Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Garrett78

(10,721 posts)
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 01:40 PM Mar 2016

Michigan: The First Bellwether

None of the Democratic primary/caucus results thus far have been very surprising. Michigan is the first state other than Texas and Georgia that has more than 100 pledged delegates. While Michigan's demographics don't mirror US demographics, Michigan is more representative than other states that have voted thus far (though you can make the case that some of the southern states are more representative of the Democratic electorate specifically).

A win by Sanders would change the narrative from "Clinton's got this" to "Clinton probably still has this but maybe not." A double digit win by Sanders would shift the narrative even more.

A narrow margin of victory for Clinton won't change the narrative, per se, but it would give the Sanders campaign a glimmer of hope.

A substantial margin of victory for Clinton will confirm what most already suspect, which is that the race is essentially over.

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Michigan: The First Bellwether (Original Post) Garrett78 Mar 2016 OP
Seems like a fair assessment. Nt metroins Mar 2016 #1
As a Sanders supporter, I agree. MI is a big one. Barack_America Mar 2016 #2
We'll find out soon enough. MineralMan Mar 2016 #3
I think we know how Mississippi will go. Garrett78 Mar 2016 #4
I truly doubt that Michigan is up in the air at all. MineralMan Mar 2016 #5
I kind of doubt it, too... Garrett78 Mar 2016 #6
Data from the last 50 years of primaries... Analytics_American Mar 2016 #7
50 years doesn't amount to all that many presidential elections. Garrett78 Mar 2016 #8

Garrett78

(10,721 posts)
4. I think we know how Mississippi will go.
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 03:53 PM
Mar 2016

It's a pretty safe bet anyway. Michigan is a little more up in the air, though I'll be surprised if Clinton doesn't win.

Garrett78

(10,721 posts)
6. I kind of doubt it, too...
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 04:03 PM
Mar 2016

...but it's at least more up in the air than some of the most recent primaries/caucuses. If not more up in the air, certainly the first and most substantial bellwether at this point. If I was a betting man, I'd bet on scenario 3 from my OP.

7. Data from the last 50 years of primaries...
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 04:57 PM
Mar 2016

yield interesting conclusions; 50 years of election results are not insignificant, and as our access to data grows exponentially, our ability to decipher it becomes more and more detrimental!

https://onlinebusiness.american.edu/blog/presidential-primary-predictions/

Everyone-- eyes on the upcoming elections! Next up: Hawaii, Idaho, Michigan, and Mississippi on Tuesday, March 8.

Garrett78

(10,721 posts)
8. 50 years doesn't amount to all that many presidential elections.
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 08:22 PM
Mar 2016

Plus, demographics are changing, and the field of candidates is pretty unique this year.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Michigan: The First Bellw...