2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumDisgraceful conservative tactics: Under the bus . . . .
Last week there was some post about Bernie throwing AAs in the south under the bus. . .
Actually, it was BERNIE who was thrown under the bus by those voters. And encouraged to do it by those "leaders" in congress who turned their backs on him. That is the truth of it.
Bernie was arrested fighting for civil rights. In college he took a bus to be in DC for the MLK 'I had a dream' speech and march on Washington. And has kept up that record for 50 years.
Hillary, on the other hand was a Goldwater Girl, campaigning for a man who wanted to repeal the Civil Rights Act and wanted to re-segregate the south.
So, flip your head inside out however you want, but Bernie has had skin in the game for civil rights since the beginning and they threw him out with the bathwater.
Happyhippychick
(8,422 posts)But again it's more of the same Bernie v. Hillary crap that has made DU a complete cesspool. Too bad.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Cobalt Violet
(9,976 posts)And her supporters support a conservative.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)the Clintons.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)I mean, if it is a cesspool, shouldn't you be at the country club or somewhere else? Why are you stooping down to the level of the common people?
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)
Response to pdsimdars (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Response to Live and Learn (Reply #4)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)Man there are so many supposed progressives who think exactly like conservatives. They pick some tiny, non-existent angle and blow it up like it was the whole statement.
There was a Yuuuuuuge percentage of black voters who voted for Hillary, that isn't all and no one ever said ALL did. They chose to vote for someone who has worked for decades behind the scenes to forward legislation that has done harm to the AA community. Those are facts. So, IMHO, those who voted against someone who fought along side them for their rights and chose Hillary, turned their backs on him and on their own history.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Confusing an unsupported allegation with truth is indeed, rather convenient I would imagine.
Dogmatic hacks and the irrational voter will most certainly maintain the pretense that bumper-sticker statements are truth if if validates their biases.
And, as there certainly are many dogmatic hacks rewriting critical thought into something a little bit more legitimate and diaphanous than it really is, I can certainly understand your sentiment.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)Bernie himself has said this isn't about him. And this is my opinion and I don't feel I have to run it by you or anyone else.
What I stated were just facts. If you have a problem with facts, I suggest you join the GOP and also become a climate denier.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Jitter65
(3,089 posts)Democrat. And has never wavered.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Liz Warren was a Repub until she was 40 in 1996.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)She is actually pushing PROGRESSIVE legislation with all her might. It isn't about sex or labels, it's about actions. You shall know them by their works.
Whereas Hillary pushes CONSERVATIVE, corporate legislation. . as in the latest, biggest --- TPP.
Bernie has been against ALL those trade deals from day 1. Whereas Hillary has been supporting them all these decades, calling the TPP the "gold standard" of trade deals on 45 separate occassions . . oh, that was until it became unpopular and now, she's evolved (in word only as people close to her say they don't see any distance between her and Obama on TPP).
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)Last edited Mon Feb 29, 2016, 10:27 AM - Edit history (1)
Hillary was a Republican and was head of the Young Republicans at her college. And has never waivered, except in name only.
Typical conservative, trying to re-write historical facts.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)It is in her own words (on video) that she was a Goldwater Girl and was campaigning for him. Heard of Youtube?
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)"throwing Bernie under the bus" ?
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)when they needed people to support them Bernie was "in it" for them while Hillary was campaigning for a man who wanted to repeal the Civil Rights Act.
And now, people seem to have conveniently forgotten who was with them and who was against them. They turned their backs on a fellow freedom fighter and went with the other side. Laugh all you want. Those were the facts.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)You run with that.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)You can try to spin this or mischaracterize it any way you like. But those are the facts of where Hillary was and where Bernie has always been. If those facts shed an unfavorable light on your candidate, that is not my fault, it is not my characterization, it is what happened.
Bernie supported them when it mattered and they chose to vote for someone who did NOT support them when it mattered. You can draw any conclusions you choose.
