Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
64 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
DAYUMM! NAACP Dot Scott responds to Bernie phone banker. (Original Post) JaneyVee Feb 2016 OP
Perhaps not a lot for Clinton supporters on a tirade 2pooped2pop Feb 2016 #1
Hint: the tirade came after the offensive remark. JaneyVee Feb 2016 #2
That explain a lot KingFlorez Feb 2016 #3
I call utter bullshit. TM99 Feb 2016 #4
You think civil rights icons are the liars? JaneyVee Feb 2016 #6
Whether a person is an icon or not is completely irrelevant. TM99 Feb 2016 #9
Caught lying? JaneyVee Feb 2016 #15
Oh ffs Janey TM99 Feb 2016 #16
Cool. I'll stick to defending civil rights icons... JaneyVee Feb 2016 #32
Read it and weep Janey. TM99 Feb 2016 #37
Mmm hmm. JaneyVee Feb 2016 #39
Yeah, mmm hmmm, that's why it was rated as False. TM99 Feb 2016 #41
Authoritarians can be easily identified Promethean Feb 2016 #58
Cults of personality are involved TM99 Feb 2016 #62
It's called video evidence. Blue State Bandit Feb 2016 #63
Or what? whatchamacallit Feb 2016 #25
As if being a "civil right icon" means you can't be full of shit. Lizzie Poppet Feb 2016 #35
No, but I do believe RoccoR5955 Feb 2016 #56
People break the script and sometimes get out of control KingFlorez Feb 2016 #10
Why not? TM99 Feb 2016 #12
I disagree about those incidents, but this thread isn't about those KingFlorez Feb 2016 #17
So you and I are at a stalemate. TM99 Feb 2016 #18
The only time I read about welfare UglyGreed Feb 2016 #36
Now a days welfare on DU TM99 Feb 2016 #44
I've phone banked too and am going again in an hour or so Arazi Feb 2016 #22
I actually DO NOT believe the script had... JaneyVee Feb 2016 #33
Agreed. This reeks of bullcrap farleftlib Feb 2016 #46
Methinks either ms Scott is a liar (there are lots of those in camp weather vane), or the call Doctor_J Feb 2016 #23
It just doesn't pass the smell test. TM99 Feb 2016 #26
This is from Stormfront? I noticed there's no link for this Arazi Feb 2016 #28
The original appears to be from Yahoo News TM99 Feb 2016 #29
Yep, calling bullshit here too. HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #31
Why would a public figure of the NAACP lie? JaneyVee Feb 2016 #34
Why would a caller lie? HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #45
Why did Huerta and Lewis lie? TM99 Feb 2016 #53
At the absolute worst, it was a volunteer having a crappy day mythology Feb 2016 #48
I think the problem is that those are the prepared talking points...nt SidDithers Feb 2016 #5
I actually laughed out loud. JaneyVee Feb 2016 #8
Beyond the foolish background assumption ("how could you POSSIBLY not vote for my candidate?")..... brooklynite Feb 2016 #7
It probably was a lack of training thing. JaneyVee Feb 2016 #11
Silly season. Dot Scott's point? BAAAAAD Bernie phone banker. The end. Nanjeanne Feb 2016 #13
I wouldn't legitimize this smear. Too coincidental that this call, snagglepuss Feb 2016 #24
How insulting can you get? oasis Feb 2016 #14
Cool story, Dot. GeorgeGist Feb 2016 #19
How do we know it was a person who supported Sanders and not a political dirty trick? Skwmom Feb 2016 #20
Bullshit Doctor_J Feb 2016 #21
Can you post the link for this? Thanks eom Arazi Feb 2016 #27
Here: JaneyVee Feb 2016 #42
"I'm...a college graduate. I've got a masters....I ain't never lived in public housing." tularetom Feb 2016 #30
In all fairness, it could have been Trump University. Vinca Feb 2016 #38
Are you calling the head of NAACP dumb? JaneyVee Feb 2016 #43
considering welfare is one of the things always brought up here JI7 Feb 2016 #40
That's typical as we've seen here MaggieD Feb 2016 #47
It was probably a Brock Bank sleazist undermining a better candidate. kristopher Feb 2016 #49
A straight DU Hillary supporter back in December told LGBT DUers that Hillary owns us. Bluenorthwest Feb 2016 #50
Good God alcibiades_mystery Feb 2016 #51
Bernie and his supporters are all insensitive racists. We get it. Can we talk about the issues now? jalan48 Feb 2016 #52
How generous of you to taint all Bernie supporters with a Hillary supporter's anecdote. valerief Feb 2016 #54
More HRC Trolling.. modestybl Feb 2016 #55
I guess having a candidate who opposed welfare reform calling him set him iff a bit. Carlo Marx Feb 2016 #57
Yeah, OK nyabingi Feb 2016 #59
Kick & very highly recommended! William769 Feb 2016 #60
Nice story :) azurnoir Feb 2016 #61
Ok, I just got back from phone banking for Bernie Arazi Feb 2016 #64
 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
1. Perhaps not a lot for Clinton supporters on a tirade
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 05:04 PM
Feb 2016

