Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
4. I still don't know what actual science was done
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 09:17 AM
Oct 2012

As it was presented it was mostly about record-breaking by a record seeker.

I haven't read anything about what scientific purposes were actually pursued. I suppose that will come out in the book.

LonePirate

(13,413 posts)
6. The science may have to deal with stressors impacting the body, such as temperature, pressure, speed
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 09:25 AM
Oct 2012

We may have already known these things; but it was a new experiment with different variables and conditions. If nothing else, if reaffirmed the need for his jumpsuit.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
9. Yes, but was there any high altitude physiology done?
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 09:44 AM
Oct 2012

I haven't heard anything on that, and what might have been done and what was could be very different.

Maybe redbull just needed an ad campaign featuring a record-breaking parachute jump.

caraher

(6,278 posts)
7. Well, it was mainly about record-breaking
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 09:30 AM
Oct 2012

In terms of science, broadly construed, there were supposedly some incremental advances in pressure suit design. I don't think there would be much more than that.

A colleague estimates that he could have flown 750 research balloon flights to the same altitude with his instruments with the amount of helium lost forever to the atmosphere by this stunt. I think he and others should switch to hydrogen anyway given the impending helium shortage... but in any event, science was never a significant objective of the record-breaking effort.

kaiden

(1,314 posts)
12. After the Columbia broke up over Texas in 2003,
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 11:03 AM
Oct 2012

scientists wanted to know if they could protect astronauts in such a situation if they were wearing, upon reentry, the correct space suits, helmets and each had a parachute. The astronauts could "eject" and then freefall for a certain amount of time before releasing their parachutes. If I remember, many of the Columbia astronauts were alive until they hit the ground.

caraher

(6,278 posts)
15. Are you confusing Columbia and Challenger?
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 02:02 PM
Oct 2012

The re-entry heat that destroyed the orbiter would have killed individual astronauts attempting an egress, and this is the first I've heard of anyone riding Columbia to the ground. But Challenger's disaster at launch is the one where there is good reason to believe astronauts survived the explosion and were alive until hitting the water.

I do think that all the engineering information needed to design individual escape systems for launch failure existed prior to the Red Bull record skydive. Perhaps there's a little data to add from this, but it certainly didn't drive the project!

yellowcanine

(35,698 posts)
13. Tell me she did not say that. That is beyond ignorant.
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 11:30 AM
Oct 2012

Anyone with even a modicum of science knowledge would not make a mistake like that.

caraher

(6,278 posts)
16. It's on whoever puts the text on the screen
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 02:03 PM
Oct 2012

Probably not Mitchell... unless that other person was transcribing fragments of the words she spoke.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Andrea Mitchell does Scie...