Someone is desperately trying to poison the waters with Warren and Sanders

[whatchamacallit]

Bernie supporters sure don't want that, so who does?

[Avalux]

1. Gee I wonder....who has the most to gain from these dirty tricks? n/t

[Matariki]

2. And gosh, right after DWS's payday loan friendly bill

[whatchamacallit]

3. Yeah, funny that...

[Betty Karlson]

19. The coincidences just keep piling up.

But if you think they form a pattern, you are a complacent millennial key-board warrior with racist and sexist tendencies. So there. Also 9/11 and a gender.

[Matariki]

50. LOL

[Autumn]

4. Gee I wonder who would want to do that and who has done that in the past

Because
Really it does seem to be an
Obnoxious ploy by perhaps some one who possibly could be working on the
Clinton campaign
Kick because it seems rather unlikely that Bernie supporters would harass Elizabeth Warren.

[bunnies]

10. ^^^^ This ^^^

Well done.

[G_j]

13. yep

[Nanjeanne]

5. The whole Bernie Bros was a dupe of 2008 Clinton strategy against Obama

And this is no different. FB and Twitter are all anonymous if you want to be. A great place for smears to take place as long as you have the media prepped to spread it. No surprise. Sounds just a "little bit nutty, a little bit slutty" to me.

[JaneyVee]

6. Operation Chaos 2016

IMHO

Because I refuse to believe real progressives would act this way.

[whatchamacallit]

8. We agree

[Dr Hobbitstein]

7. Get the big roll.

Bernie supporters have been bullying Clinton endorsers online since the Bernie joined the race. Warren had facebook comments turned off on her page BECAUSE of the constant commenting on every post demanding she endorse Bernie (she recently turned comments back on). After Bernie loses MA, they berate her for not endorsing. It's no conspiracy, it's a bunch of childish assholes on the internet who has a sad because EW didn't endorse Bernie.

[whatchamacallit]

9. Right, more Bernie supporter genus mythos

Only Bernie supporters harrass online because they're genetically predisposed to do so. Talk about a wild conspiracy theory...

[Dr Hobbitstein]

11. So you deny that Bernie supporters have a history of harrassing people online?

No one said a damn thing about genetic disposition. It's Occam's razor: the simplest answer is usually the correct one.

Not all Bernie supporters are harassing people. But a very vocal segment is. Bernie himself has acknowledged this. Why won't you?

[whatchamacallit]

15. Do you deny Hillary supporters do the same?

What's your rationale for this being a Bernie-side-only phenomenon? How is it possible? I guess an alternate theory could be Bernie is just a giant asshole magnet... As far as Occam's razor is concerned, given the long established history of political dirty tricks and use of provocateurs, the razor could just as easily favor that answer.

[Dr Hobbitstein]

18. I'm not denying Hillary supporters may harass people online.

But it's been established that a vocal population of Bernie supporters have been harassing Hillary supporters online.

I'm not saying it's all Bernie supporters (it is not) or most (once again, it is not), or even DUers (it is not). But there are quite a few, and Bernie himself asked them to stop once before.

Facebook isn't anonymous. These people are obvious Bernie supporters.

[whatchamacallit]

20. It's been established by Hillary supporters and surrogates

Bernie doesn't really know who those folks are, but he told them to chill because that's how he rolls.

[Dr Hobbitstein]

22. Facebook is NOT anonymous.

These are Bernie supporters. People who's pages are LITTERED with pro-Bernie messages. Bernie has acknowledged this, but you would rather believe it's a vast conspiracy involving thousands of people (pretty hard to pull off silently) rather than thousands of people being assholes.

Maybe you need this roll instead?

[whatchamacallit]

28. Nah

you can go ahead and tuck that back up where you pulled it from.

[Svafa]

32. It's not hard to create a fake account on facebook. There are tons of them. nt

[Dr Hobbitstein]

35. And they get flagged all the time.

They're easy to spot. Usually only a pic or two, no real info, and recent join dates.

Long term facebook accounts are not fakes.

[Svafa]

39. Was every commenter investigated to make sure that their profiles were old enough?

[Dr Hobbitstein]

40. Click through them.

https://www.facebook.com/ElizabethWarren/?ref=br_rs

I clicked through QUITE a few.