Me, I would have said fuck you. That may be why I haven't phone banked.

KingFlorez

(12,689 posts)
3. That explain a lot
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 05:07 PM
Feb 2016

If one person received a call like this, there likely were hundreds of others. There probably weren't enough to trigger a nearly 50% loss, but things like this can turn people out to vote.

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
4. I call utter bullshit.
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 05:18 PM
Feb 2016

I have phone banked for Sanders. We have scripts. This is not even close to how we do it.

We introduce ourselves and say we are volunteers for the Sanders campaign. We ask them if they are planning to vote in the primary. If they are GOP or say no, we thank them for their time and hang up. If they say yes, we give a little spiel about Sanders and ask them if we can count on their support. If they say yes and strongly, we may ask them to volunteer. If they say they are undecided, we thank them for their time, encourage them to do more research at his site and end the call. And if they say no or are voting for Clinton, then we do the same and end the call.

People might break this script, not everyone is a professional. But when they do, we deal with it. But this whole interchange sound made up based on what I know our actual phone bank scripts are.

And given the lies about 'No English' from Huerta and Lewis' lie about Sanders and his civil rights activism (and then his backpedalling) I am willing to bet dollars to do-nut this is another lying smear.

Keep it up Clinton supporters and surrogates. By the time the fall arrives, if she is the nominee, she will lose in a landslide.

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
9. Whether a person is an icon or not is completely irrelevant.
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 05:23 PM
Feb 2016

Those two were caught lying.

You can scream all you want that they didn't. And yet, they did.

I have actually met John Lewis. He is a man like any other - not perfect, sometimes foolish, and a wonderful person who fought for my father when you were not even born.

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
16. Oh ffs Janey
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 05:30 PM
Feb 2016

I am not going to play games with you.

There was video proof, other witnesses, etc.

Buzzfeed? The fucking site with cute kitty photos that my girlfriend sends me to brighten my day is your source?

You drag an un-cited article tidbit over here that when searched for shows up on Stormfront and Reddit to bash Sanders supporters yet fucking again.

I dismiss you with extreme prejudice. You are not even worth the time arguing with.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
32. Cool. I'll stick to defending civil rights icons...
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 06:04 PM
Feb 2016

I guess you can stick to defending your unnamed anonymous person.

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
37. Read it and weep Janey.
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 06:31 PM
Feb 2016
http://www.snopes.com/sanders-english-only-huerta/

CLAIM: Supporters of Bernie Sanders shouted "English only" at civil rights activist Dolores Huerta during one Nevada caucus event, ostensibly objecting to a translation of remarks into Spanish.

FALSE


There are plenty of eye-witness accounts, video proof, and links to all relevant information to completely debunk your talking point.

