Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

hill2016

(1,772 posts)
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 10:33 AM Mar 2016

I'm so sad people have no understanding of demand/supply. Fracking->increases oil SS -> lower price

So sad that some people have NO concept of maths, economics or reality.

By the way, this is a positive statement not a normative statement.

In relation to this thread
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511438279

69 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I'm so sad people have no understanding of demand/supply. Fracking->increases oil SS -> lower price (Original Post) hill2016 Mar 2016 OP
Awaiting translation to standard English HERVEPA Mar 2016 #1
Seems like the OP writer doesn't research the LNG tankers and depots being built, to sell offshore. TheBlackAdder Mar 2016 #38
I wonder if Fracking leads to anything besides increased Oil Supply? el_bryanto Mar 2016 #2
PERHAPS FRACKING LEADS TO..................'EARTHQUAKES'''......SAY IT AIN'T SO?????????? Stuart G Mar 2016 #4
Ah - do you have any evidence to support that claim? el_bryanto Mar 2016 #8
A Texas judge found there was enough evidence to support... PyaarRevolution Mar 2016 #61
I know, right? Shadowflash Mar 2016 #11
Seeing the general inclination of the posts by the OP. PyaarRevolution Mar 2016 #62
Only money matters. Cobalt Violet Mar 2016 #53
Because for some of us, LWolf Mar 2016 #68
I'm so sad people post cryptic OPs. marmar Mar 2016 #3
Oh, I understand, all right. raging moderate Mar 2016 #10
I'm so sad people have no understanding of climate change. Fracking->toxic runoff->poisoned water VulgarPoet Mar 2016 #5
I'm so sad people condescendingly mistake different priorities for ignorance. Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #6
maths is hard. cherokeeprogressive Mar 2016 #7
Didn't you get enough abuse in your last post on this? panader0 Mar 2016 #9
Translation for those who need it. noamnety Mar 2016 #12
I'm so sad people have to support the things that we as Dems used to rally together ScreamingMeemie Mar 2016 #13
.... bigwillq Mar 2016 #15
+1 demmiblue Mar 2016 #18
^yep. nt cyberswede Mar 2016 #25
Makes me wonder how far this will go. bunnies Mar 2016 #35
It is sickening and destroying the Democratic Party from within. PufPuf23 Mar 2016 #42
You like math, but do you like science? gollygee Mar 2016 #14
I don't believe the OP likes economics Bad Thoughts Mar 2016 #24
Keep fracking and we will be tracking soaring prces for clean drinking water Tom Rinaldo Mar 2016 #16
I think it's USA gold mining industry that uses toxic chems & tears-up land is hard on environment. Sunlei Mar 2016 #67
I am so sad that some people acuse others of not having a concept of "economics" Stuart G Mar 2016 #17
Why not just kick your last shitty thread, instead of creating a new one to point to it? whatchamacallit Mar 2016 #19
... AzDar Mar 2016 #49
how's the price of clean water in the market?...how's its supply?...and, in an emerging market... islandmkl Mar 2016 #20
Glad to see this has only gotten one Rec. Amimnoch Mar 2016 #21
It's sad people believe with all the Wall Street manipulation mmonk Mar 2016 #22
LOWER OIL PRICES ARE BEING DRIVEN BY THE SAUDIS, NOT FRACKING Bad Thoughts Mar 2016 #23
Actually, fracking is not the reason. DetlefK Mar 2016 #26
so.. hill2016 Mar 2016 #36
please get a clue ibegurpard Mar 2016 #44
In general, Yes. But as I said, it's more complicated than just supply&demand. DetlefK Mar 2016 #50
I'm so sad and ANGRY that the water in Pennsylvania is contaminated from fracking. Avalux Mar 2016 #27
...... daleanime Mar 2016 #28
I feel your pain. It's so sincere. Broward Mar 2016 #29
What is sad choie Mar 2016 #30
Wow! Now hillary loves fracking so her supporters love it too! Nt Logical Mar 2016 #31
SUCK OF THE DAY Ron Green Mar 2016 #32
People's wellbeing, safety, and health Svafa Mar 2016 #33
The last big boom in the late '70s - mid '80s gave us the S&L scandal bigbrother05 Mar 2016 #34
No concept of reality ? TheFarS1de Mar 2016 #37
We do understand that. But when you poison the ground water, it isn't worth the price reduction. Motown_Johnny Mar 2016 #39
Then why are the frackers going broke because of the Saudi caused LOW oil prices? hobbit709 Mar 2016 #40
Meanwhile the planet has recorded a temperature of 2C over pre-industrial baseline... Spider Jerusalem Mar 2016 #41
Amen to that! Increased temps=larger ocean dead zones=less oxygen Lorien Mar 2016 #46
Oh FFS... ibegurpard Mar 2016 #43
Here's some reality for you Hill: Lorien Mar 2016 #45
Fracking fans need to wake up to what this process does to us all: Lorien Mar 2016 #47
At the risk of being rude DefenseLawyer Mar 2016 #48
Fracking did not increase oil, itself, by significant amounts. joshcryer Mar 2016 #51
The reality is A Little Weird Mar 2016 #52
And the word 'fracking' sounds like a swear word. It's fun to say. That must be worth something. GoneFishin Mar 2016 #54
Because you're still wrong and it still isn't related. Chan790 Mar 2016 #55
Up is down and down is up. Vinca Mar 2016 #56
I will agree only if you promise to drink the resultant groundwater for a year -if you last that Katashi_itto Mar 2016 #57
Fracking leads to drinking beer and kissing in phone booths; all anyone needs to know. cherokeeprogressive Mar 2016 #58
Last week I actually saw cluster bombs defended. djean111 Mar 2016 #59
So money means everything? libtodeath Mar 2016 #60
Geez, and I'm so sad other people don't understand WATER pdsimdars Mar 2016 #63
Sounds like text from a HRC speech to Exxon. HooptieWagon Mar 2016 #64
Not possible,she would not let that slip out after cashing the check. libtodeath Mar 2016 #69
This is why Bernie's free public college education is so important beedle Mar 2016 #65
there is easy quality crude oil across the world. There is less fracking & tar sands because its not Sunlei Mar 2016 #66

