th grade and learn citizenship when conversing to people in the Democratic party. You're embarrassing yourself.
oasis
(53,694 posts)No source needed on that fact.
dimple
(56 posts)oasis
(53,694 posts)jfern
(5,204 posts)INdemo
(7,024 posts)That is the Karl Rove/Lee Atwater way ..Hillary/David Brock will ATTACK..ATTACK..ATTACK and then when the Sanders campaign answers back in a way to see set the record straight the the Clinton campaign will say on one of the corporate news networks ..Bernie Sanders attacked me or Bernie attacked my position on Wall Street. and they get away with it Cause its the Hillary networks
This is what the right wing advisers like David Brock and John Podesta do. David Brock actually went on CNN and lied about Bernie Sanders Healthcare plan and in the process of talking about Socialism he dropped the label Marxist/Communist and got away with with it...Even George Steponapolis (who by the way contributed a considerable amount to her PAC as well as personal contributions) must have read from the same script becasue he too labeled Bernie Sanders a Socialist (never a Democratic-Socialist) and also a Marxist-Communist...on "This Week"
George is so far in the Tank for Hillary on his show that when this campaign is over it's going to take a Huge Rescue Squad and Recitation team to get him out.
So yes WTF are you talking about....Weaver and Tad Devine have answered Hillary and the Right wing Attacks from her Karl Rove advisors and have never attacked her,except talk about issues. Hillary Clinton cannot talk about the issues cause she cant get ahead of Bernie Sanders on his stance on the The Too Big to fail Banks,or the Wage inequality,the Healthcare plan(which the Clinton campaign lies about,especially Bill) The Private prison issue,which Hillary wont talk about because the Prision network owns her, and the list goes on.
Sure he talks about Hillary's Wall St connection and should..And yes the list goes on and on.
So when you are talking about Attacks you need to look around and see the Karl Rove masters Daivid Brock,John Podesta,yes even Bill Clinton... and their Karl Rove right wing tactics at work.
oasis
(53,694 posts)The 20 year old, Super Predator "bring them to heel story". Nina Turner was on CNN last Thursday going all negative and nasty on Hillary.
Apparently, the degree of their negativity was a turnoff to SC voters.
Response to oasis (Reply #64)
INdemo This message was self-deleted by its author.
INdemo
(7,024 posts)about SC voters
oasis
(53,694 posts)Petrushka
(3,709 posts)polly7
(20,582 posts)of lives and led to the pipeline to profit-prison system has consequences. Welfare reform breaking up families forcing young women and men to work at low-paying jobs that kept them in crushing poverty - have people recovered from that yet?
What is she planning on DOING to correct these consequences - releasing people serving life sentences for an ounce of marijuana?, paying reparations to families hurt by any of this?
WHEN should someone's ugly history not matter anymore?
malletgirl02
(1,523 posts)The lives of the little people don't matter to Clinton supporters. Facts about the policies supported will not make inroads.
polly7
(20,582 posts)policies have hurt people in the U.S. and all around the world - by the millions. Their 'histories' and the lack of concern for any of it by their supporters just fucking baffles me. They must be comfortable with the status quo - either that or they really don't give a shit about the little people/expendables anywhere.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)And when anyone else DOES bring up her scurrilous past, she screams "VICTIM"!!
Sickening
Karma13612
(4,982 posts)Tacking FULL advantage of it.
Bernie needs more surrogates.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)We must shake people from their misconceptions.
Karma13612
(4,982 posts)Lucinda
(31,170 posts)If he seriously wanted AA support, having a man who constantly denigrated a beloved president, was a boneheaded move of epic proportions. And the fact that Sanders didn't know it would be a problem, shows me how out of touch he is.
jfern
(5,204 posts)oasis
(53,694 posts)Going negative.
jfern
(5,204 posts)noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)Bernie is racist? Pure Clintonism.
oasis
(53,694 posts)PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)trashing Berne for talking about Wall St./GS corruption & greed.
I guess those all "speaking fees" are paying off for the 1%.
