HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Retired » Retired Forums » 2016 Postmortem (Forum) » Can Bernie Sanders recove...

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 10:31 AM

Can Bernie Sanders recover?

67 replies, 13021 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 67 replies Author Time Post
Reply Can Bernie Sanders recover? (Original post)
FlatBaroque Mar 2016 OP
tk2kewl Mar 2016 #1
Octafish Mar 2016 #2
Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #4
Merryland Mar 2016 #7
Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #10
I hate liars Mar 2016 #9
Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #22
SheilaT Mar 2016 #28
appalachiablue Mar 2016 #38
DeGreg Mar 2016 #56
Enthusiast Mar 2016 #16
Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #21
Enthusiast Mar 2016 #26
FlatBaroque Mar 2016 #24
Enthusiast Mar 2016 #41
Enthusiast Mar 2016 #62
QC Mar 2016 #20
Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #23
tabasco Mar 2016 #36
Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #37
senz Mar 2016 #59
FlatBaroque Mar 2016 #11
bvf Mar 2016 #18
Svafa Mar 2016 #34
Duval Mar 2016 #47
H2O Man Mar 2016 #3
WDIM Mar 2016 #5
UglyGreed Mar 2016 #6
Merryland Mar 2016 #8
PatrynXX Mar 2016 #12
Herman4747 Mar 2016 #13
mikehiggins Mar 2016 #25
AlbertCat Mar 2016 #43
closeupready Mar 2016 #14
Buzz Clik Mar 2016 #15
Cassiopeia Mar 2016 #29
Buzz Clik Mar 2016 #31
Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #39
AlbertCat Mar 2016 #44
Buzz Clik Mar 2016 #46
AlbertCat Mar 2016 #48
Buzz Clik Mar 2016 #50
salinsky Mar 2016 #52
padfun Mar 2016 #53
Scootaloo Mar 2016 #57
47of74 Mar 2016 #17
bvf Mar 2016 #19
tomm2thumbs Mar 2016 #27
SheilaT Mar 2016 #30
JimDandy Mar 2016 #35
tomm2thumbs Mar 2016 #45
malthaussen Mar 2016 #32
FlatBaroque Mar 2016 #33
robcotton Mar 2016 #66
FlatBaroque Mar 2016 #67
corbettkroehler Mar 2016 #40
FlatBaroque Mar 2016 #42
hopemountain Mar 2016 #64
Oilwellian Mar 2016 #61
blackspade Mar 2016 #49
Mike Nelson Mar 2016 #51
LineReply .
merrily Mar 2016 #54
lunatica Mar 2016 #55
Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2016 #58
dreamnightwind Mar 2016 #60
AtomicKitten Mar 2016 #63
myrna minx Mar 2016 #65

Response to FlatBaroque (Original post)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 10:40 AM

1. LOL

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FlatBaroque (Original post)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 10:42 AM

2. They're spinning it as only 1-percent today on Detroit NPR.

Not that the guy came up from 30-points back.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Octafish (Reply #2)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 10:45 AM

4. I have never been more disappointed in NPR than during this primary.

 

And I'm a long-standing contributor...

I don't listen as much as I used to because I don't commute by car, and the only radio I own is there (yeah, I know...internet radio). But I've always expected NPR to be the least biased major(ish) news source. That confidence eroded in 2008, and is pretty much shattered now.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lizzie Poppet (Reply #4)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 10:53 AM

7. and we pretty much pay for NPR, right?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Merryland (Reply #7)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 11:01 AM

10. By various methods, yes (mostly).

 

There's also corporate underwriting, but the majority of NPR funding comes from pledge drives, personal contributions, government funding (thus also us), etc. Seriously reconsidering my modestly generous pledge...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lizzie Poppet (Reply #4)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 10:58 AM

9. NPR has leaned right for years

Just like network and cable news channels, they feature members of AEI, CEI, Heritage, Cato, et al whenever they need "unbiased" third party commentary. And when they're not slanting the news, NPR sticks with safe "public interest" stories.

