HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Retired » Retired Forums » 2016 Postmortem (Forum) » A Tweet from Naomi Klein

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 03:24 PM

A Tweet from Naomi Klein

http://www.naomiklein.org/shock-doctrine

77 replies, 8547 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 77 replies Author Time Post
Reply A Tweet from Naomi Klein (Original post)
Ferd Berfel Mar 2016 OP
SoLeftIAmRight Mar 2016 #1
Armstead Mar 2016 #31
Duval Mar 2016 #36
gcomeau Mar 2016 #46
TimeToEvolve Mar 2016 #52
jeff47 Mar 2016 #60
disillusioned73 Mar 2016 #2
monicaangela Mar 2016 #3
thereismore Mar 2016 #4
Cali_Democrat Mar 2016 #5
tk2kewl Mar 2016 #6
thereismore Mar 2016 #7
nilram Mar 2016 #76
Nanjeanne Mar 2016 #8
oasis Mar 2016 #9
MissDeeds Mar 2016 #12
oasis Mar 2016 #16
Armstead Mar 2016 #33
oasis Mar 2016 #38
xocet Mar 2016 #39
arcane1 Mar 2016 #51
NJCher Mar 2016 #19
oasis Mar 2016 #23
RoccoR5955 Mar 2016 #20
Dustlawyer Mar 2016 #27
JackRiddler Mar 2016 #24
oasis Mar 2016 #25
rhett o rick Mar 2016 #68
jalan48 Mar 2016 #10
Dont call me Shirley Mar 2016 #11
litlbilly Mar 2016 #18
mikeysnot Mar 2016 #35
Dont call me Shirley Mar 2016 #55
mikeysnot Mar 2016 #75
UglyGreed Mar 2016 #13
SammyWinstonJack Mar 2016 #30
ozone_man Mar 2016 #63
whatchamacallit Mar 2016 #14
Armstead Mar 2016 #34
whatchamacallit Mar 2016 #43
lostnfound Mar 2016 #57
Ferd Berfel Mar 2016 #59
TIME TO PANIC Mar 2016 #15
pdsimdars Mar 2016 #17
jhart3333 Mar 2016 #21
RoccoR5955 Mar 2016 #22
Herman4747 Mar 2016 #26
Arazi Mar 2016 #28
jtuck004 Mar 2016 #29
Recoverin_Republican Mar 2016 #32
Duval Mar 2016 #41
Recoverin_Republican Mar 2016 #45
JDPriestly Mar 2016 #37
hifiguy Mar 2016 #40
Octafish Mar 2016 #62
postulater Mar 2016 #66
Octafish Mar 2016 #67
postulater Mar 2016 #69
Duval Mar 2016 #42
kgnu_fan Mar 2016 #44
BlueMTexpat Mar 2016 #47
RiverLover Mar 2016 #48
TimeToEvolve Mar 2016 #54
RiverLover Mar 2016 #64
Gary 50 Mar 2016 #58
RiverLover Mar 2016 #65
yuiyoshida Mar 2016 #49
avaistheone1 Mar 2016 #50
nichomachus Mar 2016 #53
TheDormouse Mar 2016 #56
Enthusiast Mar 2016 #61
whereisjustice Mar 2016 #70
warrprayer Mar 2016 #71
Fast Walker 52 Mar 2016 #72
Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #73
NNadir Mar 2016 #74
2banon Mar 2016 #77

Response to Ferd Berfel (Original post)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 03:27 PM

1. Climate change and the sixth global mass-extinction event is happening now

 

Sanders knows this.

He is the only one that win keep this in the spotlight

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SoLeftIAmRight (Reply #1)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 05:33 PM

31. Well not to be contrary but if we're already in mass extinction, why bother?

 

I'm Bernie all the way, and support the climate change agenda.

But on a cosmic level, if we're already going down, does it make a difference?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Armstead (Reply #31)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 05:38 PM

36. Yes, because we still have time to delay if we can cut emissions.

 

Bernie's idea of putting a tax on carbon emissions is a good way to start.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Armstead (Reply #31)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:26 PM

46. How big a mass extinction do you want it to be?

 

"Mass extinction" refers to the large scale loss of species and biodiversity planet wide. Not the specific extinction of the human race.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Armstead (Reply #31)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:25 PM

52. careful with that nihilism!

that's how you wind up as a hillary supporter

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Armstead (Reply #31)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 09:18 PM

60. Mass extinctions don't wipe out everything.

If they did, we wouldn't be here.

If we do nothing, lots of plants and animals will go extinct. Billions of humans will die....leaving billions of humans alive.