Barack_America
(28,876 posts)onecaliberal
(36,594 posts)Liar
casperthegm
(643 posts)and pretend none of this happened, right?
SammyWinstonJack
(44,316 posts)having to run againt her. Smh
mindem
(1,580 posts)GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)pacalo
(24,857 posts)Bernie is about many issues. Hillary thinks there's only one issue -- the banks with a carte blanche relationship with the legislature, running amok at the expense of the most vulnerable -- because the banks happen to be a large part of Hillary's number one issue: protecting the 1%.
Integrity -- one candidate has it & the other doesn't.
anotherproletariat
(1,446 posts)Step back for a minute and think about how you would approach a campaign. We know that only doing positive campaigning does not work with everyone. In some way you have to point out the weaknesses of your opponent. What would you have said if you were trying to beat Bernie? Clearly the Big Bank issue is one that people most associate with him, and since most people don't listen carefully (or much at all) to speeches, it was an easy, relatable thing to use.
Eric J in MN
(35,639 posts)NT
anotherproletariat
(1,446 posts)devious in her speech transcripts during his speech? They are still competing with each other. If I was him I would keep using that same attack, because it is the best thing he has. Just as Hillary calling him a one issue candidate seems to work for her. Bernie has no proof, he is just floating it to see if it works, and she is using his main talking point against him. Seems like pretty tame politics to me.
Eric J in MN
(35,639 posts)...that wouldn't mean most of her campaign is meaningless. Maybe the fraction of her campaign about getting tough on Wall St.
If Bernie Sanders doesn't care about Single Payer health care, free tuition, increasing the number of jobs, etc. that would mean most of his campaign is meaningless.
Martin Eden
(15,629 posts)No matter how you spin it.
oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)polly7
(20,582 posts)BreakfastClub
(765 posts)people have a tough time with a woman being direct and competing the way men do. Many think women should be nice, but let me tell you: Politics is not "nice," and Hillary does not have to be nice to her competition.
polly7
(20,582 posts)How it that being kind??
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)Bernie's the one going from college campus to college campus raising the hopes of impressionable college students with visions of free tuition, a $15/hr national minimum wage and Medicare for all knowing that the republican-controlled House in the next presidency won't even allow these issues to be debated on the floor of the House. You know what they say about glass houses.
retrowire
(10,345 posts)elljay
(1,178 posts)Is raising the hopes of her followers that she will achieve her very modest agenda because she can get things done. The Republicans, who LOVE her almost as much as Satan will bend over backwards to not oppose everything she does, right? In your dreams. The only thing she will accomplish is to pass legislation that helps her Wall Street pals.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)NO WE CAN"T
NO WE CAN'T
NO WE CAN'T
NO WE CAN'T
(but every other first world country can)
See how crazy your side sounds?
Herman4747
(1,825 posts)...so when control of Congress and the Presidency shifts in your favor, you're in a notably better position to implement what you wish.
For example, when Obamacare passed early in Barack Obama's first term, it had been helped along by Democrats favoring expansion of the number of people with health care coverage since the early 1990s (or some might even say since the late 1940s). How would it have been like if out of the blue Democrats announced "let's increase the number of people covered?", after failing to push for it earlier? Would it not seem to some like 15% without health care coverage is not so consequential? Recall that Obamacare just barely passed, and this was helped by the fact that people thought high numbers of uninsured was an ongoing problem.
All in it together
(275 posts)We should have an education system that has free tuition through state universities like we did 25 or 30 years ago. Reagan and his ideas changed that. Instead we have a system that puts college students into debt that can't be discharged in bankruptcy. Hillary likes this system, it helps her banker friends. So honest Abe doesn't agree with Hillary.
Hey if we give up without trying, the repubs can push the party even further right. Hillary is profiting off of that, see her and hubbies speeches to the too big to fail banks.
We should work to get those Repubs out of congress and Bernie in the Presidency to get anything done
Iwillnevergiveup
(9,298 posts)May I call you All?