I was a faithful listener of NPR many years ago, but beginning in the 80s, it's taken a long march to the right.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to I hate liars (Reply #9)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 11:27 AM

22. I guess I didn't see it nearly that soon.

 

Embarrassing...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to I hate liars (Reply #9)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 11:41 AM

28. I first noticed it back in 1992

 

when various NPR commentators, most specifically Cokie Roberts, assured us over and over again that Bill Clinton had zero chance of winning the nomination, or the Presidency. I began to understand the entire "Inside the Beltway" mentality, although I'd noticed that during the 1970's when I actually lived in the DC area. That mindset has only strengthened in the decades since, and they are all like people who don't believe anyone else is entirely real.

Well, we are real, and we actually are an amazing and diverse bunch in this country.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SheilaT (Reply #28)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 12:18 PM

38. Blind arrogance and isolation from the rest of America will be an undoing

for some unless real reforms are enacted, as history shows. The 90s are over, the memo didn't reach some yet apparently.

'Apres moi, le deluge' (after me, the flood), King Louis XV of France (1715-1774)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_XV_of_France

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to I hate liars (Reply #9)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 01:43 PM

56. Yes, you got it..

 

You can easily detect the bias towards the status quo and The Establishment mindset. Even when they try to give Bernie "equal time" (remember that) they seem to always frame the question with Hillary in mind, and the "experts" always seem to do the same.

NPR is like Radio Free America aimed at US Citizens-- telling us what to think.
I mean they report on war, war, war, like they're covering a sport and they they're a bunch of homers.

Anyway, it's disheartening sometimes to think that a lot of people hear what they say as the unvarnished truth, when it's just propaganda for the powers that be.

p.s. Looking in the concept of "examination of dissent" and you'll see how deep a mind fuck propaganda can be. And, watch "The Century of The Self" BBC (?) series of docs by Adam Curtis (search youtube) -- and OMG, just Wow.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lizzie Poppet (Reply #4)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 11:18 AM

16. Don't they have a Republican CEO?

I have been boycotting NPR since before 2008. They are reliably biased. False and misleading information is seldom if ever challenged.

In 2008 I was fishing and listening to NPR. A propaganda piece came on. I was shocked by the nature of the narrative. I was even more shocked when the host said absolutely nothing to refute such an obvious blatant lie.

I refuse to listen to an American Pravda.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Enthusiast (Reply #16)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 11:24 AM

21. Not according to his Wikipedia profile, anyway.

 

Mohn has contributed to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, Gephardt for President, Gore 2000, John Kerry for President, McCain 2000, Obama Victory Fund 2012, and the Progressive Patriots Fund[1]


The only glitch there is McCain 2000, but after W got the nomination, apparently he flipped to Gore. That was right at the peak of McCain's "maverick" period, when he was actually advocating some sensible election reforms, and so forth. Unfucking elections being a huge, huge issue, I can understand Mohn's position.

Overall, I'd have to consider Mohn a liberal, albeit more in the Hillary mold than the Sanders mold.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lizzie Poppet (Reply #21)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 11:34 AM

26. Well, regardless, NPR has an obvious rightward bias. I guess we aren't supposed to notice, lol.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Enthusiast (Reply #16)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 11:32 AM

24. You may be thinking of when Bush Jr. brought in a political hack to run PBS

Tomlinson was his name IIRC

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FlatBaroque (Reply #24)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 12:22 PM

41. Maybe so. I have not listened for a long time. But I can smell the masqueraders a mile off.

I'll give 'em a listen and find out.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FlatBaroque (Reply #24)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 03:40 PM

62. Okay. Today I listened to several hours of NPR. They were very unfair to Bernie.

I will continue my boycott.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lizzie Poppet (Reply #4)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 11:22 AM

20. Nice Polite Republicans. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to QC (Reply #20)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 11:27 AM

23. Ouch!

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lizzie Poppet (Reply #4)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 12:08 PM

36. Please stop contributing.

 

NPR is part of the problem.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tabasco (Reply #36)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 12:15 PM

37. That's my intent.

 

I've been a contributing listener for years, and it will be a bit odd not to have an OPB (Oregon Public Broadcasting) sticker on my car. But I'm done...I'm not renewing my pledge. Back to nothing but obscure goth/industrial and J-metal band (and one Luna Lovegood) stickers, I guess...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lizzie Poppet (Reply #4)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 01:50 PM

59. This is what Republicans wanted when they kept defunding NPR

 

They handed it to the 1% who now own it -- with a little help from people (like me) who still contribute.