Nonhlanhla
(2,074 posts)who worked for Civil Rights deserves the black vote, kind of as a reward for his hard work, as if they had not won their Civil Rights for themselves?
I thought Civil Rights was about African Americans having the right to decide for themselves.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)It never ceases to amaze me.
A people were oppressed and fighting for their rights and one man came to their side and was in the trenches with them and has been for 50 years.
While the other was campaigning for a man who wanted to re-segregate the south and repeal Civil Rights.
And somehow your mind thinks these facts mean nothing?
Just WOW!
It's like someone pushed you down in the mud and one guy comes to help you up while another keeps pushing others down, and when it comes time to choose between the two, you think what they did to you has nothing to do with it?
What kind of brain thinks like that?
Nonhlanhla
(2,074 posts)Just because they don't agree with your assessment of the two candidates?
Wow, just wow.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)I stated the facts of the actions taken by Bernie at a critical time in civil rights and also where Hillary was. That is not an "assessment".
And there is also the fact of the percentage of AAs voting for each candidate.
All of these things are on record, they are facts.
In my opinion, those who turned their backs on someone who had been on their side, shows a real lack of respect and appreciation. Simple as that.
What word or words would you use to describe that situation? The situation where someone fights by your side for your family and you choose someone who was on the other side? Tell me, what words do you use?
They turned their BACKS on him and he fought with them and she did NOT.
Spin it however you want to make your mind feel good about supporting someone like that.
Nonhlanhla
(2,074 posts)According to you, the black voters who support Clinton "show a real lack of respect and appreciation."
For God's sake, just listen to yourself.
And yes, you gave an assessment of the two candidates which is not objectively true, because it ignores part of both their records. For example, it ignores the fact the Bernie was so tone deaf about the importance of Obama to the black community that he wanted to primary him. On the flip side your assessment ignores Hillary's long track record of working with African Americans, starting while she was still in college and one of the few white women there working with the black students to hire more black faculty, to mention just one example.
I understand that YOU feel Bernie is the best candidate, but to say that black voters who don't agree with you show a lack of respect for Bernie, is itself disrespectful. How about showing some respect and appreciation for the people who have had to fight for their right to vote, to live with integrity, to be treated with RESPECT?
vdogg
(1,385 posts)Well done.
LexVegas
(6,959 posts)pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)The real point with anything is doing the right thing. Bernie did the right thing and Hillary did not. As has happened so many times in the record.
If you choose to be ignorant of it that is your choice, but people should know who they are voting for, what kind of person.
Hillary seems to do what is politically convenient while Bernie does the hard thing of doing what is right.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Candidate A always engages in triangulation while Candidate B, doing precisely the same thing, is simply engaging in outreach.
As always, simply insert candidate of your choice in slot B to create another tired bumper-sticker-- because there are not enough of them to fill the vast, vapid, lands of Allegation yet.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)Just be thankful we're getting a bunch of the deep red states out of the way quickly, so Bernie has a chance to rebuild momentum after Tuesday.
Vinca
(53,994 posts)I have my opinion about why he got such a low vote among AA, but I'll keep it to myself rather than risk a million bashing replies.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)Let people know the facts. Bernie does the right thing even when it is hard to do, while Hillary does the convenient thing.
Blue_Adept
(6,499 posts)Sanders supporters that only talk about what he did 50 years ago doesn't mean jack to most people. That's the stuff of history books - especially in the hyper fast information age we live in now.
Supporters would be far better off talking about what he's done and accomplished in the past ten years.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)for those who cared to read all the way to the end, he has been doing the same for a whole 50 year record.
Whereas Hillary argued behind the scenes for minimum sentencing, 3 strikes, etc. Bill Clinton was responsible for putting more people in prison than ANY president in history. . .and guess who makes up the biggest percent.
The Clintons have been bad for AAs and Bernie has been good and yet, AAs voted in droves for Clinton. You do the math.