WELCOME!
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)infrastructure, no wars, decent wages, while H. Clinton is promising higher and higher profits for Wall Street.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)I cannot vote against my conscience. One candidate represents the TPP, Wall St, and the like. Why would I vote for my abusers? Wall St stole my house and $70k from me in an illegal and fraudulent scheme. I am NOT playing victim here. I *WAS a victim.
sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)Halleluja!
NCjack
(10,297 posts)- free healthcare
- free tuition
- climate change
- campaign finance reform
- expanding Social Security
- reducing the number of people in prison
So, getting the money out of politics is not a single issue.
retrowire
(10,345 posts)Deadshot
(384 posts)She says she's a progressive. She's lying.
She says she has nothing to hide with her speeches to big banks. She's lying.
Her whole campaign is nothing but lies just to get elected.
dchill
(42,660 posts)Not her and her campaign. That's what she means.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Against liberals, liberalism, and the entire democratic party success of the last seventy years. She proudly admitted she won't even attempt to do anything about the problems we have.
WayBeyondBlue
(86 posts)my shocked face. She tries to tell the truth, honest! Said so herself!
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)List Of - Publicly Disclosed - HRC Speeches And Fees - $ 21,667,000 - A True One Percenter
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-02-27/snowden-sums-presidential-campaign-just-one-tweet

arikara
(5,562 posts)$21,667,000...
She's such a money grubber I wonder why she wants to bother with the president job to begin with.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
6chars
(3,967 posts)it allows her to fight for you.
mikehiggins
(5,614 posts)I mean just thinking the words "quid quo pro", or "bribe" or "corruption" is just men's secret code for saying they don't like HRC.
I agree with Sanders. These companies ain't that smart. They're just throwing their money around for the hell of it.
Riiiiiiggghhhhtttt....
TheUndecider
(93 posts)I thought we where talking 3 speeches for $650k.
You telling me not one person from one of those meetings has a recording!
Maybe Trump already holding them for a rainy day?
Buns_of_Fire
(19,161 posts)And they even paid more than many of the others! Will there be a Jellystone Campground in our future?
I can't imagine paying any of the Clintons $260,000 just to hear about their experiences in the Great Outdoors.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
Buns_of_Fire
(19,161 posts)CdnExtraNational
(105 posts)So that campgrounds can continue hiring camp counselors from the Philippines for $2.77 an hour.
Maybe this was a thank you as much as a quid pro quo.
Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)Uncle Joe
(65,137 posts)Thanks for the thread, Eric J in MN.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)I'm a Bernie supporter who has found some other Bernie supporters kinda tacky, but that's kinda tacky as well.
Eric J in MN
(35,639 posts)NT
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)kath
(10,565 posts)Tacky.
But that's her, all the way.
Zorro
(18,692 posts)Poor butthurt Berniacs can't come to grips that their candidate was crushed in the SC primary, so they continue to find some slight in whatever Clinton says.
And their howling will be deafening three days from now.
malletgirl02
(1,523 posts)and see how that works out for Hillary Clinton in the general election if she wins the primary.
Response to malletgirl02 (Reply #73)
Post removed
malletgirl02
(1,523 posts)if she wins the primary, but I have to admit you are making very hard since you engaged in personal insults. I will vote for her, but I will not give any money or work for her.
Contrary1
(12,629 posts)yuiyoshida
(45,415 posts)AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
Mail Message
On Sat Feb 27, 2016, 11:28 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Don't like the taste of your own medicine?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1359642
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
This post contains insults.
JURY RESULTS
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Feb 27, 2016, 11:35 PM, and the Jury voted 5-2 to HIDE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Ridiculously hostile.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: asshole
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Disgusting. If this is how "Hillbots" react when winning an easily predictable redstate, can you imagine how they will view liberals if they win the nomination? Again, disgusting.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: There are insults in this thread, time to chill, we are better than this.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It's not this post that's insulting. Leave It!