If we stop doing incremental crap, we might save some of those plant and animal species. And fewer billions of humans will die.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ferd Berfel (Original post)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 03:27 PM

2. Oh snap..

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ferd Berfel (Original post)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 03:31 PM

3. Thanks for posting this!

And, thank you Naomi Klein. Hopefully sooner rather than later the populous will understand this is one of if not the most important problem we face on this planet, and the person selected for president should not be someone who is owned by corporate America.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ferd Berfel (Original post)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 03:35 PM

4. But she is a woman!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to thereismore (Reply #4)


Response to thereismore (Reply #4)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 03:41 PM

6. a damned smart one too

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tk2kewl (Reply #6)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 04:07 PM

7. Indeed. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to thereismore (Reply #4)

Wed Mar 2, 2016, 03:14 PM

76. So clearly she is going to burn in that special womanly hell

that Albright spoke of. At least, according to Albright.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ferd Berfel (Original post)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 04:09 PM

8. So many issues to care about. Unfortunately it appears all the Clinton supporters want

is Hillary annointed and money to control politics.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ferd Berfel (Original post)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 04:14 PM

9. Hillary is spelled with two LLs, Naomi. Great journalists you are.

No matter, the next time you write about her you'll refer to her as, Madam President.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oasis (Reply #9)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 04:27 PM

12. "Great journalists you are"

 

Oops! Looks like Naomi isn't the only one who makes mistakes.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MissDeeds (Reply #12)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 04:34 PM

16. I don't count on my writing skills for a paycheck.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oasis (Reply #16)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 05:35 PM

33. I do, and look at the mess I always make of my posts

 

Naomi Klein (hope I spelled her name right) is one of the most clear-eyed and brilliant writers and speakers out there.

I wouldn't dismiss her because of a few misplaced digits while typing.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Armstead (Reply #33)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 05:41 PM

38. Over the years, I would dial in when she appeared as a guest on

a talking heads show. After Hill wraps up the nomination, Naomi will be forced to train her guns back on the GOP. I'll lighten up on her at that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oasis (Reply #16)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 05:43 PM

39. You might want to rethink your spelling of Madam if you care to be respectful. Otherwise, one might

infer you intend a double entendre with quite a negative connotation.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oasis (Reply #16)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:24 PM

51. And she doesn't count on tweets for a paycheck.

 

But hey, anything to deflect from pro-fracking Clinton!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oasis (Reply #9)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 04:39 PM

19. Well, if you want to nitpick grammar...

Put "Hillary" in quotes, as you are talking about a word. "Great journalists you are" is not only an incomplete sentence, but it addresses Naomi in the plural through the use of the "s" and the "are." Naomi is clearly not two people.

Please write a little more. I'm not teaching grammar this semester and I'm sure you won't let my skills get rusty.


Cher

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NJCher (Reply #19)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 04:42 PM

23. I don't correct keyboard warriors on spelling and grammar as a courtesy.

Enough said.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oasis (Reply #9)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 04:40 PM

20. And Here I thought that Madame Doctor Secretary Clinton spelled her name

 

with an e and two L's, as in Hellary!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RoccoR5955 (Reply #20)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 05:16 PM

27. I just call her "Sell Out!"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oasis (Reply #9)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 04:47 PM

24. Twitter doesn't allow corrections.

 

I go nuts about mistakes on names, but it happens to everyone.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JackRiddler (Reply #24)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 04:54 PM

25. Thanks, we all learned something today.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oasis (Reply #9)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 10:26 PM

68. The world may be crumbling and you worry about spelling. Hillary can't be trusted.

 

At least by the 99%. Goldman-Sachs trusts her, they paid enough.

There are two side to the class war, why would you choose the side of the wealthy bastards that brought up this mess?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ferd Berfel (Original post)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 04:25 PM

10. An important endorsement.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ferd Berfel (Original post)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 04:26 PM

11. She's Feelin The Bern! Naomi always speaks truth to irresponsible power!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Dont call me Shirley (Reply #11)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 04:39 PM

18. she always has, that's why I respect her so much

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Dont call me Shirley (Reply #11)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 05:37 PM

35. I'm reading "This Changes Everything" now...

on the last few pages, have to return it to the library in morning...

Staying away from Non-Fiction for a while to save what little hope I have for my kids future.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mikeysnot (Reply #35)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:29 PM

55. How is it? I get so riled up reading NF like Naomi's books too. We must stop the Oligarch's war on

Life, for our kid's and the earth's sake.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Dont call me Shirley (Reply #55)

Wed Mar 2, 2016, 02:26 PM

75. Frustrating.

She wrote about all the protest in Canada regarding the original pipeline was going to go to the pacific through BC and was blocked by grass roots activism and the leadership of the First Nation people...

So they moved it to going through the US keystone XL... never heard on TV that even Canadian's didn't want it.

If you read Shock Doctrine this one will piss you off also.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ferd Berfel (Original post)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 04:27 PM

13. Funny how people who

care support Bernie..............

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to UglyGreed (Reply #13)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 05:30 PM

30. Right? #NotmeUs.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to UglyGreed (Reply #13)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 09:29 PM

63. I know, right?

Naomi Klein knows well the disaster capitalism that Hillary and Bill stand for.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ferd Berfel (Original post)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 04:28 PM

14. Wish SHE could run for president

Naomi.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to whatchamacallit (Reply #14)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 05:37 PM

34. I think she's Canadian, eh?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Armstead (Reply #34)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 05:57 PM

43. Yep

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to whatchamacallit (Reply #14)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 08:00 PM

57. Naomi Klein as Secretary of interior then

That would strike fear in their hearts!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to lostnfound (Reply #57)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 08:08 PM

59. Oooo...


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ferd Berfel (Original post)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 04:31 PM

15. K & R!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ferd Berfel (Original post)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 04:38 PM

17. As usual, Naomi is right on the mark!

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ferd Berfel (Original post)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 04:41 PM

21. Thanks for reminder Naomi. You are my hero.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ferd Berfel (Original post)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 04:41 PM

22. I am glad that at least SOMEONE knows

 

that the MOST important issue is our environment.
Like I always say, "There is no Plan(et) B."
We have very little time to remedy this, and I am certain that a devout capitalist like Hellary will not address it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ferd Berfel (Original post)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 05:04 PM

26. Hillary supports fracking.

 

Moreover, she doesn't lead when it comes to climate change; she merely follows.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ferd Berfel (Original post)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 05:18 PM

28. Kicked and Recced eom

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ferd Berfel (Original post)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 05:24 PM

29. Looking at our nation you can tell the future of humanity is a priority, Lol. n/t

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ferd Berfel (Original post)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 05:35 PM

32. GOP propagandists must love a mind so susceptible to suggestion. A perfect subject for BF Skinner



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Recoverin_Republican (Reply #32)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 05:45 PM

41. BF Skinner? Ewwww He put his own child in a Skinner Box.

 

Just saying. Psychology major here in undergrad.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Duval (Reply #41)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:21 PM

45. yeah, had to hit the 'reward' bar ten times to get out. --- Not! Just kidding.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ferd Berfel (Original post)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 05:41 PM

37. Now THAT is an important endorsement.

Feel the Bern! And thank you, Naomi Klein.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ferd Berfel (Original post)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 05:45 PM

40. I LOVE Naomi Klein.

 

One of the very best the Left has, and a stellar writer.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hifiguy (Reply #40)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 09:29 PM

62. SidDithers of DU reported she ''was a bit of a drinker'' at U-T.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022146890#post82

Made me sad to know he would report something like that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Octafish (Reply #62)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 10:14 PM

66. That post is mostly about Naomi Wolfe.

And I didn't see anything about excessive drinking or a post by SidDithers.

Did I miss something? Or is my ignore list showing?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to postulater (Reply #66)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 10:25 PM

67. Reply 82. I got a screen shot.



whatchamacallit (14,001 posts)
41. Hmm... guess I'll try in this thread

Hi Sid, what's your opinion of Naomi Klein?

American support for these wars proves we're falling behind in math

----------------------------------------------------------------

Response to whatchamacallit (Reply #41)Mon Jan 7, 2013, 05:24 PM
Star Member SidDithers (39,065 posts)

82. I didn't think much of her when we were at UofT together...

she seemed to be about self-promotion back then. Guess it worked out for her OK.

She was a writer, then editor of The Varsity. Heard her speak a few times.

I remember she used to be a bit of drinker. But that was twenty three years ago.

Sid

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Octafish (Reply #67)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 10:32 PM

69. Thanks.

I missed it the first time through.

I don't hold somebody's college experience against them. I think we all have some done some experimenting at one time or another (for some of us it was one time AND another).

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ferd Berfel (Original post)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 05:47 PM

42. Kicked and recommended.

 

Naomi Klein is one of my heroes.


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ferd Berfel (Original post)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:05 PM

44. K&R

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ferd Berfel (Original post)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:26 PM

47. Well, I love Naomi Klein

but I would have respected her more if she stayed out of our electoral politics. Does she really want to see a GOPer in the WH?