My problem is, I love my local affiliate but hate national for their blatant pro-Hillary stance.

I'm going to suspend my monthly donations until they begin broadcasting fairly again.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Octafish (Reply #2)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 11:06 AM

11. National Pentagon Radio has its priorities

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Octafish (Reply #2)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 11:21 AM

18. Irritating as hell.

 

If I hear the words "narrow win" one more fucking time, I swear I'm going to call them and ask who I talk to about getting a refund on years of donations.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Octafish (Reply #2)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 11:57 AM

34. NPR's coverage is horrendous.

I like my local affiliate fine, but NPR as a whole....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Octafish (Reply #2)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 12:39 PM

47. We stopped giving to NPR years ago.

 

I used to rely on them for honesty and was dismayed when they began their slant to the right.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FlatBaroque (Original post)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 10:43 AM

3. Recommended.

Hilarious. But sadly accurate.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FlatBaroque (Original post)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 10:47 AM

5. The Ma$$ Media needs to stop trying to decide our elections!

Its over when the last vote is counted at the convention until then the media just needs to stick to the facts and end the Spin!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FlatBaroque (Original post)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 10:48 AM

6. Twistin"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to UglyGreed (Reply #6)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 10:53 AM

8. Nice!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FlatBaroque (Original post)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 11:07 AM

12. Someone had it

on CNN as she's winning it the same way Obama did. Huh? actually she stole Michigan outright in 2008 other than that, everyone wins differently this is setting up to be a north vs the south thing. Although the KKK isn't exactly anti Jewish at least I thought maybe it is I don't know..

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PatrynXX (Reply #12)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 11:12 AM

13. Yeah, that was bad what she did with regards to Michigan...

 

...in 2008. Barack Obama was honorable, Hillary was atrocious.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PatrynXX (Reply #12)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 11:32 AM

25. The KKK is anti-Jewish. No question about that. Always has been. Always will be. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PatrynXX (Reply #12)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 12:33 PM

43. Although the KKK isn't exactly anti Jewish

 

Yes it is.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FlatBaroque (Original post)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 11:14 AM

14. omg, that was a LOL for REAL!

 

K&R

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FlatBaroque (Original post)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 11:17 AM

15. Or is this simply postponing the inevitable?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Buzz Clik (Reply #15)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 11:42 AM

29. Or is this simply the beginning of the end for your candidate?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cassiopeia (Reply #29)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 11:48 AM

31. time will tell.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Buzz Clik (Reply #15)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 12:19 PM

39. Hard to say at this point.

 

Hillary's no longer "inevitable" (never was...), but remains the front runner, and by a not-insignificant margin. This is likely to go down to the wire.

Of course, even if it's by a single pledged delegate, the superdelegates had better flip to the popular choice. If they don't, the party dies right then and there (for all that the death throes will be long and painful).

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Buzz Clik (Reply #15)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 12:34 PM

44. Or is this simply postponing the inevitable?

 

Sorry.... it's not her turn!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AlbertCat (Reply #44)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 12:38 PM

46. She'll earn whatever she gets -- win or lose, it will be earned.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Buzz Clik (Reply #46)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 12:41 PM

48. She'll earn whatever she gets

 

Like her speaking fees?


She hasn't earned what she's got already. The nepotism and insider shenanigans are already blinding.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AlbertCat (Reply #48)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 12:44 PM

50. Just like her speaking fees.

 

If Sanders could get paid for speaking, he would.

Unfortunately, the people who want to hear him speak aren't willing to pay for anything.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Buzz Clik (Reply #50)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 12:48 PM

52. Ouch ...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Buzz Clik (Reply #50)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 01:19 PM

53. Except for the few million dollars donated to his campaign

every few weeks, or every time he is attacked. So yes, we are willing to pay to hear him.