[Kip Humphrey]

36. Your sources

article quoted in the trash piece:

Peter Daou

Peter Daou is a former adviser to Hillary Clinton and John Kerry and a veteran of two presidential campaigns. He is the CEO of True Blue Media, which owns and operates Blue Nation Review

I have followed this story closely and have read the oft repeated meme that OF COURSE these are Bernie Supporters because FaceBook never lies???

So, Link in the Facebook pages of these Bernie supporters who are trashing E.Warren. Show us your proof. The quoted Hillary camp article certainly does not provide these Facebook pages.

Of course you won't because you can't. Proving in all finality that this is a false-flag operation.

[Dr Hobbitstein]

37. Read the comments on EVERY post.

https://www.facebook.com/ElizabethWarren/?ref=br_rs

Click on the names, look at the profiles.

ETA: My source for this was the EW page, where I first saw it. There have been news stories since, but I haven't read them.

[JaneyVee]

12. Ya know, theres an easy way to find out.

Go to the social media page of anyone who endorses Hillary and read the comments. Then click on their profile and scan through their posts. Shouldnt be hard to separate myth from reality.

[marions ghost]

16. If you think that's the way to separate myth from reality...

oh never mind

[Marr]

38. You should be a Biblical Archaeologist.

That's pretty much how they work, too.

[whatchamacallit]

17. I don't buy this narrative

I'm pretty sure Warren is too smart to either.

[whatchamacallit]

25. Sounds like your kind of Chaos and FUD

[noiretextatique]

42. Question: how do you know they are from "bernie peeps"?

Is there a some new technology that can determine the poltical affliliation of an email sender?

[noiretextatique]

46. You did not answer my question nt

[misterhighwasted]

49. okay.

Later

[MineralMan]

21. No kidding? Really?

[randome]

24. It's almost like a Presidential campaign or something was going on. What's wrong with these people?

[hr][font color="blue"][center]Everything is a satellite to some other thing.[/center][/font][hr]

[MineralMan]

26. I know. Who knew there was a presidential race?

I'm shocked, really. And people are attacking Elizabeth Warren for not endorsing someone? Who would do that? She's not required to make an endorsement. Who would be angry about her non-endorsement decision?

'Tis a puzzlement, to be sure.

[SwampG8r]

27. Well we know one candidate has an army of fake social media

I mean we know for a.fact one candidate has spent money to generate fake enthusiasm on social media. Hillary has a history of paying for fake social medis support.
Anyone check to.see if the "bernie bros" arent a bought out fake social media creation?
Be a shame to waste all those fake.accounts and profiles after paying good money.

[Svafa]

33. +1

[UglyGreed]

29. Everyday more and

more I feel that the Warren endorsement hoax which I fell for (for a moment along with thousands of others) as a calculated maneuver possibly planned by Correct the Record via David Brock. He has no shame and will do whatever he can to get the result he desires. Now day after day we have articles of "BernieBros" attacking Warren, how very convenient.

[blm]

31. GOP ops - they want to turn Sanders supporters against Warren. If there's anyone the GOP hates more

than Sanders politically it would be Warren. I wouldn't trust anyone claiming to be a 'Sanders supporter' who attacks Warren. Period.

[whatchamacallit]

34. You can't turn Sanders supporters against Warren

They love her. While many desire it, most are not expecting Warren's endorsement of Bernie. Intelligent people understand there are meta-political considerations involved in these endorsements.

[blm]

47. That's kinda my point. GOP op poseurs wouldn't get that reality the way REAL supporters

get it. We have long held admiration for BOTH Sanders and Warren. Their games really only accomplish the task of outing them.

[whatchamacallit]

48. Ah... I see

you're right.

[George II]

41. Care to fill us in on who that "someone" might be? Otherwise, what's the point of this OP?

[whatchamacallit]

43. You were unable to glean the meaning of this?

Hm... an unfortunate lack of reasoning skills.

[George II]

44. No, and no. But that is an "unfortunate lack of" information. Thanks. Now I can move on.

[Hoyt]

51. Sanders supporters are not above slamming Warren for not endorsing him. They've slammed

some real Democratic icons for endorsing Clinton.

[whatchamacallit]

52. I didn't

but those you did seemed to do so because one had a peculiar selective memory, and the other appeared to be lying.