I will agree to disagree with her opinion. If Hillary does get the nomination, I wouldn't be at all surprised to see Hillary invite Naomi to provide some input about the issues that Naomi has written so beautifully about. Hillary is a very gracious person who actually solicits input from those who hold opposing views, listens, and learns accordingly.

Too many see that as a fault. I see it as a major strength.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BlueMTexpat (Reply #47)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:33 PM

48. " Does she really want to see a GOPer in the WH?" Hell NO!

That's why she said vote for Bernie.

From Fracking to Keystone XL, Green Groups Face a Hillary Clinton Problem
http://www.forbes.com/sites/tomzeller/2015/04/17/from-fracking-to-keystone-xl-green-groups-face-a-hillary-clinton-problem/#4ffe1f3f4a9b

Oil And Gas Lobbyists Support Hillary Clinton’s Campaign
http://www.mintpressnews.com/MyMPN/oil-and-gas-lobbyists-support-hillary-clintons-campaign/

Hillary Clinton rakes in money from fossil fuel interests
http://grist.org/climate-energy/hillary-clinton-rakes-in-money-from-fossil-fuel-interests/

They aren't paying her off to help fight Climate Change. Hello? We need to wake UP.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RiverLover (Reply #48)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:28 PM

54. thanks 4 posting this

may i repost these links?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TimeToEvolve (Reply #54)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 10:10 PM

64. Always. Anytime! /nt


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RiverLover (Reply #48)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 08:06 PM

58. Didn't you hear Hillary say she is immune to bribes?

She takes the money and takes the money and takes the money and gives nothing in return. She is the first person in the history of the earth to achieve this miraculous state. It's almost like she's a sorcerer the way corporations can't throw money at her fast enough and all for nothing in return. It's a miracle, praise the lord! If you are a skeptic you might not believe her but she has that covered too. You see, she told us she never never ever lies. So all you Bernie supporters should be happy when it's over that there will be a "Goldmans Girl" in the white house.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gary 50 (Reply #58)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 10:13 PM

65. Amen & hallelujah!

Gag.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ferd Berfel (Original post)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:17 PM

49. K&R

TWEETED and ReTweeted.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ferd Berfel (Original post)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:23 PM

50. I support Bernie on climate change

 

and pretty much everything. Thanks Naomi!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ferd Berfel (Original post)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:26 PM

53. Hold that bus! We have someone else to throw under it. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ferd Berfel (Original post)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:30 PM

56. All the coolest people are for Bernie nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ferd Berfel (Original post)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 09:27 PM

61. Wow! K&R! This post has hundreds of recommendations!

Way to go, Naomi!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ferd Berfel (Original post)

Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:03 AM

70. Wall Street trusts her.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ferd Berfel (Original post)

Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:21 AM

71. Kick and Rex

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ferd Berfel (Original post)

Wed Mar 2, 2016, 01:06 AM

72. I think people will need more than a gentle reminder of this incredibly important point

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ferd Berfel (Original post)

Wed Mar 2, 2016, 02:47 AM

73. Proud to stand with Ms Klein. She is right. Clinton can't be trusted.

 

That's the thing about weathervanes.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ferd Berfel (Original post)

Wed Mar 2, 2016, 10:58 AM

74. Tweet from me: The formula that Bernie Sanders proposes to address climate change...

...is more of the same, which is failing big time.

We spent two trillion dollars in the last 10 years on so called "renewable energy," tore up huge sections of China to isolate exotic metals, including extremely toxic cadmium - 10% of Southern China's rice crop is now badly contaminated with this metal - and so called "renewable energy" in the form of solar and wind does not produce 5 of the 560 exajoules of energy humanity consumes each year.

2015 was recorded - once the data is finalized - as either the worst year ever observed for increases in carbon dioxide, or the second worst.

Bernie Sanders' State - which did not dump a single molecule of carbon dioxide to generate electricity for decades - now is dependent on electricity provided by dangerous natural gas.

To suggest that Bernie Sanders will learn enough epidemiology, chemistry, physics and engineering knowledge to adjudge nuclear energy in a realistic and fair way is absurd. Nothing in his career shows any level of having a clue on this topic.

Nuclear energy need not be perfect, without risk, and without cost to be superior to everything else. It only needs to be superior to everything else, which it is.

The efforts on the left to deny these simple facts is our creationism frankly. We are making the situation worse, not better.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ferd Berfel (Original post)

Wed Mar 2, 2016, 04:00 PM

77. Kickin' & a Recken'

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread