Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 08:27 PM Mar 2016

The Clintons and the sordid UBS affair

...Those facts, of themselves, raise disturbing questions. Did a bank that still ranks as "the world's biggest wealth manager" and has at its disposal a bevy of economists and law firms have a legitimate reason for paying Bill Clinton $1.5 million in speaking fees? Or was the $1.5 million and the tenfold increase in Clinton Foundation donations a reward for the former secretary of State's intervention? If the latter, that reward would have, under federal law (18 U.S.C. § 201(c)(1)(A)), amounted to an illicit bribe.

But there's a more troubling question that arises. There can be little doubt that a media firestorm would ensue if a former president were to accept a lucrative speaking fee from the Mafia. Should the reaction be any different when the speaking fee comes from "banksters" who defrauded the U.S. government?

That's the true context here, according to a Feb. 18, 2009 U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ) press release that discussed the details of an unsealed "criminal information" and a "deferred prosecution agreement." The DoJ alleges that UBS did much more than permit wealthy Americans to stash billions in tax evading offshore accounts. In direct violation of a 2000 agreement with the IRS, Swiss bankers traveled to the U.S. 3,800 times to foster the elicit business and "used encrypted laptops and other counter-surveillance techniques to help prevent the detection of their marketing efforts and the identities and offshore assets of their U.S. clients...."

...When UBS, which could have lost its ability to conduct business in the U.S. if successfully prosecuted, balked at the IRS demand that it turn over information for all 52,000 accounts, the IRS filed a legal action seeking to compel disclosure. That is when, at the behest of the Swiss government, Hillary Clinton stepped in to negotiate a deal that prevented the IRS from gaining access to more than 91 percent of the illicit, tax-evading offshore accounts.

http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/presidential-campaign/272396-the-clintons-and-the-sordid-ubs-affair

Canning is a retired attorney, author, Vietnam Veteran (4th Infantry, Central Highlands 1968) and a senior adviser to Veterans For Bernie. He has been a member of the California state bar since 1977.

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Clintons and the sordid UBS affair (Original Post) magical thyme Mar 2016 OP
After reading Hillary Clinton stepped in you know nothing SamKnause Mar 2016 #1
Tit for tat. PWPippin Mar 2016 #2

SamKnause

(13,107 posts)
1. After reading Hillary Clinton stepped in you know nothing
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 08:38 PM
Mar 2016

good will follow.

I wish this lady would disappear from public life.

I am as tired of the Clinton family as I am of the Bush family.

The destruction these two families have caused this country,

and countries around the world is incalculable.

PWPippin

(213 posts)
2. Tit for tat.
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 08:42 PM
Mar 2016

Amazing that this didn't raise more of a stink at the time. I wonder if Hillary got to hand pick the ones that were and weren't turned over to the IRS. One way to deal with anyone on an enemies' list.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The Clintons and the sord...