Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

hill2016

(1,772 posts)
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 01:29 AM Mar 2016

Petraeus got a fine and a suspended term for a misdemeanor charge of mishandling classified data

This was where the fact pattern showed that that he deliberately lied to the FBI and actively sought to pass unclassified materials to his biographer.

Clinton has so far not been accused of anything remotely as egregious.

36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Petraeus got a fine and a suspended term for a misdemeanor charge of mishandling classified data (Original Post) hill2016 Mar 2016 OP
I respectfully disagree. NWCorona Mar 2016 #1
I doubt you are sincere... FarPoint Mar 2016 #26
" I doubt you are sincere..." NWCorona Mar 2016 #30
I'm a Bernie fan too. FarPoint Mar 2016 #32
only because her name was "Hillary" - be honest about it DrDan Mar 2016 #29
Not at all. NWCorona Mar 2016 #31
I agree Dem2 Mar 2016 #2
The most serious charges she could face are those related to Press Virginia Mar 2016 #9
Seems very unlikely Dem2 Mar 2016 #10
Why? Press Virginia Mar 2016 #13
I posted an pdf of an email that has since been declassified NWCorona Mar 2016 #15
I don't remember Petraeus running for president. Autumn Mar 2016 #3
Or two wrongs making a right. beac Mar 2016 #23
I expect shit like that from republicans when it comes from democrats Autumn Mar 2016 #24
Me too. beac Mar 2016 #25
Petraeus was running against (in, standing in the way of) Sanders' dream, so he's not nearly Hoyt Mar 2016 #4
I have seen on here that they are also connecting this to heR foundation 2pooped2pop Mar 2016 #5
Yah, too bad we allow this shit with our government officials. malokvale77 Mar 2016 #6
Patreaus passed troop movement notes to his mistress/biographer to impress her. SunSeeker Mar 2016 #7
Markings are irrelevant. The book Petreaus gave to his mistress, who Press Virginia Mar 2016 #11
Hillary also had contracted with a server farm that didn't have the clearance to do so. NWCorona Mar 2016 #16
Markings are absolutely relevant. A newspaper article is not the same as troop movement notes. SunSeeker Mar 2016 #18
You'd better let the government know so they can change the NDA Press Virginia Mar 2016 #19
A newspaper article is not "SAP." SunSeeker Mar 2016 #21
Nobody said it was. Press Virginia Mar 2016 #22
Petraeus 2020! Cheese Sandwich Mar 2016 #8
Vote Hillary, she just has a misdemeanor jfern Mar 2016 #12
Bumper sticker suggestion: HILLARY: PROBABLY WON'T BE INDICTED! AtomicKitten Mar 2016 #14
Petraeus wasn't running for POTUS either so even a fine and a suspended term is serious for Hillary azurnoir Mar 2016 #17
Petraeus gave unclassified materials to someone he was having an affair with renate Mar 2016 #20
And most people were livid about his slap on the wrist. morningfog Mar 2016 #27
it went far beyond "mishandling" - he consciously gave it to his "girlfriend" DrDan Mar 2016 #28
Petraeus downloaded classified information. DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #33
Come on, you guys, don't ruin a good outrage! randome Mar 2016 #36
And he resigned. So yup, if she's guilty she should resign Arazi Mar 2016 #34
I don't want impeachment hearings in 2017. mmonk Mar 2016 #35

FarPoint

(12,336 posts)
26. I doubt you are sincere...
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 11:57 AM
Mar 2016

Maybe you just don't desire to vote for Hillary ....What he did was careless, he knew it was Wong and discounted security protocol believing he was above THAT...

NWCorona

(8,541 posts)
30. " I doubt you are sincere..."
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 12:06 PM
Mar 2016

I think that is kinda low. Yes I'm a Bernie supporter and I can be very critical of Hillary but that doesn't mean I'm not sincere. I haven't been here long but I have been very respectfully of other people's opinion and have no problems giving Hillary props when it's do. I also point out where I disagree with Bernie.

I'm not a hater.

FarPoint

(12,336 posts)
32. I'm a Bernie fan too.
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 12:12 PM
Mar 2016

I also won't needlessly give props to a repug, warmongering, hypocrite who knowingly took liberties for selfish sexual gains and risked national security for his pleasure. I won't go there to support him and ditch or trash talk a true liberal Democrat.

Dem2

(8,168 posts)
2. I agree
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 01:33 AM
Mar 2016

I can't figure out what she'd be charged with when comparing similar cases, the status of the rules while she served and previous SoS's. It just makes no sense that she'd be even remotely in danger of indictment. FFS Bush/Cheney are war criminals, not even a misdemeanor charge.

 

Press Virginia

(2,329 posts)
9. The most serious charges she could face are those related to
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 02:13 AM
Mar 2016

the retention of the information outside the government system, which is a felony. Which is one of the things Petreaus did.

The rest are misdemeanors related to improper handling of the information itself.
Improper storage, gross negligence

Now, if she destroyed anything that should have been turned over its a felony too

 

Press Virginia

(2,329 posts)
13. Why?
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 02:22 AM
Mar 2016

We already know she had classified information on her server. The IG has said some of it was classified TS/SCI at the time it was sent.