In fact, every time Hillary speaks more evil, I donate more to the Sanders campaign. And I still have another grand and a half to go until I max out.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Buzz Clik (Reply #15)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 01:44 PM

57. How'd that big win you predicted feel, Buzz Clik?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FlatBaroque (Original post)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 11:19 AM

17. LOL

 

This is the same media that craps on the President every chance they get.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FlatBaroque (Original post)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 11:22 AM

19. ROFL! n/t

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FlatBaroque (Original post)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 11:40 AM

27. Have to admit, he looked FLOORED like he had come to believe his own lies


Last night, the entire panel looked like they had studied for the wrong test




Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tomm2thumbs (Reply #27)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 11:43 AM

30. Nice. Looked like they had studied for the wrong test.

 

I need to remember that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tomm2thumbs (Reply #27)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 12:04 PM

35. More like: looked like they had cheated for the wrong test.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JimDandy (Reply #35)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 12:36 PM

45. OMG LOL


you are SO right!!!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FlatBaroque (Original post)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 11:48 AM

32. Saw that one on Facebook.

Hope it goes viral.

-- Mal

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malthaussen (Reply #32)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 11:56 AM

33. If you saw it on Facebook and I got it from Twitter, it already has gone viral

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FlatBaroque (Reply #33)

Fri Mar 11, 2016, 05:35 PM

66. memes

yes, it def. did go viral. i posted it and the next morning the other 98% had posted it and i had like 100 facebook messages telling me my meme was wviral lol. check my profile for my other memes. thanks for posting it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to robcotton (Reply #66)

Fri Mar 11, 2016, 05:46 PM

67. Good job

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FlatBaroque (Original post)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 12:22 PM

40. All Useless Until After Philly

I tried CNN and MSNBC last night after Michigan was called and the tilt remained. Van Jones, whom I respect right down to my core, was positively giddy when describing how Hillary won Mississippi in a blow-out.

I've had to build my own filters for all of the spin.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to corbettkroehler (Reply #40)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 12:31 PM

42. That is unfortunate, I have been liking Van Jones (more than the others, at least) /

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FlatBaroque (Reply #42)

Thu Mar 10, 2016, 05:31 AM

64. on anderson cooper 360, van

repeated the bs about the minutemen charge from hillary saying that bernie will never be able to recover from this charge with latino voters in light of his vote against the immigraton bill in '07.

curiously, dolores huerta also brought up how bernie had voted against the immigration bill in '07.

yet neither bothered to clarify why bernie voted against the '07 bill but did vote in favor of the '08 bill.

two minority icons - now lying for hillary.

it seems they all (including all of the msm) get their morning scripts and orders for talking points for the day from hillary's campaign - and they all fall into line spouting lies.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to corbettkroehler (Reply #40)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 03:37 PM

61. I was watching and that's not what I took away from it

My impression was he was being facetious about Hillary winning Mississippi. My impression was he was happy about Bernie winning Michigan. I don't usually watch American Pravda so don't know what he usually says, but my impression last night was he's not a big fan of Hillary and he was pleased to see Bernie do so well.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FlatBaroque (Original post)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 12:43 PM

49. Bernie has a sad...



NOT!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FlatBaroque (Original post)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 12:47 PM

51. I thought this meant...

...in the delegate count. Yes, if Bernie increases his margins of victory.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to FlatBaroque (Original post)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 01:38 PM

55. I clicked on your thread in a huff and am now smiling

But for a tiny fraction of a second I thought Wolf had actually said that. It's not like anyone is stretching the truth a whole hell of a lot in that graphic!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FlatBaroque (Original post)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 01:48 PM

58. I'll check the scientific, highly accurate,reality based, polls to answer that. Oh, wait....

 

That would be like checking for the ratings for the best soup by checking Campbell Soup commercials.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FlatBaroque (Original post)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 02:11 PM

60. Hillary came in 2nd, Bernie was next to last! - eom

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FlatBaroque (Original post)

Thu Mar 10, 2016, 02:26 AM

63. Perfect. k/r

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FlatBaroque (Original post)

Thu Mar 10, 2016, 05:56 AM

65. LOL - too perfect.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread