Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumNot Scientific, but...
I live in the Northwest Suburbs of Chicago; a fairly Republican area. I have seen several Bernie Sanders signs and NOT A SINGLE HILLARY CLINTON SIGN! I have no doubt people will vote for her on Tuesday, but it is clear there is a major enthusism gap. If she is the nominee in November, this should be very concerning.
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Not Scientific, but... (Original Post)
Chasstev365
Mar 2016
OP
PonyUp
(1,680 posts)1. I wonder how many of the 600 workers who just lost their jobs at Nabisco will vote for her
Thanks, ^N^A^F^T^A
Metric System
(6,048 posts)2. A supposed enthusiasm gap, yet leading in the popular vote.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)3. Yard signs? Feh! Everyone knows that COUNTING BUMPER STICKERS ...
... it's the only accurate way to predict a winner!
Go, Hillary!
Chasstev365
(7,798 posts)4. Thanks Jackie!
I'm starting to recognize the Hillary supporters who are blind to the fact Hillary is a majorly flawed candidate.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)5. Ha! Congratulations! :-P