NWCorona

(8,541 posts)
15. I posted an pdf of an email that has since been declassified
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 02:44 AM
Mar 2016

But was marked SBU/SENSITIVE SECURITY INFORMATION (SSI) at the time it was sent.

beac

(9,992 posts)
23. Or two wrongs making a right.
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 11:39 AM
Mar 2016

This is the same "But, but, but someone else did it!" BS that Hillarians are trying to use comparing the guy holding a "Bankers for Hillary" behind Bill Clinton bellowing into a bullhorn outside a polling station.

What Petraeus did was wrong. What Hillary did was wrong. What the signholder did was wrong. What Bill did was wrong.

Why do Clinton supporters think evidence of others' wrongdoing excuses the Clintons from theirs? It's baffling.

Autumn

(45,055 posts)
24. I expect shit like that from republicans when it comes from democrats
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 11:43 AM
Mar 2016

that's a different matter. I hold democrats to a higher standard because I hold myself and my actions to a higher standard.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
4. Petraeus was running against (in, standing in the way of) Sanders' dream, so he's not nearly
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 01:37 AM
Mar 2016

as bad as Clinton.

 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
5. I have seen on here that they are also connecting this to heR foundation
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 01:48 AM
Mar 2016

And the selling of political favors through it. I think it perhaps was something in the emails. Maybe the plutonium deal? So it is possible that this could lead to quite a lot.

malokvale77

(4,879 posts)
6. Yah, too bad we allow this shit with our government officials.
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 01:59 AM
Mar 2016

Is that your argument for Hillary Clinton?

SunSeeker

(51,550 posts)
7. Patreaus passed troop movement notes to his mistress/biographer to impress her.
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 02:05 AM
Mar 2016

He knew what was showing her was THE most top secret sensitive info there is. Then he lied about it to the FBI. And he was only hit with a misdemeanor and probation.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/in-clinton-email-investigation-justice-department-grants-immunity-to-former-state-department-staffer/2016/03/02/e421e39e-e0a0-11e5-9c36-e1902f6b6571_story.html

None of the emails Hillary sent or received was marked classified, let alone top secret, at the time. It was only classified after the fact in response to a right wing group's FOIA request for her emails. And it was crazy overclassification. One of the emails they decided to classify as secret was an email forwarding a newspaper article about drones, that was already available to millions of people. It is ridiculous. That is why Hillary has been saying the State Department should turn over all this stuff.

This is not a real threat to Hillary, as much as some here and in the GOP wish it were. The FBI is dotting every "i" and crossing every "t" because this is such a politically charged matter and the Benghazi Committee is watching every move. So, it will be thoroughly, mind-numbingly investigated.

 

Press Virginia

(2,329 posts)
11. Markings are irrelevant. The book Petreaus gave to his mistress, who
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 02:20 AM
Mar 2016

incidently held a TS/SCI, wasn't marked as classified either.

If she received information on say drone program operations or sat data, it's classified. The IG has already said some of the information was classified TS/SCI or higher at the time it was sent.

And Drone Program information is ALWAYS classified when produced.

NWCorona

(8,541 posts)
16. Hillary also had contracted with a server farm that didn't have the clearance to do so.
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 02:47 AM
Mar 2016

The office didn't even have an alarm. Crazy stuff

SunSeeker

(51,550 posts)
18. Markings are absolutely relevant. A newspaper article is not the same as troop movement notes.
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 02:53 AM
Mar 2016

Otherwise, there would be a lot of reporters, not to mention people getting that article, in jail.

 

Press Virginia

(2,329 posts)
19. You'd better let the government know so they can change the NDA
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 03:09 AM
Mar 2016

which clearly states the signee is responsible for safeguarding sensitive information, marked or unmarked.

She had SAP information on her server. That's higher than Top Secret.

 

Press Virginia

(2,329 posts)
22. Nobody said it was.
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 11:27 AM
Mar 2016

And it doesn't matter if the NYTs ran a full expose on the drone program, complete with the blue prints, it's still a classified program subject to the same law as any other document.
She signed an NDA, it was her responsibility to abide by it

renate

(13,776 posts)
20. Petraeus gave unclassified materials to someone he was having an affair with
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 03:17 AM
Mar 2016

I think Hillary is like me... I wouldn't know how servers work or anything like that. I can totally understand her relying on others to be responsible about security etc.

There are things about her that I do not care for, but this isn't one of them.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
33. Petraeus downloaded classified information.
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 12:14 PM
Mar 2016

General Petraeus knowingly and deliberately downloaded classified information, including the names of clandestine operatives on at least several occasions, wrote it down in a written file, shared it with his paramour, and then lied to the FBI when asked about it. It was the latter act that was the most egregious.

BTW, the prosecutor who actually prosecuted General Petraeus wrote that his situation and Secretary Clinton's situation are dissimilar, ergo:

http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2015/08/30/clinton-controversy-no-comparison-petraeus-column/71421242/


I do wonder about the motives of those who conflate the two.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
36. Come on, you guys, don't ruin a good outrage!
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 12:18 PM
Mar 2016

[hr][font color="blue"][center]Everything is a satellite to some other thing.[/center][/font][hr]

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Petraeus got a fine and a...