Post removed

[FreakinDJ]

1. That would be a criminal act

[amborin]

2. indeed!

[dana_b]

3. yes, yes indeed

but i don't know if she would be indicted or just out right pardoned.

As I said yesterday:

so it's not a conspiracy theory that the Saudi's funded the Benghazi attack. And either:
1) she didn't pass this info (1st missing e-mail) onto John Kerry because the e-mail was done after her time was through (very sloppy!!) or
2) she didn't want this info getting out there and she deleted it
3) the State Department took it off of the rolls because it was too important and sensitive to be released - which means WHY was it on her private server in the first place??

Then the osecond e-mail suggests that it was important but it was deleted.
1) a mistake (they do happen! er... yeah...)
2) the State Department took it off of the rolls because it was too important and sensitive to be released - which means WHY was it on her private server in the first place??

Sounds like she is in deep doo-doo. Maybe that's why she lost it last night at the debate. I can imagine that she's under amazing stress right now.

If they are putting together a Grand Jury - and from this article it sounds like that is a strong possibility - then how will she have time to do that AND run for President?? And of course WHY is she running since it sounds like a strong possibility that she will e indicted IF there is a Grand Jury forming? I there isn't a Grand Jury, it would be interesting to find out why the State Department didn't think that this case warranted it.

[amborin]

4. yes, and more here:

https://d262ilb51hltx0.cloudfront.net/max/800/1*vX_WOY1V9u2iO69W4-cz0A.png

Guccifer uncovered something else in his hack that could not be verified until the last of the e-mails were released by the State Department last week. In addition to the four full e-mails he released, he also leaked a screenshot of Sidney Blumenthal’s AOL inbox. If we cross reference this screenshot with the Blumenthal e-mails in the State Department release, we can see that the e-mail with the subject “H: Libya security latest. Sid” is missing from the State Department e-mails....

snip

his missing e-mail is certainly something that would have been requested as part of the investigation as it was sent before February 1st and clearly relates to Libya. The fact that it is missing suggests one of two possibilities:

The State Department does have a copy of this e-mail but deemed it top secret and too sensitive to release, even in redacted form. This would indicate that Sidney Blumenthal was sending highly classified information from his AOL account to Secretary Clinton’s private e-mail server despite the fact that he never even had a security clearance to deal with such sensitive information in the first place. If this scenario explains why the e-mail is missing, classified materials were mishandled.

The State Department does not have a copy, and this e-mail was deleted by both Clinton and Blumenthal before turning over their subpoenaed e-mails to investigators, which would be considered destruction of evidence and lying to federal officials. This also speaks to the reason why the private clintonemail.com server may have been established in the first place. If Blumenthal were to regularly send highly sensitive yet technically “unclassified” information from his AOL account to Clinton’s official government e-mail account, it could have been revealed with a FOIA request. It has already been established that Hillary Clinton deleted 15 of Sidney Blumenthal’s e-mails to her, this discrepancy was discovered when Blumenthal’s e-mails were subpoenaed, although a State Department official claims that none of these 15 e-mails have any information about the Benghazi attack. It would seem from the subject line that this e-mail does. And it is missing from the public record.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-03-09/missing-clinton-e-mail-claims-saudis-financed-benghazi-attacks