TheBlackAdder

(28,255 posts)
38. Seems like the OP writer doesn't research the LNG tankers and depots being built, to sell offshore.
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 10:15 PM
Mar 2016

.


NG is being fracked for planned sales to Pacific Rim and Eurasia countries, not for domestic consumption.

People were sold on NG as a better alternative to electric and fuel oil for residential use.

Now, with the cost of solar coming down, factored over 20 years, the price is competitive and not subject to market fluctuation. As solar continues to come down in price and land-based wind generation is cheaper than NG, there is little future for oil and NG. It's a dying industry that will see less and less market share over the years.



.

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
2. I wonder if Fracking leads to anything besides increased Oil Supply?
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 10:35 AM
Mar 2016

I mean, is it possible that fracking could lead to, oh I don't know, terrible environmental consequences?

Bryant

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
8. Ah - do you have any evidence to support that claim?
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 10:40 AM
Mar 2016

Or are you just fucking around?

Because I was of course being facetious - there's plenty of evidence that Fracking does lead to environmental consequences in those communities unfortunate enough to live near fracking sites. I kind of assumed that most if not all DUers were aware of the environmental consequences of Fracking.

Bryant

Shadowflash

(1,536 posts)
11. I know, right?
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 10:41 AM
Mar 2016

I really have never seen any pro fracking posts on this board before. How odd.

Yes it increases the oil supply so we get a few cents off each gallon but it is destroying the environment. So much so that the CEOs of oil companies don't want it near THEIR homes.

Not worth the extra nickle per gallon. Not by a long shot.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2014/02/22/exxon-mobil-tillerson-ceo-fracking/5726603/

PyaarRevolution

(814 posts)
62. Seeing the general inclination of the posts by the OP.
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 09:23 AM
Mar 2016

I'm starting to wonder if he or she is an actual Hillary supporter.

LWolf

(46,179 posts)
68. Because for some of us,
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 09:46 AM
Mar 2016

what we do to the planet is more important than the price of oil. You know; those of us who have been advocating transferring from fossil fuels to more sustainable, cleaner energy for decades, or for our entire lives.

We know that won't happen until the oil industry has extracted every goddamned last drop of profit, and ensured that they will hold the reins of whatever comes next.

To suggest that fracking is acceptable because of oil prices? That's the mindset I have voted, and will be voting against for my voting life.

raging moderate

(4,317 posts)
10. Oh, I understand, all right.
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 10:40 AM
Mar 2016

I just care about a greater good. And about not victimizing others for my benefit.

VulgarPoet

(2,872 posts)
5. I'm so sad people have no understanding of climate change. Fracking->toxic runoff->poisoned water
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 10:39 AM
Mar 2016

So sad that some people have NO concept of clean fuel, the future generation not being throttled by smog, or what's been going on with the weather recently.

