Serious Question

[speaktruthtopower]

Should Hillary's time spent as first lady of Arkansas and the U.S. be considered relevant experience or a hiatus in her resume?

Are older professional women likely to discern this differently than men and millenials?

No flaming please, just honest opinions.

[Buzz Clik]

1. Your question is flame bait. You will be flamed

...but not by me.

[Arazi]

2. She puts it on her resume. She gets to decide

I believe its relevant if she does

[Mister Ed]

3. One's entire life experiance should be considered part of one's resume.

Can't see why the question arises.

[BernieforPres2016]

13. I agree

Why is this even a question?

[JohnnyLib2]

4. Years at the hubs of government--

Surely are valuable and relevant experience.

[speaktruthtopower]

5. Agreed. But give me a percentage..

of how much it counts compared to holding office.

[NCTraveler]

6. My offensive reader just went up to one.

The simple answer is yes.

I think you are asking out of true sincerity and will get some solid replies giving you better clarity. That's why it stopped at a one.

Put it this way. For many of us here, Clintons experience in those two times alone makes her overqualified for our jobs.

Field specific of course. That is about as simple as I can make the concept and politely show why this is actually based in different concepts of how women are viewed.

[NCTraveler]

7. You should also read up on S CHIP. Nt

[mmonk]

8. Any duties in governing should be listed.

Not time.

[speaktruthtopower]

10. Interesting way to put it...

and she might benefit by getting into those details instead of broad platitudes.

[mmonk]

11. Some have engaged in programs and should be credited.

Some have not.

[sufrommich]

9. Sigh....trash thread.nt

[bigwillq]

12. Counts as experince to me (nt)