I particularly like this part --

We examined Nevada State Democratic Party caucus guidelines with respect to general procedure, and were unable to locate any specific procedural policy about translators. If such a provision was codified, it wasn't available in caucus-related instructional material.

However, caucus policy documents published by the Nevada State Democratic Party in 2008 [PDF] and 2016 [PDF] appeared to favor the objections to Huerta's participation after the caucus was called to order, because of her clear identification as a campaign operative, advocate, volunteer, or surrogate. (Below, Huerta speaking outside the caucus on 20 February 2015, wearing a Clinton campaign t-shirt and hat):

Only eligible, registered caucus participants may participate on caucus matters or elections ... Campaign Staff and campaign volunteers that are observers will not be allowed to communicate, signal, or instruct the eligible caucus participants once the caucus is called to order by the Temporary Chair ... Anyone may attend the caucus as an observer but may only observe and may not participate or attempt to influence the caucus in [any way] if they are not eligible to caucus.
 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
41. Yeah, mmm hmmm, that's why it was rated as False.
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 06:40 PM
Feb 2016

Keep spinning Janey, that's all you got. Cause it sure ain't facts.

Promethean

(468 posts)
58. Authoritarians can be easily identified
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 07:57 PM
Feb 2016

by siding with authorities no matter what. They are willing to trample any ethical or moral position because the authority is of overwhelming importance.

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
62. Cults of personality are involved
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 08:04 PM
Feb 2016

with that as well.

I see that quite often from supporters of a certain candidate and then project that onto another.

I will let you guess which these are.

whatchamacallit

(15,558 posts)
25. Or what?
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 05:50 PM
Feb 2016

Hillary supporters will work even harder to divide democrats and the country at large by race?

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
56. No, but I do believe
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 07:55 PM
Feb 2016

that there is something nefarious going on. Either opposition, or RepubliCLOWN. Either way, it stinks on ice. I know that we have scripts when we phone bank.
I also believe that an awful lot of folks have been duped into voting for a corporatist.

KingFlorez

(12,689 posts)
10. People break the script and sometimes get out of control
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 05:23 PM
Feb 2016

Phone bankers cannot be controlled and judging from similar talking points about welfare being used around this place, I don't doubt that this story is true. This woman had absolutely no reason to make this story up, none at all.

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
12. Why not?
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 05:24 PM
Feb 2016

Huerta made up the 'No English' Tweets. Lewis made up stuff when he implied Sanders was not a civil rights activist. Capeheart made up shit when he went on MSNBC and said photos of Sanders were not Sanders.

KingFlorez

(12,689 posts)
17. I disagree about those incidents, but this thread isn't about those
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 05:31 PM
Feb 2016

Considering that we've seen Sanders supporters online mention welfare as a reason that black voters should support Sanders, it's plausible that a phone banker used that logic with someone they called.

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
18. So you and I are at a stalemate.
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 05:35 PM
Feb 2016

You have seen one thing that suggests it is plausible she is not lying.

I have seen other things that suggest it is plausible that she is lying.

You could likely find proof of your assertions and present them as evidence. I can do with regards to my assertions. But neither of us can prove this true or false. There is no record. There is just her word. Huerta tried the same thing. But video proof and other witnesses showed that her words were lies.

I doubt this occurred.

UglyGreed

(7,661 posts)
36. The only time I read about welfare
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 06:15 PM
Feb 2016

on DU is when it was mentioned in reference to Bill Clinton's welfare reform stating it hurt women and children which I assume it did.......

Arazi

(6,829 posts)
22. I've phone banked too and am going again in an hour or so
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 05:46 PM
Feb 2016

My script is exactly what you have TM99 but I'll snap a photo of it today and figure out how to post it later.

There's nothing about "welfare" there and certainly if the person on the phone is a HRC a supporter you wish them well and say good bye.