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
6. I'm so sad people condescendingly mistake different priorities for ignorance.
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 10:39 AM
Mar 2016

Money isn't everything to some of us. We're not conservatives.

Or liberals that imitate them...

 

noamnety

(20,234 posts)
12. Translation for those who need it.
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 10:41 AM
Mar 2016

Poisoning the water supply isn't so bad if it helps big business keep gas prices down for poor people. It's all about helping poor people.

ScreamingMeemie

(68,918 posts)
13. I'm so sad people have to support the things that we as Dems used to rally together
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 10:43 AM
Mar 2016

against all because of a candidate.

I don't care who that candidate is, I stick to my principals.

 

bunnies

(15,859 posts)
35. Makes me wonder how far this will go.
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 01:08 PM
Mar 2016

Fracking?! Poison water? Democrats are cool with these things now? Gee, I cant wait to find out whats next!

PufPuf23

(8,856 posts)
42. It is sickening and destroying the Democratic Party from within.
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 10:57 PM
Mar 2016

Then that was the aim of the DLC and is the aim of those now carrying the neoliberal torch.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
14. You like math, but do you like science?
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 10:44 AM
Mar 2016

Fracking does a lot of bad to the environment.

And as far as economic issues go, if there isn't fracking, there's more incentive to come up with sustainable energy solutions.

Bad Thoughts

(2,541 posts)
24. I don't believe the OP likes economics
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 11:47 AM
Mar 2016

It really does not support the assertion that fracking has been keeping has prices low.

Tom Rinaldo

(22,919 posts)
16. Keep fracking and we will be tracking soaring prces for clean drinking water
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 10:47 AM
Mar 2016

That's life and death supply and demand.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
67. I think it's USA gold mining industry that uses toxic chems & tears-up land is hard on environment.
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 09:43 AM
Mar 2016

all those old mines full of a toxic mess, and old coal mines too.

Stuart G

(38,458 posts)
17. I am so sad that some people acuse others of not having a concept of "economics"
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 10:52 AM
Mar 2016

Economics involves more than the price of one product at one time

islandmkl

(5,275 posts)
20. how's the price of clean water in the market?...how's its supply?...and, in an emerging market...
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 11:19 AM
Mar 2016

what is the price of real estate in the not-too-distant future in those areas, you know, major fault-line locations like south-central Kansas and north-central Oklahoma, which are now suffering daily earthquakes of increasing intensity...

one thing I learned from growing up in Kansas...there were just too damn many earthquakes...well, actually there were never any, NONE, that were discernible physically...

today...well that situation has changed...Kansas is tornadoes, Land of Oz, Dorothy and Toto...NOT California falling into the sea...

 

Amimnoch

(4,558 posts)
21. Glad to see this has only gotten one Rec.
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 11:19 AM
Mar 2016

Really, if this is your issue, you might be on the wrong side of the table.

mmonk

(52,589 posts)
22. It's sad people believe with all the Wall Street manipulation
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 11:31 AM
Mar 2016

that real supply and demand is still practiced. It's equally sad that people think we can poison our aquifers and rivers and streams with no cost to the natural world and life and no later monetary costs.

DetlefK

(16,423 posts)
26. Actually, fracking is not the reason.
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 12:04 PM
Mar 2016

Right now:

1. Saudi-Arabia is keeping the price low to kill the US fracking-companies that were founded with loans.

2. Venezuela desperately needs money and has shit-tons of oil. They push even more oil on the market, lowering the price even more.

In the near future:

3. Iran will start selling oil again, lowering the price even more.

4. China is putting a break on its economic growth, slowing economic growth in many small asian countries as well, reducing the overall demand for oil.

 

hill2016

(1,772 posts)
36. so..
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 09:39 PM
Mar 2016

if not for the fact that the US fracking companies have been fracking, the price of oil would be higher?

ibegurpard

(16,685 posts)
44. please get a clue
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 11:09 PM
Mar 2016

The Saudis and OPEC have been playing chicken with US and Canadian oil producers by flooding the market with their oil (which is cheaper to produce than fracking methods). We could PAY companies to using fracking to produce oil right now and they wouldn't be doing it because the price of oil is so low. Please educate yourself on basic supply and demand before you post rot like this.