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
Cannot reply to automated messages
Alert abuse Delete this DU Mail
Response to Zorro (Reply #67)
Zorra This message was self-deleted by its author.
PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)good lord. hey I'm not a single issue voter if I was I'd be Republican all the way. She keeps pushing that smart people are gonna start thinking what else does she lie about
zappaman
(20,627 posts)
democrank
(12,598 posts)I recently lost my other half, a Vietnam Vet, so this chart is very helpful.
When I first read it, I thought you were making a joke about grief, but on second thought....that would be a deplorable thing to do.
SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)It would be hard to believe we have people here doing that
jfern
(5,204 posts)Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Her attacking Bernie for voting for the Commodities Futures Act which HER HUSBAND'S ADVISER AND HER OWN CAMPAIGN ECONOMIC ADVISER, GENSLER, placed into an omnibus budget bill that had to be passed at the last minute or close to it in 2000.
Hillary attacks Bernie and lies about what he stands for.
She has utterly lost my vote. I will vote for every other Democrat on my ballot but not for Hillary. I think she has a bad character. She herself is unfair and greedy. How can she tell others to be fair and generous and kind?
Doesn't make sense to me.
I'm 100% for Bernie.
If Hillary runs as the Democratic candidate, Democrats have no hope of winning in November. And that is a dangerous situation in my view.
senseandsensibility
(24,974 posts)Female or not, HER words make it hard for a fellow female to support her.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)n/t
ellennelle
(614 posts)to me, this is all about character.
those who claim she is more "qualified" seem to overlook the fact that obama was no more qualified 8 years ago.
she's certainly qualified to keep us tacking hard to the right with the "middle" way.
i'll take bernie's character over her so-called "qualifications" every day of the week.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)ericson00
(2,707 posts)royal strength will be able to take on Donald Trump.
nc4bo
(17,651 posts)Yes Hillary Rodham Clinton, you are indeed a liar.
PatrickforO
(15,426 posts)Clinton is trying to completely co-opt Bernie to get her through the primary, after which as a CNN pundit said, she will do what they call 'pivot' to the right.
Just more bullshit. I'm with Bernie and will continue to support him until either he wins by votes, which he definitely still can, and/or until the criminal indictment we all know is brewing is issued for Clinton.
Chicago1980
(1,968 posts)It's this back and forth contentious crap that's really not needed.
Beacool
(30,518 posts)Beowulf
(761 posts)Which candidate is more likely to try to break the stranglehold the oligarchy has on what actually gets done in Washington? No one's issues are going to be dealt with in any meaningful way until the 99% can set the agenda. Otherwise, it's a rigged game and and governing is merely theatre.
antigop
(12,778 posts)Beowulf
(761 posts)antigop
(12,778 posts)Historic NY
(40,037 posts)sister_rosa_refried
(447 posts)Butt hurt? Is that it?
malletgirl02
(1,523 posts)oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)All of it is unnecessary -- the manipulations and side swipes and lies and massive control issues. The lies and negativity got to me about six weeks ago. Tonight just re-ignited my frustration with the Clinton clique.
TryLogic
(2,291 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)You know how she is.
Carlo Marx
(98 posts)Something Paul Krugman said during the 2012 Republican primaries also comes to mind. Since Krugman has shown himself to be such a whiny hack, and taken so many cheap shots at Sanders, I'll borrow a comment he made about Newt Gingrich. Hillary Clinton is "a stupid person's idea of what a smart person sounds like." To be clear, I fully acknowledge Hillary to be "wicked smart." It's her ideas and manner of persuasion, and worldview that I consider to be a joke. Gingrich also has a brain, but the crap he peddles is embarrassing.
LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)In November for the Neo-Democratic DNC Version os DWS and the Clinton's Party.
AzDar
(14,023 posts)FangedNoumenom
(145 posts)jillan
(39,451 posts)Ligyron
(8,006 posts)wow, gonna have to go find what it was she quoted.
Can't be that thing about rich people squeezing through the eye of a needle I'll bet.
Petrushka
(3,709 posts)But I'll do so after I post this reply.