This smells imo. I'm not ready to say she's lying but her accounting of the conversation goes 180 degrees from the materials

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
33. I actually DO NOT believe the script had...
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 06:06 PM
Feb 2016

Anything about welfare in it. I am comfortable with the explanation that this was an off script comment.

 

farleftlib

(2,125 posts)
46. Agreed. This reeks of bullcrap
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 07:19 PM
Feb 2016

or psyops. I doubt this ever happened. It's part of the campaign to discredit Bernie's cred because Hillary has NONE.

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
23. Methinks either ms Scott is a liar (there are lots of those in camp weather vane), or the call
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 05:48 PM
Feb 2016

Was made by a republican or Hillarian.

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
26. It just doesn't pass the smell test.
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 05:50 PM
Feb 2016

And given the OP has a tendency to post 'news' from Buzzfeed and this little un-cited nuggets, which I found on Stormfront, I am sure she had no intention of stirring the pot.

Arazi

(6,829 posts)
28. This is from Stormfront? I noticed there's no link for this
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 05:53 PM
Feb 2016

I just asked for that down thread but if you've already found it, I'd be interested in seeing it in context

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
29. The original appears to be from Yahoo News
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 05:57 PM
Feb 2016

yet another bastion of journalistic integrity, and I saw this article pushed on Reddit and Stormfront. So yeah, when I see an article from Yahoo that no one else is pushing but Reddit and Stormfront members are, then I tend to smell a rat.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
31. Yep, calling bullshit here too.
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 05:58 PM
Feb 2016

Sounds like a dirty trick by Correct the Record PAC....something they would do.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
45. Why would a caller lie?
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 07:07 PM
Feb 2016

And of course we already KNOW several Clinton surrogates have lied. So at this point I don't trust any claim, just as I don't trust her.

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
53. Why did Huerta and Lewis lie?
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 07:47 PM
Feb 2016

Because we are all human and get caught up in the zeal of electing our preferred candidate?

Or maybe some are willing to risk their long-time reputations in order to win at any cost.

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
48. At the absolute worst, it was a volunteer having a crappy day
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 07:30 PM
Feb 2016

This is in no way the Sanders approach. I don't know enough to say if I think she made it up, or if there is some middle explanation, but it sounds highly dubious to me.

brooklynite

(94,502 posts)
7. Beyond the foolish background assumption ("how could you POSSIBLY not vote for my candidate?").....
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 05:21 PM
Feb 2016

....the response was remarkably inefficient. I've read the Sanders phone bank script (assuming the volunteer wasn't just winging it), and you're supposed to say "thank you" and go on to another call. It is inefficient of your time (and the campaigns) to question the motives of a voter.

The Sanders campaign is being fairly open-minded in letting it's volunteers work on their own; I'm wondering if they're foregoing training in favor of enthusiasm.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
11. It probably was a lack of training thing.
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 05:23 PM
Feb 2016

This has nothing to do with Bernie, probably just an inexperienced phone banker.

snagglepuss

(12,704 posts)
24. I wouldn't legitimize this smear. Too coincidental that this call,
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 05:49 PM
Feb 2016

this particular offensive call happened to be made to Dot Scott. Someone could've easily called Scott and pretended to be be calling for Sanders.

Skwmom

(12,685 posts)
20. How do we know it was a person who supported Sanders and not a political dirty trick?
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 05:43 PM
Feb 2016

Answer: We do not. Would I put it past the Clinton campaign? Answer:

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
30. "I'm...a college graduate. I've got a masters....I ain't never lived in public housing."
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 05:58 PM
Feb 2016


The jokes just write themselves.

That story is utter bullshit.

But its funny!!

JI7

(89,247 posts)
40. considering welfare is one of the things always brought up here
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 06:37 PM
Feb 2016

as a reason for why black people should vote a certain why it's not that hard to believe it happened .