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
27. I'm so sad and ANGRY that the water in Pennsylvania is contaminated from fracking.
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 12:05 PM
Mar 2016

So sad and ANGRY that some people have NO concept of the worth of life and use dead-end arguments in support of that which hurts the environment and people.

Your support of Hillary is not surprising, as you sit there and promote fracking. Disgusting.

bigbrother05

(5,995 posts)
34. The last big boom in the late '70s - mid '80s gave us the S&L scandal
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 01:04 PM
Mar 2016

Oil & gas drilling/speculation throughout TX/OK/NM and into the Midwest (OH/PA) as well as the Mountain West (WY/UT) was funded by dicey loans. Many of those loans were coming out of the S&L business because they had less gov't oversight and they made a lot of insider deals (Silverado, Neil Bush?) that didn't make a lot of sense. There was also a huge boom in real estate as they built new office buildings for high flying businesses in the industry as well as in the boom towns near the production sites.

There was fracking going on all over those locations in the drive to get the most out of the ground while things were hot after the OPEC oil embargoes. There were regulatory agencies in place to monitor how the work was done so accidents and spills were quickly taken care of and lessons learned passed through the industry.

So guess what happened? At the height of the US going all in on production, OPEC opened the spigots and decimated domestic exploration. Locations with proven fields and stable infrastructure survived the downturn and the established companies absorbed the oil field service business that was left in the reduced marketplace. Lots of money was made by those in early and lost by those in late.

Any of that sound familiar? Now, after 30+ years of attacks on the government and regulations, with this new boom we have broad environmental problems in delicate locations and earthquake swarms through the Plains. Many in the industry (Koch Bros, etc) were leading advocates for the RW agenda and paved the way for Reagan and his fellow travelers, turning traditionally Dem states into the red state miasma that we see now.

So, yes it is sad, but not because we don't understand supply/demand or fracking. It's sad because we understand it only too well, and are getting pretty damn tired of it.

TheFarS1de

(1,017 posts)
37. No concept of reality ?
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 09:52 PM
Mar 2016

Poisoned ground water is the reality . Short term gain , long term pain . It is a stupid and toxic practice .

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
39. We do understand that. But when you poison the ground water, it isn't worth the price reduction.
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 10:19 PM
Mar 2016

How can you not understand that?


 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
41. Meanwhile the planet has recorded a temperature of 2C over pre-industrial baseline...
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 10:28 PM
Mar 2016

for the first time ever. The price of gasoline NEEDS to go up, significantly, by enough that people use a lot less of it.

Lorien

(31,935 posts)
46. Amen to that! Increased temps=larger ocean dead zones=less oxygen
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 11:14 PM
Mar 2016

and within 40 years= NO MORE US, or much of any other species, for that matter. It really ain't rocket science.

ibegurpard

(16,685 posts)
43. Oh FFS...
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 11:03 PM
Mar 2016

Are you seriously suggesting the United States has control over the entire supply of the world's oil? Because that's what it would take to control the prices. Fracking is expensive and companies are NOT going to do it when oil prices are where they are right now...you end up losing money.
Talk about a complete lack of knowledge about economics...

Lorien

(31,935 posts)
45. Here's some reality for you Hill:
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 11:12 PM
Mar 2016

Every body of water in Florida is connected by just TWO aquifers. One fracking waste water spill could easily fully contaminate either, making half the State uninhabitable. Is it worth it, when FREE ENERGY FALLS FROM THE SKY every day? Burlington Vermont is now using 100% clean, green renewable energy. Saudi Arabia, Germany, Denmark and Scotland hope to make the switch by 2020. Meanwhile, we have your friends the Kochs attempting to tax solar out of existence in the States so that they can enrich themselves through Fracking by creating artificial shortages.

Stop falling for and promoting Koch/ GOP/ DLC talking points. It's pathetic for any "Dem" to do so!

joshcryer

(62,287 posts)
51. Fracking did not increase oil, itself, by significant amounts.
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 06:01 AM
Mar 2016

What happened was the Saudi's started seeing that fracking was very profitable at $100 a barrel and therefore started ramping up production themselves to prevent fracking from actually becoming a thing. The more fracked wells there are the more economical it becomes to exploit shale oil, which the US has the largest supply of by far of any country.

The Saudi's don't want their biggest arms exporter to have an edge on oil so they stopped it.

A Little Weird

(1,754 posts)
52. The reality is
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 07:01 AM
Mar 2016

That even if fracking lowers gas prices (it doesn't), it is not worth it to poison the water and damage the aquifers. Even if fracking meant we could have free gas it wouldn't be worth the irreparable damage being done.