BumRushDaShow
(169,761 posts)why did he pick up in 1968 and leave NYC & Chicago, cities with large percentages of POC, to raise a family in an almost all-white state? Something that many AAs did not have the privilege to even do thanks to the housing discrimination that ran rampant then. despite the Fair Housing laws, and continued through the '70s and '80s with redlining.
He essentially ended up being part of the "white flight" that lead to a drain of tax revenue and decimated the people in the very urban areas that he was supposed to be helping. It was the fulfillment of a childhood fantasy that the color his skin allowed him the freedom to pursue.
The irony here being the Clintons lived in a city for at least 11 years (while Bill was governor) with a large population of POC while Bernie ran away from the cities. And in an obvious ploy, Bill moved to Harlem (another black enclave) after his Presidency, where he could have gone back to Arkansas. Was it pandering? Of course. But it also put his face right in the middle of a demographic that has been the most loyal to the party. It was obvious courting for Hillary but that is what politicians do, but it also providing a chance to engage... something that Bernie would have been unable to do in Vermont.
I.e., many AAs see through why these politicians do what they do but the perceptions (how it "looks"
come into play, regardless of motivation.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)Twilight Zone time.
BumRushDaShow
(169,761 posts)LibDemAlways
(15,139 posts)he sure as hell didn't move to Harlem. After leaving the WH, the Clintons bought a home in Chappaqua which, according to 2000 census figures, is 91.80% white. I'd be a little more careful about accusing Bernie of white flight when your candidate chose to live in cushy upper crust Westchester County.
BumRushDaShow
(169,761 posts)It was well-posted about here on DU. And she is not "my candidate". She is A candidate running for President in the Democratic party primary. You know what they say about "assuming".
But you admit that Clinton (Bill) made his presence known in the black politic of NYC - despite all the barbs that he took for it when he did it. As a southerner, he essentially dove head first into the midst of the symbolic and historic land of the northern black and undoubtedly picked up a few pointers in the interim given that the black-white dynamic in the south is very different from the black-white dynamic in the north (something that was also discovered during the 2008 SC primary and obviously corrected in the 2016 one).
But the question again is - why did Bernie put down his signs, and pick up his family and flee?
Some of the most vocal activists that shared his ideologies and who chose to move around to other areas of the country, migrated to places where their voices could be heard and things could get done, including places like CA (notably northern in the Bay area), a state far far more diverse than VT. When in VT, what did he do as mayor to promote diversity outside of endorsing Jesse Jackson in 1988?
Blue_Adept
(6,499 posts)What has he done in the past ten years, policy-wise, that has made an impact. What has he done prior to announcing his candidacy that got him up front and close to people whose vote he's trying to get?
You can talk Hillary all you want, but that's not what's being asked here.
72DejaVu
(1,545 posts)Or the "how to talk to black people" training just wasn't up to snuff.
SidDithers
(44,333 posts)Sid
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)LexVegas
(6,959 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Right now Sanders supporters are Clintons biggest asset.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)When you talk about her actual record. The fact that it is negative is not our fault, it is her fault. She did those things. And to point out her record is not being negative it is being truthful.
And all you have to combat all those bad things in her record, is when they are brought out, you say, "Oh, how mean these people are to tell all those ugly facts."
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Happy Monday!!!!!
kwassa
(23,340 posts)I am not talking about indirectly on racism via poverty programs.
Show me that 50 year record specifically on this issue. The lists I've seen are about economics, not racism.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Notice how the H supporters swarmed your thread and offer nothing but the same old same old?
Just remember that only 8% of the Dem voters in SC voted for H. Just a measly 8%.
And what the real problem is, as you pointed out, a full 87% of Dem voters in SC turned their backs not on just Bernie, but the whole voting process.
Glad that SC is behind us and that in reality the H campaign can't gloat about some major victory. Just 8% is just embarrassing.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)YCHDT
(962 posts)... they should.
This is the height of condescension
emulatorloo
(46,155 posts)thucythucy
(9,103 posts)and think you should delete this OP.
Really, the condescension you show toward African American voters is just breath taking.
Please self delete.