Petrushka
(3,709 posts)She said it was one of her favorites.
I wonder if she realizes verse 7 is only one part of a thought/sentence that begins with verse 4.
Oh, well . . .
Ligyron
(8,006 posts)I'll check out the vid
FangedNoumenom
(145 posts)1 Corinthians
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)and integrity is what Bernie has.
The Midway Rebel
(2,191 posts)She learned from the best.
Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)She said her campaign is now driven by small donations. Really?...
Buns_of_Fire
(19,161 posts)FloridaBlues
(4,669 posts)stonecutter357
(13,045 posts)deutsey
(20,166 posts)and the issue is all about herself.
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)But then again, those aren't too good for Hillary.
Eric J in MN
(35,639 posts)Of course there are other aspects, such as whether we should let officials accept gifts, let them become lobbyists, etc.
Raster
(21,010 posts)Vinca
(53,994 posts)And I don't think she can win the general unless Trump causes lots of Republicans to vote for her. That's appropriate, of course, since she was half a Republican until Bernie dragged her to the left.
raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)TBF
(36,669 posts)LeFleur1
(1,197 posts)Paranoid reigns in the Sanders camp. Hillary mentioned Bernie in a nice way. Never once did she say he was a single issue candidate. She said America is more than a single issue, and even those who hear every word she says as coming from the devil have to dig deep to come up with an insult to Bernie in her speech.
Advice to those Bernie supporters who take everything anyone, who isn't a supporter, says about Bernie as an insult: Take a deep breath and try to surround yourself with really calming music and maybe l i s t e n to the words. Try to understand the actual words, not a faulty interpretation of the words.
malletgirl02
(1,523 posts)Eric J in MN
(35,639 posts)"America isn't a single issue country, my friends. We need more than a plan for the biggest banks."
Her words in her closing statement of the sixth debate: "I am not a single-issue candidate, and I do not believe we live in a single-issue country."
Her campaign created a YouTube video called "Single Issue" showing Bernie Sanders talking about Wall St and the rich:
I interpret Hillary Clinton as saying in her SC victory speech that Bernie Sander's only issue is breaking up the biggest banks.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)Moostache
(11,179 posts)I believe that the Democratic Party, and Bernie Sanders' campaign. would be better served by being more accurate in describing the policy positions being proposed.
It's not "FREE" as in "those Democrats are trying to GIVE YOUR MONEY TO THOSE BROWN PEOPLE" or "those Democrats are trying to GIVE FREE STUFF to buy votes". Bernie Sanders proposes tax increases, and more importantly use of tax dollars to fund programs that actually HELP AMERICANS, ALL AMERICANS, by increasing access to healthcare and education INSTEAD of invasions, occupations, military strikes and enforcing EMPIRE USA overseas that helps a select elite of business owners and campaign funders and HURTS most Americans in the process.
IT IS NOT "FREE"...it is a rational way to use American tax dollars to help American citizens. It is the single greatest policy change/proposal of the last 36 years; and a return to the days of the New Deal and Great Society way of thinking, about caring for the population and needs in OUR COUNTRY, instead of meddling in the affairs of other countries exclusively to pay off campaign donors and sleazy corporate interests.
IT IS NOT "FREE"...it is looking at the way we are currently being ripped off by monied interests and facing the reality that it CAN BE DONE BETTER...ITS NOT TOO HARD....ITS NOT A UNICORN.
Eric J in MN
(35,639 posts)NT
Moostache
(11,179 posts)Tax-funded
Extended benefit
Publicly available
The point is not do much Frank Lutz style wordsmithing as it is to stop playing into GOP stereotypes and talking points. We need to stop playing defense and start insisting these plans are sound and better for us all.
Eric J in MN
(35,639 posts)A middle-class parent whose kids will go to college someday and who hears "tax-funded tuition" may expect a bigger burden even though it would give that family a lighter burden.
"Extended benefit tuition" and "publicly available tuition" are vague.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)ReallyIAmAnOptimist
(357 posts)May The Force be with Bernie!