Even if Hillary didn't have a bunch of other negatives, this single topic alone would make her unworthy of the presidency.

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
54. And the word 'fracking' sounds like a swear word. It's fun to say. That must be worth something.
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 07:57 AM
Mar 2016

You can use it so many ways, like:

"Those fracking assholes polluted the drinking water for thousands of children and pregnant women".

 

Chan790

(20,176 posts)
55. Because you're still wrong and it still isn't related.
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 08:22 AM
Mar 2016

The cost of oil has dropped so far that frack oil and gas production has been basically zero-lined...what of it is occurring is occurring on Uncle Sam's dime for the most part, going directly into the strategic reserve and not into the marketplace, in order to keep workers working and prevent a massive depression-level economic downturn in rural areas of America that cannot afford that kind of economic collapse right now at the same time we don't want to spike the price of oil further by allowing that oil into the marketplace because it would cause the production scale-down to spread and spread the downturn with it to yet more areas of the country.

It would have no impact on the price or supply of oil if it were banned because that oil is not in the marketplace now. (It's the hydrocarbon equivalent of farm subsidies going to grow corn that goes from farm to incinerator in order to keep it out of the commodity market so it doesn't spike the commodity price.) We're within about a year and a half of the point where we meet that strategic maximum holding and that production ceases too, with or without a ban, if the price to get it out of the ground continues to exceed the ppb of oil in the international and national marketplaces.

In short, you're still wrong. You will remain wrong as long as you continue to believe something untrue...that fracked oil and gas are, in any part, part of how we have gotten close enough to energy independence that OPEC decided to shit the market in order to try to force domestic production to cease. If fracked oil in the US and Canada dropped to zero tomorrow, supply would still exceed demand by a substantial enough margin that it would not move the needle on the price of a barrel of oil.

Vinca

(50,328 posts)
56. Up is down and down is up.
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 08:55 AM
Mar 2016

Some Democrats now love fracking and hate single-payer. Light those faucets people.

 

Katashi_itto

(10,175 posts)
57. I will agree only if you promise to drink the resultant groundwater for a year -if you last that
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 09:04 AM
Mar 2016

long.

So yes, fracking has some small effect on oil prices in the effect that more oil means less prices. However there is a ripple effect. Environment, earthquakes, poisoned groundwater. You know, the small stuff.

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
58. Fracking leads to drinking beer and kissing in phone booths; all anyone needs to know.
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 09:07 AM
Mar 2016

Now kindly go something out of the ordinary with yourself.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
59. Last week I actually saw cluster bombs defended.
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 09:19 AM
Mar 2016

Looks like the Department of Making Bad Things Seem GOOD has started its task of trying to make the issues that people have with Hillary's stances, deeds, record, and policies palatable.

Fracking GOOD! TPP Good! War GOOD! Cluster bombs NECESSARY! And any disagreement will be labeled sexist.
Guess what? We can see all that coming. Won't work.

 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
63. Geez, and I'm so sad other people don't understand WATER
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 09:26 AM
Mar 2016

Did you know that people need water to live?
Did you know that people need food to live and that you need water to grow food?
Do you have any idea where water comes from?
It's called an aquifer. If that ever gets tainted, it can't be fixed.

Let the people with BIG brains and some perspective decide which is more important, a possible small reduction in gas prices or LIFE ON EARTH? Hmmmmm. Seems like a no brainer to me. It seems to me that only people with no brains or perspective would choose to save a few cents.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
64. Sounds like text from a HRC speech to Exxon.
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 09:33 AM
Mar 2016

I wouldn't normally expect to see RW talking points on DU, but Hillary (Drill, Baby, Drill!) Clinton isn't a usual Democratic candidate. I'm surprised she isn't running as a Republican, where her policy positions lie.

 

beedle

(1,235 posts)
65. This is why Bernie's free public college education is so important
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 09:38 AM
Mar 2016

A decent education could have prevented this tragically cryptic message supporting a policy based on voodoo economics.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
66. there is easy quality crude oil across the world. There is less fracking & tar sands because its not
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 09:40 AM
Mar 2016

worth the cost anymore.

Our country is fortunate we aren't totally dependent on crude oil sales like some other 'struggling' countries. We're actually exporting some crude this year, that's new business

Plus an extra couple hundred a month in my pocket from lower gas price, is another huge positive.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I'm so sad people have no...