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
50. A straight DU Hillary supporter back in December told LGBT DUers that Hillary owns us.
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 07:35 PM
Feb 2016

"LGBT. Last I heard, Hillary owned this portion of the base. LGBT believe that she is a member of this portion of the base. All Your LGBT Base Are Belong to Clinton, and Sanders would be advised to not even waste his time on this one."

Did DU's Hillary supporters balk at that exploitation, the majority speaking for a minority as if they had that standing? No, they did not. They enjoyed that thread. That OP spoke for just about every group you can imagine, all owned by Hillary:
" All Your Female Base Are Belong to Clinton (and Will Always Belong to Clinton). Period. That is not to say that some women will not vote for Sanders. Some women will also vote for the GOP nominee. Some would vote for David Duke."

"Blacks. As Toni Morrison said, Bill Clinton was the first Black president--until Obama was the first Black president. Hillary is married to one of these man, and she was Secretary of State for the other. In addition, she is Obama's anointed successor."

"All Your Latino Base Are Belong to Clinton. Sanders had better pick himself a Latino running mate pronto if he plans to compete for this demographic. Or better yet, suddenly discover that one of his parents is Hispanic."
(note the use of the word 'pronto' which is tacky)

The Jews really get the best one, it features genocide, Rawanda and Hitler....
"Hillary Clinton has shown a willingness to commit US ground troops in order to combat genocide. Bill was the one who vetoed sending troops to Rwanda, if it was up to Hillary we would have been there in Africa saving lives. And even if she did not actually dodge bullets in the Balkans stopping a genocide, she and her daughter were there on the ground showing their support for a mission that the GOP hated because it was not intended to prop up the price of oil, it was supposed to save lives. Sanders, on the other hand, is running as the No War, Not Ever candidate. Never, Bernie? Not even to stop another Hitler?"
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251603541


So yeah, you guys are pure class, never insensitive and never exploitative of groups you are not part of !!!! The sweetest, kindest campaigners ever.
The thread is devoid of complaints from you or other Clinton supporters. This is back in September. She owns gays. Said some straight person, Jews, Bernie wouldn't fight Hitler! Latinos, they dig Castro so much that they belong to Hillary, much like chattel or small change.
But hey, this is a good bit of gossip you offer, while I'm offering the written record of DU.

valerief

(53,235 posts)
54. How generous of you to taint all Bernie supporters with a Hillary supporter's anecdote.
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 07:50 PM
Feb 2016

Cuz freedumb.

 

Carlo Marx

(98 posts)
57. I guess having a candidate who opposed welfare reform calling him set him iff a bit.
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 07:56 PM
Feb 2016

His candidate helped drown welfare in the government killing bath tub.

nyabingi

(1,145 posts)
59. Yeah, OK
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 08:02 PM
Feb 2016

It doesn't really matter what supporters of Bernie Sanders say, but what Bernie has to say. Thus far, I've only heard and seen good things from Bernie the man.

What I've heard from Hillary is disgusting, and those are the words that people should be paying attention to.

Arazi

(6,829 posts)
64. Ok, I just got back from phone banking for Bernie
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 10:02 PM
Feb 2016

i was calling Louisiana fyi

There's literally NO place to insert a do it yourself comment after a person has identified themselves as a HRC supporter. You thank them for their time and hang up. That's it. The directions are explicit and if you didn't read it, the staff tells you outright to thank them and hang up without any further dialogue

The times I've phoned before someone has been "supervising" because there's always newbies and today was no exception- the newbies are not just unleashed, the staff hovers around them as they're calling to ensure nothing goes wrong.

I did not get a screen capture because Hubdialer.com crashed at @ 6 pm in the office I was at. The staff immediately shifted to paper lists (people who had called or spoken with staff at different events locally) instead of the automated calling program, and I was shifted to putting together yard signs.

I will be back tomorrow and will get a screen shot first thing instead of waiting til last thing but I call phony baloney on this story

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»DAYUMM! NAACP Dot Scott r...