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)That's why we should go to war with Iraq and support DOMA until it is just completely unsupportable in practical terms.
polly7
(20,582 posts)
EdwardBernays
(3,343 posts)Hillary Clinton lied?!!!?!?!!???!!!
That's gonna take me a minute to get my head around.
OhZone
(3,216 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)that Clinton represents.
Why would Democrats worship at the alter of Wealth? We have 50,000,000 Americans living in poverty and the Big Money doesn't care.
If you want this to continue vote for Clinton/Goldman-Sachs. If you want to reduce poverty, vote for Sanders.
OhZone
(3,216 posts)rhett, it isn't all about money.
It's also about a very wide range of other things. Defense, privacy, security, diversity, health, drug safety, the supreme court, our rights and on and on.
And don't forget Team Clinton in the 90s raised taxes on the rich and balanced the budget and got a surplus! Furthermore Wall Street has been bad players at times, but they aren't 100% evil, and they're a part of the economy.
If all ya got, is that GOTCHA! That she made some money on speeches and took donations, that's getting old. You know, even Obama had a lot of donations from Wall Street. I think I read he took more than Hillary in 2008. And he got a lot of new regulations on Wall Street so quid pro quo it's not!
Have you ever thought, maybe some of the donations from people in the finance industry are because they think she might be good for the economy?
BAM!!
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)of the 99%. They have shared their enormous wealth with the Clintons that obviously think Wealth is everything.
Yeah she took some money from the Wealthy 1% to the tune 30,000,000 plus millions of dollars and they expect quid pro quo.
Tell the 50,000,000 American living in poverty that it's not about money.
And plezz don't drag out the crap about a raising economy raises all boat, because in the last 30 years that's been false.
The is a class war and the Clintons with their 150,000,000 AND GROWING wealth are not on the people's side.
OhZone
(3,216 posts)are well off. Like FDR. Like Warren Buffet at times. Like the Clintons. Like George Soros.
Again, even Obama got lotsa Wall Street contributions.

BAM!
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)her riches in the last 15 years most from corporations and billionaires that expect quid pro quo.
FDR was wealthy but fought for the People. Clinton is not for the People.
TIME TO PANIC
(1,894 posts)The rest of the world thinks we're fools for being so easily manipulated.
JustAMaverick
(35 posts)This is strictly about power and nothing but power. The machine will not let Bernie succeed under any circumstances. The fact he has gotten this far with the entire establishment, and all the money of wall street and the multi-nationals stacked against him. But the very system itself is designed to prevent anyone like him from succeeding.
Everyone should have been aware of this going in. The rot is too deep and the fascist state has already grown roots. The future has gotten considerably darker and more ominous as the machine has shown the power of social programming and how it can bend an entire race of people to vote enthusiastically against their own interests.
No...now it will have to be in the streets and it will be very ugly.
Babel_17
(5,400 posts)Also describes the status of her campaign.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)I bet Sen Warren is reluctant to endorse Sanders because she knows that if Clinton won, she might not be nice.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)She's the most rotten and corrupt politician this country has seen since Richard Nixon. She wouldn't know the truth about anything even if it bit her on the ass.
Human sewage.
cs1058
(18 posts)Article addressing the irony of Hillary campaign's attacks on Obama in '08 and its racial overtones.
Eric J in MN
(35,639 posts)Tweet tonight from a reporter who follows HRC campaign:
Jennifer Epstein Verified account
@jeneps
Clinton's only explicit mention of Donald Trump on the stump lately has been about not wanting to pay for his son to go to college
Hillary Clinton disagrees with Sanders' free tuition plan for state colleges in her stump speech, but portrays Sanders in her South Carolina victory speech as only wanting to break up the biggest banks.
kstewart33
(6,552 posts)I don't think I've ever met a perfect person, or a completely evil one. So I think I'll pass on this, and hope that these kind of attacks from both sides will stop.
Eric J in MN
(35,639 posts)NT